Chicago and New Orleans: opposite ends of a great river
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Labor & Engenho (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/labore/article/view/8649744 |
Resumo: | This paper considers the contrasting and deliberate efforts to reshape the Tluvial futures of two important American cities which essentially re-wrote their riparian heritages. Chicago’s aggressive extension of its commercial reach through its artiTicial connection with the Mississippi has become embodied in its environmental, political, and literary history. Conversely, New Orleans crafted a defensive local culture in its environmental history, politics, and literature. The contrasting investments in river-altering infrastructure and urban relationships with the one river expose the signiTicance of each city’s position within a watershed and in shaping its respective cultural history and its identity. |
id |
UNICAMP-15_762d424c1678ccf5b1887ed4f378753d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8649744 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-15 |
network_name_str |
Labor & Engenho (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Chicago and New Orleans: opposite ends of a great riverChicago and New Orleans: opposite ends of a great riverRiver. Urban infrastructure. Chicago. New Orleans.River. Urban infrastructure. Chicago. New Orleans.This paper considers the contrasting and deliberate efforts to reshape the Tluvial futures of two important American cities which essentially re-wrote their riparian heritages. Chicago’s aggressive extension of its commercial reach through its artiTicial connection with the Mississippi has become embodied in its environmental, political, and literary history. Conversely, New Orleans crafted a defensive local culture in its environmental history, politics, and literature. The contrasting investments in river-altering infrastructure and urban relationships with the one river expose the signiTicance of each city’s position within a watershed and in shaping its respective cultural history and its identity.This paper considers the contrasting and deliberate efforts to reshape the Tluvial futures of two important American cities which essentially re-wrote their riparian heritages. Chicago’s aggressive extension of its commercial reach through its artiTicial connection with the Mississippi has become embodied in its environmental, political, and literary history. Conversely, New Orleans crafted a defensive local culture in its environmental history, politics, and literature. The contrasting investments in river-altering infrastructure and urban relationships with the one river expose the signiTicance of each city’s position within a watershed and in shaping its respective cultural history and its identity.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2017-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAnalytical ResearchPesquisa analíticaapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/labore/article/view/864974410.20396/labore.v11i2.8649744Labor e Engenho; Vol. 11 No. 2 (2017): abr./jun.; 128-136Labor e Engenho; Vol. 11 Núm. 2 (2017): abr./jun.; 128-136Labor e Engenho; v. 11 n. 2 (2017): abr./jun.; 128-1362176-8846reponame:Labor & Engenho (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/labore/article/view/8649744/16194Copyright (c) 2017 Labor e Engenhoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessColten, Craig Edward2017-06-30T12:47:13Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8649744Revistahttp://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/laborePUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/labore/oai||argollo@fec.unicamp.br2176-88461981-1152opendoar:2017-06-30T12:47:13Labor & Engenho (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Chicago and New Orleans: opposite ends of a great river Chicago and New Orleans: opposite ends of a great river |
title |
Chicago and New Orleans: opposite ends of a great river |
spellingShingle |
Chicago and New Orleans: opposite ends of a great river Colten, Craig Edward River. Urban infrastructure. Chicago. New Orleans. River. Urban infrastructure. Chicago. New Orleans. |
title_short |
Chicago and New Orleans: opposite ends of a great river |
title_full |
Chicago and New Orleans: opposite ends of a great river |
title_fullStr |
Chicago and New Orleans: opposite ends of a great river |
title_full_unstemmed |
Chicago and New Orleans: opposite ends of a great river |
title_sort |
Chicago and New Orleans: opposite ends of a great river |
author |
Colten, Craig Edward |
author_facet |
Colten, Craig Edward |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Colten, Craig Edward |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
River. Urban infrastructure. Chicago. New Orleans. River. Urban infrastructure. Chicago. New Orleans. |
topic |
River. Urban infrastructure. Chicago. New Orleans. River. Urban infrastructure. Chicago. New Orleans. |
description |
This paper considers the contrasting and deliberate efforts to reshape the Tluvial futures of two important American cities which essentially re-wrote their riparian heritages. Chicago’s aggressive extension of its commercial reach through its artiTicial connection with the Mississippi has become embodied in its environmental, political, and literary history. Conversely, New Orleans crafted a defensive local culture in its environmental history, politics, and literature. The contrasting investments in river-altering infrastructure and urban relationships with the one river expose the signiTicance of each city’s position within a watershed and in shaping its respective cultural history and its identity. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-06-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Analytical Research Pesquisa analítica |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/labore/article/view/8649744 10.20396/labore.v11i2.8649744 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/labore/article/view/8649744 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.20396/labore.v11i2.8649744 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/labore/article/view/8649744/16194 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Labor e Engenho info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Labor e Engenho |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Labor e Engenho; Vol. 11 No. 2 (2017): abr./jun.; 128-136 Labor e Engenho; Vol. 11 Núm. 2 (2017): abr./jun.; 128-136 Labor e Engenho; v. 11 n. 2 (2017): abr./jun.; 128-136 2176-8846 reponame:Labor & Engenho (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Labor & Engenho (Online) |
collection |
Labor & Engenho (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Labor & Engenho (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||argollo@fec.unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1800217038289895424 |