Does one size fit all? An analysis of portfolio allocation in the Brazilian multiparty presidential system
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Opinião Pública (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8653391 |
Resumo: | Presidents face a dilemma of whom to appoint for cabinet positions. They need to secure legislative support for their government and at the same time achieve their goals in terms of public policy. This work analyzes the portfolio allocation of Brazilian presidents in Brazil’s multiparty system. This study tests some hypotheses using multinomial logistic regression to identify appointment strategies adopted by the presidents in four different governmental sectors from 1990 to 2016. To do so, first, we create an index of ministerial politicization (IMP) and aggregate the ministries in these four sections, employing cluster analysis. The results show that appointments to the core positions in government tend to be less politicized. Moreover, the president’s personal nominations were greater in the presidential units that carry out the political coordination and typical functions of the State. |
id |
UNICAMP-10_124af34e2a94ae89c40c37d579e07b89 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8653391 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-10 |
network_name_str |
Opinião Pública (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Does one size fit all? An analysis of portfolio allocation in the Brazilian multiparty presidential systemBrazilian multiparty presidential system. Cabinet ministers appointment. Government coalition management. BrazilPresidents face a dilemma of whom to appoint for cabinet positions. They need to secure legislative support for their government and at the same time achieve their goals in terms of public policy. This work analyzes the portfolio allocation of Brazilian presidents in Brazil’s multiparty system. This study tests some hypotheses using multinomial logistic regression to identify appointment strategies adopted by the presidents in four different governmental sectors from 1990 to 2016. To do so, first, we create an index of ministerial politicization (IMP) and aggregate the ministries in these four sections, employing cluster analysis. The results show that appointments to the core positions in government tend to be less politicized. Moreover, the president’s personal nominations were greater in the presidential units that carry out the political coordination and typical functions of the State.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2018-09-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa teóricaapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8653391Opinião Pública; Vol. 24 No. 2 (2018): maio/ago.; 427-455Opinião Pública; Vol. 24 Núm. 2 (2018): maio/ago.; 427-455Opinião Pública; v. 24 n. 2 (2018): maio/ago.; 427-4551807-0191reponame:Opinião Pública (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8653391/18504Palotti, Pedro Lucas de MouraCavalcante, Pedro Luiz Costainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-08-26T14:34:11Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8653391Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/opPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/oaicesop@unicamp.br||racael@unicamp.br || rop@unicamp.br1807-01910104-6276opendoar:2019-08-26T14:34:11Opinião Pública (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Does one size fit all? An analysis of portfolio allocation in the Brazilian multiparty presidential system |
title |
Does one size fit all? An analysis of portfolio allocation in the Brazilian multiparty presidential system |
spellingShingle |
Does one size fit all? An analysis of portfolio allocation in the Brazilian multiparty presidential system Palotti, Pedro Lucas de Moura Brazilian multiparty presidential system. Cabinet ministers appointment. Government coalition management. Brazil |
title_short |
Does one size fit all? An analysis of portfolio allocation in the Brazilian multiparty presidential system |
title_full |
Does one size fit all? An analysis of portfolio allocation in the Brazilian multiparty presidential system |
title_fullStr |
Does one size fit all? An analysis of portfolio allocation in the Brazilian multiparty presidential system |
title_full_unstemmed |
Does one size fit all? An analysis of portfolio allocation in the Brazilian multiparty presidential system |
title_sort |
Does one size fit all? An analysis of portfolio allocation in the Brazilian multiparty presidential system |
author |
Palotti, Pedro Lucas de Moura |
author_facet |
Palotti, Pedro Lucas de Moura Cavalcante, Pedro Luiz Costa |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cavalcante, Pedro Luiz Costa |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Palotti, Pedro Lucas de Moura Cavalcante, Pedro Luiz Costa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian multiparty presidential system. Cabinet ministers appointment. Government coalition management. Brazil |
topic |
Brazilian multiparty presidential system. Cabinet ministers appointment. Government coalition management. Brazil |
description |
Presidents face a dilemma of whom to appoint for cabinet positions. They need to secure legislative support for their government and at the same time achieve their goals in terms of public policy. This work analyzes the portfolio allocation of Brazilian presidents in Brazil’s multiparty system. This study tests some hypotheses using multinomial logistic regression to identify appointment strategies adopted by the presidents in four different governmental sectors from 1990 to 2016. To do so, first, we create an index of ministerial politicization (IMP) and aggregate the ministries in these four sections, employing cluster analysis. The results show that appointments to the core positions in government tend to be less politicized. Moreover, the president’s personal nominations were greater in the presidential units that carry out the political coordination and typical functions of the State. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-09-11 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Pesquisa teórica |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8653391 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8653391 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8653391/18504 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Opinião Pública; Vol. 24 No. 2 (2018): maio/ago.; 427-455 Opinião Pública; Vol. 24 Núm. 2 (2018): maio/ago.; 427-455 Opinião Pública; v. 24 n. 2 (2018): maio/ago.; 427-455 1807-0191 reponame:Opinião Pública (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Opinião Pública (Online) |
collection |
Opinião Pública (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Opinião Pública (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cesop@unicamp.br||racael@unicamp.br || rop@unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1800217018021969920 |