Composição botânica e controle de plantas daninhas no cultivo da palma forrageira (Opuntia e Nopalea)
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar |
Texto Completo: | http://revistarebram.com/index.php/revistauniara/article/view/1750 |
Resumo: | Forage cactus (Opuntia and Nopalea) responds positively to cultural treatments such as weeding and weed cutting. However, the scarce labor and the high cost of labor is a challenge that producers, the scientific community and the government have to solve. The objective of this work was to evaluate 9 (nine) commercial herbicides and some mixtures of them in the control of weeds in the culture of forage cactus varieties Miúda (N. cochenillifera) and Orelha de Elefante Mexicana (O. stricta) in the municipality of Caruaru, Pernambuco, Brazil. Two experiments were carried out at the Experimental Station of the Agronomic Institute of Pernambuco (IPA) in Caruaru-PE. The designs used were in randomized blocks with three replications. The treatments evaluated were: 1. No weed control, 2. Hand weeding, 3. Mowing, 4. DMA®806BR (2,4-D), 5. GLYPHOSATE ATAR 48® (glyphosate)+DIURON NORTOX 500 SC ® (diuron), 6. GLYPHOSATE ATAR 48® (glyphosate)+AMERIS® (tebuthiurom), 7. HEXAZINONE-D NORTOX (hexazinone+diuron), 8. VOLCANE® (MSMA), 9. GOAL®BR (oxyfluorfen), 10. TARGA®50 BR (kizalofop-p-ethyl), 11. FUSILADE® 250 EW (fluasifop-p-butyl), 12. AMERIS® (tebutiuron), 13. GLYPHOSATE ATAR 48® (glyphosate)+DIURON NORTOX 500 SC ® (diuron)+AMERIS® (tebuthiuron). The botanical composition of the invasive plants, bare soil, survival, toxicity and productivity of fresh and dry matter of cactus were evaluated in the two years of cultivation. Among the identified species, those with the highest densities were: Ageratum conyzoides, Nicandra physalodes, Scoparia dulcis, Conyza bonariensis, Amaranthus viridis, Acanthospermum hispidum, Alternanthera tenella, Senegalia tenuifolia, Cordia goeldiana, Senegalia tenuifolia, Turnera subulata and Poaceae. The herbicides GLYPHOSATE ATAR 48®+AMERIS®; AMERIS®; and GLYPHOSATE ATAR 48®+DIURON NORTOX 500 SC®+AMERIS® were the most efficient in controlling weeds, due to high percentages of bare soil (75 to 99.67%), low toxicity (<8.33%) and high productivity of fresh (120.69 to 167.05 t.ha-1) and dry (21.75 to 24.40 t.ha-1) matter. Dry and fresh matter productivity was positively correlated with each other, and between bare soil and plant survival. Complementary studies are needed to support the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Supply in the registration of products. |
id |
UNIARA_6e8b5dd79ced196bf91deb52b9a252a6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistarebram.com:article/1750 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIARA |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Composição botânica e controle de plantas daninhas no cultivo da palma forrageira (Opuntia e Nopalea)chemical controlherbicides;invasive plantsNopalea cochenilliferaOpuntia strictacontrole químicoherbicidasNopalea cochenilliferaOpuntia strictaplantas invasorasForage cactus (Opuntia and Nopalea) responds positively to cultural treatments such as weeding and weed cutting. However, the scarce labor and the high cost of labor is a challenge that producers, the scientific community and the government have to solve. The objective of this work was to evaluate 9 (nine) commercial herbicides and some mixtures of them in the control of weeds in the culture of forage cactus varieties Miúda (N. cochenillifera) and Orelha de Elefante Mexicana (O. stricta) in the municipality of Caruaru, Pernambuco, Brazil. Two experiments were carried out at the Experimental Station of the Agronomic Institute of Pernambuco (IPA) in Caruaru-PE. The designs used were in randomized blocks with three replications. The treatments evaluated were: 1. No weed control, 2. Hand weeding, 3. Mowing, 4. DMA®806BR (2,4-D), 5. GLYPHOSATE ATAR 48® (glyphosate)+DIURON NORTOX 500 SC ® (diuron), 6. GLYPHOSATE ATAR 48® (glyphosate)+AMERIS® (tebuthiurom), 7. HEXAZINONE-D NORTOX (hexazinone+diuron), 8. VOLCANE® (MSMA), 9. GOAL®BR (oxyfluorfen), 10. TARGA®50 BR (kizalofop-p-ethyl), 11. FUSILADE® 250 EW (fluasifop-p-butyl), 12. AMERIS® (tebutiuron), 13. GLYPHOSATE ATAR 48® (glyphosate)+DIURON NORTOX 500 SC ® (diuron)+AMERIS® (tebuthiuron). The botanical composition of the invasive plants, bare soil, survival, toxicity and productivity of fresh and dry matter of cactus were evaluated in the two years of cultivation. Among the identified species, those with the highest densities were: Ageratum conyzoides, Nicandra physalodes, Scoparia dulcis, Conyza bonariensis, Amaranthus viridis, Acanthospermum hispidum, Alternanthera tenella, Senegalia tenuifolia, Cordia goeldiana, Senegalia tenuifolia, Turnera subulata and Poaceae. The herbicides GLYPHOSATE