On the syntax of ought-to-be constructions with and without a specific addressee

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rech, Núbia Ferreira
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Guesser, Simone
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/14270
Resumo: This paper focuses on the (ought-to-be) deontic, which is analyzed from the concepts of obligation discussed in Castañeda (1970), Feldman (1986) and Hacquard (2006, 2010). From co-occurrence tests of an ought-to-be modal with other elements in the CP layer – in particular, with the wh-phrase por que (why) and with adverbial elements, it was found that ought-to-be is interpreted between the high projections IntP and ModP. It was also shown that an ought-to-be can be used in an utterance with or without a specific addressee and that this difference reflects in the syntax. The proposal is to extend the analysis by Portner, Pak and Zanuttini (2019), developed for Korean speech style particles, to the ought-to-be deontic, postulating that this deontic, when used with a specific addressee, integrates a structure in which the cP category is projected, which allows features that express the speaker-addressee relation, such as status, to be checked. Consequently, this modal is restricted to the matrix domain. When, however, it appears in an utterance without a specific addressee, it integrates a structure without the projection of cP, since it does not refer to the speaker-addressee relationship. In this case, it can appear in both the matrix and embedded domains.
id UNESP-4_265ad5c87bf40be893b42c2918fe092f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14270
network_acronym_str UNESP-4
network_name_str Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling On the syntax of ought-to-be constructions with and without a specific addresseeSobre a sintaxe de construções ought-to-be com e sem addressee específicoought-to-be deontic modalityspeaker-addressee relationshipcP categorydeôntico ought-to-bemodalidade deônticarelação falante-interlocutorcategoria cPThis paper focuses on the (ought-to-be) deontic, which is analyzed from the concepts of obligation discussed in Castañeda (1970), Feldman (1986) and Hacquard (2006, 2010). From co-occurrence tests of an ought-to-be modal with other elements in the CP layer – in particular, with the wh-phrase por que (why) and with adverbial elements, it was found that ought-to-be is interpreted between the high projections IntP and ModP. It was also shown that an ought-to-be can be used in an utterance with or without a specific addressee and that this difference reflects in the syntax. The proposal is to extend the analysis by Portner, Pak and Zanuttini (2019), developed for Korean speech style particles, to the ought-to-be deontic, postulating that this deontic, when used with a specific addressee, integrates a structure in which the cP category is projected, which allows features that express the speaker-addressee relation, such as status, to be checked. Consequently, this modal is restricted to the matrix domain. When, however, it appears in an utterance without a specific addressee, it integrates a structure without the projection of cP, since it does not refer to the speaker-addressee relationship. In this case, it can appear in both the matrix and embedded domains.O presente artigo tem como foco o deôntico ought-to-be, analisado a partir dos conceitos de obrigação discutidos em Castañeda (1970), Feldman (1986) e Hacquard (2006, 2010). A partir de testes de co-ocorrência de um modal ought-to-be com elementos que ocorrem na camada CP – em particular, com a expressão-wh por que e com elementos adverbiais –, constatamos que o ought-to-be é interpretado entre as posições altas de IntP e ModP. Mostramos também que um ought-to-be pode figurar em construções com ou sem addressee específico e que essa diferença se reflete na sintaxe. Nossa proposta é estender a análise de Portner, Pak e Zanuttini (2019), desenvolvida para partículas de estilo de fala do coreano, para o deôntico ought-to-be, postulando que esse deôntico, quando usado com um addressee específico, integra uma estrutura em que a categoria cP é projetada, o que permite que traços que expressam a relação falante-interlocutor, tais como o traço de status, sejam checados. Consequentemente, esse modal é restrito ao domínio matriz. Por outro lado, quando ele ocorre em uma sentença sem addressee específico, ele integra uma estrutura sem a projeção de cP, uma vez que ele não remete à relação falante-interlocutor. Nesse caso, o modal aparece em domínios matrizes e encaixados.UNESP2022-10-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/1427010.1590/1981-5794-e14270ALFA: Revista de Linguística; v. 66 (2022)1981-5794reponame:Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online)instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporenghttps://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/14270/14269https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/14270/14270Copyright (c) 2022 ALFA: Revista de Linguísticahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRech, Núbia FerreiraGuesser, Simone2023-02-17T18:05:59Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14270Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=1981-5794&lng=pt&nrm=isoPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpalfa@unesp.br1981-57940002-5216opendoar:2023-02-17T18:05:59Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv On the syntax of ought-to-be constructions with and without a specific addressee
Sobre a sintaxe de construções ought-to-be com e sem addressee específico
title On the syntax of ought-to-be constructions with and without a specific addressee
spellingShingle On the syntax of ought-to-be constructions with and without a specific addressee
Rech, Núbia Ferreira
ought-to-be deontic modality
speaker-addressee relationship
cP category
deôntico ought-to-be
modalidade deôntica
relação falante-interlocutor
categoria cP
title_short On the syntax of ought-to-be constructions with and without a specific addressee
title_full On the syntax of ought-to-be constructions with and without a specific addressee
title_fullStr On the syntax of ought-to-be constructions with and without a specific addressee
title_full_unstemmed On the syntax of ought-to-be constructions with and without a specific addressee
title_sort On the syntax of ought-to-be constructions with and without a specific addressee
author Rech, Núbia Ferreira
author_facet Rech, Núbia Ferreira
Guesser, Simone
author_role author
author2 Guesser, Simone
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rech, Núbia Ferreira
Guesser, Simone
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv ought-to-be deontic modality
speaker-addressee relationship
cP category
deôntico ought-to-be
modalidade deôntica
relação falante-interlocutor
categoria cP
topic ought-to-be deontic modality
speaker-addressee relationship
cP category
deôntico ought-to-be
modalidade deôntica
relação falante-interlocutor
categoria cP
description This paper focuses on the (ought-to-be) deontic, which is analyzed from the concepts of obligation discussed in Castañeda (1970), Feldman (1986) and Hacquard (2006, 2010). From co-occurrence tests of an ought-to-be modal with other elements in the CP layer – in particular, with the wh-phrase por que (why) and with adverbial elements, it was found that ought-to-be is interpreted between the high projections IntP and ModP. It was also shown that an ought-to-be can be used in an utterance with or without a specific addressee and that this difference reflects in the syntax. The proposal is to extend the analysis by Portner, Pak and Zanuttini (2019), developed for Korean speech style particles, to the ought-to-be deontic, postulating that this deontic, when used with a specific addressee, integrates a structure in which the cP category is projected, which allows features that express the speaker-addressee relation, such as status, to be checked. Consequently, this modal is restricted to the matrix domain. When, however, it appears in an utterance without a specific addressee, it integrates a structure without the projection of cP, since it does not refer to the speaker-addressee relationship. In this case, it can appear in both the matrix and embedded domains.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-10-04
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/14270
10.1590/1981-5794-e14270
url https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/14270
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1981-5794-e14270
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/14270/14269
https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/14270/14270
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 ALFA: Revista de Linguística
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 ALFA: Revista de Linguística
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UNESP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UNESP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv ALFA: Revista de Linguística; v. 66 (2022)
1981-5794
reponame:Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online)
collection Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv alfa@unesp.br
_version_ 1800214377989668864