Dissociação entre movimento de xp e de x0: sem evidências do agramatismo
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/cel/article/view/8637186 |
Resumo: | This paper is intended to show that a proposal (Grodzinsky & Friederici 2006) on dissociation between two types of movement (MOVEXP and MOVEV) is not supported by a critical review of data found in the literature of studies dealing with agrammatic aphasia. This procedure is considered to be of fundamental relevance for studies that plan to use evidence derived from studies based on linguistic aphasiology, since this field exhibits some problematic aspects concerning data analysis. Some conclusions reviewed here, thought to be straightforward, are, indeed, subject to questioning. In other cases, there are contradictory results that are commonly ignored in the construction of hypotheses. It is offered, then, a new posture on the consideration of the validity of studies that focus on aphasic syndromes within a linguistic framework. |
id |
UNICAMP-13_032a1b139136fa962bfc16a77f6437fd |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8637186 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-13 |
network_name_str |
Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Dissociação entre movimento de xp e de x0: sem evidências do agramatismoLinguísticaThis paper is intended to show that a proposal (Grodzinsky & Friederici 2006) on dissociation between two types of movement (MOVEXP and MOVEV) is not supported by a critical review of data found in the literature of studies dealing with agrammatic aphasia. This procedure is considered to be of fundamental relevance for studies that plan to use evidence derived from studies based on linguistic aphasiology, since this field exhibits some problematic aspects concerning data analysis. Some conclusions reviewed here, thought to be straightforward, are, indeed, subject to questioning. In other cases, there are contradictory results that are commonly ignored in the construction of hypotheses. It is offered, then, a new posture on the consideration of the validity of studies that focus on aphasic syndromes within a linguistic framework.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2011-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa teóricaapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/cel/article/view/863718610.20396/cel.v49i2.8637186Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos; v. 49 n. 2 (2007); 185-194Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos; Vol. 49 No. 2 (2007); 185-194Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos; Vol. 49 Núm. 2 (2007); 185-1942447-0686reponame:Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticosinstname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/cel/article/view/8637186/4908Copyright (c) 2015 Cadernos de Estudos Lingüísticosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLima, Ricardo JosehForster, RenêVillarinho, Clara2018-08-09T09:41:46Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8637186Revistahttp://revistas.iel.unicamp.br/index.php/cel/PUBhttp://revistas.iel.unicamp.br/index.php/cel/oaispublic@iel.unicamp.br||revistacel@iel.unicamp.br2447-06860102-5767opendoar:2022-11-08T14:23:43.054856Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Dissociação entre movimento de xp e de x0: sem evidências do agramatismo |
title |
Dissociação entre movimento de xp e de x0: sem evidências do agramatismo |
spellingShingle |
Dissociação entre movimento de xp e de x0: sem evidências do agramatismo Lima, Ricardo Joseh Linguística |
title_short |
Dissociação entre movimento de xp e de x0: sem evidências do agramatismo |
title_full |
Dissociação entre movimento de xp e de x0: sem evidências do agramatismo |
title_fullStr |
Dissociação entre movimento de xp e de x0: sem evidências do agramatismo |
title_full_unstemmed |
Dissociação entre movimento de xp e de x0: sem evidências do agramatismo |
title_sort |
Dissociação entre movimento de xp e de x0: sem evidências do agramatismo |
author |
Lima, Ricardo Joseh |
author_facet |
Lima, Ricardo Joseh Forster, Renê Villarinho, Clara |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Forster, Renê Villarinho, Clara |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lima, Ricardo Joseh Forster, Renê Villarinho, Clara |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Linguística |
topic |
Linguística |
description |
This paper is intended to show that a proposal (Grodzinsky & Friederici 2006) on dissociation between two types of movement (MOVEXP and MOVEV) is not supported by a critical review of data found in the literature of studies dealing with agrammatic aphasia. This procedure is considered to be of fundamental relevance for studies that plan to use evidence derived from studies based on linguistic aphasiology, since this field exhibits some problematic aspects concerning data analysis. Some conclusions reviewed here, thought to be straightforward, are, indeed, subject to questioning. In other cases, there are contradictory results that are commonly ignored in the construction of hypotheses. It is offered, then, a new posture on the consideration of the validity of studies that focus on aphasic syndromes within a linguistic framework. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-08-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Pesquisa teórica |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/cel/article/view/8637186 10.20396/cel.v49i2.8637186 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/cel/article/view/8637186 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.20396/cel.v49i2.8637186 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/cel/article/view/8637186/4908 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Cadernos de Estudos Lingüísticos info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Cadernos de Estudos Lingüísticos |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos; v. 49 n. 2 (2007); 185-194 Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos; Vol. 49 No. 2 (2007); 185-194 Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos; Vol. 49 Núm. 2 (2007); 185-194 2447-0686 reponame:Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos |
collection |
Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
spublic@iel.unicamp.br||revistacel@iel.unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1800216492736774144 |