ATAR 48®+AMERIS®; AMERIS®; and GLYPHOSATE ATAR 48®+DIURON NORTOX 500 SC®+AMERIS® were the most efficient in controlling weeds, due to high percentages of bare soil (75 to 99.67%), low toxicity (<8.33%) and high productivity of fresh (120.69 to 167.05 t.ha-1) and dry (21.75 to 24.40 t.ha-1) matter. Dry and fresh matter productivity was positively correlated with each other, and between bare soil and plant survival. Complementary studies are needed to support the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Supply in the registration of products.A palma forrageira (Opuntia e Nopalea) responde positivamente aos tratos culturais como capina e roço das plantas daninhas. No entanto, a mão de obra escassa e o custo elevado da mão de obra é um desafio que os produtores, comunidade científica e governo tem que solucionar. O objetivo do trabalho foi avaliar 9 (nove) herbicidas comerciais e algumas misturas deles no controle de plantas daninhas na cultura da palma forrageira variedades Miúda (N. cochenillifera) e Orelha de Elefante Mexicana (O. stricta) no município de Caruaru, Pernambuco, Brasil. Foram realizados dois experimentos na Estação Experimental do Instituto Agronômico de Pernambuco (IPA) em Caruaru-PE. Os delineamentos utilizados foram em blocos ao acaso com três repetições. Os tratamentos avaliados foram: 1. Ausência de controle de plantas daninhas, 2. Capina manual, 3. Roçagem, 4. DMA®806BR (2,4-D), 5. GLIFOSATO ATAR 48® (glifosato)+DIURON NORTOX 500 SC® (diurom), 6. GLIFOSATO ATAR 48® (glifosato)+AMERIS® (tebutiurom), 7. HEXAZINONA-D NORTOX (hexazinona+diurom), 8. VOLCANE® (MSMA), 9. GOAL®BR (oxifluorfem), 10. TARGA®50 BR (quizalofope-p-etílico), 11. FUSILADE® 250 EW (fluasifope-p-butílico), 12. AMERIS® (tebutiurom), 13. GLIFOSATO ATAR 48® (glifosato)+DIURON NORTOX 500 SC® (diurom)+AMERIS® (tebutiurom). A composição botânica das plantas invasoras, solo descoberto, sobrevivência, toxicidade e produtividade de matéria fresca e seca da palma foram avaliadas nos dois anos de cultivo. Dentre as espécies identificadas as que tiveram as maiores densidades foram: Ageratum conyzoides, Nicandra physalodes, Scoparia dulcis, Conyza bonariensis, Amaranthus viridis, Acanthospermum hispidum, Alternanthera tenella, Senegalia tenuifolia, Cordia goeldiana, Senegalia tenuifolia, Turnera subulata e Poaceae. Os herbicidas GLIFOSATO ATAR 48®+AMERIS®; AMERIS®; e GLIFOSATO ATAR 48®+DIURON NORTOX 500 SC®+AMERIS® foram os mais eficientes no controle das plantas daninhas, devido a altas percentagens de solo descoberto (75 a 99,67%), baixa toxicidade (<8,33%) e elevada produtividade de matéria fresca (120,69 a 167,05 t.ha-1) e seca (21,75 a 24,40 t.ha-1). A produtividade de matéria seca e fresca foi correlacionada positivamente entre si, e entre o solo descoberto e a sobrevivência das plantas. Estudos complementares são necessários para subsidiar o Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento no registro de produtos.Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar - ReBraM2023-10-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistarebram.com/index.php/revistauniara/article/view/175010.25061/2527-2675/ReBraM/2023.v26i2.1750Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar; v. 26 n. 2 (2023): Maio-Agosto2527-26751415-3580reponame:Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinarinstname:Universidade de Araraquara (UNIARA)instacron:UNIARAporhttp://revistarebram.com/index.php/revistauniara/article/view/1750/903Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinarhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLemos Alves, Francisco AbelSilva, Maria da Conceição Cordeiro dos Santos, DjalmaViana de Freitas, Erinaldo2024-02-16T23:44:18Zoai:ojs.revistarebram.com:article/1750Revistahttp://revistarebram.com/index.php/revistauniaraPRIhttps://revistarebram.com/index.php/revistauniara/oairevistauniara@uniara.com||2527-26752527-2675opendoar:2024-02-16T23:44:18Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar - Universidade de Araraquara (UNIARA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Composição botânica e controle de plantas daninhas no cultivo da palma forrageira (Opuntia e Nopalea) |
title |
Composição botânica e controle de plantas daninhas no cultivo da palma forrageira (Opuntia e Nopalea) |
spellingShingle |
Composição botânica e controle de plantas daninhas no cultivo da palma forrageira (Opuntia e Nopalea) Lemos Alves, Francisco Abel chemical control herbicides; invasive plants Nopalea cochenillifera Opuntia stricta controle químico herbicidas Nopalea cochenillifera Opuntia stricta plantas invasoras |
title_short |
Composição botânica e controle de plantas daninhas no cultivo da palma forrageira (Opuntia e Nopalea) |
title_full |
Composição botânica e controle de plantas daninhas no cultivo da palma forrageira (Opuntia e Nopalea) |
