Bobbio Hobbes’ reader: sovereign power and natural law
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Aurora (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/aurora/article/view/7422 |
Resumo: | The central question of this article was to elucidate the relationship between sovereign power and the maintenance of law, that, by nature, men have to defend and preserve their lives. The relation between sovereign power and natural law can be explained from the following questions: does natural law and man have to preserve his life and the integrity of the members of his civil enterprise with the institution of the State? On the other hand, the sovereign power instituted as absolute power has been limited by the natural right that men have of self-preservation? Our Goal is to verify if the natural right that man has to preserve his life and an integrity of the members of his body disappears with the institution of the State. It is also tried to undertake whether the sovereign power instituted as absolute power is limited by the natural right that men have to self-preservation. The hypothesis of work that we elaborate is that of a measure in the sovereign power like absolute power and the natural right that the men possess, not civil state, of self-preservation. What is proposed is to verify, by what ways Norberto Bobbio, reader of Hobbes, contributes to the clarification of the problem posed, recurrent and central in the theory and philosophy of law. |
id |
UNESP-32_9819234a8ab5dff10363e75c68f8f8e7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.marilia.unesp.br:article/7422 |
network_acronym_str |
UNESP-32 |
network_name_str |
Revista Aurora (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Bobbio Hobbes’ reader: sovereign power and natural lawBobbio leitor de Hobbes: poder soberano e direito naturalBobbioHobbesPoder soberanoDireito naturalBobbioHobbesSovereign PowerNatural LawThe central question of this article was to elucidate the relationship between sovereign power and the maintenance of law, that, by nature, men have to defend and preserve their lives. The relation between sovereign power and natural law can be explained from the following questions: does natural law and man have to preserve his life and the integrity of the members of his civil enterprise with the institution of the State? On the other hand, the sovereign power instituted as absolute power has been limited by the natural right that men have of self-preservation? Our Goal is to verify if the natural right that man has to preserve his life and an integrity of the members of his body disappears with the institution of the State. It is also tried to undertake whether the sovereign power instituted as absolute power is limited by the natural right that men have to self-preservation. The hypothesis of work that we elaborate is that of a measure in the sovereign power like absolute power and the natural right that the men possess, not civil state, of self-preservation. What is proposed is to verify, by what ways Norberto Bobbio, reader of Hobbes, contributes to the clarification of the problem posed, recurrent and central in the theory and philosophy of law.A questão central do presente artigo consistiu em elucidar a relação entre o poder soberano e a manutenção do direito que, por natureza, os homens têm de defender e preservar as suas vidas. A relação entre poder soberano e direito natural, pode ser explicitada a partir das seguintes questões: o direito natural que o homem tem de preservar a sua vida e a integridade dos membros do seu corpo desaparece com a instituição do Estado? Por outro lado, o poder soberano instituído como poder absoluto é limitado pelo direito natural que os homens têm de autopreservação? Nosso objetivo visa verificar se o direito natural que o homem tem de preservar a sua vida e a integridade dos membros do seu corpo desaparece com a instituição do Estado. Intenta-se, ainda, saber se o poder soberano instituído como poder absoluto é limitado pelo direito natural que os homens têm à autopreservação. A hipótese de trabalho que elaboramos é a de que há uma tensão entre o poder soberano como poder absoluto e o direito natural que os homens possuem, no Estado civil, de autopreservação. O que se propõe é verificar, por que caminhos Norberto Bobbio, leitor de Hobbes, contribui para o esclarecimento do problema posto, recorrente e central na teoria e filosofia do direito.Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências2017-11-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/aurora/article/view/742210.36311/1982-8004.2017.v10n1.05.p55Revista Aurora; v. 10 n. 1 (2017); 55-74Revista Aurora; Vol. 10 No. 1 (2017); 55-74Revista Aurora; Vol. 10 Núm. 1 (2017); 55-741982-80042177-0484reponame:Revista Aurora (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporhttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/aurora/article/view/7422/4693Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Aurorahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRibeiro, Emmanuel Pedro2024-04-02T20:42:09Zoai:ojs.revistas.marilia.unesp.br:article/7422Revistahttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/aurora/indexPUBhttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/aurora/oaiaurora.revista@gmail.com||1982-80041982-8004opendoar:2024-04-02T20:42:09Revista Aurora (Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Bobbio Hobbes’ reader: sovereign power and natural law Bobbio leitor de Hobbes: poder soberano e direito natural |
title |
Bobbio Hobbes’ reader: sovereign power and natural law |
spellingShingle |
Bobbio Hobbes’ reader: sovereign power and natural law Ribeiro, Emmanuel Pedro Bobbio Hobbes Poder soberano Direito natural Bobbio Hobbes Sovereign Power Natural Law |
title_short |
Bobbio Hobbes’ reader: sovereign power and natural law |
title_full |
Bobbio Hobbes’ reader: sovereign power and natural law |
title_fullStr |
Bobbio Hobbes’ reader: sovereign power and natural law |
title_full_unstemmed |
Bobbio Hobbes’ reader: sovereign power and natural law |
title_sort |
Bobbio Hobbes’ reader: sovereign power and natural law |
author |
Ribeiro, Emmanuel Pedro |
author_facet |
Ribeiro, Emmanuel Pedro |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ribeiro, Emmanuel Pedro |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Bobbio Hobbes Poder soberano Direito natural Bobbio Hobbes Sovereign Power Natural Law |
topic |
Bobbio Hobbes Poder soberano Direito natural Bobbio Hobbes Sovereign Power Natural Law |
description |
The central question of this article was to elucidate the relationship between sovereign power and the maintenance of law, that, by nature, men have to defend and preserve their lives. The relation between sovereign power and natural law can be explained from the following questions: does natural law and man have to preserve his life and the integrity of the members of his civil enterprise with the institution of the State? On the other hand, the sovereign power instituted as absolute power has been limited by the natural right that men have of self-preservation? Our Goal is to verify if the natural right that man has to preserve his life and an integrity of the members of his body disappears with the institution of the State. It is also tried to undertake whether the sovereign power instituted as absolute power is limited by the natural right that men have to self-preservation. The hypothesis of work that we elaborate is that of a measure in the sovereign power like absolute power and the natural right that the men possess, not civil state, of self-preservation. What is proposed is to verify, by what ways Norberto Bobbio, reader of Hobbes, contributes to the clarification of the problem posed, recurrent and central in the theory and philosophy of law. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-11-07 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/aurora/article/view/7422 10.36311/1982-8004.2017.v10n1.05.p55 |
url |
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/aurora/article/view/7422 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.36311/1982-8004.2017.v10n1.05.p55 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/aurora/article/view/7422/4693 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Aurora https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Aurora https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Aurora; v. 10 n. 1 (2017); 55-74 Revista Aurora; Vol. 10 No. 1 (2017); 55-74 Revista Aurora; Vol. 10 Núm. 1 (2017); 55-74 1982-8004 2177-0484 reponame:Revista Aurora (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Revista Aurora (Online) |
collection |
Revista Aurora (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Aurora (Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
aurora.revista@gmail.com|| |
_version_ |
1797053557956935680 |