Varieties of state interventionism in financial policy in the aftermath of the 2008 global crisis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lins,Maria Antonieta Del Tedesco
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Economia e Sociedade
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-06182020000200407
Resumo: Abstract Thanks to lessons learned and reforms implemented after the financial crises of the late 1990s, most emerging market economies proved relatively resilient to the 2008 global crisis. Yet to cope with the turbulence that ensued, several interventions by monetary authorities in foreign exchange and capital markets were carried out. The literature on Latin American financial systems and central bank reform tends to emphasize international actors and pressures as key determinants of policy change. In contrast, this paper raises the hypothesis that domestic concerns were the main drivers of financial policymaking after the 2008 crisis even in countries with different institutional arrangements and macroeconomic trajectories such as Brazil, Mexico and Argentina. Through a comparative case study analysis, it is concluded that indeed the three countries’ approaches to exchange markets and capital controls contradicted international perceptions and even the IMF’s stance on foreign exchange policies and the management of capital flows. By pursuing more autonomy and responding to domestic priorities, each of the three countries adopted different policy measures.
id UNICAMP-11_b540df9f78f101b2645b4782f5d984bc
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0104-06182020000200407
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-11
network_name_str Economia e Sociedade
repository_id_str
spelling Varieties of state interventionism in financial policy in the aftermath of the 2008 global crisisFinancial policyFinancial integrationEmerging economiesLatin American economiesAbstract Thanks to lessons learned and reforms implemented after the financial crises of the late 1990s, most emerging market economies proved relatively resilient to the 2008 global crisis. Yet to cope with the turbulence that ensued, several interventions by monetary authorities in foreign exchange and capital markets were carried out. The literature on Latin American financial systems and central bank reform tends to emphasize international actors and pressures as key determinants of policy change. In contrast, this paper raises the hypothesis that domestic concerns were the main drivers of financial policymaking after the 2008 crisis even in countries with different institutional arrangements and macroeconomic trajectories such as Brazil, Mexico and Argentina. Through a comparative case study analysis, it is concluded that indeed the three countries’ approaches to exchange markets and capital controls contradicted international perceptions and even the IMF’s stance on foreign exchange policies and the management of capital flows. By pursuing more autonomy and responding to domestic priorities, each of the three countries adopted different policy measures.Instituto de Economia da Universidade Estadual de CampinasPublicações2020-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-06182020000200407Economia e Sociedade v.29 n.2 2020reponame:Economia e Sociedadeinstname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMP10.1590/1982-3533.2020v29n2art03info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLins,Maria Antonieta Del Tedescoeng2020-09-16T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0104-06182020000200407Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/ecosPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/ecos/oaicbaltar@unicamp.br||ppec@unicamp.br||prates@unicamp.br1982-35330104-0618opendoar:2022-11-08T14:23:44.102854Economia e Sociedade - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Varieties of state interventionism in financial policy in the aftermath of the 2008 global crisis
title Varieties of state interventionism in financial policy in the aftermath of the 2008 global crisis
spellingShingle Varieties of state interventionism in financial policy in the aftermath of the 2008 global crisis
Lins,Maria Antonieta Del Tedesco
Financial policy
Financial integration
Emerging economies
Latin American economies
title_short Varieties of state interventionism in financial policy in the aftermath of the 2008 global crisis
title_full Varieties of state interventionism in financial policy in the aftermath of the 2008 global crisis
title_fullStr Varieties of state interventionism in financial policy in the aftermath of the 2008 global crisis
title_full_unstemmed Varieties of state interventionism in financial policy in the aftermath of the 2008 global crisis
title_sort Varieties of state interventionism in financial policy in the aftermath of the 2008 global crisis
author Lins,Maria Antonieta Del Tedesco
author_facet Lins,Maria Antonieta Del Tedesco
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lins,Maria Antonieta Del Tedesco
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Financial policy
Financial integration
Emerging economies
Latin American economies
topic Financial policy
Financial integration
Emerging economies
Latin American economies
description Abstract Thanks to lessons learned and reforms implemented after the financial crises of the late 1990s, most emerging market economies proved relatively resilient to the 2008 global crisis. Yet to cope with the turbulence that ensued, several interventions by monetary authorities in foreign exchange and capital markets were carried out. The literature on Latin American financial systems and central bank reform tends to emphasize international actors and pressures as key determinants of policy change. In contrast, this paper raises the hypothesis that domestic concerns were the main drivers of financial policymaking after the 2008 crisis even in countries with different institutional arrangements and macroeconomic trajectories such as Brazil, Mexico and Argentina. Through a comparative case study analysis, it is concluded that indeed the three countries’ approaches to exchange markets and capital controls contradicted international perceptions and even the IMF’s stance on foreign exchange policies and the management of capital flows. By pursuing more autonomy and responding to domestic priorities, each of the three countries adopted different policy measures.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-06182020000200407
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-06182020000200407
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1982-3533.2020v29n2art03
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Economia da Universidade Estadual de Campinas
Publicações
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Economia da Universidade Estadual de Campinas
Publicações
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Economia e Sociedade v.29 n.2 2020
reponame:Economia e Sociedade
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Economia e Sociedade
collection Economia e Sociedade
repository.name.fl_str_mv Economia e Sociedade - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cbaltar@unicamp.br||ppec@unicamp.br||prates@unicamp.br
_version_ 1800216546134458368