The news coverage of the 2017 general strikes: protest paradigm or political slant
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Opinião Pública (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8658115 |
Resumo: | The protest paradigm is a concept widely used in the international literature in studies on the mass media’s unfavorable treatment of political and social protests. There are three explanations for such treatment: (1) it varies depending on the ideological values of the media outlet (the more conservative, the higher the probability of adopting the paradigm of protest); (2) it varies depending on the position of the protest in relation to the status quo; and (3) it does not always occur. In this paper, we analyze the Brazilian media’s coverage of the general strikes of 2017 against the Labor and Social Security reforms, examining the speeches and images associated with the groups involved in the general strikes in the publication Jornal Nacional and in the newspapers Folha de S. Paulo, O Estado de S. Paulo, and O Globo. To this end, we implement the methodologies of framing analysis, image interpretation, and word clouds. The results confirm the occurrence of a protest paradigm in these cases and reveal five predominant ways of framing protests: (1) violence and vandalism; (2) selfish and disorganized action; (3) public disorder; (4) source of economic losses; and (5) lack of popular legitimacy. In conclusion, we reflect on this article’s contribution to the international debate about the protest paradigm. |
id |
UNICAMP-10_b232448dcbc52bdecea5b2bc0a31e264 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8658115 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-10 |
network_name_str |
Opinião Pública (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The news coverage of the 2017 general strikes: protest paradigm or political slantLa cobertura de las huelgas generales de 2017: paradigma de protesta o militancia política A cobertura jornalística das greves gerais de 2017: paradigma de protesto ou militância política MediaProtestsLabor and social security reformProtest paradigmFederal government.MediosHuelgasReforma laboral y de pensionesParadigma de protestGobierno federal.MídiaGrevesReforma trabalhistaReforma da previdênciaParadigma de protestoGoverno federal.The protest paradigm is a concept widely used in the international literature in studies on the mass media’s unfavorable treatment of political and social protests. There are three explanations for such treatment: (1) it varies depending on the ideological values of the media outlet (the more conservative, the higher the probability of adopting the paradigm of protest); (2) it varies depending on the position of the protest in relation to the status quo; and (3) it does not always occur. In this paper, we analyze the Brazilian media’s coverage of the general strikes of 2017 against the Labor and Social Security reforms, examining the speeches and images associated with the groups involved in the general strikes in the publication Jornal Nacional and in the newspapers Folha de S. Paulo, O Estado de S. Paulo, and O Globo. To this end, we implement the methodologies of framing analysis, image interpretation, and word clouds. The results confirm the occurrence of a protest paradigm in these cases and reveal five predominant ways of framing protests: (1) violence and vandalism; (2) selfish and disorganized action; (3) public disorder; (4) source of economic losses; and (5) lack of popular legitimacy. In conclusion, we reflect on this article’s contribution to the international debate about the protest paradigm.El paradigma de protesta es un concepto ampliamente utilizado por la literatura internacional en los estudios del tratamiento dispensado por los grandes medios a manifestaciones políticas y sociales. Hay tres explicaciones para su ocurrencia: (1) varía con la orientación ideológica del medio (el más conservador, más probabilidades de adoptar el paradigma protesta); (2) varía con la posición de la protesta en relación al statu quo; y (3) no siempre ocurre. En este articulo analizamos la cobertura que grandes medios brasileños dieran a las huelgas generales de 2017 contra las reformas Laboral y Pensionaria, examinando los discursos e imágenes asociados a los grupos involucrados en las huelgas generales en el Jornal Nacional (televisión) y en los impresos Folha de S. Paulo, O Estado de S. Paulo y O Globo. Para ello utilizamos las metodologías del análisis de encuadramiento, interpretación de imágenes y nubes de palabras. Los resultados confirman la ocurrencia de paradigma protesta en estos casos y revelan cinco formas predominantes de la formulación de las huelgas: (1) la violencia y el vandalismo, (2) egoísta, acción desorganizada, (3) el trastorno al espacio público, (4) Asociación retraso y (5) ausencia de legitimidad popular. En la conclusión reflexionamos sobre la contribución del presente trabajo al debate internacional sobre el tema. Palabras clave: medios; huelgas; reforma laboral y de pensiones; paradigma de protesta; gobierno federal. O paradigma de protesto é um conceito amplamente utilizado pela literatura internacional nos estudos do tratamento dispensado pela grande mídia a manifestações políticas e sociais. Há três explicações para sua ocorrência: (1) varia com a orientação ideológica do meio (quanto mais conservador, maior a probabilidade de adotar o paradigma de protesto); (2) varia com a posição do protesto em relação ao status quo; e (3) nem sempre ocorre. Neste artigo analisamos a cobertura que a grande mídia brasileira dispensou às greves gerais de 2017 contra as reformas trabalhista e previdenciária, examinando os discursos e imagens associados aos grupos envolvidos nas greves gerais no Jornal Nacional e nos impressos Folha de S. Paulo, O Estado de S. Paulo e O Globo. Para tal utilizamos as metodologias da análise de enquadramento, interpretação de imagens e nuvens de palavras. Os resultados encontrados confirmam a ocorrência de paradigma de protesto nesses casos e revelam cinco modos predominantes de enquadrar as greves: (1) violência e vandalismo, (2) ação egoísta e desorganizada, (3) transtorno ao espaço público, (4) fonte de prejuízo à economia e (5) ausência de legitimidade popular. Na conclusão refletimos sobre a contribuição do presente artigo para o debate internacional sobre o assunto.