Influence of inventory cutoff rules on whole-building LCA results

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pulgrossi, Lizzie Monique
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Silva, Vanessa Gomes da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: PARC (Campinas)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/parc/article/view/8658259
Resumo: The scarce publications on whole-building lifecycle assessment (wbLCA) highlights the need to reduce the number of flows considered. Cutoff rules facilitate inventory modeling, but their effects are underexplored in the literature. This work investigates how the most well-known cutoff approaches used in wbLCA - by mass and energy, as indicated by the EN 15804 standard, and by building elements, as adopted by LEED v4 certification – influence the assessment results, relatively to a baseline, complete inventory. Cradle to grave impacts was calculated for two case studies. SimaPro v8.5/9.0 supported processes composition and adaptation from the Ecoinvent database. CML-IA baseline and CED methods were used for impact assessment, and k-means clustering highlighted relationships amongst environmental categories. Whilst the European cutoff rule retains a considerable share of impacts on all categories, the elements excluded by the LEED approach mostly impact non-assessed categories, such as ecotoxicity, human toxicity, and abiotic depletion. These categories are highly affected by some building materials production. The free choice of three environmental categories to assess may also result in information redundancy whenever they pertain to the same cluster. To balance inventory completion viability while ensuring the integrity of wbLCA conclusions, we recommend that the certification compute over 75% of the metals used in the building and strategically expand the set of categories evaluated on a mandatory basis. Additional studies are now needed to confirm our findings and validate propositions for certification-oriented wbLCA.
id UNICAMP-20_196338fbefb5e60ef077dc281997ca2c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8658259
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-20
network_name_str PARC (Campinas)
repository_id_str
spelling Influence of inventory cutoff rules on whole-building LCA resultsInfluência de regras de corte de inventário nos resultados de ACV de edificaçõesLife Cycle AssesmentWhole-building LCACutoff rulesLEEDCertificationAvaliação do Ciclo de VidaACV de edificação completaRegras de corteLEEDCertificaçãoThe scarce publications on whole-building lifecycle assessment (wbLCA) highlights the need to reduce the number of flows considered. Cutoff rules facilitate inventory modeling, but their effects are underexplored in the literature. This work investigates how the most well-known cutoff approaches used in wbLCA - by mass and energy, as indicated by the EN 15804 standard, and by building elements, as adopted by LEED v4 certification – influence the assessment results, relatively to a baseline, complete inventory. Cradle to grave impacts was calculated for two case studies. SimaPro v8.5/9.0 supported processes composition and adaptation from the Ecoinvent database. CML-IA baseline and CED methods were used for impact assessment, and k-means clustering highlighted relationships amongst environmental categories. Whilst the European cutoff rule retains a considerable share of impacts on all categories, the elements excluded by the LEED approach mostly impact non-assessed categories, such as ecotoxicity, human toxicity, and abiotic depletion. These categories are highly affected by some building materials production. The free choice of three environmental categories to assess may also result in information redundancy whenever they pertain to the same cluster. To balance inventory completion viability while ensuring the integrity of wbLCA conclusions, we recommend that the certification compute over 75% of the metals used in the building and strategically expand the set of categories evaluated on a mandatory basis. Additional studies are now needed to confirm our findings and validate propositions for certification-oriented wbLCA.A escassa literatura disponível sobre avaliação do ciclo de vida de edificações (ACVed) aponta a necessidade de reduzir os fluxos considerados. As regras de corte auxiliam a viabilizar a modelagem, mas o efeito de variações na sua aplicação é inexplorado na literatura. O objetivo deste trabalho é investigar a influência da aplicação das duas principais abordagens de corte de inventário utilizadas em ACVed - por massa e energia, indicada pela norma EN 15804, e por subsistema construtivo, como adotado pela certificação LEED v4 - relativamente ao inventário mais completo possível (“best-of-knowledge”). Impactos do berço ao túmulo foram calculados para dois casos. A plataforma SimaPro v8.5/9.0 apoiou a composição dos processos e adaptações da base Ecoinvent. Foram utilizados os métodos CML-IA baseline e CED para avaliação de impacto, e clusterização k-means para prospecção de relações entre categorias ambientais. Enquanto a regra de corte europeia retém uma parcela considerável dos impactos em todas as categorias, os subsistemas excluídos pelo LEED afetam principalmente categorias não avaliadas, mas em que a produção de materiais de construção tem efeito relevante, como ecotoxicidades, toxicidade humana e depleção abiótica. Adicionalmente, a livre escolha de três categorias ambientais propicia redundância de informação, caso elas façam parte de um mesmo cluster. Para equilibrar a viabilidade da ACVed, enquanto se assegura a integridade das conclusões, recomendamos que a certificação adicione subsistemas na avaliação até que mais de 75% dos metais sejam computados, e amplie estrategicamente o conjunto de categorias avaliadas mandatoriamente. Estudos adicionais são agora necessários para confirmar estas proposições.