Process-based entities are relational structures. From whitehead to structuralism

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ferrari, Francesco Maria
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Manuscrito (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8665653
Resumo: The aim of this work is to argue for the idea that processes and process-based entities are to be modelled as relational structures. Relational structures are genuine structures, namely entities not committed to the existence of basic objects. My argument moves from the analysis of Whitehead’s original insight about process-based entities that, despite some residual of substance metaphysics, has the merit of grounding the intrinsic dynamism of reality on the holistic and relational characters of process-based enti[1]ties. The current model of process ontology requires gen[1]uine emergence and this, in turn, requires organizations, i.e., emergence in organizations. Another view about pro[1]cesses rely on a structural specification of processes. I sug[1]gest that the two views can be made compatible by the help of a specific sort of structures, namely relational struc[1]tures. The appeal to the mathematical theory of genuine structures, category theory, reveals the formal plausibility of this convergence. According to this formal approach, genuine structures are essentially dynamic entities for they are relational, namely, as well as organizations, they are not existentially committed to particulars.
id UNICAMP-17_e10c523a6a510562415227cc03300a43
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8665653
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-17
network_name_str Manuscrito (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Process-based entities are relational structures. From whitehead to structuralismProcess-based entities are relational structures. From whitehead to structuralismProcess-based entities are relational structures. From whitehead to structuralismProcess ontologyEmergenceRelational structuresCategory theoryOntic structural realismOntología de procesosApariciónEstructuras relacionalesTeoría de categoríasRealismo estructural ònticoOntologia de processoEmergênciaEstruturas relacionaisTeoria da categoriaRealismo estrutural ônticoThe aim of this work is to argue for the idea that processes and process-based entities are to be modelled as relational structures. Relational structures are genuine structures, namely entities not committed to the existence of basic objects. My argument moves from the analysis of Whitehead’s original insight about process-based entities that, despite some residual of substance metaphysics, has the merit of grounding the intrinsic dynamism of reality on the holistic and relational characters of process-based enti[1]ties. The current model of process ontology requires gen[1]uine emergence and this, in turn, requires organizations, i.e., emergence in organizations. Another view about pro[1]cesses rely on a structural specification of processes. I sug[1]gest that the two views can be made compatible by the help of a specific sort of structures, namely relational struc[1]tures. The appeal to the mathematical theory of genuine structures, category theory, reveals the formal plausibility of this convergence. According to this formal approach, genuine structures are essentially dynamic entities for they are relational, namely, as well as organizations, they are not existentially committed to particulars.The aim of this work is to argue for the idea that processes and process-based entities are to be modelled as relational structures. Relational structures are genuine structures, namely entities not committed to the existence of basic objects. My argument moves from the analysis of Whitehead’s original insight about process-based entities that, despite some residual of substance metaphysics, has the merit of grounding the intrinsic dynamism of reality on the holistic and relational characters of process-based enti[1]ties. The current model of process ontology requires gen[1]uine emergence and this, in turn, requires organizations, i.e., emergence in organizations. Another view about pro[1]cesses rely on a structural specification of processes. I sug[1]gest that the two views can be made compatible by the help of a specific sort of structures, namely relational struc[1]tures. The appeal to the mathematical theory of genuine structures, category theory, reveals the formal plausibility of this convergence. According to this formal approach, genuine structures are essentially dynamic entities for they are relational, namely, as well as organizations, they are not existentially committed to particulars.The aim of this work is to argue for the idea that processes and process-based entities are to be modelled as relational structures. Relational structures are genuine structures, namely entities not committed to the existence of basic objects. My argument moves from the analysis of Whitehead’s original insight about process-based entities that, despite some residual of substance metaphysics, has the merit of grounding the intrinsic dynamism of reality on the holistic and relational characters of process-based enti[1]ties. The current model of process ontology requires gen[1]uine emergence and this, in turn, requires organizations, i.e., emergence in organizations. Another view about pro[1]cesses rely on a structural specification of processes. I sug[1]gest that the two views can be made compatible by the help of a specific sort of structures, namely relational struc[1]tures. The appeal to the mathematical theory of genuine structures, category theory, reveals the formal plausibility of this convergence. According to this formal approach, genuine structures are essentially dynamic entities for they are relational, namely, as well as organizations, they are not existentially committed to particulars.