About critical moments, public problems and the public arena: contributions of French pragmatism
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Aurora (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/aurora/article/view/9333 |
Resumo: | This article presents the main contributions to the Social Sciences of some of the leading authors of French pragmatism. However, given the variety of authors, themes, and concepts that orbit pragmatist sociology, we chose to focus on the sociology of criticism by Luc Boltanski and Laurent Thévenot, Daniel Cefaï's studies, and, to a lesser extent, Louis Queré’s, about problematic situations, public problems and the public arena. Thus, this brief and interested incursion into the debate undertaken by pragmatist authors intends to outline some key elements of the debate, highlighting the main arguments and concepts of this important academic movement. |
id |
UNESP-32_19e6acddcd9eae78ee9831797c813d2c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.marilia.unesp.br:article/9333 |
network_acronym_str |
UNESP-32 |
network_name_str |
Revista Aurora (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
About critical moments, public problems and the public arena: contributions of French pragmatismSobre momentos críticos, problemas públicos e arena pública: contribuições do pragmatismo FrancêsPragmatismCritical momentsPublic problemsPublic arenaMomentos CríticosProblemas Públicos Arena PúblicaPragmatismoThis article presents the main contributions to the Social Sciences of some of the leading authors of French pragmatism. However, given the variety of authors, themes, and concepts that orbit pragmatist sociology, we chose to focus on the sociology of criticism by Luc Boltanski and Laurent Thévenot, Daniel Cefaï's studies, and, to a lesser extent, Louis Queré’s, about problematic situations, public problems and the public arena. Thus, this brief and interested incursion into the debate undertaken by pragmatist authors intends to outline some key elements of the debate, highlighting the main arguments and concepts of this important academic movement.O presente artigo tem por objetivo apresentar algumas das principais contribuições de alguns dos principais autores do pragmatismo francês para as Ciências Sociais. No entanto, tendo em vista a variedade de autores, temas e conceitos que orbitam em torno da noção de uma sociologia pragmatista, optamos por focar na sociologia da crítica de Luc Boltanski e Laurent Thévenot, nos estudos de Daniel Cefaï e, em menor medida, de Louis Queré, sobre situações problemáticas, problemas públicos e arena pública. Assim, essa breve e interessada incursão no debate empreendido pelos autores do pragmatismo pretende delinear alguns elementos-chave do debate, pontuando os principais argumentos e conceitos desse importante movimento acadêmico. Submetido em: 17/10/2019Aceito em: 25/05/2020Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências2021-05-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/aurora/article/view/933310.36311/1982-8004.2020.v13n2.p53-76Revista Aurora; v. 13 n. 2 (2020); 53-76Revista Aurora; Vol. 13 No. 2 (2020); 53-76Revista Aurora; Vol. 13 Núm. 2 (2020); 53-761982-80042177-0484reponame:Revista Aurora (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporhttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/aurora/article/view/9333/7057Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Aurorahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAntunes, Henrique Fernandes2024-04-02T22:11:29Zoai:ojs.revistas.marilia.unesp.br:article/9333Revistahttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/aurora/indexPUBhttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/aurora/oaiaurora.revista@gmail.com||1982-80041982-8004opendoar:2024-04-02T22:11:29Revista Aurora (Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
About critical moments, public problems and the public arena: contributions of French pragmatism Sobre momentos críticos, problemas públicos e arena pública: contribuições do pragmatismo Francês |
title |
About critical moments, public problems and the public arena: contributions of French pragmatism |
spellingShingle |
About critical moments, public problems and the public arena: contributions of French pragmatism Antunes, Henrique Fernandes Pragmatism Critical moments Public problems Public arena Momentos Críticos Problemas Públicos Arena Pública Pragmatismo |
title_short |
About critical moments, public problems and the public arena: contributions of French pragmatism |
title_full |
About critical moments, public problems and the public arena: contributions of French pragmatism |
title_fullStr |
About critical moments, public problems and the public arena: contributions of French pragmatism |
title_full_unstemmed |
About critical moments, public problems and the public arena: contributions of French pragmatism |
title_sort |
About critical moments, public problems and the public arena: contributions of French pragmatism |
author |
Antunes, Henrique Fernandes |
author_facet |
Antunes, Henrique Fernandes |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Antunes, Henrique Fernandes |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Pragmatism Critical moments Public problems Public arena Momentos Críticos Problemas Públicos Arena Pública Pragmatismo |
topic |
Pragmatism Critical moments Public problems Public arena Momentos Críticos Problemas Públicos Arena Pública Pragmatismo |
description |
This article presents the main contributions to the Social Sciences of some of the leading authors of French pragmatism. However, given the variety of authors, themes, and concepts that orbit pragmatist sociology, we chose to focus on the sociology of criticism by Luc Boltanski and Laurent Thévenot, Daniel Cefaï's studies, and, to a lesser extent, Louis Queré’s, about problematic situations, public problems and the public arena. Thus, this brief and interested incursion into the debate undertaken by pragmatist authors intends to outline some key elements of the debate, highlighting the main arguments and concepts of this important academic movement. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-05-11 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/aurora/article/view/9333 10.36311/1982-8004.2020.v13n2.p53-76 |
url |
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/aurora/article/view/9333 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.36311/1982-8004.2020.v13n2.p53-76 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/aurora/article/view/9333/7057 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Aurora https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Aurora https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Aurora; v. 13 n. 2 (2020); 53-76 Revista Aurora; Vol. 13 No. 2 (2020); 53-76 Revista Aurora; Vol. 13 Núm. 2 (2020); 53-76 1982-8004 2177-0484 reponame:Revista Aurora (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Revista Aurora (Online) |
collection |
Revista Aurora (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Aurora (Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
aurora.revista@gmail.com|| |
_version_ |
1797053558515826688 |