Re-democratization and the city in dispute: the debate in the architecture and urbanism magazines between 1985 and 1990
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | PARC (Campinas) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/parc/article/view/8655530 |
Resumo: | This paper investigates different instances of the ongoing debate in architecture throughout the process of re-democratization in Brazil, from articles published between 1985 and 1990 in the Brazilian magazines Projeto and Arquitetura e Urbanismo (AU). The reorganization of state-market relations — one of the facets of the re-democratization process — has given new contours to the city’s dispute between the various representatives of the public and private spheres. On the other hand, the field of architecture and its different instances actively participated in the debates about re-democratization and, sometimes more, sometimes less explicitly, its actors defended their political positions and fed the discussions about the new Constitution. Therefore, there was a two-way street between the debates in architecture and the dispute for the city in the debates over the 1988 Constitution. The balance of something that can be called the “modernist heritage” in Brazil and, specifically, the association between the practice of urban planning and Lucio Costa’s Brasilia Pilot Plan, elucidates such positions. As a result, this paper approaches different fronts of the ongoing debate in the field throughout the time frame, establishing a new framework on Architecture’s history during these years. |
id |
UNICAMP-20_8527133a1c5e6d862088f5ae28c4b3c2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8655530 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-20 |
network_name_str |
PARC (Campinas) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Re-democratization and the city in dispute: the debate in the architecture and urbanism magazines between 1985 and 1990REDEMOCRATIZACIÓN Y LEGISLACIÓN URBANA: EL DEBATE A PARTIR DE ARTÍCULOS PUBLICADOS EN LAS REVISTAS PROJETO Y ARQUITETURA E URBANISMO ENTRE 1985 Y 1990Redemocratização e legislação urbana: o debate nas revistas de arquitetura e urbanismo entre 1985 e 1990Arquitetura brasileiraPlanejamento urbanoRedemocratizaçãoBrazilian architectureUrban planningRe-democratizationThis paper investigates different instances of the ongoing debate in architecture throughout the process of re-democratization in Brazil, from articles published between 1985 and 1990 in the Brazilian magazines Projeto and Arquitetura e Urbanismo (AU). The reorganization of state-market relations — one of the facets of the re-democratization process — has given new contours to the city’s dispute between the various representatives of the public and private spheres. On the other hand, the field of architecture and its different instances actively participated in the debates about re-democratization and, sometimes more, sometimes less explicitly, its actors defended their political positions and fed the discussions about the new Constitution. Therefore, there was a two-way street between the debates in architecture and the dispute for the city in the debates over the 1988 Constitution. The balance of something that can be called the “modernist heritage” in Brazil and, specifically, the association between the practice of urban planning and Lucio Costa’s Brasilia Pilot Plan, elucidates such positions. As a result, this paper approaches different fronts of the ongoing debate in the field throughout the time frame, establishing a new framework on Architecture’s history during these years.Este artículo analiza críticamente los debates acerca de la Asamblea Constituyente y del proceso de redemocratización en Brasil a partir de artículos publicados entre 1985 y 1990. Trata de los momentos en que los debates aparecen de forma directa, sobre todo en las revistas especializadas Projeto y Arquitetura e Urbanismo (AU). A continuación, trata de la asociación entre la práctica de la planificación urbana y el Plan Piloto de Brasilia, de Lucio Costa. Tal asociación llevó a una serie de autores a elaborar críticas a la planificación urbana como críticas a la arquitectura moderna. Los dos frentes de análisis construyen cierta lectura sobre la práctica de planificación urbana y sobre la arquitectura moderna brasileña presente desde mediados de la década de 1980 hasta los días de hoy.Este artigo investiga diferentes instâncias do debate em curso no campo da arquitetura ao longo do processo de redemocratização no Brasil, a partir de artigos publicados entre 1985 e 1990 nas revistas Projeto e Arquitetura e Urbanismo (AU). A reorganização das relações entre Estado e mercado – uma das facetas do processo de redemocratização – deu novos contornos à disputa pela cidade entre os diversos representantes da esfera pública e da esfera privada. Por outro lado, o campo da arquitetura e suas diferentes instâncias participavam ativamente dos debates acerca do processo de redemocratização e, de maneira ora mais, ora menos explícita, seus atores defendiam suas posições políticas e alimentavam os debates acerca da nova Constituição. Havia, portanto, uma via de mão dupla entre as discussões no campo da arquitetura e a disputa pela cidade nos debates acerca da Constituição de 1988. O balanço de algo que pode ser chamado de “herança modernista” no Brasil e, especificamente, a associação entre a prática do planejamento urbano ao Plano Piloto de Brasília, de Lucio Costa, elucida tais posições. Como resultado, aproxima diferentes frentes do debate em curso no meio ao longo do recorte, possibilitando dar a esses anos lastro histórico no âmbito da arquitetura e urbanismo.