The worker Villages insist on staying: the cases of the villages of the Jardim Botanico [in Rio de Janeiro city] and the Meio da Serra [in Petropolis, state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil]
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Labor & Engenho (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/labore/article/view/8670009 |
Resumo: | The cases of two workers' villages located in the State of Rio de Janeiro, which remained after the disappearance of the respective tissue factories that gave rise to them, are presented. It is the workers’ village of Fábrica Cometa, in the Middle of the Serra – Petrópolis district/ RJ – and the workers’ village of Fabrics factory Carioca, in the Jardim Botânico neighborhood, south of the city of Rio de Janeiro, both legally protected at federal and municipal levels, respectively. The choice was made due to the result of consisting of rare cases, in the context of the industrial heritage of Rio de Janeiro, especially about the permanence of former workers and descendants as residents and buildings dating back to the original functions. It addresses, among other aspects, the process of construction of working-class villages, the strategies of domination and social control adopted by the owners of the factories, the formation of positive memories for former workers and the lack of housing policies that guarantee effective access to good quality housing. The cases chosen to highlight the recognition by the State of its cultural importance, as well as the need for continuity of housing functions of social interest. specific objectives highlight a brief analysis of the different social and economic contexts established in Brazil, from the 19th century on, which enabled the emergence and decline of fabric factories; the architectural characteristics of cotton fabric factories and their workers' villages; and specificities of the working-class villages of the Botanical Garden and the Middle of the Mountain Range: their architectures and memories, through testimonials from former workers. |
id |
UNICAMP-15_1548f341611ada2389053e656404e130 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8670009 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-15 |
network_name_str |
Labor & Engenho (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The worker Villages insist on staying: the cases of the villages of the Jardim Botanico [in Rio de Janeiro city] and the Meio da Serra [in Petropolis, state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil]As vilas operárias teimam em permanecer: os casos das vilas do Jardim Botânico no Rio de Janeiro e do Meio da Serra, no distrito de Petrópolis [RJ]As vilas operárias teimam em permanecer: os casos das vilas do Jardim Botânico no Rio de Janeiro e do Meio da Serra, no distrito de Petrópolis [RJ]Worker villageIndustrial architectureCultural heritagePatrimonio industrialVilas operáriasArquitetura industrialVilas operáriasArquitetura industrialPatrimônio culturalThe cases of two workers' villages located in the State of Rio de Janeiro, which remained after the disappearance of the respective tissue factories that gave rise to them, are presented. It is the workers’ village of Fábrica Cometa, in the Middle of the Serra – Petrópolis district/ RJ – and the workers’ village of Fabrics factory Carioca, in the Jardim Botânico neighborhood, south of the city of Rio de Janeiro, both legally protected at federal and municipal levels, respectively. The choice was made due to the result of consisting of rare cases, in the context of the industrial heritage of Rio de Janeiro, especially about the permanence of former workers and descendants as residents and buildings dating back to the original functions. It addresses, among other aspects, the process of construction of working-class villages, the strategies of domination and social control adopted by the owners of the factories, the formation of positive memories for former workers and the lack of housing policies that guarantee effective access to good quality housing. The cases chosen to highlight the recognition by the State of its cultural importance, as well as the need for continuity of housing functions of social interest. specific objectives highlight a brief analysis of the different social and economic contexts established in Brazil, from the 19th century on, which enabled the emergence and decline of fabric factories; the architectural characteristics of cotton fabric factories and their workers' villages; and specificities of the working-class villages of the Botanical Garden and the Middle of the Mountain Range: their architectures and memories, through testimonials from former workers.Apresentam-se os casos de duas vilas operárias, localizadas no Estado do Rio de Janeiro, que remanesceram após o desaparecimento das respectivas fábricas de tecidos que lhes deram origem. Tratam-se da vila operária da Fábrica Cometa, no Meio da Serra – distrito de Petrópolis/RJ– e da Vila Operária da Fábrica