Does one size fit all? An analysis of portfolio allocation in the Brazilian multiparty presidential system

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Palotti, Pedro Lucas de Moura
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Cavalcante, Pedro Luiz Costa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Opinião Pública (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8653391
Resumo: Presidents face a dilemma of whom to appoint for cabinet positions. They need to secure legislative support for their government and at the same time achieve their goals in terms of public policy. This work analyzes the portfolio allocation of Brazilian presidents in Brazil’s multiparty system. This study tests some hypotheses using multinomial logistic regression to identify appointment strategies adopted by the presidents in four different governmental sectors from 1990 to 2016. To do so, first, we create an index of ministerial politicization (IMP) and aggregate the ministries in these four sections, employing cluster analysis. The results show that appointments to the core positions in government tend to be less politicized. Moreover, the president’s personal nominations were greater in the presidential units that carry out the political coordination and typical functions of the State.
id UNICAMP-10_124af34e2a94ae89c40c37d579e07b89
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8653391
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-10
network_name_str Opinião Pública (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Does one size fit all? An analysis of portfolio allocation in the Brazilian multiparty presidential systemBrazilian multiparty presidential system. Cabinet ministers appointment. Government coalition management. BrazilPresidents face a dilemma of whom to appoint for cabinet positions. They need to secure legislative support for their government and at the same time achieve their goals in terms of public policy. This work analyzes the portfolio allocation of Brazilian presidents in Brazil’s multiparty system. This study tests some hypotheses using multinomial logistic regression to identify appointment strategies adopted by the presidents in four different governmental sectors from 1990 to 2016. To do so, first, we create an index of ministerial politicization (IMP) and aggregate the ministries in these four sections, employing cluster analysis. The results show that appointments to the core positions in government tend to be less politicized. Moreover, the president’s personal nominations were greater in the presidential units that carry out the political coordination and typical functions of the State.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2018-09-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa teóricaapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8653391Opinião Pública; Vol. 24 No. 2 (2018): maio/ago.; 427-455Opinião Pública; Vol. 24 Núm. 2 (2018): maio/ago.; 427-455Opinião Pública; v. 24 n. 2 (2018): maio/ago.; 427-4551807-0191reponame:Opinião Pública (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8653391/18504Palotti, Pedro Lucas de MouraCavalcante, Pedro Luiz Costainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-08-26T14:34:11Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8653391Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/opPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/oaicesop@unicamp.br||racael@unicamp.br || rop@unicamp.br1807-01910104-6276opendoar:2019-08-26T14:34:11Opinião Pública (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Does one size fit all? An analysis of portfolio allocation in the Brazilian multiparty presidential system
title Does one size fit all? An analysis of portfolio allocation in the Brazilian multiparty presidential system
spellingShingle Does one size fit all? An analysis of portfolio allocation in the Brazilian multiparty presidential system
Palotti, Pedro Lucas de Moura
Brazilian multiparty presidential system. Cabinet ministers appointment. Government coalition management. Brazil
title_short Does one size fit all? An analysis of portfolio allocation in the Brazilian multiparty presidential system
title_full Does one size fit all? An analysis of portfolio allocation in the Brazilian multiparty presidential system
title_fullStr Does one size fit all? An analysis of portfolio allocation in the Brazilian multiparty presidential system
title_full_unstemmed Does one size fit all? An analysis of portfolio allocation in the Brazilian multiparty presidential system
title_sort Does one size fit all? An analysis of portfolio allocation in the Brazilian multiparty presidential system
author Palotti, Pedro Lucas de Moura
author_facet Palotti, Pedro Lucas de Moura
Cavalcante, Pedro Luiz Costa
author_role author
author2 Cavalcante, Pedro Luiz Costa
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Palotti, Pedro Lucas de Moura
Cavalcante, Pedro Luiz Costa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Brazilian multiparty presidential system. Cabinet ministers appointment. Government coalition management. Brazil
topic Brazilian multiparty presidential system. Cabinet ministers appointment. Government coalition management. Brazil
description Presidents face a dilemma of whom to appoint for cabinet positions. They need to secure legislative support for their government and at the same time achieve their goals in terms of public policy. This work analyzes the portfolio allocation of Brazilian presidents in Brazil’s multiparty system. This study tests some hypotheses using multinomial logistic regression to identify appointment strategies adopted by the presidents in four different governmental sectors from 1990 to 2016. To do so, first, we create an index of ministerial politicization (IMP) and aggregate the ministries in these four sections, employing cluster analysis. The results show that appointments to the core positions in government tend to be less politicized. Moreover, the president’s personal nominations were greater in the presidential units that carry out the political coordination and typical functions of the State.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-09-11
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Pesquisa teórica
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8653391
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8653391
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8653391/18504
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Opinião Pública; Vol. 24 No. 2 (2018): maio/ago.; 427-455
Opinião Pública; Vol. 24 Núm. 2 (2018): maio/ago.; 427-455
Opinião Pública; v. 24 n. 2 (2018): maio/ago.; 427-455
1807-0191
reponame:Opinião Pública (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Opinião Pública (Online)
collection Opinião Pública (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Opinião Pública (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cesop@unicamp.br||racael@unicamp.br || rop@unicamp.br
_version_ 1800217018021969920