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2020-12-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/parc/article/view/865825910.20396/parc.v11i0.8658259PARC Pesquisa em Arquitetura e Construção; Vol. 11 (2020): Continuous publication; e020026PARC Pesquisa em Arquitetura e Construção; Vol. 11 (2020): Publicação contínua; e020026PARC Pesquisa em Arquitetura e Construção; v. 11 (2020): Publicação contínua; e0200261980-6809reponame:PARC (Campinas)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/parc/article/view/8658259/25692Campinas, Brazil; ComteporaryCampinas, Brasil; ContemporâneoCopyright (c) 2020 PARC Pesquisa em Arquitetura e Construçãohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPulgrossi, Lizzie MoniqueSilva, Vanessa Gomes da2021-01-29T11:48:30Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8658259Revistahttp://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/parcPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/parc/oai||parc@fec.unicamp.br1980-68091980-6809opendoar:2021-01-29T11:48:30PARC (Campinas) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Influence of inventory cutoff rules on whole-building LCA results
Influência de regras de corte de inventário nos resultados de ACV de edificações
title Influence of inventory cutoff rules on whole-building LCA results
spellingShingle Influence of inventory cutoff rules on whole-building LCA results
Pulgrossi, Lizzie Monique
Life Cycle Assesment
Whole-building LCA
Cutoff rules
LEED
Certification
Avaliação do Ciclo de Vida
ACV de edificação completa
Regras de corte
LEED
Certificação
title_short Influence of inventory cutoff rules on whole-building LCA results
title_full Influence of inventory cutoff rules on whole-building LCA results
title_fullStr Influence of inventory cutoff rules on whole-building LCA results
title_full_unstemmed Influence of inventory cutoff rules on whole-building LCA results
title_sort Influence of inventory cutoff rules on whole-building LCA results
author Pulgrossi, Lizzie Monique
author_facet Pulgrossi, Lizzie Monique
Silva, Vanessa Gomes da
author_role author
author2 Silva, Vanessa Gomes da
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pulgrossi, Lizzie Monique
Silva, Vanessa Gomes da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Life Cycle Assesment
Whole-building LCA
Cutoff rules
LEED
Certification
Avaliação do Ciclo de Vida
ACV de edificação completa
Regras de corte
LEED
Certificação
topic Life Cycle Assesment
Whole-building LCA
Cutoff rules
LEED
Certification
Avaliação do Ciclo de Vida
ACV de edificação completa
Regras de corte
LEED
Certificação
description The scarce publications on whole-building lifecycle assessment (wbLCA) highlights the need to reduce the number of flows considered. Cutoff rules facilitate inventory modeling, but their effects are underexplored in the literature. This work investigates how the most well-known cutoff approaches used in wbLCA - by mass and energy, as indicated by the EN 15804 standard, and by building elements, as adopted by LEED v4 certification – influence the assessment results, relatively to a baseline, complete inventory. Cradle to grave impacts was calculated for two case studies. SimaPro v8.5/9.0 supported processes composition and adaptation from the Ecoinvent database. CML-IA baseline and CED methods were used for impact assessment, and k-means clustering highlighted relationships amongst environmental categories. Whilst the European cutoff rule retains a considerable share of impacts on all categories, the elements excluded by the LEED approach mostly impact non-assessed categories, such as ecotoxicity, human toxicity, and abiotic depletion. These categories are highly affected by some building materials production. The free choice of three environmental categories to assess may also result in information redundancy whenever they pertain to the same cluster. To balance inventory completion viability while ensuring the integrity of wbLCA conclusions, we recommend that the certification compute over 75% of the metals used in the building and strategically expand the set of categories evaluated on a mandatory basis. Additional studies are now needed to confirm our findings and validate propositions for certification-oriented wbLCA.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-18
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Texto
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/parc/article/view/8658259
10.20396/parc.v11i0.8658259
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/parc/article/view/8658259
identifier_str_mv 10.20396/parc.v11i0.8658259
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/parc/article/view/8658259/25692
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 PARC Pesquisa em Arquitetura e Construção
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 PARC Pesquisa em Arquitetura e Construção
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Campinas, Brazil; Comteporary
Campinas, Brasil; Contemporâneo
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv PARC Pesquisa em Arquitetura e Construção; Vol. 11 (2020): Continuous publication; e020026
PARC Pesquisa em Arquitetura e Construção; Vol. 11 (2020): Publicação contínua; e020026
PARC Pesquisa em Arquitetura e Construção; v. 11 (2020): Publicação contínua; e020026
1980-6809
reponame:PARC (Campinas)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str PARC (Campinas)
collection PARC (Campinas)
repository.name.fl_str_mv PARC (Campinas) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||parc@fec.unicamp.br
_version_ 1809283615099453440