Parties, government and legislative power in the participatory budgeting (PB) disputes: a comparative analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Souza, Luciana Andressa Martins de
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Opinião Pública (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8665629
Resumo: This article aims to broaden the debate about the disputes between the PB, the parties and the local political actors, by presenting a systematic and diachronic analysis of the impacts of the balance of power of the governing and opposition parties, outlined within the scope of the electoral arena, on the adoption, interruption, interruption and the end of this democratic innovation, as well as on its different degrees of institutionalization. To this end, we analyzed three counterfactual pairs of municipalities with mostly similar characteristics, namely: São Carlos and Piracicaba; Rio Claro and Leme; Matão and Sertãozinho, which differ from each other by the party that led the PB initiative (PT and other parties). The results reveal a universe little explored and likely to be replicated in other contexts, contributing both to the expansion of the debate on the role of the legislative power in the degree of institutionalization of participatory institutions and to the improvement of this research agenda.
id UNICAMP-10_7118055201eee4b3e1a0d574ecd4683d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8665629
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-10
network_name_str Opinião Pública (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Parties, government and legislative power in the participatory budgeting (PB) disputes: a comparative analysis Partidos, gobierno y legislativo en las disputas del presupuesto participativo: un análisis comparativo Partidos, governo e legislativo nas disputas do orçamento participativo: uma análise comparativaOrçamento participativo (OP)Partidos políticosExecutivoLegislativoGovernos locaisParticipatory budgeting (PB)Political partiesExecutive powerLegislative powerLocal governmentsPresupuesto participativo (PP)Partidos políticosEjecutivoLegislativoGobiernos localesThis article aims to broaden the debate about the disputes between the PB, the parties and the local political actors, by presenting a systematic and diachronic analysis of the impacts of the balance of power of the governing and opposition parties, outlined within the scope of the electoral arena, on the adoption, interruption, interruption and the end of this democratic innovation, as well as on its different degrees of institutionalization. To this end, we analyzed three counterfactual pairs of municipalities with mostly similar characteristics, namely: São Carlos and Piracicaba; Rio Claro and Leme; Matão and Sertãozinho, which differ from each other by the party that led the PB initiative (PT and other parties). The results reveal a universe little explored and likely to be replicated in other contexts, contributing both to the expansion of the debate on the role of the legislative power in the degree of institutionalization of participatory institutions and to the improvement of this research agenda.Este artículo busca ampliar el debate acerca de las disputas entre el PP, los partidos y los actores políticos locales, al presentar un análisis sistemático y diacrónico del impacto de la composición de fuerzas de los partidos en el poder y los de la oposición, perfilada en el ámbito de la arena electoral, así como de la adopción, continuidad, interrupción y fin de esta innovación democrática, en sus distintos grados de institucionalización. Para ello, analizamos tres pares contrafactuales de municipios con características esencialmente similares, a saber: São Carlos y Piracicaba; Rio Claro y Leme; Matão y Sertãozinho, que se diferencian entre sí por el partido que lideró la iniciativa del PP (PT y otros partidos). Los resultados nos revelan un universo poco explorado y susceptible de ser replicado en otros contextos, contribuyendo tanto a la ampliación del debate sobre el papel del Legislativo en el grado de institucionalización de las instituciones participativas, como a la mejora de esta agenda de investigación.Este artigo amplia a discussão acerca das disputas entre o Orçamento Participativo (OP), os partidos e os atores políticos locais, ao apresentar uma análise sistemática e diacrônica dos impactos da composição de forças dos partidos governistas e oposicionistas, delineadas no âmbito da arena eleitoral, sobre a adoção, durabilidade, interrupção e o fim dessa inovação democrática, assim como sobre os seus distintos graus de institucionalização. Para tanto, analisamos três pares contrafactuais de municípios com características majoritariamente semelhantes, a saber: São Carlos e Piracicaba; Rio Claro e Leme; Matão e Sertãozinho. Esses pares se diferenciam pelo partido que esteve à frente da iniciativa do OP (PT e outros partidos). Os resultados revelam um universo pouco explorado e passível de ser replicado em outros contextos, contribuindo tanto para a ampliação do debate acerca do papel do Legislativo no grau de institucionalização de instituições participativas quanto para o aprimoramento dessa agenda de pesquisa.