Composição botânica e controle de plantas daninhas no cultivo da palma forrageira (Opuntia e Nopalea)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lemos Alves, Francisco Abel
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Silva, Maria da Conceição, Cordeiro dos Santos, Djalma, Viana de Freitas, Erinaldo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar
Texto Completo: http://revistarebram.com/index.php/revistauniara/article/view/1750
Resumo: Forage cactus (Opuntia and Nopalea) responds positively to cultural treatments such as weeding and weed cutting. However, the scarce labor and the high cost of labor is a challenge that producers, the scientific community and the government have to solve. The objective of this work was to evaluate 9 (nine) commercial herbicides and some mixtures of them in the control of weeds in the culture of forage cactus varieties Miúda (N. cochenillifera) and Orelha de Elefante Mexicana (O. stricta) in the municipality of Caruaru, Pernambuco, Brazil. Two experiments were carried out at the Experimental Station of the Agronomic Institute of Pernambuco (IPA) in Caruaru-PE. The designs used were in randomized blocks with three replications. The treatments evaluated were: 1. No weed control, 2. Hand weeding, 3. Mowing, 4. DMA®806BR (2,4-D), 5. GLYPHOSATE ATAR 48® (glyphosate)+DIURON NORTOX 500 SC ® (diuron), 6. GLYPHOSATE ATAR 48® (glyphosate)+AMERIS® (tebuthiurom), 7. HEXAZINONE-D NORTOX (hexazinone+diuron), 8. VOLCANE® (MSMA), 9. GOAL®BR (oxyfluorfen), 10. TARGA®50 BR (kizalofop-p-ethyl), 11. FUSILADE® 250 EW (fluasifop-p-butyl), 12. AMERIS® (tebutiuron), 13. GLYPHOSATE ATAR 48® (glyphosate)+DIURON NORTOX 500 SC ® (diuron)+AMERIS® (tebuthiuron). The botanical composition of the invasive plants, bare soil, survival, toxicity and productivity of fresh and dry matter of cactus were evaluated in the two years of cultivation. Among the identified species, those with the highest densities were: Ageratum conyzoides, Nicandra physalodes, Scoparia dulcis, Conyza bonariensis, Amaranthus viridis, Acanthospermum hispidum, Alternanthera tenella, Senegalia tenuifolia, Cordia goeldiana, Senegalia tenuifolia, Turnera subulata and Poaceae. The herbicides GLYPHOSATE ATAR 48®+AMERIS®; AMERIS®; and GLYPHOSATE ATAR 48®+DIURON NORTOX 500 SC®+AMERIS® were the most efficient in controlling weeds, due to high percentages of bare soil (75 to 99.67%), low toxicity (<8.33%) and high productivity of fresh (120.69 to 167.05 t.ha-1) and dry (21.75 to 24.40 t.ha-1) matter. Dry and fresh matter productivity was positively correlated with each other, and between bare soil and plant survival. Complementary studies are needed to support the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Supply in the registration of products.
id UNIARA_6e8b5dd79ced196bf91deb52b9a252a6
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistarebram.com:article/1750
network_acronym_str UNIARA
network_name_str Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar
repository_id_str
spelling Composição botânica e controle de plantas daninhas no cultivo da palma forrageira (Opuntia e Nopalea)chemical controlherbicides;invasive plantsNopalea cochenilliferaOpuntia strictacontrole químicoherbicidasNopalea cochenilliferaOpuntia strictaplantas invasorasForage cactus (Opuntia and Nopalea) responds positively to cultural treatments such as weeding and weed cutting. However, the scarce labor and the high cost of labor is a challenge that producers, the scientific community and the government have to solve. The objective of this work was to evaluate 9 (nine) commercial herbicides and some mixtures of them in the control of weeds in the culture of forage cactus varieties Miúda (N. cochenillifera) and Orelha de Elefante Mexicana (O. stricta) in the municipality of Caruaru, Pernambuco, Brazil. Two experiments were carried out at the Experimental Station of the Agronomic Institute of Pernambuco (IPA) in Caruaru-PE. The designs used were in randomized blocks with three replications. The treatments evaluated were: 1. No weed control, 2. Hand weeding, 3. Mowing, 4. DMA®806BR (2,4-D), 5. GLYPHOSATE ATAR 48® (glyphosate)+DIURON NORTOX 500 SC ® (diuron), 6. GLYPHOSATE ATAR 48® (glyphosate)+AMERIS® (tebuthiurom), 7. HEXAZINONE-D NORTOX (hexazinone+diuron), 8. VOLCANE® (MSMA), 9. GOAL®BR (oxyfluorfen), 10. TARGA®50 BR (kizalofop-p-ethyl), 11. FUSILADE® 250 EW (fluasifop-p-butyl), 12. AMERIS® (tebutiuron), 13. GLYPHOSATE ATAR 48® (glyphosate)+DIURON NORTOX 500 SC ® (diuron)+AMERIS® (tebuthiuron). The botanical composition of the invasive plants, bare soil, survival, toxicity and productivity of fresh and dry matter of cactus were evaluated in the two years of cultivation. Among the identified species, those with the highest densities were: Ageratum conyzoides, Nicandra physalodes, Scoparia dulcis, Conyza