Ontology and the political absolute: a critical reading of Spinoza on women

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Canaslan, Eylem
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Manuscrito (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8674094
Resumo: The “black page” in Spinoza’s Political Treatise has been much discussed and interpreted. These can be roughly divided into three groups: Approaches that see the “black page” as an extension of Spinoza’s theory of the passions and imagination; approaches that maintain that Spinoza excluded women from politics not because of their innate weaknesses but because of their social conditions; approaches that maintain that he excluded women because he saw them as weaker beings, but this contradicts his certain accounts, especially in the Ethics. In this paper, I take the latter view. My contribution is to argue that this contradiction is not unique to the Ethics. I pursue my reading along two lines, one ontological and one political. In the first, I focus on the continuity between the Ethics and the Political Treatise and show that the “black page” is also inconsistent with the ontology and methodology of the Political Treatise itself. In the second, I argue that the exclusion of women also contradicts the concept of the political absolute developed in this last work, since this concept problematizes any kind of exclusion and provides for political stability the strategic principle of increasing the number of decision-makers as much as possible.
id UNICAMP-17_f34a6b6c5662e035d78b6ffe88f435f0
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8674094
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-17
network_name_str Manuscrito (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Ontology and the political absolute: a critical reading of Spinoza on womenOntology and the political absolute: a critical reading of Spinoza on womenOntology and the political absolute: a critical reading of Spinoza on womenSpinozaWomenOntologySui jurisPolitical absoluteSpinozaWomenOntologySui jurisPolitical absoluteSpinozaWomenOntologySui jurisPolitical absoluteThe “black page” in Spinoza’s Political Treatise has been much discussed and interpreted. These can be roughly divided into three groups: Approaches that see the “black page” as an extension of Spinoza’s theory of the passions and imagination; approaches that maintain that Spinoza excluded women from politics not because of their innate weaknesses but because of their social conditions; approaches that maintain that he excluded women because he saw them as weaker beings, but this contradicts his certain accounts, especially in the Ethics. In this paper, I take the latter view. My contribution is to argue that this contradiction is not unique to the Ethics. I pursue my reading along two lines, one ontological and one political. In the first, I focus on the continuity between the Ethics and the Political Treatise and show that the “black page” is also inconsistent with the ontology and methodology of the Political Treatise itself. In the second, I argue that the exclusion of women also contradicts the concept of the political absolute developed in this last work, since this concept problematizes any kind of exclusion and provides for political stability the strategic principle of increasing the number of decision-makers as much as possible.The “black page” in Spinoza’s Political Treatise has been much discussed and interpreted. These can be roughly divided into three groups: Approaches that see the “black page” as an extension of Spinoza’s theory of the passions and imagination; approaches that maintain that Spinoza excluded women from politics not because of their innate weaknesses but because of their social conditions; approaches that maintain that he excluded women because he saw them as weaker beings, but this contradicts his certain accounts, especially in the Ethics. In this paper, I take the latter view. My contribution is to argue that this contradiction is not unique to the Ethics. I pursue my reading along two lines, one ontological and one political. In the first, I focus on the continuity between the Ethics and the Political Treatise and show that the “black page” is also inconsistent with the ontology and methodology of the Political Treatise itself. In the second, I argue that the exclusion of women also contradicts the concept of the political absolute developed in this last work, since this concept problematizes any kind of exclusion and provides for political stability the strategic principle of increasing the number of decision-makers as much as possible.The “black page” in Spinoza’s Political Treatise has been much discussed and interpreted. These can be roughly divided into three groups: Approaches that see the “black page” as an extension of Spinoza’s theory of the passions and imagination; approaches that maintain that Spinoza excluded women from politics not because of their innate weaknesses but because of their social conditions; approaches that maintain that he excluded women because he saw them as weaker beings, but this contradicts his certain accounts, especially in the Ethics. In this paper, I take the latter view. My contribution is to argue that this contradiction is not unique to the Ethics. I pursue my reading along two lines, one ontological and one political. In the first, I focus on the continuity between the Ethics and the Political Treatise and show that the “black page” is also inconsistent with the ontology and methodology of the Political Treatise itself. In the second, I argue that the exclusion of women also contradicts the concept of the political absolute developed in this last work, since this concept problematizes any kind of exclusion and provides for political stability the strategic principle of increasing the number of decision-makers as much as possible.