Political contestation and the evolution of National Social Protection Policy Framework (NSPPF) in Zimbabwe
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalho |
Texto Completo: | https://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/rbest/article/view/16531 |
Resumo: | The rise of social protection in Africa is a complex global phenomenon shaped by a wide range of actors interacting at different levels and whose access to policy space and degree of influence are determined by the power and interests that each actor holds. Similarly, in Zimbabwe, the development of the National Social Protection Policy Framework (NSPPF) was a political contestation between the government and different external agencies (international financial institutions, international non-governmental organisations, and United Nations agencies); within the government itself; and within the external agencies themselves. This article looks at the process of developing the NSPPF and concludes that the rise of social protection in Africa needs to be understood as a political contestation, not as a mere technical process. Each player was driven by a different ideological position that it would “push” to prevail over other players’ interests. While external agencies’ push for the policy prevailed, the “success” came at the cost of little national ownership that made its implementation uncertain. |
id |
UNICAMP-22_59b40c340e219d14c7d2ed4193d9a632 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:inpec.econtents.bc.unicamp.br:article/16531 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-22 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalho |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Political contestation and the evolution of National Social Protection Policy Framework (NSPPF) in ZimbabweDisputa política y evolución del National Social Protection Policy Framework (NSPPF) en ZimbabueLa contestation politique et l’évolution du National Social Protection Policy Framework (NSPPF) au ZimbabweDisputa política e evolução do National Social Protection Policy Framework (NSPPF) no ZimbábueProtección socialPolítica socialEscenario político - ZimbabueProteção socialPolítica socialArena política - ZimbábueSocial protectionSocial policyPolitical arena - ZimbabweProtection socialePolitique socialeArène politique - ZimbabweThe rise of social protection in Africa is a complex global phenomenon shaped by a wide range of actors interacting at different levels and whose access to policy space and degree of influence are determined by the power and interests that each actor holds. Similarly, in Zimbabwe, the development of the National Social Protection Policy Framework (NSPPF) was a political contestation between the government and different external agencies (international financial institutions, international non-governmental organisations, and United Nations agencies); within the government itself; and within the external agencies themselves. This article looks at the process of developing the NSPPF and concludes that the rise of social protection in Africa needs to be understood as a political contestation, not as a mere technical process. Each player was driven by a different ideological position that it would “push” to prevail over other players’ interests. While external agencies’ push for the policy prevailed, the “success” came at the cost of little national ownership that made its implementation uncertain.El aumento de la protección social en África es un fenómeno global complejo conformado por un amplio espectro de actores que interactúan a diferentes niveles y cuyo acceso al espacio político y grado de influencia vienen determinados por el poder y los intereses que cada actor posee. Del mismo modo, en Zimbabue, el desarrollo del National Social Protection Policy Framework (NSPPF) fue una disputa política entre el gobierno y diferentes agencias externas (instituciones financieras internacionales, organizaciones no gubernamentales internacionales y agencias de las Naciones Unidas); dentro del propio gobierno; y dentro de las propias agencias externas. Este artículo examina el proceso de elaboración del NSPPF y concluye que la ampliación de la protección social en África debe entenderse como una cuestión política, no como un mero proceso técnico. Cada actor estaba dirigido por una posición ideológica diferente, que presionaba para prevalecer sobre los intereses de otros actores. Al prevalecer la influencia de organismos externos en esta política, el “éxito” se produjo a costa de una escasa apropiación nacional, lo que hizo que su aplicación fuera incierta.L'essor de la protection sociale en Afrique est un phénomène mondial complexe, façonné par un large éventail d'acteurs qui interagissent à différents niveaux et dont l'accès à l'espace politique et le degré d'influence sont déterminés par le pouvoir et les intérêts que détient chaque acteur. De même, au Zimbabwe, l'élaboration du National Social Protection Policy Framework (NSPPF) a été une lutte politique entre le gouvernement et différentes agences externes (institutions financières internationales, organisations non gouvernementales internationales et agences des Nations unies), au sein du gouvernement lui-même et au sein des agences externes. Cet article