bonariensis, Amaranthus viridis, Acanthospermum hispidum, Alternanthera tenella, Senegalia tenuifolia, Cordia goeldiana, Senegalia tenuifolia, Turnera subulata and Poaceae. The herbicides GLYPHOSATE ATAR 48®+AMERIS®; AMERIS®; and GLYPHOSATE ATAR 48®+DIURON NORTOX 500 SC®+AMERIS® were the most efficient in controlling weeds, due to high percentages of bare soil (75 to 99.67%), low toxicity (<8.33%) and high productivity of fresh (120.69 to 167.05 t.ha-1) and dry (21.75 to 24.40 t.ha-1) matter. Dry and fresh matter productivity was positively correlated with each other, and between bare soil and plant survival. Complementary studies are needed to support the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Supply in the registration of products.A palma forrageira (Opuntia e Nopalea) responde positivamente aos tratos culturais como capina e roço das plantas daninhas. No entanto, a mão de obra escassa e o custo elevado da mão de obra é um desafio que os produtores, comunidade científica e governo tem que solucionar. O objetivo do trabalho foi avaliar 9 (nove) herbicidas comerciais e algumas misturas deles no controle de plantas daninhas na cultura da palma forrageira variedades Miúda (N. cochenillifera) e Orelha de Elefante Mexicana (O. stricta) no município de Caruaru, Pernambuco, Brasil. Foram realizados dois experimentos na Estação Experimental do Instituto Agronômico de Pernambuco (IPA) em Caruaru-PE. Os delineamentos utilizados foram em blocos ao acaso com três repetições. Os tratamentos avaliados foram: 1. Ausência de controle de plantas daninhas, 2. Capina manual, 3. Roçagem, 4. DMA®806BR (2,4-D), 5. GLIFOSATO ATAR 48® (glifosato)+DIURON NORTOX 500 SC® (diurom), 6. GLIFOSATO ATAR 48® (glifosato)+AMERIS® (tebutiurom), 7. HEXAZINONA-D NORTOX (hexazinona+diurom), 8. VOLCANE® (MSMA), 9. GOAL®BR (oxifluorfem), 10. TARGA®50 BR (quizalofope-p-etílico), 11. FUSILADE® 250 EW (fluasifope-p-butílico), 12. AMERIS® (tebutiurom), 13. GLIFOSATO ATAR 48® (glifosato)+DIURON NORTOX 500 SC® (diurom)+AMERIS® (tebutiurom). A composição botânica das plantas invasoras, solo descoberto, sobrevivência, toxicidade e produtividade de matéria fresca e seca da palma foram avaliadas nos dois anos de cultivo. Dentre as espécies identificadas as que tiveram as maiores densidades foram: Ageratum conyzoides, Nicandra physalodes, Scoparia dulcis, Conyza bonariensis, Amaranthus viridis, Acanthospermum hispidum, Alternanthera tenella, Senegalia tenuifolia, Cordia goeldiana, Senegalia tenuifolia, Turnera subulata e Poaceae. Os herbicidas GLIFOSATO ATAR 48®+AMERIS®; AMERIS®; e GLIFOSATO ATAR 48®+DIURON NORTOX 500 SC®+AMERIS® foram os mais eficientes no controle das plantas daninhas, devido a altas percentagens de solo descoberto (75 a 99,67%), baixa toxicidade (<8,33%) e elevada produtividade de matéria fresca (120,69 a 167,05 t.ha-1) e seca (21,75 a 24,40 t.ha-1). A produtividade de matéria seca e fresca foi correlacionada positivamente entre si, e entre o solo descoberto e a sobrevivência das plantas. Estudos complementares são necessários para subsidiar o Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento no registro de produtos.Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar - ReBraM2023-10-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistarebram.com/index.php/revistauniara/article/view/175010.25061/2527-2675/ReBraM/2023.v26i2.1750Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar; v. 26 n. 2 (2023): Maio-Agosto2527-26751415-3580reponame:Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinarinstname:Universidade de Araraquara (UNIARA)instacron:UNIARAporhttp://revistarebram.com/index.php/revistauniara/article/view/1750/903Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinarhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLemos Alves, Francisco AbelSilva, Maria da Conceição Cordeiro dos Santos, DjalmaViana de Freitas, Erinaldo2024-02-16T23:44:18Zoai:ojs.revistarebram.com:article/1750Revistahttp://revistarebram.com/index.php/revistauniaraPRIhttps://revistarebram.com/index.php/revistauniara/oairevistauniara@uniara.com||2527-26752527-2675opendoar:2024-02-16T23:44:18Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar - Universidade de Araraquara (UNIARA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Composição botânica e controle de plantas daninhas no cultivo da palma forrageira (Opuntia e Nopalea)
title Composição botânica e controle de plantas daninhas no cultivo da palma forrageira (Opuntia e Nopalea)
spellingShingle Composição botânica e controle de plantas daninhas no cultivo da palma forrageira (Opuntia e Nopalea)
Lemos Alves, Francisco Abel
chemical control
herbicides;
invasive plants
Nopalea cochenillifera
Opuntia stricta
controle químico
herbicidas
Nopalea cochenillifera
Opuntia stricta
plantas invasoras
title_short Composição botânica e controle de plantas daninhas no cultivo da palma forrageira (Opuntia e Nopalea)
