Two-valued weak kleene logics

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Da Ré, Bruno
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Szmuc, Damian
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Manuscrito (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8656455
Resumo: In the literature,Weak Kleene logics are usually taken as three-valued logics. However, Suszko has challenged the main idea of many-valued logic claiming that every logic can be presented in a two-valued fashion. In this paper, we provide two-valued semantics for the Weak Kleene logics and for a number of four-valued subsystems of them. We do the same for the so-called Logics of Nonsense, which are extensions of the Weak Kleene logics with unary operators that allow looking at them as Logics of Formal Inconsistency (LFIs) and Logics of Formal Underterminedness (LFUs). Our aim with this work, rather than arguing for Suszko’s thesis, is to show that two-valued presentations of these peculiar logics enlighten the non-standard behavior of their logical connectives. More specifically, the twovalued presentations of paraconsistent logics illustrate and clarify the disjunctive flavor of the conjunction, and dually, the two-valued presentations of paracomplete subsystems of Weak Kleene logics reveal the conjunctive flavor of the disjunction.
id UNICAMP-17_ede324af1bd19c4d84724f68bd2a38d2
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8656455
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-17
network_name_str Manuscrito (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Two-valued weak kleene logicsWeak kleene logicsBivaluationsLogics of nonsense.In the literature,Weak Kleene logics are usually taken as three-valued logics. However, Suszko has challenged the main idea of many-valued logic claiming that every logic can be presented in a two-valued fashion. In this paper, we provide two-valued semantics for the Weak Kleene logics and for a number of four-valued subsystems of them. We do the same for the so-called Logics of Nonsense, which are extensions of the Weak Kleene logics with unary operators that allow looking at them as Logics of Formal Inconsistency (LFIs) and Logics of Formal Underterminedness (LFUs). Our aim with this work, rather than arguing for Suszko’s thesis, is to show that two-valued presentations of these peculiar logics enlighten the non-standard behavior of their logical connectives. More specifically, the twovalued presentations of paraconsistent logics illustrate and clarify the disjunctive flavor of the conjunction, and dually, the two-valued presentations of paracomplete subsystems of Weak Kleene logics reveal the conjunctive flavor of the disjunction.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2019-09-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8656455Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 42 n. 1 (2019): jan./mar.; 1-43Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 42 No. 1 (2019): jan./mar.; 1-43Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 42 Núm. 1 (2019): jan./mar.; 1-432317-630Xreponame:Manuscrito (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8656455/21241Brazil; 2019Copyright (c) 2019 Manuscritoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDa Ré, BrunoSzmuc, Damian2019-09-03T17:58:24Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8656455Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscritoPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/oaimwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br2317-630X0100-6045opendoar:2019-09-03T17:58:24Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Two-valued weak kleene logics
title Two-valued weak kleene logics
spellingShingle Two-valued weak kleene logics
Da Ré, Bruno
Weak kleene logics
Bivaluations
Logics of nonsense.
title_short Two-valued weak kleene logics
title_full Two-valued weak kleene logics
title_fullStr Two-valued weak kleene logics
title_full_unstemmed Two-valued weak kleene logics
title_sort Two-valued weak kleene logics
author Da Ré, Bruno
author_facet Da Ré, Bruno
Szmuc, Damian
author_role author
author2 Szmuc, Damian
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Da Ré, Bruno
Szmuc, Damian
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Weak kleene logics
Bivaluations
Logics of nonsense.
topic Weak kleene logics
Bivaluations
Logics of nonsense.
description In the literature,Weak Kleene logics are usually taken as three-valued logics. However, Suszko has challenged the main idea of many-valued logic claiming that every logic can be presented in a two-valued fashion. In this paper, we provide two-valued semantics for the Weak Kleene logics and for a number of four-valued subsystems of them. We do the same for the so-called Logics of Nonsense, which are extensions of the Weak Kleene logics with unary operators that allow looking at them as Logics of Formal Inconsistency (LFIs) and Logics of Formal Underterminedness (LFUs). Our aim with this work, rather than arguing for Suszko’s thesis, is to show that two-valued presentations of these peculiar logics enlighten the non-standard behavior of their logical connectives. More specifically, the twovalued presentations of paraconsistent logics illustrate and clarify the disjunctive flavor of the conjunction, and dually, the two-valued presentations of paracomplete subsystems of Weak Kleene logics reveal the conjunctive flavor of the disjunction.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-09-03
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8656455
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8656455
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8656455/21241
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Manuscrito
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Manuscrito
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; 2019
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 42 n. 1 (2019): jan./mar.; 1-43
Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 42 No. 1 (2019): jan./mar.; 1-43
Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 42 Núm. 1 (2019): jan./mar.; 1-43
2317-630X
reponame:Manuscrito (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Manuscrito (Online)
collection Manuscrito (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br
_version_ 1800216567064035328