title_fullStr |
Composição botânica e controle de plantas daninhas no cultivo da palma forrageira (Opuntia e Nopalea) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Composição botânica e controle de plantas daninhas no cultivo da palma forrageira (Opuntia e Nopalea) |
title_sort |
Composição botânica e controle de plantas daninhas no cultivo da palma forrageira (Opuntia e Nopalea) |
author |
Lemos Alves, Francisco Abel |
author_facet |
Lemos Alves, Francisco Abel Silva, Maria da Conceição Cordeiro dos Santos, Djalma Viana de Freitas, Erinaldo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva, Maria da Conceição Cordeiro dos Santos, Djalma Viana de Freitas, Erinaldo |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lemos Alves, Francisco Abel Silva, Maria da Conceição Cordeiro dos Santos, Djalma Viana de Freitas, Erinaldo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
chemical control herbicides; invasive plants Nopalea cochenillifera Opuntia stricta controle químico herbicidas Nopalea cochenillifera Opuntia stricta plantas invasoras |
topic |
chemical control herbicides; invasive plants Nopalea cochenillifera Opuntia stricta controle químico herbicidas Nopalea cochenillifera Opuntia stricta plantas invasoras |
description |
Forage cactus (Opuntia and Nopalea) responds positively to cultural treatments such as weeding and weed cutting. However, the scarce labor and the high cost of labor is a challenge that producers, the scientific community and the government have to solve. The objective of this work was to evaluate 9 (nine) commercial herbicides and some mixtures of them in the control of weeds in the culture of forage cactus varieties Miúda (N. cochenillifera) and Orelha de Elefante Mexicana (O. stricta) in the municipality of Caruaru, Pernambuco, Brazil. Two experiments were carried out at the Experimental Station of the Agronomic Institute of Pernambuco (IPA) in Caruaru-PE. The designs used were in randomized blocks with three replications. The treatments evaluated were: 1. No weed control, 2. Hand weeding, 3. Mowing, 4. DMA®806BR (2,4-D), 5. GLYPHOSATE ATAR 48® (glyphosate)+DIURON NORTOX 500 SC ® (diuron), 6. GLYPHOSATE ATAR 48® (glyphosate)+AMERIS® (tebuthiurom), 7. HEXAZINONE-D NORTOX (hexazinone+diuron), 8. VOLCANE® (MSMA), 9. GOAL®BR (oxyfluorfen), 10. TARGA®50 BR (kizalofop-p-ethyl), 11. FUSILADE® 250 EW (fluasifop-p-butyl), 12. AMERIS® (tebutiuron), 13. GLYPHOSATE ATAR 48® (glyphosate)+DIURON NORTOX 500 SC ® (diuron)+AMERIS® (tebuthiuron). The botanical composition of the invasive plants, bare soil, survival, toxicity and productivity of fresh and dry matter of cactus were evaluated in the two years of cultivation. Among the identified species, those with the highest densities were: Ageratum conyzoides, Nicandra physalodes, Scoparia dulcis, Conyza bonariensis, Amaranthus viridis, Acanthospermum hispidum, Alternanthera tenella, Senegalia tenuifolia, Cordia goeldiana, Senegalia tenuifolia, Turnera subulata and Poaceae. The herbicides GLYPHOSATE ATAR 48®+AMERIS®; AMERIS®; and GLYPHOSATE ATAR 48®+DIURON NORTOX 500 SC®+AMERIS® were the most efficient in controlling weeds, due to high percentages of bare soil (75 to 99.67%), low toxicity (<8.33%) and high productivity of fresh (120.69 to 167.05 t.ha-1) and dry (21.75 to 24.40 t.ha-1) matter. Dry and fresh matter productivity was positively correlated with each other, and between bare soil and plant survival. Complementary studies are needed to support the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Supply in the registration of products. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-10-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://revistarebram.com/index.php/revistauniara/article/view/1750 10.25061/2527-2675/ReBraM/2023.v26i2.1750 |
url |
http://revistarebram.com/index.php/revistauniara/article/view/1750 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.25061/2527-2675/ReBraM/2023.v26i2.1750 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistarebram.com/index.php/revistauniara/article/view/1750/903 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar - ReBraM |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar - ReBraM |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar; v. 26 n. 2 (2023): Maio-Agosto 2527-2675 1415-3580 reponame:Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar instname:Universidade de Araraquara (UNIARA) instacron:UNIARA |
instname_str |
Universidade de Araraquara (UNIARA) |
instacron_str |
UNIARA |
institution |
UNIARA |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar |
collection |
Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar - Universidade de Araraquara (UNIARA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistauniara@uniara.com|| |
_version_ |
1797174604428476416 |