Chicago and New Orleans: opposite ends of a great river

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Colten, Craig Edward
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Labor & Engenho (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/labore/article/view/8649744
Resumo: This paper considers the contrasting and deliberate efforts to reshape the Tluvial futures of two important American cities which essentially re-wrote their riparian heritages. Chicago’s aggressive extension of its commercial reach through its artiTicial connection with the Mississippi has become embodied in its environmental, political, and literary history. Conversely, New Orleans crafted a defensive local culture in its environmental history, politics, and literature. The contrasting investments in river-altering infrastructure and urban relationships with the one river expose the signiTicance of each city’s position within a watershed and in shaping its respective cultural history and its identity.
id UNICAMP-15_762d424c1678ccf5b1887ed4f378753d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8649744
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-15
network_name_str Labor & Engenho (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Chicago and New Orleans: opposite ends of a great riverChicago and New Orleans: opposite ends of a great riverRiver. Urban infrastructure. Chicago. New Orleans.River. Urban infrastructure. Chicago. New Orleans.This paper considers the contrasting and deliberate efforts to reshape the Tluvial futures of two important American cities which essentially re-wrote their riparian heritages. Chicago’s aggressive extension of its commercial reach through its artiTicial connection with the Mississippi has become embodied in its environmental, political, and literary history. Conversely, New Orleans crafted a defensive local culture in its environmental history, politics, and literature. The contrasting investments in river-altering infrastructure and urban relationships with the one river expose the signiTicance of each city’s position within a watershed and in shaping its respective cultural history and its identity.This paper considers the contrasting and deliberate efforts to reshape the Tluvial futures of two important American cities which essentially re-wrote their riparian heritages. Chicago’s aggressive extension of its commercial reach through its artiTicial connection with the Mississippi has become embodied in its environmental, political, and literary history. Conversely, New Orleans crafted a defensive local culture in its environmental history, politics, and literature. The contrasting investments in river-altering infrastructure and urban relationships with the one river expose the signiTicance of each city’s position within a watershed and in shaping its respective cultural history and its identity.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2017-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAnalytical ResearchPesquisa analíticaapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/labore/article/view/864974410.20396/labore.v11i2.8649744Labor e Engenho; Vol. 11 No. 2 (2017): abr./jun.; 128-136Labor e Engenho; Vol. 11 Núm. 2 (2017): abr./jun.; 128-136Labor e Engenho; v. 11 n. 2 (2017): abr./jun.; 128-1362176-8846reponame:Labor & Engenho (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/labore/article/view/8649744/16194Copyright (c) 2017 Labor e Engenhoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessColten, Craig Edward2017-06-30T12:47:13Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8649744Revistahttp://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/laborePUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/labore/oai||argollo@fec.unicamp.br2176-88461981-1152opendoar:2017-06-30T12:47:13Labor & Engenho (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Chicago and New Orleans: opposite ends of a great river
Chicago and New Orleans: opposite ends of a great river
title Chicago and New Orleans: opposite ends of a great river
spellingShingle Chicago and New Orleans: opposite ends of a great river
Colten, Craig Edward
River. Urban infrastructure. Chicago. New Orleans.
River. Urban infrastructure. Chicago. New Orleans.
title_short Chicago and New Orleans: opposite ends of a great river
title_full Chicago and New Orleans: opposite ends of a great river
title_fullStr Chicago and New Orleans: opposite ends of a great river
title_full_unstemmed Chicago and New Orleans: opposite ends of a great river
title_sort Chicago and New Orleans: opposite ends of a great river
author Colten, Craig Edward
author_facet Colten, Craig Edward
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Colten, Craig Edward
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv River. Urban infrastructure. Chicago. New Orleans.
River. Urban infrastructure. Chicago. New Orleans.
topic River. Urban infrastructure. Chicago. New Orleans.
River. Urban infrastructure. Chicago. New Orleans.
description This paper considers the contrasting and deliberate efforts to reshape the Tluvial futures of two important American cities which essentially re-wrote their riparian heritages. Chicago’s aggressive extension of its commercial reach through its artiTicial connection with the Mississippi has become embodied in its environmental, political, and literary history. Conversely, New Orleans crafted a defensive local culture in its environmental history, politics, and literature. The contrasting investments in river-altering infrastructure and urban relationships with the one river expose the signiTicance of each city’s position within a watershed and in shaping its respective cultural history and its identity.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-06-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Analytical Research
Pesquisa analítica
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/labore/article/view/8649744
10.20396/labore.v11i2.8649744
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/labore/article/view/8649744
identifier_str_mv 10.20396/labore.v11i2.8649744
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/labore/article/view/8649744/16194
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Labor e Engenho
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Labor e Engenho
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Labor e Engenho; Vol. 11 No. 2 (2017): abr./jun.; 128-136
Labor e Engenho; Vol. 11 Núm. 2 (2017): abr./jun.; 128-136
Labor e Engenho; v. 11 n. 2 (2017): abr./jun.; 128-136
2176-8846
reponame:Labor & Engenho (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Labor & Engenho (Online)
collection Labor & Engenho (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Labor & Engenho (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||argollo@fec.unicamp.br
_version_ 1800217038289895424