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2023-07-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextTextoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8674094Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 46 n. 1 (2023): Jan./Mar.; 147-196Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 46 No. 1 (2023): Jan./Mar.; 147-196Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 46 Núm. 1 (2023): Jan./Mar.; 147-1962317-630Xreponame:Manuscrito (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8674094/32295Brazil, ContemporaryBrasil; ContemporáneoBrazil, ContemporanyCopyright (c) 2023 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofiahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCanaslan, Eylem2023-07-28T19:54:05Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8674094Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscritoPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/oaimwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br2317-630X0100-6045opendoar:2023-07-28T19:54:05Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Ontology and the political absolute: a critical reading of Spinoza on women
Ontology and the political absolute: a critical reading of Spinoza on women
Ontology and the political absolute: a critical reading of Spinoza on women
title Ontology and the political absolute: a critical reading of Spinoza on women
spellingShingle Ontology and the political absolute: a critical reading of Spinoza on women
Canaslan, Eylem
Spinoza
Women
Ontology
Sui juris
Political absolute
Spinoza
Women
Ontology
Sui juris
Political absolute
Spinoza
Women
Ontology
Sui juris
Political absolute
title_short Ontology and the political absolute: a critical reading of Spinoza on women
title_full Ontology and the political absolute: a critical reading of Spinoza on women
title_fullStr Ontology and the political absolute: a critical reading of Spinoza on women
title_full_unstemmed Ontology and the political absolute: a critical reading of Spinoza on women
title_sort Ontology and the political absolute: a critical reading of Spinoza on women
author Canaslan, Eylem
author_facet Canaslan, Eylem
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Canaslan, Eylem
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Spinoza
Women
Ontology
Sui juris
Political absolute
Spinoza
Women
Ontology
Sui juris
Political absolute
Spinoza
Women
Ontology
Sui juris
Political absolute
topic Spinoza
Women
Ontology
Sui juris
Political absolute
Spinoza
Women
Ontology
Sui juris
Political absolute
Spinoza
Women
Ontology
Sui juris
Political absolute
description The “black page” in Spinoza’s Political Treatise has been much discussed and interpreted. These can be roughly divided into three groups: Approaches that see the “black page” as an extension of Spinoza’s theory of the passions and imagination; approaches that maintain that Spinoza excluded women from politics not because of their innate weaknesses but because of their social conditions; approaches that maintain that he excluded women because he saw them as weaker beings, but this contradicts his certain accounts, especially in the Ethics. In this paper, I take the latter view. My contribution is to argue that this contradiction is not unique to the Ethics. I pursue my reading along two lines, one ontological and one political. In the first, I focus on the continuity between the Ethics and the Political Treatise and show that the “black page” is also inconsistent with the ontology and methodology of the Political Treatise itself. In the second, I argue that the exclusion of women also contradicts the concept of the political absolute developed in this last work, since this concept problematizes any kind of exclusion and provides for political stability the strategic principle of increasing the number of decision-makers as much as possible.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-07-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Text
Texto
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8674094
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8674094
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8674094/32295
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil, Contemporary
Brasil; Contemporáneo
Brazil, Contemporany
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 46 n. 1 (2023): Jan./Mar.; 147-196
Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 46 No. 1 (2023): Jan./Mar.; 147-196
Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 46 Núm. 1 (2023): Jan./Mar.; 147-196
2317-630X
reponame:Manuscrito (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Manuscrito (Online)
collection Manuscrito (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br
_version_ 1800216568502681600