de Tecidos Carioca, no bairro do Jardim Botânico, zona sul da Cidade do Rio de Janeiro, ambas protegidas em nível federal e municipal, respectivamente. A escolha se deu em virtude de consistirem em casos raros, no contexto do patrimônio industrial fluminense, especialmente no que diz respeito à permanência de ex-operários e descendentes como moradores e edificações que remontam às funções originais. Abordam-se, dentre outros aspectos, o processo de construção das vilas operárias, as estratégias de dominação e controle social adotadas pelos donos das fábricas, a formação de memórias positivas aos ex-operários e a inexistência de políticas habitacionais que garantam o efetivo acesso a moradias de boa qualidade. Os casos escolhidos destacam o reconhecimento pelo Estado da sua importância cultural, bem como da necessidade da continuidade das funções habitacionais de interesse social. Os objetivos específicos destacam uma breve análise dos diferentes contextos sociais e econômicos estabelecidos no Brasil, a partir do século XIX, que viabilizaram o surgimento e o declínio das fábricas de tecido; as características arquitetônicas das fábricas de tecidos de algodão e suas vilas operárias; e especificidades das vilas operárias do Jardim Botânico e do Meio da Serra: suas arquiteturas e memórias, por meio de depoimentos de ex-operários.Apresentam-se os casos de duas vilas operárias, localizadas no Estado do Rio de Janeiro, que remanesceram após o desaparecimento das respectivas fábricas de tecidos que lhes deram origem. Tratam-se da vila operária da Fábrica Cometa, no Meio da Serra – distrito de Petrópolis/RJ– e da Vila Operária da Fábrica de Tecidos Carioca, no bairro do Jardim Botânico, zona sul da Cidade do Rio de Janeiro, ambas protegidas em nível federal e municipal, respectivamente. A escolha se deu em virtude de consistirem em casos raros, no contexto do patrimônio industrial fluminense, especialmente no que diz respeito à permanência de ex-operários e descendentes como moradores e edificações que remontam às funções originais. Abordam-se, dentre outros aspectos, o processo de construção das vilas operárias, as estratégias de dominação e controle social adotadas pelos donos das fábricas, a formação de memórias positivas aos ex-operários e a inexistência de políticas habitacionais que garantam o efetivo acesso a moradias de boa qualidade. Os casos escolhidos destacam o reconhecimento pelo Estado da sua importância cultural, bem como da necessidade da continuidade das funções habitacionais de interesse social. Os objetivos específicos destacam uma breve análise dos diferentes contextos sociais e econômicos estabelecidos no Brasil, a partir do século XIX, que viabilizaram o surgimento e o declínio das fábricas de tecido; as características arquitetônicas das fábricas de tecidos de algodão e suas vilas operárias; e especificidades das vilas operárias do Jardim Botânico e do Meio da Serra: suas arquiteturas e memórias, por meio de depoimentos de ex-operários.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2022-12-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoTextoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/labore/article/view/867000910.20396/labore.v16i00.8670009Labor e Engenho; Vol. 16 (2022): Publicação contínua; e022020Labor e Engenho; Vol. 16 (2022): Publicação contínua; e022020Labor e Engenho; v. 16 (2022): Publicação contínua; e0220202176-8846reponame:Labor & Engenho (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/labore/article/view/8670009/30726Brazil; ContemporaryBrasil; Contemporâneo Brasil; Contemporâneo Copyright (c) 2022 Labor e Engenhohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarlos, Claudio Antônio S. Lima2023-04-24T16:15:46Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8670009Revistahttp://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/laborePUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/labore/oai||argollo@fec.unicamp.br2176-88461981-1152opendoar:2023-04-24T16:15:46Labor & Engenho (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The worker Villages insist on staying: the cases of the villages of the Jardim Botanico [in Rio de Janeiro city] and the Meio da Serra [in Petropolis, state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil] As vilas operárias teimam em permanecer: os casos das vilas do Jardim Botânico no Rio de Janeiro e do Meio da Serra, no distrito de Petrópolis [RJ] As vilas operárias teimam em permanecer: os casos das vilas do Jardim Botânico no Rio de Janeiro e do Meio da Serra, no distrito de Petrópolis [RJ] |
title |
The worker Villages insist on staying: the cases of the villages of the Jardim Botanico [in Rio de Janeiro city] and the Meio da Serra [in Petropolis, state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil] |
spellingShingle |
