Aristotle’s contrast between episteme and doxa in its context (posterior analytics I.33)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Angioni, Lucas
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Manuscrito (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8657756
Resumo: Aristotle contrasts episteme and doxa through the key notions of universal and necessary. These notions have played a central role in Aristotle’s characterization of scientific knowledge in the previous chapters of APo. They are not spelled out in APo I.33, but work as a sort of reminder that packs an adequate characterization of scientific knowledge and thereby gives a highly specified context for Aristotle’s contrast between episteme and doxa. I will try to show that this context introduces a contrast in terms of explanatory claims: on the one hand, episteme covers those claims which capture explanatory connections that are universal and necessary and thereby deliver scientific understanding; on the other hand, doxa covers the explanatory attempts that fail at doing so.
id UNICAMP-17_33ea4d677fe4e5a3dc966fb6578c2828
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8657756
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-17
network_name_str Manuscrito (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Aristotle’s contrast between episteme and doxa in its context (posterior analytics I.33)AristotleExplanationDemonstrationEpistemologyEssencialismAristotle contrasts episteme and doxa through the key notions of universal and necessary. These notions have played a central role in Aristotle’s characterization of scientific knowledge in the previous chapters of APo. They are not spelled out in APo I.33, but work as a sort of reminder that packs an adequate characterization of scientific knowledge and thereby gives a highly specified context for Aristotle’s contrast between episteme and doxa. I will try to show that this context introduces a contrast in terms of explanatory claims: on the one hand, episteme covers those claims which capture explanatory connections that are universal and necessary and thereby deliver scientific understanding; on the other hand, doxa covers the explanatory attempts that fail at doing so.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2019-12-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8657756Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 42 n. 4 (2019): out./dez.; 157-210Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 42 No. 4 (2019): out./dez.; 157-210Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 42 Núm. 4 (2019): out./dez.; 157-2102317-630Xreponame:Manuscrito (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8657756/21750Brazil; ContemporaryCopyright (c) 2019 Manuscritoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAngioni, Lucas2019-12-04T14:29:02Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8657756Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscritoPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/oaimwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br2317-630X0100-6045opendoar:2019-12-04T14:29:02Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Aristotle’s contrast between episteme and doxa in its context (posterior analytics I.33)
title Aristotle’s contrast between episteme and doxa in its context (posterior analytics I.33)
spellingShingle Aristotle’s contrast between episteme and doxa in its context (posterior analytics I.33)
Angioni, Lucas
Aristotle
Explanation
Demonstration
Epistemology
Essencialism
title_short Aristotle’s contrast between episteme and doxa in its context (posterior analytics I.33)
title_full Aristotle’s contrast between episteme and doxa in its context (posterior analytics I.33)
title_fullStr Aristotle’s contrast between episteme and doxa in its context (posterior analytics I.33)
title_full_unstemmed Aristotle’s contrast between episteme and doxa in its context (posterior analytics I.33)
title_sort Aristotle’s contrast between episteme and doxa in its context (posterior analytics I.33)
author Angioni, Lucas
author_facet Angioni, Lucas
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Angioni, Lucas
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Aristotle
Explanation
Demonstration
Epistemology
Essencialism
topic Aristotle
Explanation
Demonstration
Epistemology
Essencialism
description Aristotle contrasts episteme and doxa through the key notions of universal and necessary. These notions have played a central role in Aristotle’s characterization of scientific knowledge in the previous chapters of APo. They are not spelled out in APo I.33, but work as a sort of reminder that packs an adequate characterization of scientific knowledge and thereby gives a highly specified context for Aristotle’s contrast between episteme and doxa. I will try to show that this context introduces a contrast in terms of explanatory claims: on the one hand, episteme covers those claims which capture explanatory connections that are universal and necessary and thereby deliver scientific understanding; on the other hand, doxa covers the explanatory attempts that fail at doing so.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-12-03
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8657756
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8657756
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8657756/21750
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Manuscrito
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Manuscrito
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporary
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 42 n. 4 (2019): out./dez.; 157-210
Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 42 No. 4 (2019): out./dez.; 157-210
Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 42 Núm. 4 (2019): out./dez.; 157-210
2317-630X
reponame:Manuscrito (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Manuscrito (Online)
collection Manuscrito (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br
_version_ 1800216567105978368

Registros relacionados