Liberal tradition, positivism and pedagogy: Rui Barbosa's defeated ideas
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Perspectivas |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/perspectivas/article/view/3555 |
Resumo: | The first Brazilian Republic (1889-1930) is often seen as authoritarian because of the influence of positivistic ideas, and also as oligarchic, an unintentional consequence of liberal institutions operating upon an insolidary society, as theorizes Oliveira Vianna. This article presents, instead, a liberalism which has genetic links with oligarchization and a positivism that seeks to reduce the individualism with a sense of common interest. The emphasis here is on the thought of Rui Barbosa, currently known as a typical liberal jurist aiming to implement North-American federalism in Brazil. In the opposite sense, this important brazilian political actor is shown as someone worried about the most central positivistic questions: putting the family – and not only the individual – in the centre of the nation’s building process, and asking for some political centralization, to overcome the oligarchic authoritarianism derived from the freedom of private interests. Some Rui Barbosa’s political speeches – specially those justifying his political options – are used to demonstrate the above argument, for, as it can be understood by Weber, Marx and Koselleck’s concepts, they become extremely important in periods of legitimacy crisis of the modern Abstract State. This was precisely the case in Brazil, when the Monarchy was substituted by the Republic in 1889. |
id |
UNESP-5_d9789b41cea1beff4d85d1699fe0a158 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/3555 |
network_acronym_str |
UNESP-5 |
network_name_str |
Perspectivas |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Liberal tradition, positivism and pedagogy: Rui Barbosa's defeated ideasTradição liberal, positivismo e pedagogia: a síntese derrotada de Rui BarbosaRui BarbosaPositivismoLiberalismoPrimeira RepúblicaBrasilOligarquiaThe first Brazilian Republic (1889-1930) is often seen as authoritarian because of the influence of positivistic ideas, and also as oligarchic, an unintentional consequence of liberal institutions operating upon an insolidary society, as theorizes Oliveira Vianna. This article presents, instead, a liberalism which has genetic links with oligarchization and a positivism that seeks to reduce the individualism with a sense of common interest. The emphasis here is on the thought of Rui Barbosa, currently known as a typical liberal jurist aiming to implement North-American federalism in Brazil. In the opposite sense, this important brazilian political actor is shown as someone worried about the most central positivistic questions: putting the family – and not only the individual – in the centre of the nation’s building process, and asking for some political centralization, to overcome the oligarchic authoritarianism derived from the freedom of private interests. Some Rui Barbosa’s political speeches – specially those justifying his political options – are used to demonstrate the above argument, for, as it can be understood by Weber, Marx and Koselleck’s concepts, they become extremely important in periods of legitimacy crisis of the modern Abstract State. This was precisely the case in Brazil, when the Monarchy was substituted by the Republic in 1889.Concebe-se, freqüentemente, a Primeira República brasileira (1889-1930) como autoritária, por ser alimentada pelo ideário positivista, e oligárquica, por resultar do mau funcionamento de instituições liberais sobre uma sociedade insolidária, como no diagnóstico de Oliveira Vianna. Este artigo apresenta, ao contrário, um liberalismo que se associa doutrinariamente à oligarquização, e um positivismo que visa temperar o individualismo privatista com um senso de interesse comum. Enfatiza-se o pensamento de Rui Barbosa, tido por um liberal americanista filiado ao federalismo estadunidense. A contrario senso, mostra-se um personagem aproximado às preocupações positivistas: exaltando a família como célula formadora da pátria e clamando por alguma centralização política, como remédio contra o autoritarismo oligárquico oriundo da liberdade dos interesses particulares. Utiliza-se seus discursos de justificação política, que, tal como se depreende de conceitos tomados a Weber, Marx e Koselleck, se tornam de suma importância nos períodos de crise de legitimidade de Estados abstratos. Este era precisamente o cenário quando a Monarquia foi substituída pela República no Brasil, em 1889.Universidade Estadual Paulista / UNESP2011-02-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/perspectivas/article/view/3555Perspectivas: Revista de Ciências Sociais; v. 37 (2010)1984-02410101-3459reponame:Perspectivasinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporhttps://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/perspectivas/article/view/3555/3324Copyright (c) 2011 Perspectivas: Revista de Ciências Sociaisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAraújo, Gisele Silva2011-02-21T19:43:52Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/3555Revistahttps://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/perspectivasPUBhttps://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/perspectivas/oai||lahuerta@fclar.unesp.br1984-02410101-3459opendoar:2011-02-21T19:43:52Perspectivas - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Liberal tradition, positivism and pedagogy: Rui Barbosa's defeated ideas Tradição liberal, positivismo e pedagogia: a síntese derrotada de Rui Barbosa |
title |
Liberal tradition, positivism and pedagogy: Rui Barbosa's defeated ideas |
spellingShingle |
Liberal tradition, positivism and pedagogy: Rui Barbosa's defeated ideas Araújo, Gisele Silva Rui Barbosa Positivismo Liberalismo Primeira República Brasil Oligarquia |
title_short |
Liberal tradition, positivism and pedagogy: Rui Barbosa's defeated ideas |
title_full |
Liberal tradition, positivism and pedagogy: Rui Barbosa's defeated ideas |
title_fullStr |
Liberal tradition, positivism and pedagogy: Rui Barbosa's defeated ideas |
title_full_unstemmed |
Liberal tradition, positivism and pedagogy: Rui Barbosa's defeated ideas |
title_sort |
Liberal tradition, positivism and pedagogy: Rui Barbosa's defeated ideas |
author |
Araújo, Gisele Silva |
author_facet |
Araújo, Gisele Silva |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Araújo, Gisele Silva |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Rui Barbosa Positivismo Liberalismo Primeira República Brasil Oligarquia |
topic |
Rui Barbosa Positivismo Liberalismo Primeira República Brasil Oligarquia |
description |
The first Brazilian Republic (1889-1930) is often seen as authoritarian because of the influence of positivistic ideas, and also as oligarchic, an unintentional consequence of liberal institutions operating upon an insolidary society, as theorizes Oliveira Vianna. This article presents, instead, a liberalism which has genetic links with oligarchization and a positivism that seeks to reduce the individualism with a sense of common interest. The emphasis here is on the thought of Rui Barbosa, currently known as a typical liberal jurist aiming to implement North-American federalism in Brazil. In the opposite sense, this important brazilian political actor is shown as someone worried about the most central positivistic questions: putting the family – and not only the individual – in the centre of the nation’s building process, and asking for some political centralization, to overcome the oligarchic authoritarianism derived from the freedom of private interests. Some Rui Barbosa’s political speeches – specially those justifying his political options – are used to demonstrate the above argument, for, as it can be understood by Weber, Marx and Koselleck’s concepts, they become extremely important in periods of legitimacy crisis of the modern Abstract State. This was precisely the case in Brazil, when the Monarchy was substituted by the Republic in 1889. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-02-21 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/perspectivas/article/view/3555 |
url |
https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/perspectivas/article/view/3555 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/perspectivas/article/view/3555/3324 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2011 Perspectivas: Revista de Ciências Sociais info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2011 Perspectivas: Revista de Ciências Sociais |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista / UNESP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista / UNESP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Perspectivas: Revista de Ciências Sociais; v. 37 (2010) 1984-0241 0101-3459 reponame:Perspectivas instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Perspectivas |
collection |
Perspectivas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Perspectivas - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||lahuerta@fclar.unesp.br |
_version_ |
1800215727887613952 |