The worker Villages insist on staying: the cases of the villages of the Jardim Botanico [in Rio de Janeiro city] and the Meio da Serra [in Petropolis, state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil] Carlos, Claudio Antônio S. Lima Worker village Industrial architecture Cultural heritage Patrimonio industrial Vilas operárias Arquitetura industrial Vilas operárias Arquitetura industrial Patrimônio cultural |
title_short |
The worker Villages insist on staying: the cases of the villages of the Jardim Botanico [in Rio de Janeiro city] and the Meio da Serra [in Petropolis, state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil] |
title_full |
The worker Villages insist on staying: the cases of the villages of the Jardim Botanico [in Rio de Janeiro city] and the Meio da Serra [in Petropolis, state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil] |
title_fullStr |
The worker Villages insist on staying: the cases of the villages of the Jardim Botanico [in Rio de Janeiro city] and the Meio da Serra [in Petropolis, state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil] |
title_full_unstemmed |
The worker Villages insist on staying: the cases of the villages of the Jardim Botanico [in Rio de Janeiro city] and the Meio da Serra [in Petropolis, state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil] |
title_sort |
The worker Villages insist on staying: the cases of the villages of the Jardim Botanico [in Rio de Janeiro city] and the Meio da Serra [in Petropolis, state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil] |
author |
Carlos, Claudio Antônio S. Lima |
author_facet |
Carlos, Claudio Antônio S. Lima |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Carlos, Claudio Antônio S. Lima |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Worker village Industrial architecture Cultural heritage Patrimonio industrial Vilas operárias Arquitetura industrial Vilas operárias Arquitetura industrial Patrimônio cultural |
topic |
Worker village Industrial architecture Cultural heritage Patrimonio industrial Vilas operárias Arquitetura industrial Vilas operárias Arquitetura industrial Patrimônio cultural |
description |
The cases of two workers' villages located in the State of Rio de Janeiro, which remained after the disappearance of the respective tissue factories that gave rise to them, are presented. It is the workers’ village of Fábrica Cometa, in the Middle of the Serra – Petrópolis district/ RJ – and the workers’ village of Fabrics factory Carioca, in the Jardim Botânico neighborhood, south of the city of Rio de Janeiro, both legally protected at federal and municipal levels, respectively. The choice was made due to the result of consisting of rare cases, in the context of the industrial heritage of Rio de Janeiro, especially about the permanence of former workers and descendants as residents and buildings dating back to the original functions. It addresses, among other aspects, the process of construction of working-class villages, the strategies of domination and social control adopted by the owners of the factories, the formation of positive memories for former workers and the lack of housing policies that guarantee effective access to good quality housing. The cases chosen to highlight the recognition by the State of its cultural importance, as well as the need for continuity of housing functions of social interest. specific objectives highlight a brief analysis of the different social and economic contexts established in Brazil, from the 19th century on, which enabled the emergence and decline of fabric factories; the architectural characteristics of cotton fabric factories and their workers' villages; and specificities of the working-class villages of the Botanical Garden and the Middle of the Mountain Range: their architectures and memories, through testimonials from former workers. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-12-15 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Texto Texto info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/labore/article/view/8670009 10.20396/labore.v16i00.8670009 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/labore/article/view/8670009 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.20396/labore.v16i00.8670009 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/labore/article/view/8670009/30726 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Labor e Engenho https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Labor e Engenho https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazil; Contemporary Brasil; Contemporâneo Brasil; Contemporâneo |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Labor e Engenho; Vol. 16 (2022): Publicação contínua; e022020 Labor e Engenho; Vol. 16 (2022): Publicação contínua; e022020 Labor e Engenho; v. 16 (2022): Publicação contínua; e022020 2176-8846 reponame:Labor & Engenho (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Labor & Engenho (Online) |
collection |
Labor & Engenho (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Labor & Engenho (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||argollo@fec.unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1800217039256682496 |