The systematic use of the five modes for the suspension of judgement
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Manuscrito (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8657075 |
Resumo: | The five modes are a list of tools used by ancient sceptics to guide dogmatic people towards suspending their judgement. Attributed to Agrippa (of uncertain date) and used extensively by Sextus Empiricus (2nd or 3rd century CE), these modes are still widely discussed today by epistemologists and specialists in ancient philosophy. Scholars disagree, however, on how to understand the way the five modes are used together and what the logical form of the sceptical strategy behind their deployment is. This paper offers a reconstruction of the system of the five modes that avoids these problems. In specific, unlike previous reconstructions, (a) it includes a non-trivial version of the mode of relativity, (b) avoids committing the sceptic to a normative principle and (c) follows the textual evidence more closely. Moreover, I argue that the system can be better understood as a list of steps in a process, whose underlying logic can be expressed by a single algorithm. |
id |
UNICAMP-17_dc88fb17349b8a24a97e479413cbd6e5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8657075 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-17 |
network_name_str |
Manuscrito (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The systematic use of the five modes for the suspension of judgementSkepticismPyrrhonian scepticismAgrippa's trilemmaAncient philosophy.The five modes are a list of tools used by ancient sceptics to guide dogmatic people towards suspending their judgement. Attributed to Agrippa (of uncertain date) and used extensively by Sextus Empiricus (2nd or 3rd century CE), these modes are still widely discussed today by epistemologists and specialists in ancient philosophy. Scholars disagree, however, on how to understand the way the five modes are used together and what the logical form of the sceptical strategy behind their deployment is. This paper offers a reconstruction of the system of the five modes that avoids these problems. In specific, unlike previous reconstructions, (a) it includes a non-trivial version of the mode of relativity, (b) avoids committing the sceptic to a normative principle and (c) follows the textual evidence more closely. Moreover, I argue that the system can be better understood as a list of steps in a process, whose underlying logic can be expressed by a single algorithm.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2019-10-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8657075Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 42 n. 3 (2019): jul./set.; 47-85Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 42 No. 3 (2019): jul./set.; 47-85Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 42 Núm. 3 (2019): jul./set.; 47-852317-630Xreponame:Manuscrito (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8657075/21427Brazil; ContemporaryCopyright (c) 2019 Manuscritoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVázquez, Daniel2019-10-11T12:56:49Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8657075Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscritoPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/oaimwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br2317-630X0100-6045opendoar:2019-10-11T12:56:49Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The systematic use of the five modes for the suspension of judgement |
title |
The systematic use of the five modes for the suspension of judgement |
spellingShingle |
The systematic use of the five modes for the suspension of judgement Vázquez, Daniel Skepticism Pyrrhonian scepticism Agrippa's trilemma Ancient philosophy. |
title_short |
The systematic use of the five modes for the suspension of judgement |
title_full |
The systematic use of the five modes for the suspension of judgement |
title_fullStr |
The systematic use of the five modes for the suspension of judgement |
title_full_unstemmed |
The systematic use of the five modes for the suspension of judgement |
title_sort |
The systematic use of the five modes for the suspension of judgement |
author |
Vázquez, Daniel |
author_facet |
Vázquez, Daniel |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Vázquez, Daniel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Skepticism Pyrrhonian scepticism Agrippa's trilemma Ancient philosophy. |
topic |
Skepticism Pyrrhonian scepticism Agrippa's trilemma Ancient philosophy. |
description |
The five modes are a list of tools used by ancient sceptics to guide dogmatic people towards suspending their judgement. Attributed to Agrippa (of uncertain date) and used extensively by Sextus Empiricus (2nd or 3rd century CE), these modes are still widely discussed today by epistemologists and specialists in ancient philosophy. Scholars disagree, however, on how to understand the way the five modes are used together and what the logical form of the sceptical strategy behind their deployment is. This paper offers a reconstruction of the system of the five modes that avoids these problems. In specific, unlike previous reconstructions, (a) it includes a non-trivial version of the mode of relativity, (b) avoids committing the sceptic to a normative principle and (c) follows the textual evidence more closely. Moreover, I argue that the system can be better understood as a list of steps in a process, whose underlying logic can be expressed by a single algorithm. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-10-10 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8657075 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8657075 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8657075/21427 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Manuscrito info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Manuscrito |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazil; Contemporary |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 42 n. 3 (2019): jul./set.; 47-85 Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 42 No. 3 (2019): jul./set.; 47-85 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 42 Núm. 3 (2019): jul./set.; 47-85 2317-630X reponame:Manuscrito (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Manuscrito (Online) |
collection |
Manuscrito (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1800216567081861120 |