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2021-05-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoTextoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8665629Opinião Pública; Vol. 27 No. 1 (2021): jan./abr.; 154-188Opinião Pública; Vol. 27 Núm. 1 (2021): jan./abr.; 154-188Opinião Pública; v. 27 n. 1 (2021): jan./abr.; 154-1881807-0191reponame:Opinião Pública (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8665629/26678Brazil; ContemporaryBrasil; ContemporáneoBrasil; ContemporâneoCopyright (c) 2021 Luciana Andressa Martins de Souzahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSouza, Luciana Andressa Martins de 2021-05-13T16:24:59Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8665629Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/opPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/oaicesop@unicamp.br||racael@unicamp.br || rop@unicamp.br1807-01910104-6276opendoar:2021-05-13T16:24:59Opinião Pública (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Parties, government and legislative power in the participatory budgeting (PB) disputes: a comparative analysis
Partidos, gobierno y legislativo en las disputas del presupuesto participativo: un análisis comparativo
Partidos, governo e legislativo nas disputas do orçamento participativo: uma análise comparativa
title Parties, government and legislative power in the participatory budgeting (PB) disputes: a comparative analysis
spellingShingle Parties, government and legislative power in the participatory budgeting (PB) disputes: a comparative analysis
Souza, Luciana Andressa Martins de
Orçamento participativo (OP)
Partidos políticos
Executivo
Legislativo
Governos locais
Participatory budgeting (PB)
Political parties
Executive power
Legislative power
Local governments
Presupuesto participativo (PP)
Partidos políticos
Ejecutivo
Legislativo
Gobiernos locales
title_short Parties, government and legislative power in the participatory budgeting (PB) disputes: a comparative analysis
title_full Parties, government and legislative power in the participatory budgeting (PB) disputes: a comparative analysis
title_fullStr Parties, government and legislative power in the participatory budgeting (PB) disputes: a comparative analysis
title_full_unstemmed Parties, government and legislative power in the participatory budgeting (PB) disputes: a comparative analysis
title_sort Parties, government and legislative power in the participatory budgeting (PB) disputes: a comparative analysis
author Souza, Luciana Andressa Martins de
author_facet Souza, Luciana Andressa Martins de
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Souza, Luciana Andressa Martins de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Orçamento participativo (OP)
Partidos políticos
Executivo
Legislativo
Governos locais
Participatory budgeting (PB)
Political parties
Executive power
Legislative power
Local governments
Presupuesto participativo (PP)
Partidos políticos
Ejecutivo
Legislativo
Gobiernos locales
topic Orçamento participativo (OP)
Partidos políticos
Executivo
Legislativo
Governos locais
Participatory budgeting (PB)
Political parties
Executive power
Legislative power
Local governments
Presupuesto participativo (PP)
Partidos políticos
Ejecutivo
Legislativo
Gobiernos locales
description This article aims to broaden the debate about the disputes between the PB, the parties and the local political actors, by presenting a systematic and diachronic analysis of the impacts of the balance of power of the governing and opposition parties, outlined within the scope of the electoral arena, on the adoption, interruption, interruption and the end of this democratic innovation, as well as on its different degrees of institutionalization. To this end, we analyzed three counterfactual pairs of municipalities with mostly similar characteristics, namely: São Carlos and Piracicaba; Rio Claro and Leme; Matão and Sertãozinho, which differ from each other by the party that led the PB initiative (PT and other parties). The results reveal a universe little explored and likely to be replicated in other contexts, contributing both to the expansion of the debate on the role of the legislative power in the degree of institutionalization of participatory institutions and to the improvement of this research agenda.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-05-13
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Texto
Texto
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8665629
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8665629
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8665629/26678
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Luciana Andressa Martins de Souza
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Luciana Andressa Martins de Souza
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporary
Brasil; Contemporáneo
Brasil; Contemporâneo
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Opinião Pública; Vol. 27 No. 1 (2021): jan./abr.; 154-188
Opinião Pública; Vol. 27 Núm. 1 (2021): jan./abr.; 154-188
Opinião Pública; v. 27 n. 1 (2021): jan./abr.; 154-188
1807-0191
reponame:Opinião Pública (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Opinião Pública (Online)
collection Opinião Pública (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Opinião Pública (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cesop@unicamp.br||racael@unicamp.br || rop@unicamp.br
_version_ 1800217018170867712