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2021-05-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoTextoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8665653Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 44 n. 1 (2021): jan./mar.; 149-207Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 44 No. 1 (2021): jan./mar.; 149-207Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 44 Núm. 1 (2021): jan./mar.; 149-2072317-630Xreponame:Manuscrito (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8665653/26734Brazil; ContemporaryBrasil; ContemporáneoBrasil; ContemporâneoCopyright (c) 2021 Francesco Maria Ferrarihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFerrari, Francesco Maria 2022-04-27T17:16:07Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8665653Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscritoPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/oaimwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br2317-630X0100-6045opendoar:2022-04-27T17:16:07Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Process-based entities are relational structures. From whitehead to structuralism
Process-based entities are relational structures. From whitehead to structuralism
Process-based entities are relational structures. From whitehead to structuralism
title Process-based entities are relational structures. From whitehead to structuralism
spellingShingle Process-based entities are relational structures. From whitehead to structuralism
Ferrari, Francesco Maria
Process ontology
Emergence
Relational structures
Category theory
Ontic structural realism
Ontología de procesos
Aparición
Estructuras relacionales
Teoría de categorías
Realismo estructural òntico
Ontologia de processo
Emergência
Estruturas relacionais
Teoria da categoria
Realismo estrutural ôntico
title_short Process-based entities are relational structures. From whitehead to structuralism
title_full Process-based entities are relational structures. From whitehead to structuralism
title_fullStr Process-based entities are relational structures. From whitehead to structuralism
title_full_unstemmed Process-based entities are relational structures. From whitehead to structuralism
title_sort Process-based entities are relational structures. From whitehead to structuralism
author Ferrari, Francesco Maria
author_facet Ferrari, Francesco Maria
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ferrari, Francesco Maria
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Process ontology
Emergence
Relational structures
Category theory
Ontic structural realism
Ontología de procesos
Aparición
Estructuras relacionales
Teoría de categorías
Realismo estructural òntico
Ontologia de processo
Emergência
Estruturas relacionais
Teoria da categoria
Realismo estrutural ôntico
topic Process ontology
Emergence
Relational structures
Category theory
Ontic structural realism
Ontología de procesos
Aparición
Estructuras relacionales
Teoría de categorías
Realismo estructural òntico
Ontologia de processo
Emergência
Estruturas relacionais
Teoria da categoria
Realismo estrutural ôntico
description The aim of this work is to argue for the idea that processes and process-based entities are to be modelled as relational structures. Relational structures are genuine structures, namely entities not committed to the existence of basic objects. My argument moves from the analysis of Whitehead’s original insight about process-based entities that, despite some residual of substance metaphysics, has the merit of grounding the intrinsic dynamism of reality on the holistic and relational characters of process-based enti[1]ties. The current model of process ontology requires gen[1]uine emergence and this, in turn, requires organizations, i.e., emergence in organizations. Another view about pro[1]cesses rely on a structural specification of processes. I sug[1]gest that the two views can be made compatible by the help of a specific sort of structures, namely relational struc[1]tures. The appeal to the mathematical theory of genuine structures, category theory, reveals the formal plausibility of this convergence. According to this formal approach, genuine structures are essentially dynamic entities for they are relational, namely, as well as organizations, they are not existentially committed to particulars.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-05-15
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Texto
Texto
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8665653
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8665653
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8665653/26734
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Francesco Maria Ferrari
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Francesco Maria Ferrari
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporary
Brasil; Contemporáneo
Brasil; Contemporâneo
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 44 n. 1 (2021): jan./mar.; 149-207
Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 44 No. 1 (2021): jan./mar.; 149-207
Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 44 Núm. 1 (2021): jan./mar.; 149-207
2317-630X
reponame:Manuscrito (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Manuscrito (Online)
collection Manuscrito (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br
_version_ 1800216567652286464