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2020-12-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/parc/article/view/865553010.20396/parc.v11i0.8655530PARC Pesquisa em Arquitetura e Construção; Vol. 11 (2020): Continuous publication; e020022PARC Pesquisa em Arquitetura e Construção; Vol. 11 (2020): Publicação contínua; e020022PARC Pesquisa em Arquitetura e Construção; v. 11 (2020): Publicação contínua; e0200221980-6809reponame:PARC (Campinas)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/parc/article/view/8655530/25647Brazil; 1985-1990Brasil; 1985-1990Copyright (c) 2020 PARC Pesquisa em Arquitetura e Construçãohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBragaia, Flavio Antonio D'Ugo Frajndlich, Rafael Urano2020-12-21T15:52:36Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8655530Revistahttp://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/parcPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/parc/oai||parc@fec.unicamp.br1980-68091980-6809opendoar:2020-12-21T15:52:36PARC (Campinas) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Re-democratization and the city in dispute: the debate in the architecture and urbanism magazines between 1985 and 1990 REDEMOCRATIZACIÓN Y LEGISLACIÓN URBANA: EL DEBATE A PARTIR DE ARTÍCULOS PUBLICADOS EN LAS REVISTAS PROJETO Y ARQUITETURA E URBANISMO ENTRE 1985 Y 1990 Redemocratização e legislação urbana: o debate nas revistas de arquitetura e urbanismo entre 1985 e 1990 |
title |
Re-democratization and the city in dispute: the debate in the architecture and urbanism magazines between 1985 and 1990 |
spellingShingle |
Re-democratization and the city in dispute: the debate in the architecture and urbanism magazines between 1985 and 1990 Bragaia, Flavio Antonio D'Ugo Arquitetura brasileira Planejamento urbano Redemocratização Brazilian architecture Urban planning Re-democratization |
title_short |
Re-democratization and the city in dispute: the debate in the architecture and urbanism magazines between 1985 and 1990 |
title_full |
Re-democratization and the city in dispute: the debate in the architecture and urbanism magazines between 1985 and 1990 |
title_fullStr |
Re-democratization and the city in dispute: the debate in the architecture and urbanism magazines between 1985 and 1990 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Re-democratization and the city in dispute: the debate in the architecture and urbanism magazines between 1985 and 1990 |
title_sort |
Re-democratization and the city in dispute: the debate in the architecture and urbanism magazines between 1985 and 1990 |
author |
Bragaia, Flavio Antonio D'Ugo |
author_facet |
Bragaia, Flavio Antonio D'Ugo Frajndlich, Rafael Urano |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Frajndlich, Rafael Urano |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bragaia, Flavio Antonio D'Ugo Frajndlich, Rafael Urano |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Arquitetura brasileira Planejamento urbano Redemocratização Brazilian architecture Urban planning Re-democratization |
topic |
Arquitetura brasileira Planejamento urbano Redemocratização Brazilian architecture Urban planning Re-democratization |
description |
This paper investigates different instances of the ongoing debate in architecture throughout the process of re-democratization in Brazil, from articles published between 1985 and 1990 in the Brazilian magazines Projeto and Arquitetura e Urbanismo (AU). The reorganization of state-market relations — one of the facets of the re-democratization process — has given new contours to the city’s dispute between the various representatives of the public and private spheres. On the other hand, the field of architecture and its different instances actively participated in the debates about re-democratization and, sometimes more, sometimes less explicitly, its actors defended their political positions and fed the discussions about the new Constitution. Therefore, there was a two-way street between the debates in architecture and the dispute for the city in the debates over the 1988 Constitution. The balance of something that can be called the “modernist heritage” in Brazil and, specifically, the association between the practice of urban planning and Lucio Costa’s Brasilia Pilot Plan, elucidates such positions. As a result, this paper approaches different fronts of the ongoing debate in the field throughout the time frame, establishing a new framework on Architecture’s history during these years. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-14 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Texto info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/parc/article/view/8655530 10.20396/parc.v11i0.8655530 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/parc/article/view/8655530 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.20396/parc.v11i0.8655530 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/parc/article/view/8655530/25647 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 PARC Pesquisa em Arquitetura e Construção https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 PARC Pesquisa em Arquitetura e Construção https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazil; 1985-1990 Brasil; 1985-1990 |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
PARC Pesquisa em Arquitetura e Construção; Vol. 11 (2020): Continuous publication; e020022 PARC Pesquisa em Arquitetura e Construção; Vol. 11 (2020): Publicação contínua; e020022 PARC Pesquisa em Arquitetura e Construção; v. 11 (2020): Publicação contínua; e020022 1980-6809 reponame:PARC (Campinas) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
PARC (Campinas) |
collection |
PARC (Campinas) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
PARC (Campinas) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||parc@fec.unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1809283615038636032 |