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2019-10-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoTextoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8658115Opinião Pública; Vol. 25 No. 3 (2019): set./dez.; 495-430Opinião Pública; Vol. 25 Núm. 3 (2019): set./dez.; 495-430Opinião Pública; v. 25 n. 3 (2019): set./dez.; 495-4301807-0191reponame:Opinião Pública (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8658115/21994Brazil; ContemporaryBrasil; ContemporáneoBrasil; ContemporâneoFeres Júnior, João Candido, Marcia RangelMelo, Patricia Bandeira deVieira , Lidiane Rezendeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-02-28T12:25:14Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8658115Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/opPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/oaicesop@unicamp.br||racael@unicamp.br || rop@unicamp.br1807-01910104-6276opendoar:2020-02-28T12:25:14Opinião Pública (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The news coverage of the 2017 general strikes: protest paradigm or political slant La cobertura de las huelgas generales de 2017: paradigma de protesta o militancia política A cobertura jornalística das greves gerais de 2017: paradigma de protesto ou militância política |
title |
The news coverage of the 2017 general strikes: protest paradigm or political slant |
spellingShingle |
The news coverage of the 2017 general strikes: protest paradigm or political slant Feres Júnior, João Media Protests Labor and social security reform Protest paradigm Federal government. Medios Huelgas Reforma laboral y de pensiones Paradigma de protest Gobierno federal. Mídia Greves Reforma trabalhista Reforma da previdência Paradigma de protesto Governo federal. |
title_short |
The news coverage of the 2017 general strikes: protest paradigm or political slant |
title_full |
The news coverage of the 2017 general strikes: protest paradigm or political slant |
title_fullStr |
The news coverage of the 2017 general strikes: protest paradigm or political slant |
title_full_unstemmed |
The news coverage of the 2017 general strikes: protest paradigm or political slant |
title_sort |
The news coverage of the 2017 general strikes: protest paradigm or political slant |
author |
Feres Júnior, João |
author_facet |
Feres Júnior, João Candido, Marcia Rangel Melo, Patricia Bandeira de Vieira , Lidiane Rezende |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Candido, Marcia Rangel Melo, Patricia Bandeira de Vieira , Lidiane Rezende |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Feres Júnior, João Candido, Marcia Rangel Melo, Patricia Bandeira de Vieira , Lidiane Rezende |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Media Protests Labor and social security reform Protest paradigm Federal government. Medios Huelgas Reforma laboral y de pensiones Paradigma de protest Gobierno federal. Mídia Greves Reforma trabalhista Reforma da previdência Paradigma de protesto Governo federal. |
topic |
Media Protests Labor and social security reform Protest paradigm Federal government. Medios Huelgas Reforma laboral y de pensiones Paradigma de protest Gobierno federal. Mídia Greves Reforma trabalhista Reforma da previdência Paradigma de protesto Governo federal. |
description |
The protest paradigm is a concept widely used in the international literature in studies on the mass media’s unfavorable treatment of political and social protests. There are three explanations for such treatment: (1) it varies depending on the ideological values of the media outlet (the more conservative, the higher the probability of adopting the paradigm of protest); (2) it varies depending on the position of the protest in relation to the status quo; and (3) it does not always occur. In this paper, we analyze the Brazilian media’s coverage of the general strikes of 2017 against the Labor and Social Security reforms, examining the speeches and images associated with the groups involved in the general strikes in the publication Jornal Nacional and in the newspapers Folha de S. Paulo, O Estado de S. Paulo, and O Globo. To this end, we implement the methodologies of framing analysis, image interpretation, and word clouds. The results confirm the occurrence of a protest paradigm in these cases and reveal five predominant ways of framing protests: (1) violence and vandalism; (2) selfish and disorganized action; (3) public disorder; (4) source of economic losses; and (5) lack of popular legitimacy. In conclusion, we reflect on this article’s contribution to the international debate about the protest paradigm. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-10-07 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Texto Texto info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8658115 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8658115 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8658115/21994 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazil; Contemporary Brasil; Contemporáneo Brasil; Contemporâneo |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Opinião Pública; Vol. 25 No. 3 (2019): set./dez.; 495-430 Opinião Pública; Vol. 25 Núm. 3 (2019): set./dez.; 495-430 Opinião Pública; v. 25 n. 3 (2019): set./dez.; 495-430 1807-0191 reponame:Opinião Pública (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Opinião Pública (Online) |
collection |
Opinião Pública (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Opinião Pública (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cesop@unicamp.br||racael@unicamp.br || rop@unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1800217018072301568 |