Compatibility between Metarhizium anisopliae and fungicides registered to bean crop (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: López Espinosa, David Jossue
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Aparecida Cunha, Natália, Isla Rivera, Silvia, Flores Ricardez, Alejandro Gregorio, Nunes Carvalho, Valdeir, Batista da Silva, Aleska, Teixeira Duarte, Rogério
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar
Texto Completo: http://revistarebram.com/index.php/revistauniara/article/view/743
Resumo: The objective of this research was to analyze, under laboratorial conditions, the compatibility between the entomopathogenic fungi Metarhizium anisopliae and fungicides recommended to bean crop (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). The pesticides analyzed were Manzate WG® (a.i. mancozeb) (500 g × 100 L-1), Nativo® (a.i. tebuconazole + trifloxystrobin) (300 mL × 100 L-1), Portero® (i.a. carbendazim) (250 mL × 100 L-1) and Tebuco Nortox (i.a. tebuconazole) (250 mL × 100 L1). The toxic effect of fungicides on the entomopathogen was performed in laboratorial conditions by the addition of the pesticides in culture medium BDA. After medium solidification were inoculated the reproductive structures of entomopathogen, at 107 conidia/mL, totaling eight replicates per treatment. After 24 h the conidia viability was analyzed, and after seven days , the area of colony growth (cm2) was measured and the number of conidia for each treatment was counted, being the media compared by Tukey test (P < 0.05), and standardized by compatibility classification. All fungicides inhibited the vegetative growth and conidiogenesis of M. anisopliae. Only the active ingredient mancozeb provided conidia viability of M. anisopliae, represented by 7.25 ± 1.11% of viable conidia. All tested fungicides were toxic to the entomopathogenic fungi M. anisopliae, under laboratorial conditions.
id UNIARA_807341a4667c167b16651a33ab60d473
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistarebram.com:article/743
network_acronym_str UNIARA
network_name_str Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar
repository_id_str
spelling Compatibility between Metarhizium anisopliae and fungicides registered to bean crop (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)Compatibilidade entre Metarhizium anisopliae e fungicidas registrados para a cultura do feijão (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)interaçãocontrole microbianoagrotóxicoThe objective of this research was to analyze, under laboratorial conditions, the compatibility between the entomopathogenic fungi Metarhizium anisopliae and fungicides recommended to bean crop (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). The pesticides analyzed were Manzate WG® (a.i. mancozeb) (500 g × 100 L-1), Nativo® (a.i. tebuconazole + trifloxystrobin) (300 mL × 100 L-1), Portero® (i.a. carbendazim) (250 mL × 100 L-1) and Tebuco Nortox (i.a. tebuconazole) (250 mL × 100 L1). The toxic effect of fungicides on the entomopathogen was performed in laboratorial conditions by the addition of the pesticides in culture medium BDA. After medium solidification were inoculated the reproductive structures of entomopathogen, at 107 conidia/mL, totaling eight replicates per treatment. After 24 h the conidia viability was analyzed, and after seven days , the area of colony growth (cm2) was measured and the number of conidia for each treatment was counted, being the media compared by Tukey test (P < 0.05), and standardized by compatibility classification. All fungicides inhibited the vegetative growth and conidiogenesis of M. anisopliae. Only the active ingredient mancozeb provided conidia viability of M. anisopliae, represented by 7.25 ± 1.11% of viable conidia. All tested fungicides were toxic to the entomopathogenic fungi M. anisopliae, under laboratorial conditions.O objetivo da pesquisa foi analisar em condições laboratoriais a compatibilidade entre o fungo entomopatogênico Metarhizium anisopliae e fungicidas registrados para a cultura do feijão (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Os agrotóxicos analisados foram Manzate WG® (i.a. mancozebe) (500 g × 100 L-1), Nativo® (i.a. tebuconazol + trifloxistrobina) (300 mL × 100 L-1), Portero® (i.a. carbendazim) (250 mL × 100 L-1) e Tebuco Nortox (i.a. tebuconazol) (250 mL × 100 L1). O efeito tóxico dos fungicidas sobre o entomopatógeno foi determinado em condição laboratorial, através da adição dos produtos químicos em meio de cultura BDA. Após solidificação do meio, foram inoculadas as estruturas reprodutivas do entomopatógeno, na concentração de 107 conídios/mL, totalizando oito repetições por tratamento. A viabilidade dos conídios foi analisada 24 h após inoculação, e após sete dias foi mensurada a área de crescimento da colônia (cm2), e contabilizado o número de conídios em cada tratamento, sendo as médias comparadas pelo teste de Tukey (P < 0,05), e padronizadas pela classificação de compatibilidade. Todos os fungicidas inibiram por completo o crescimento vegetativo e a conidiogênese de M. anisopliae. Apenas o ingrediente ativo mancozebe propiciou a viabilidade de conídios de M. anisopliae, representado por 7,25 ± 1,11% de conídios viáveis. Todos os fungicidas testados são tóxicos ao fungo entomopatogênico M. anisopliae, sob condição laboratorial.Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar - ReBraM2020-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistarebram.com/index.php/revistauniara/article/view/74310.25061/2527-2675/ReBraM/2020.v23i2.743Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar - ReBraM; v. 23 n. 2 (2020): Maio-Agosto; 180-1872527-26751415-3580reponame:Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinarinstname:Universidade de Araraquara (UNIARA)instacron:UNIARAporhttp://revistarebram.com/index.php/revistauniara/article/view/743/601Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinarinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLópez Espinosa, David JossueAparecida Cunha, NatáliaIsla Rivera, SilviaFlores Ricardez, Alejandro GregorioNunes Carvalho, ValdeirBatista da Silva, AleskaTeixeira Duarte, Rogério2020-10-05T03:34:04Zoai:ojs.revistarebram.com:article/743Revistahttp://revistarebram.com/index.php/revistauniaraPRIhttps://revistarebram.com/index.php/revistauniara/oairevistauniara@uniara.com||2527-26752527-2675opendoar:2020-10-05T03:34:04Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar - Universidade de Araraquara (UNIARA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Compatibility between Metarhizium anisopliae and fungicides registered to bean crop (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
Compatibilidade entre Metarhizium anisopliae e fungicidas registrados para a cultura do feijão (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
title Compatibility between Metarhizium anisopliae and fungicides registered to bean crop (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
spellingShingle Compatibility between Metarhizium anisopliae and fungicides registered to bean crop (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
López Espinosa, David Jossue
interação
controle microbiano
agrotóxico
title_short Compatibility between Metarhizium anisopliae and fungicides registered to bean crop (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
title_full Compatibility between Metarhizium anisopliae and fungicides registered to bean crop (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
title_fullStr Compatibility between Metarhizium anisopliae and fungicides registered to bean crop (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
title_full_unstemmed Compatibility between Metarhizium anisopliae and fungicides registered to bean crop (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
title_sort Compatibility between Metarhizium anisopliae and fungicides registered to bean crop (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
author López Espinosa, David Jossue
author_facet López Espinosa, David Jossue
Aparecida Cunha, Natália
Isla Rivera, Silvia
Flores Ricardez, Alejandro Gregorio
Nunes Carvalho, Valdeir
Batista da Silva, Aleska
Teixeira Duarte, Rogério
author_role author
author2 Aparecida Cunha, Natália
Isla Rivera, Silvia
Flores Ricardez, Alejandro Gregorio
Nunes Carvalho, Valdeir
Batista da Silva, Aleska
Teixeira Duarte, Rogério
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv López Espinosa, David Jossue
Aparecida Cunha, Natália
Isla Rivera, Silvia
Flores Ricardez, Alejandro Gregorio
Nunes Carvalho, Valdeir
Batista da Silva, Aleska
Teixeira Duarte, Rogério
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv interação
controle microbiano
agrotóxico
topic interação
controle microbiano
agrotóxico
description The objective of this research was to analyze, under laboratorial conditions, the compatibility between the entomopathogenic fungi Metarhizium anisopliae and fungicides recommended to bean crop (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). The pesticides analyzed were Manzate WG® (a.i. mancozeb) (500 g × 100 L-1), Nativo® (a.i. tebuconazole + trifloxystrobin) (300 mL × 100 L-1), Portero® (i.a. carbendazim) (250 mL × 100 L-1) and Tebuco Nortox (i.a. tebuconazole) (250 mL × 100 L1). The toxic effect of fungicides on the entomopathogen was performed in laboratorial conditions by the addition of the pesticides in culture medium BDA. After medium solidification were inoculated the reproductive structures of entomopathogen, at 107 conidia/mL, totaling eight replicates per treatment. After 24 h the conidia viability was analyzed, and after seven days , the area of colony growth (cm2) was measured and the number of conidia for each treatment was counted, being the media compared by Tukey test (P < 0.05), and standardized by compatibility classification. All fungicides inhibited the vegetative growth and conidiogenesis of M. anisopliae. Only the active ingredient mancozeb provided conidia viability of M. anisopliae, represented by 7.25 ± 1.11% of viable conidia. All tested fungicides were toxic to the entomopathogenic fungi M. anisopliae, under laboratorial conditions.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://revistarebram.com/index.php/revistauniara/article/view/743
10.25061/2527-2675/ReBraM/2020.v23i2.743
url http://revistarebram.com/index.php/revistauniara/article/view/743
identifier_str_mv 10.25061/2527-2675/ReBraM/2020.v23i2.743
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistarebram.com/index.php/revistauniara/article/view/743/601
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar - ReBraM
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar - ReBraM
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar - ReBraM; v. 23 n. 2 (2020): Maio-Agosto; 180-187
2527-2675
1415-3580
reponame:Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar
instname:Universidade de Araraquara (UNIARA)
instacron:UNIARA
instname_str Universidade de Araraquara (UNIARA)
instacron_str UNIARA
institution UNIARA
reponame_str Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar
collection Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar - Universidade de Araraquara (UNIARA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistauniara@uniara.com||
_version_ 1797174606757363712