The systematic use of the five modes for the suspension of judgement

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Vázquez, Daniel
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Manuscrito (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8657075
Resumo: The five modes are a list of tools used by ancient sceptics to guide dogmatic people towards suspending their judgement. Attributed to Agrippa (of uncertain date) and used extensively by Sextus Empiricus (2nd or 3rd century CE), these modes are still widely discussed today by epistemologists and specialists in ancient philosophy. Scholars disagree, however, on how to understand the way the five modes are used together and what the logical form of the sceptical strategy behind their deployment is. This paper offers a reconstruction of the system of the five modes that avoids these problems. In specific, unlike previous reconstructions, (a) it includes a non-trivial version of the mode of relativity, (b) avoids committing the sceptic to a normative principle and (c) follows the textual evidence more closely. Moreover, I argue that the system can be better understood as a list of steps in a process, whose underlying logic can be expressed by a single algorithm.
id UNICAMP-17_dc88fb17349b8a24a97e479413cbd6e5
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8657075
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-17
network_name_str Manuscrito (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The systematic use of the five modes for the suspension of judgementSkepticismPyrrhonian scepticismAgrippa's trilemmaAncient philosophy.The five modes are a list of tools used by ancient sceptics to guide dogmatic people towards suspending their judgement. Attributed to Agrippa (of uncertain date) and used extensively by Sextus Empiricus (2nd or 3rd century CE), these modes are still widely discussed today by epistemologists and specialists in ancient philosophy. Scholars disagree, however, on how to understand the way the five modes are used together and what the logical form of the sceptical strategy behind their deployment is. This paper offers a reconstruction of the system of the five modes that avoids these problems. In specific, unlike previous reconstructions, (a) it includes a non-trivial version of the mode of relativity, (b) avoids committing the sceptic to a normative principle and (c) follows the textual evidence more closely. Moreover, I argue that the system can be better understood as a list of steps in a process, whose underlying logic can be expressed by a single algorithm.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2019-10-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8657075Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 42 n. 3 (2019): jul./set.; 47-85Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 42 No. 3 (2019): jul./set.; 47-85Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 42 Núm. 3 (2019): jul./set.; 47-852317-630Xreponame:Manuscrito (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8657075/21427Brazil; ContemporaryCopyright (c) 2019 Manuscritoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVázquez, Daniel2019-10-11T12:56:49Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8657075Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscritoPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/oaimwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br2317-630X0100-6045opendoar:2019-10-11T12:56:49Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The systematic use of the five modes for the suspension of judgement
title The systematic use of the five modes for the suspension of judgement
spellingShingle The systematic use of the five modes for the suspension of judgement
Vázquez, Daniel
Skepticism
Pyrrhonian scepticism
Agrippa's trilemma
Ancient philosophy.
title_short The systematic use of the five modes for the suspension of judgement
title_full The systematic use of the five modes for the suspension of judgement
title_fullStr The systematic use of the five modes for the suspension of judgement
title_full_unstemmed The systematic use of the five modes for the suspension of judgement
title_sort The systematic use of the five modes for the suspension of judgement
author Vázquez, Daniel
author_facet Vázquez, Daniel
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Vázquez, Daniel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Skepticism
Pyrrhonian scepticism
Agrippa's trilemma
Ancient philosophy.
topic Skepticism
Pyrrhonian scepticism
Agrippa's trilemma
Ancient philosophy.
description The five modes are a list of tools used by ancient sceptics to guide dogmatic people towards suspending their judgement. Attributed to Agrippa (of uncertain date) and used extensively by Sextus Empiricus (2nd or 3rd century CE), these modes are still widely discussed today by epistemologists and specialists in ancient philosophy. Scholars disagree, however, on how to understand the way the five modes are used together and what the logical form of the sceptical strategy behind their deployment is. This paper offers a reconstruction of the system of the five modes that avoids these problems. In specific, unlike previous reconstructions, (a) it includes a non-trivial version of the mode of relativity, (b) avoids committing the sceptic to a normative principle and (c) follows the textual evidence more closely. Moreover, I argue that the system can be better understood as a list of steps in a process, whose underlying logic can be expressed by a single algorithm.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-10-10
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8657075
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8657075
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8657075/21427
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Manuscrito
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Manuscrito
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporary
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 42 n. 3 (2019): jul./set.; 47-85
Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 42 No. 3 (2019): jul./set.; 47-85
Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 42 Núm. 3 (2019): jul./set.; 47-85
2317-630X
reponame:Manuscrito (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Manuscrito (Online)
collection Manuscrito (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br
_version_ 1800216567081861120