Circuits of Economy on Amapa’s border: a hybrid of subsystems for its spatial reorganization
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Labor & Engenho (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/labore/article/view/8635578 |
Resumo: | Territorial organization of boundary spaces and its (re)formatting to transboundary, especially those of Amapa State with French Guiana, need deeper analysis when inserted on regional development debates, by inserting reflections about Amapá's border condition, its spatial organization and reconstructing its spatial interaction. Milton Santos’s approaches are going to be adopted from reflections about the categories of object, rule and action systems, and economy circuits. This work aims in discussing the economy circuit formatting of Amapa-French Guiana border from recent economy actions established there, providing new use of the border and its territory. This work is subdivided into three parts. The first one presents a reflection about the spatial (de)construction, the use of the territory and, from Milton Santos’s focus, a reflection about object, rule and action systems; On the second, Milton Santos’s circuit economy subsystems (superior and inferior) are discussed as (un)stimulating agents for space (re)organization; On the third, the border’s function and the pursuit for territorial integration are inserted; On the fourth, it is debated about Amapa State’s insertion as a late border. |
id |
UNICAMP-15_64f8a7e3645c08e7aa03476344af95b9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8635578 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-15 |
network_name_str |
Labor & Engenho (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Circuits of Economy on Amapa’s border: a hybrid of subsystems for its spatial reorganizationCircuitos da Economia na fronteira amapaense: um híbrido de subsistemas para a sua reorganização espacialBorder. Economy circuits. Amapa. Amapa’s late border.FronteiraCircuitos da economiaAmapáFronteira tardia amapaenseTerritorial organization of boundary spaces and its (re)formatting to transboundary, especially those of Amapa State with French Guiana, need deeper analysis when inserted on regional development debates, by inserting reflections about Amapá's border condition, its spatial organization and reconstructing its spatial interaction. Milton Santos’s approaches are going to be adopted from reflections about the categories of object, rule and action systems, and economy circuits. This work aims in discussing the economy circuit formatting of Amapa-French Guiana border from recent economy actions established there, providing new use of the border and its territory. This work is subdivided into three parts. The first one presents a reflection about the spatial (de)construction, the use of the territory and, from Milton Santos’s focus, a reflection about object, rule and action systems; On the second, Milton Santos’s circuit economy subsystems (superior and inferior) are discussed as (un)stimulating agents for space (re)organization; On the third, the border’s function and the pursuit for territorial integration are inserted; On the fourth, it is debated about Amapa State’s insertion as a late border.A organização territorial de espaços fronteiriços e a sua (re)formatação para transfronteiriços, em especial as do Estado do Amapá com a Guiana Francesa, necessitam de análises mais profundas quando se insere nos debates do desenvolvimento regional, ao inserir reflexões sobre sua condição fronteiriça, sua organização espacial e reconstruindo sua interação espacial. Serão adotadas as abordagens de Milton Santos, a partir de reflexões sobre as categorias de sistemas de objetos, de normas, de ações, e os circuitos da economia. Este trabalho visa discutir a formatação do circuito econômico da fronteira Amapá-Guiana Francesa a partir das recentes ações econômicas ali estabelecidas, proporcionando novos usos da fronteira e do seu território. Este trabalho subdivide-se em três partes. O primeiro apresenta uma reflexão sobre a (des)construção do espaço, o uso do território e a partir do enfoque miltoniano sobre os sistemas de objetos, de normas e de ações; No segundo, discute-se os subsistemas dos circuitos da economia miltoniano (superior e inferior) como agentes (des)estimuladores para a (re)organização do espaço; No terceiro, insere-se a função da fronteira e a busca pela integração territorial; No quarto, debate-se a inserção do Estado do Amapá como uma fronteira tardia.