The literature teaching and the negativity of the literary
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Pro-Posições (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/proposic/article/view/8656349 |
Resumo: | In contrast with the “human” or “post-human” theoretical assumptions concerning literature and its institutional place, this paper intends to establish a “negative” or “unproductive” reading of the teaching of literature. Therefore, the text is divided into two key moments: first, it examines the temporality that literature requires as a result of the effective contact with its objects; then, the essay approaches the process of “self-denial” that literature opens after the contact with the specificity of the artifacts. In short, defending a “negative” reading of literature does not mean emptying it of any ethical dimension; on the contrary, the “negativity” of the literary responds to an urgent political task for the present time. |
id |
UNICAMP-18_a642c3dac8922e163868c94bf2cba140 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8656349 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-18 |
network_name_str |
Pro-Posições (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The literature teaching and the negativity of the literaryO ensino de literatura e a negatividade do literárioLiteratureTeachingNegativityLiteraturaEnsinoNegatividadeIn contrast with the “human” or “post-human” theoretical assumptions concerning literature and its institutional place, this paper intends to establish a “negative” or “unproductive” reading of the teaching of literature. Therefore, the text is divided into two key moments: first, it examines the temporality that literature requires as a result of the effective contact with its objects; then, the essay approaches the process of “self-denial” that literature opens after the contact with the specificity of the artifacts. In short, defending a “negative” reading of literature does not mean emptying it of any ethical dimension; on the contrary, the “negativity” of the literary responds to an urgent political task for the present time.Em contraste com os pressupostos teóricos “humanos” ou “pós-humanos” acerca da literatura e de seu lugar institucional, o presente ensaio propõe-se a estabelecer uma leitura “negativa” ou “improdutiva” do ensino literário. Para tanto, o texto divide-se em dois momentos fundamentais: primeiro, examina a temporalidade que a literatura exige, quando do contato efetivo com os objetos; a seguir, o ensaio volta-se para o processo de “saída de si” que a literatura inaugura, quando da entrega à especificidade dos artefatos. Em suma, defender uma leitura “negativa” da literatura não significa esvaziá-la de qualquer dimensão ética; pelo contrário, a “negatividade” do literário responde a uma tarefa política urgente para o tempo presente.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2018-12-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/proposic/article/view/8656349Pro-Posições; Vol. 29 No. 2 (2018): maio/ago.; 285-298Pro-Posições; Vol. 29 Núm. 2 (2018): maio/ago.; 285-298Pro-Posições; v. 29 n. 2 (2018): maio/ago.; 285-2981980-6248reponame:Pro-Posições (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/proposic/article/view/8656349/21169Brazil; 2019Brasil; 2019Copyright (c) 2018 Pro-Posiçõesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCechinel, André 2019-08-27T12:31:46Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8656349Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/proposicPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/proposic/oai||proposic@unicamp.br1980-62480103-7307opendoar:2019-08-27T12:31:46Pro-Posições (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The literature teaching and the negativity of the literary O ensino de literatura e a negatividade do literário |
title |
The literature teaching and the negativity of the literary |
spellingShingle |
The literature teaching and the negativity of the literary Cechinel, André Literature Teaching Negativity Literatura Ensino Negatividade |
title_short |
The literature teaching and the negativity of the literary |
title_full |
The literature teaching and the negativity of the literary |
title_fullStr |
The literature teaching and the negativity of the literary |
title_full_unstemmed |
The literature teaching and the negativity of the literary |
title_sort |
The literature teaching and the negativity of the literary |
author |
Cechinel, André |
author_facet |
Cechinel, André |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cechinel, André |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Literature Teaching Negativity Literatura Ensino Negatividade |
topic |
Literature Teaching Negativity Literatura Ensino Negatividade |
description |
In contrast with the “human” or “post-human” theoretical assumptions concerning literature and its institutional place, this paper intends to establish a “negative” or “unproductive” reading of the teaching of literature. Therefore, the text is divided into two key moments: first, it examines the temporality that literature requires as a result of the effective contact with its objects; then, the essay approaches the process of “self-denial” that literature opens after the contact with the specificity of the artifacts. In short, defending a “negative” reading of literature does not mean emptying it of any ethical dimension; on the contrary, the “negativity” of the literary responds to an urgent political task for the present time. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-14 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Texto info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/proposic/article/view/8656349 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/proposic/article/view/8656349 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/proposic/article/view/8656349/21169 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Pro-Posições info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Pro-Posições |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazil; 2019 Brasil; 2019 |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pro-Posições; Vol. 29 No. 2 (2018): maio/ago.; 285-298 Pro-Posições; Vol. 29 Núm. 2 (2018): maio/ago.; 285-298 Pro-Posições; v. 29 n. 2 (2018): maio/ago.; 285-298 1980-6248 reponame:Pro-Posições (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Pro-Posições (Online) |
collection |
Pro-Posições (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pro-Posições (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||proposic@unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1800217188875894784 |