COMPUTER SIMULATIONS IN METAPHYSICS: POSSIBILITIES AND LIMITATIONS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: WHEELER,BILLY
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Manuscrito (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452019000300108
Resumo: Abstract Computer models and simulations have provided enormous benefits to researchers in the natural and social sciences, as well as many areas of philosophy. However, to date, there has been little attempt to use computer models in the development and evaluation of metaphysical theories. This is a shame, as there are good reasons for believing that metaphysics could benefit just as much from this practice as other disciplines. In this paper I assess the possibilities and limitations of using computer models in metaphysics. I outline the way in which different kinds of model could be useful for different areas of metaphysics, and I illustrate in more detail how agent-based models specifically could be used to model two well-known theories of laws: David Lewis’s "Best System Account" and David Armstrong's "Nomic Necessitation" view. Some logically possible processes cannot be simulated on a standard computing device. I finish by assessing how much of a threat this is to the prospect of metaphysical modeling in general.
id UNICAMP-17_fb095139f476f5100e908234fd45eb84
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-60452019000300108
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-17
network_name_str Manuscrito (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling COMPUTER SIMULATIONS IN METAPHYSICS: POSSIBILITIES AND LIMITATIONSComputer modelingComputer simulationMethods in metaphysicsHumean SupervenienceNomic NecessityAbstract Computer models and simulations have provided enormous benefits to researchers in the natural and social sciences, as well as many areas of philosophy. However, to date, there has been little attempt to use computer models in the development and evaluation of metaphysical theories. This is a shame, as there are good reasons for believing that metaphysics could benefit just as much from this practice as other disciplines. In this paper I assess the possibilities and limitations of using computer models in metaphysics. I outline the way in which different kinds of model could be useful for different areas of metaphysics, and I illustrate in more detail how agent-based models specifically could be used to model two well-known theories of laws: David Lewis’s "Best System Account" and David Armstrong's "Nomic Necessitation" view. Some logically possible processes cannot be simulated on a standard computing device. I finish by assessing how much of a threat this is to the prospect of metaphysical modeling in general.UNICAMP - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Centro de Lógica, Epistemologia e História da Ciência2019-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452019000300108Manuscrito v.42 n.3 2019reponame:Manuscrito (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMP10.1590/0100-6045.2019.v42n3.bwinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessWHEELER,BILLYeng2019-10-17T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-60452019000300108Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=0100-6045&lng=pt&nrm=isoPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpmwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br2317-630X0100-6045opendoar:2019-10-17T00:00Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv COMPUTER SIMULATIONS IN METAPHYSICS: POSSIBILITIES AND LIMITATIONS
title COMPUTER SIMULATIONS IN METAPHYSICS: POSSIBILITIES AND LIMITATIONS
spellingShingle COMPUTER SIMULATIONS IN METAPHYSICS: POSSIBILITIES AND LIMITATIONS
WHEELER,BILLY
Computer modeling
Computer simulation
Methods in metaphysics
Humean Supervenience
Nomic Necessity
title_short COMPUTER SIMULATIONS IN METAPHYSICS: POSSIBILITIES AND LIMITATIONS
title_full COMPUTER SIMULATIONS IN METAPHYSICS: POSSIBILITIES AND LIMITATIONS
title_fullStr COMPUTER SIMULATIONS IN METAPHYSICS: POSSIBILITIES AND LIMITATIONS
title_full_unstemmed COMPUTER SIMULATIONS IN METAPHYSICS: POSSIBILITIES AND LIMITATIONS
title_sort COMPUTER SIMULATIONS IN METAPHYSICS: POSSIBILITIES AND LIMITATIONS
author WHEELER,BILLY
author_facet WHEELER,BILLY
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv WHEELER,BILLY
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Computer modeling
Computer simulation
Methods in metaphysics
Humean Supervenience
Nomic Necessity
topic Computer modeling
Computer simulation
Methods in metaphysics
Humean Supervenience
Nomic Necessity
description Abstract Computer models and simulations have provided enormous benefits to researchers in the natural and social sciences, as well as many areas of philosophy. However, to date, there has been little attempt to use computer models in the development and evaluation of metaphysical theories. This is a shame, as there are good reasons for believing that metaphysics could benefit just as much from this practice as other disciplines. In this paper I assess the possibilities and limitations of using computer models in metaphysics. I outline the way in which different kinds of model could be useful for different areas of metaphysics, and I illustrate in more detail how agent-based models specifically could be used to model two well-known theories of laws: David Lewis’s "Best System Account" and David Armstrong's "Nomic Necessitation" view. Some logically possible processes cannot be simulated on a standard computing device. I finish by assessing how much of a threat this is to the prospect of metaphysical modeling in general.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-07-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452019000300108
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452019000300108
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0100-6045.2019.v42n3.bw
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UNICAMP - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Centro de Lógica, Epistemologia e História da Ciência
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UNICAMP - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Centro de Lógica, Epistemologia e História da Ciência
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Manuscrito v.42 n.3 2019
reponame:Manuscrito (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Manuscrito (Online)
collection Manuscrito (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br
_version_ 1748950065860313088