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2015-06-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/labore/article/view/863557810.20396/lobore.v9i2.8635578Labor e Engenho; Vol. 9 No. 2 (2015): abr./jun.; 101-114Labor e Engenho; Vol. 9 Núm. 2 (2015): abr./jun.; 101-114Labor e Engenho; v. 9 n. 2 (2015): abr./jun.; 101-1142176-8846reponame:Labor & Engenho (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/labore/article/view/8635578/v9n208BrasilCopyright (c) 2015 Labor & Engenhoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPorto, Jadson Luís RebeloTheis, Ivo Marcos2019-08-05T04:57:18Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8635578Revistahttp://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/laborePUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/labore/oai||argollo@fec.unicamp.br2176-88461981-1152opendoar:2019-08-05T04:57:18Labor & Engenho (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Circuits of Economy on Amapa’s border: a hybrid of subsystems for its spatial reorganization Circuitos da Economia na fronteira amapaense: um híbrido de subsistemas para a sua reorganização espacial |
title |
Circuits of Economy on Amapa’s border: a hybrid of subsystems for its spatial reorganization |
spellingShingle |
Circuits of Economy on Amapa’s border: a hybrid of subsystems for its spatial reorganization Porto, Jadson Luís Rebelo Border. Economy circuits. Amapa. Amapa’s late border. Fronteira Circuitos da economia Amapá Fronteira tardia amapaense |
title_short |
Circuits of Economy on Amapa’s border: a hybrid of subsystems for its spatial reorganization |
title_full |
Circuits of Economy on Amapa’s border: a hybrid of subsystems for its spatial reorganization |
title_fullStr |
Circuits of Economy on Amapa’s border: a hybrid of subsystems for its spatial reorganization |
title_full_unstemmed |
Circuits of Economy on Amapa’s border: a hybrid of subsystems for its spatial reorganization |
title_sort |
Circuits of Economy on Amapa’s border: a hybrid of subsystems for its spatial reorganization |
author |
Porto, Jadson Luís Rebelo |
author_facet |
Porto, Jadson Luís Rebelo Theis, Ivo Marcos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Theis, Ivo Marcos |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Porto, Jadson Luís Rebelo Theis, Ivo Marcos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Border. Economy circuits. Amapa. Amapa’s late border. Fronteira Circuitos da economia Amapá Fronteira tardia amapaense |
topic |
Border. Economy circuits. Amapa. Amapa’s late border. Fronteira Circuitos da economia Amapá Fronteira tardia amapaense |
description |
Territorial organization of boundary spaces and its (re)formatting to transboundary, especially those of Amapa State with French Guiana, need deeper analysis when inserted on regional development debates, by inserting reflections about Amapá's border condition, its spatial organization and reconstructing its spatial interaction. Milton Santos’s approaches are going to be adopted from reflections about the categories of object, rule and action systems, and economy circuits. This work aims in discussing the economy circuit formatting of Amapa-French Guiana border from recent economy actions established there, providing new use of the border and its territory. This work is subdivided into three parts. The first one presents a reflection about the spatial (de)construction, the use of the territory and, from Milton Santos’s focus, a reflection about object, rule and action systems; On the second, Milton Santos’s circuit economy subsystems (superior and inferior) are discussed as (un)stimulating agents for space (re)organization; On the third, the border’s function and the pursuit for territorial integration are inserted; On the fourth, it is debated about Amapa State’s insertion as a late border. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-06-24 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Texto |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/labore/article/view/8635578 10.20396/lobore.v9i2.8635578 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/labore/article/view/8635578 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.20396/lobore.v9i2.8635578 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/labore/article/view/8635578/v9n208 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Labor & Engenho info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Labor & Engenho |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Labor e Engenho; Vol. 9 No. 2 (2015): abr./jun.; 101-114 Labor e Engenho; Vol. 9 Núm. 2 (2015): abr./jun.; 101-114 Labor e Engenho; v. 9 n. 2 (2015): abr./jun.; 101-114 2176-8846 reponame:Labor & Engenho (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Labor & Engenho (Online) |
collection |
Labor & Engenho (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Labor & Engenho (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||argollo@fec.unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1809730501042241536 |