title_full Composição botânica e controle de plantas daninhas no cultivo da palma forrageira (Opuntia e Nopalea)
title_fullStr Composição botânica e controle de plantas daninhas no cultivo da palma forrageira (Opuntia e Nopalea)
title_full_unstemmed Composição botânica e controle de plantas daninhas no cultivo da palma forrageira (Opuntia e Nopalea)
title_sort Composição botânica e controle de plantas daninhas no cultivo da palma forrageira (Opuntia e Nopalea)
author Lemos Alves, Francisco Abel
author_facet Lemos Alves, Francisco Abel
Silva, Maria da Conceição
Cordeiro dos Santos, Djalma
Viana de Freitas, Erinaldo
author_role author
author2 Silva, Maria da Conceição
Cordeiro dos Santos, Djalma
Viana de Freitas, Erinaldo
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lemos Alves, Francisco Abel
Silva, Maria da Conceição
Cordeiro dos Santos, Djalma
Viana de Freitas, Erinaldo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv chemical control
herbicides;
invasive plants
Nopalea cochenillifera
Opuntia stricta
controle químico
herbicidas
Nopalea cochenillifera
Opuntia stricta
plantas invasoras
topic chemical control
herbicides;
invasive plants
Nopalea cochenillifera
Opuntia stricta
controle químico
herbicidas
Nopalea cochenillifera
Opuntia stricta
plantas invasoras
description Forage cactus (Opuntia and Nopalea) responds positively to cultural treatments such as weeding and weed cutting. However, the scarce labor and the high cost of labor is a challenge that producers, the scientific community and the government have to solve. The objective of this work was to evaluate 9 (nine) commercial herbicides and some mixtures of them in the control of weeds in the culture of forage cactus varieties Miúda (N. cochenillifera) and Orelha de Elefante Mexicana (O. stricta) in the municipality of Caruaru, Pernambuco, Brazil. Two experiments were carried out at the Experimental Station of the Agronomic Institute of Pernambuco (IPA) in Caruaru-PE. The designs used were in randomized blocks with three replications. The treatments evaluated were: 1. No weed control, 2. Hand weeding, 3. Mowing, 4. DMA®806BR (2,4-D), 5. GLYPHOSATE ATAR 48® (glyphosate)+DIURON NORTOX 500 SC ® (diuron), 6. GLYPHOSATE ATAR 48® (glyphosate)+AMERIS® (tebuthiurom), 7. HEXAZINONE-D NORTOX (hexazinone+diuron), 8. VOLCANE® (MSMA), 9. GOAL®BR (oxyfluorfen), 10. TARGA®50 BR (kizalofop-p-ethyl), 11. FUSILADE® 250 EW (fluasifop-p-butyl), 12. AMERIS® (tebutiuron), 13. GLYPHOSATE ATAR 48® (glyphosate)+DIURON NORTOX 500 SC ® (diuron)+AMERIS® (tebuthiuron). The botanical composition of the invasive plants, bare soil, survival, toxicity and productivity of fresh and dry matter of cactus were evaluated in the two years of cultivation. Among the identified species, those with the highest densities were: Ageratum conyzoides, Nicandra physalodes, Scoparia dulcis, Conyza bonariensis, Amaranthus viridis, Acanthospermum hispidum, Alternanthera tenella, Senegalia tenuifolia, Cordia goeldiana, Senegalia tenuifolia, Turnera subulata and Poaceae. The herbicides GLYPHOSATE ATAR 48®+AMERIS®; AMERIS®; and GLYPHOSATE ATAR 48®+DIURON NORTOX 500 SC®+AMERIS® were the most efficient in controlling weeds, due to high percentages of bare soil (75 to 99.67%), low toxicity (<8.33%) and high productivity of fresh (120.69 to 167.05 t.ha-1) and dry (21.75 to 24.40 t.ha-1) matter. Dry and fresh matter productivity was positively correlated with each other, and between bare soil and plant survival. Complementary studies are needed to support the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Supply in the registration of products.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-10-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://revistarebram.com/index.php/revistauniara/article/view/1750
10.25061/2527-2675/ReBraM/2023.v26i2.1750
url http://revistarebram.com/index.php/revistauniara/article/view/1750
identifier_str_mv 10.25061/2527-2675/ReBraM/2023.v26i2.1750
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistarebram.com/index.php/revistauniara/article/view/1750/903
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar - ReBraM
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar - ReBraM
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar; v. 26 n. 2 (2023): Maio-Agosto
2527-2675
1415-3580
reponame:Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar
instname:Universidade de Araraquara (UNIARA)
instacron:UNIARA
instname_str Universidade de Araraquara (UNIARA)
instacron_str UNIARA
institution UNIARA
reponame_str Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar
collection Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar - Universidade de Araraquara (UNIARA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistauniara@uniara.com||
_version_ 1797174604428476416