Interdisciplinary perspectives in subject analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Journal of Information Science |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/article/view/8277 |
Resumo: | It discusses the concepts of organization and representation of knowledge as fundamentals for the understanding of thesauri and ontologies took as modalities of knowledge organization systems. The analysis of the complementarity relationships between the two instruments is necessary to reaffirm the conception that the technological and, above all, the categorial aspect brings them closer instead of isolating them. In subordinating the concepts of thesauri and ontologies to the broader concept of knowledge organization systems, it reflects on some of its theoretical and applied implications. Such reflections are guided by the way each instrument understands associative conceptual relationships. It is concluded that the technological apparatus used to characterize the concepts and their relationships in the ontologies contributes to the construction of more sophisticated thesauri from when considering the need to make explicit the concepts and the conceptual relationships that the instruments aim to establish. In another direction and in a complementary way, the categorial and faceted analysis model used in the construction of thesauri also contributes to the construction of semantically and structurally denser ontologies. |
id |
UNESP-31_4d9ed5ea4aa909d79863700484879fbe |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www2.marilia.unesp.br:article/8277 |
network_acronym_str |
UNESP-31 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Journal of Information Science |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Interdisciplinary perspectives in subject analysisTesauros e ontologias como modelos de sistemas de organização do conhecimentoSistemas de organização do conhecimentoTesaurosOntologiasOrganização e representação do conhecimentoKnowledge organization systemsThesauriOntologiesKnowledge organization and representationIt discusses the concepts of organization and representation of knowledge as fundamentals for the understanding of thesauri and ontologies took as modalities of knowledge organization systems. The analysis of the complementarity relationships between the two instruments is necessary to reaffirm the conception that the technological and, above all, the categorial aspect brings them closer instead of isolating them. In subordinating the concepts of thesauri and ontologies to the broader concept of knowledge organization systems, it reflects on some of its theoretical and applied implications. Such reflections are guided by the way each instrument understands associative conceptual relationships. It is concluded that the technological apparatus used to characterize the concepts and their relationships in the ontologies contributes to the construction of more sophisticated thesauri from when considering the need to make explicit the concepts and the conceptual relationships that the instruments aim to establish. In another direction and in a complementary way, the categorial and faceted analysis model used in the construction of thesauri also contributes to the construction of semantically and structurally denser ontologies.Discute os conceitos de organização e representação do conhecimento como subsídios para a compreensão dos tesauros e das ontologias enquanto modalidades de sistemas de organização do conhecimento. A análise das relações de complementaridade entre ambos os instrumentos faz-se necessária para reafirmar a concepção de que o aspecto tecnológico e, principalmente, categorial mais os aproxima do que os isola. Subordinando, portanto, os conceitos de tesauro e de ontologias ao conceito mais amplo de sistemas de organização do conhecimento, reflete sobre algumas de suas implicações teóricas e aplicadas. Tais reflexões são orientadas pelo modo como cada instrumento compreende as relações conceituais associativas. Conclui-se que o aparato tecnológico que se utiliza para a caracterização dos conceitos e de suas relações nas ontologias contribui para a construção de tesauros mais sofisticados do ponto de vista da explicitação dos conceitos e das relações conceituais que visa estabelecer. Em outra direção e de modo complementar, o modelo de análise categorial e facetado empregado na construção de tesauros também contribui para a construção de ontologias semântica e estruturalmente mais densas. Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências2019-03-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/article/view/827710.36311/1981-1640.2019.v13n1.03.p15Brazilian Journal of Information Science: Research Trends; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2019); 15-20Brazilian Journal of Information Science: Research Trends; Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2019); 15-20Brazilian Journal of Information Science: research trends; v. 13 n. 1 (2019); 15-201981-1640reponame:Brazilian Journal of Information Scienceinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporhttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/article/view/8277/5643Moreira, Walterinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-09-25T17:05:34Zoai:ojs.www2.marilia.unesp.br:article/8277Revistahttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/indexPUBhttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/oaibrajis.marilia@unesp.br||1981-16401981-1640opendoar:2020-09-25T17:05:34Brazilian Journal of Information Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Interdisciplinary perspectives in subject analysis Tesauros e ontologias como modelos de sistemas de organização do conhecimento |
title |
Interdisciplinary perspectives in subject analysis |
spellingShingle |
Interdisciplinary perspectives in subject analysis Moreira, Walter Sistemas de organização do conhecimento Tesauros Ontologias Organização e representação do conhecimento Knowledge organization systems Thesauri Ontologies Knowledge organization and representation |
title_short |
Interdisciplinary perspectives in subject analysis |
title_full |
Interdisciplinary perspectives in subject analysis |
title_fullStr |
Interdisciplinary perspectives in subject analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Interdisciplinary perspectives in subject analysis |
title_sort |
Interdisciplinary perspectives in subject analysis |
author |
Moreira, Walter |
author_facet |
Moreira, Walter |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Moreira, Walter |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Sistemas de organização do conhecimento Tesauros Ontologias Organização e representação do conhecimento Knowledge organization systems Thesauri Ontologies Knowledge organization and representation |
topic |
Sistemas de organização do conhecimento Tesauros Ontologias Organização e representação do conhecimento Knowledge organization systems Thesauri Ontologies Knowledge organization and representation |
description |
It discusses the concepts of organization and representation of knowledge as fundamentals for the understanding of thesauri and ontologies took as modalities of knowledge organization systems. The analysis of the complementarity relationships between the two instruments is necessary to reaffirm the conception that the technological and, above all, the categorial aspect brings them closer instead of isolating them. In subordinating the concepts of thesauri and ontologies to the broader concept of knowledge organization systems, it reflects on some of its theoretical and applied implications. Such reflections are guided by the way each instrument understands associative conceptual relationships. It is concluded that the technological apparatus used to characterize the concepts and their relationships in the ontologies contributes to the construction of more sophisticated thesauri from when considering the need to make explicit the concepts and the conceptual relationships that the instruments aim to establish. In another direction and in a complementary way, the categorial and faceted analysis model used in the construction of thesauri also contributes to the construction of semantically and structurally denser ontologies. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-03-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/article/view/8277 10.36311/1981-1640.2019.v13n1.03.p15 |
url |
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/article/view/8277 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.36311/1981-1640.2019.v13n1.03.p15 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/article/view/8277/5643 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Information Science: Research Trends; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2019); 15-20 Brazilian Journal of Information Science: Research Trends; Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2019); 15-20 Brazilian Journal of Information Science: research trends; v. 13 n. 1 (2019); 15-20 1981-1640 reponame:Brazilian Journal of Information Science instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Journal of Information Science |
collection |
Brazilian Journal of Information Science |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Information Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
brajis.marilia@unesp.br|| |
_version_ |
1754840471676387328 |