Alternative and traditional indicators of the Brazilian Feminist Studies Journal

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fachin, Juliana
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Araújo, Ronaldo Ferreira, Blattmann, Ursula
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Information Science
Texto Completo: https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/article/view/9255
Resumo: The connection of traditional and alternative indicators of academic impact has been recommended by scholars in the field of metric studies as they are considered complementary and offer a more complete picture of the evaluation of research results. From this perspective, the present descriptive exploratory study aimed to analyze the correlation coefficient between the traditional and alternative impact of Revista Estudos Feministas. The sample comprised the period from 2001 to 2018. Analysis data were obtained from the Dimensions database via API. 1,296 texts with 2,609 citations and 5,982 altmetric data were analyzed. The results showed that Mendeley obtained a positive evaluation in the correlation of Pearson's coefficient when compared with the quantity of published articles and with the citation and visibility indicators. The study found that altmetric data is 4.6 times larger than traditional data, although fluctuating it is important for indicating the tools and networks where readers and users share scientific content.         
id UNESP-31_8988d52547fb3aeb2feabf58b8c57549
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www2.marilia.unesp.br:article/9255
network_acronym_str UNESP-31
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Information Science
repository_id_str
spelling Alternative and traditional indicators of the Brazilian Feminist Studies JournalIndicadores alternativos y tradicionales de la Revista de Estudios Feministas BrasileiraIndicadores alternativos e tradicionais da Revista Estudos Feministas BrasileiraMétricas AlternativasMétricas TradicionaisPublicação de Acesso AbertoBase de dados DimensionsCoeficiente de PearsonAlternative MetricsTraditional MetricsOpen Access PublishingDimensions databasePearson's coefficientThe connection of traditional and alternative indicators of academic impact has been recommended by scholars in the field of metric studies as they are considered complementary and offer a more complete picture of the evaluation of research results. From this perspective, the present descriptive exploratory study aimed to analyze the correlation coefficient between the traditional and alternative impact of Revista Estudos Feministas. The sample comprised the period from 2001 to 2018. Analysis data were obtained from the Dimensions database via API. 1,296 texts with 2,609 citations and 5,982 altmetric data were analyzed. The results showed that Mendeley obtained a positive evaluation in the correlation of Pearson's coefficient when compared with the quantity of published articles and with the citation and visibility indicators. The study found that altmetric data is 4.6 times larger than traditional data, although fluctuating it is important for indicating the tools and networks where readers and users share scientific content.         Los académicos en el campo de los estudios métricos han recomendado la conexión de indicadores tradicionales y alternativos de impacto académico, ya que se consideran complementarios y ofrecen una imagen más completa de la evaluación de los resultados de la investigación. Desde esta perspectiva, el presente estudio exploratorio descriptivo tuvo como objetivo analizar el coeficiente de correlación entre el impacto tradicional y alternativo de la Revista Estudos Feministas. La muestra abarcó el período comprendido entre 2001 y 2018. Los datos de análisis se obtuvieron de la base de datos de Dimensiones a través de API. Se analizaron 1.296 textos con 2.609 citas y 5.982 datos altimétricos. Los resultados mostraron que Mendeley obtuvo una evaluación positiva en la correlación del coeficiente de Pearson en comparación con la cantidad de artículos publicados y con los indicadores de cita y visibilidad. El estudio encontró que los datos alternativos son 4.6 veces más grandes que los datos tradicionales, aunque fluctuar es importante para indicar las herramientas y las redes donde los lectores y los usuarios comparten contenido científico.    A conexão de indicadores tradicionais e alternativos de impacto acadêmico têm sido recomendados por estudiosos do campo dos estudos métricos por serem considerados complementares e oferecerem um quadro mais completo da avaliação de resultados de pesquisa. A partir dessa perspectiva o presente estudo de cunho exploratório descritivo, teve o objetivo de analisar o coeficiente de correlação entre o impacto tradicional e alternativas da Revista Estudos Feministas. A amostra constituiu o período de 2001 a 2018. Os dados de análise foram obtidos na base Dimensions via API. Foram analisados 1.296 textos que contaram com 2.609 citações e 5.982 dados altmétricos. Os resultados apontaram que o Mendeley obteve uma avaliação positiva na correlação do coeficiente de Pearson ao ser comparada com o quantitativo de artigos publicados e com os indicadores de citação e visibilidade. O estudo detectou que os dados altmétricos são 4,6 vezes maiores que o tradicional, apesar de flutuantes eles são importantes para a indicação das ferramentas e redes onde estão os leitores e usuários que compartilham conteúdo científico.Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências2020-03-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/article/view/925510.36311/1981-1640.2020.v14n1.06.p112Brazilian Journal of Information Science: Research Trends; Vol. 14 No. 1 - jan-mar (2020); 112-129Brazilian Journal of Information Science: Research Trends; Vol. 14 Núm. 1 - jan-mar (2020); 112-129Brazilian Journal of Information Science: research trends; v. 14 n. 1 - jan-mar (2020); 112-1291981-1640reponame:Brazilian Journal of Information Scienceinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporhttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/article/view/9255/6285Fachin, JulianaAraújo, Ronaldo FerreiraBlattmann, Ursulainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-01-04T19:39:57Zoai:ojs.www2.marilia.unesp.br:article/9255Revistahttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/indexPUBhttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/oaibrajis.marilia@unesp.br||1981-16401981-1640opendoar:2022-01-04T19:39:57Brazilian Journal of Information Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Alternative and traditional indicators of the Brazilian Feminist Studies Journal
Indicadores alternativos y tradicionales de la Revista de Estudios Feministas Brasileira
Indicadores alternativos e tradicionais da Revista Estudos Feministas Brasileira
title Alternative and traditional indicators of the Brazilian Feminist Studies Journal
spellingShingle Alternative and traditional indicators of the Brazilian Feminist Studies Journal
Fachin, Juliana
Métricas Alternativas
Métricas Tradicionais
Publicação de Acesso Aberto
Base de dados Dimensions
Coeficiente de Pearson
Alternative Metrics
Traditional Metrics
Open Access Publishing
Dimensions database
Pearson's coefficient
title_short Alternative and traditional indicators of the Brazilian Feminist Studies Journal
title_full Alternative and traditional indicators of the Brazilian Feminist Studies Journal
title_fullStr Alternative and traditional indicators of the Brazilian Feminist Studies Journal
title_full_unstemmed Alternative and traditional indicators of the Brazilian Feminist Studies Journal
title_sort Alternative and traditional indicators of the Brazilian Feminist Studies Journal
author Fachin, Juliana
author_facet Fachin, Juliana
Araújo, Ronaldo Ferreira
Blattmann, Ursula
author_role author
author2 Araújo, Ronaldo Ferreira
Blattmann, Ursula
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fachin, Juliana
Araújo, Ronaldo Ferreira
Blattmann, Ursula
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Métricas Alternativas
Métricas Tradicionais
Publicação de Acesso Aberto
Base de dados Dimensions
Coeficiente de Pearson
Alternative Metrics
Traditional Metrics
Open Access Publishing
Dimensions database
Pearson's coefficient
topic Métricas Alternativas
Métricas Tradicionais
Publicação de Acesso Aberto
Base de dados Dimensions
Coeficiente de Pearson
Alternative Metrics
Traditional Metrics
Open Access Publishing
Dimensions database
Pearson's coefficient
description The connection of traditional and alternative indicators of academic impact has been recommended by scholars in the field of metric studies as they are considered complementary and offer a more complete picture of the evaluation of research results. From this perspective, the present descriptive exploratory study aimed to analyze the correlation coefficient between the traditional and alternative impact of Revista Estudos Feministas. The sample comprised the period from 2001 to 2018. Analysis data were obtained from the Dimensions database via API. 1,296 texts with 2,609 citations and 5,982 altmetric data were analyzed. The results showed that Mendeley obtained a positive evaluation in the correlation of Pearson's coefficient when compared with the quantity of published articles and with the citation and visibility indicators. The study found that altmetric data is 4.6 times larger than traditional data, although fluctuating it is important for indicating the tools and networks where readers and users share scientific content.         
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-03-27
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/article/view/9255
10.36311/1981-1640.2020.v14n1.06.p112
url https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/article/view/9255
identifier_str_mv 10.36311/1981-1640.2020.v14n1.06.p112
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/article/view/9255/6285
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Information Science: Research Trends; Vol. 14 No. 1 - jan-mar (2020); 112-129
Brazilian Journal of Information Science: Research Trends; Vol. 14 Núm. 1 - jan-mar (2020); 112-129
Brazilian Journal of Information Science: research trends; v. 14 n. 1 - jan-mar (2020); 112-129
1981-1640
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Information Science
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Information Science
collection Brazilian Journal of Information Science
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Information Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv brajis.marilia@unesp.br||
_version_ 1754840471737204736

Registros relacionados