analyse le processus d'élaboration du NSPPF et conclut que la mise à l'échelle de la protection sociale en Afrique doit être comprise comme une question politique, et pas seulement comme un processus technique. Chaque acteur était guidé par une position idéologique différente, poussant à l'emporter sur les intérêts des autres acteurs. Comme l'influence des agences externes a prévalu dans cette politique, le “succès” s'est fait au prix d'une faible appropriation nationale, ce qui a rendu sa mise en œuvre incertaine.O aumento da proteção social na África é um fenômeno global complexo moldado por uma ampla gama de atores que interagem em diferentes níveis e cujo acesso ao espaço político e grau de influência são determinados pelo poder e pelos interesses que cada ator detém. Da mesma forma, no Zimbábue, o desenvolvimento do National Social Protection Policy Framework (NSPPF) foi uma disputa política entre o governo e diferentes agências externas (instituições financeiras internacionais, organizações não-governamentais internacionais e agências das Nações Unidas); dentro do próprio governo; e dentro das próprias agências externas. Este artigo analisa o processo de desenvolvimento do NSPPF e conclui que a ampliação da proteção social na África precisa ser entendida como uma questão política, e não como um mero processo técnico. Cada ator foi direcionado por uma posição ideológica diferente, pressionando para prevalecer sobre os interesses dos outros atores. À medida que a influência de agências externas prevaleceu nessa política, o “sucesso” veio com o custo de uma baixa apropriação nacional, que tornou sua implementação incerta.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2022-11-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoTexteTextoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/rbest/article/view/1653110.20396/rbest.v4i00.16531RBEST Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalho; v. 4 (2022): Dossiê: Proteção social em tempos de austeridade; e022011Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalho; Vol. 4 (2022): Dossier: Protección social en tiempos de austeridad; e022011RBEST: Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalho; Vol. 4 (2022): Dossier: Social protection in times of austerity; e022011RBEST: Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalho; Vol. 4 (2022): Dossier: La protection sociale en période d'austérité; e0220112674-9564reponame:Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalhoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp)instacron:UNICAMPenghttps://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/rbest/article/view/16531/12069Zimbabwe; ContemporaryZimbabwe; ContemporáneoZimbabwe; ContemporainZimbabwe; ContemporâneoCopyright (c) 2022 Samuel Kapingidzahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKapingidza, Samuel2022-11-16T13:17:35Zoai:inpec.econtents.bc.unicamp.br:article/16531Revistahttps://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/rbest/indexPUBhttps://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/rbest/oairbest@unicamp.br || ppec@unicamp.br2674-95642674-9564opendoar:2022-11-16T13:17:35Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalho - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Political contestation and the evolution of National Social Protection Policy Framework (NSPPF) in Zimbabwe Disputa política y evolución del National Social Protection Policy Framework (NSPPF) en Zimbabue La contestation politique et l’évolution du National Social Protection Policy Framework (NSPPF) au Zimbabwe Disputa política e evolução do National Social Protection Policy Framework (NSPPF) no Zimbábue |
title |
Political contestation and the evolution of National Social Protection Policy Framework (NSPPF) in Zimbabwe |
spellingShingle |
Political contestation and the evolution of National Social Protection Policy Framework (NSPPF) in Zimbabwe Kapingidza, Samuel Protección social Política social Escenario político - Zimbabue Proteção social Política social Arena política - Zimbábue Social protection Social policy Political arena - Zimbabwe Protection sociale Politique sociale Arène politique - Zimbabwe |
title_short |
Political contestation and the evolution of National Social Protection Policy Framework (NSPPF) in Zimbabwe |
title_full |
Political contestation and the evolution of National Social Protection Policy Framework (NSPPF) in Zimbabwe |
title_fullStr |
Political contestation and the evolution of National Social Protection Policy Framework (NSPPF) in Zimbabwe |
title_full_unstemmed |
Political contestation and the evolution of National Social Protection Policy Framework (NSPPF) in Zimbabwe |
title_sort |
Political contestation and the evolution of National Social Protection Policy Framework (NSPPF) in Zimbabwe |
author |
Kapingidza, Samuel |
author_facet |
Kapingidza, Samuel |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Kapingidza, Samuel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Protección social Política social Escenario político - Zimbabue Proteção social Política social Arena política - Zimbábue Social protection Social policy Political arena - Zimbabwe Protection sociale Politique sociale Arène politique - Zimbabwe |
topic |
Protección social Política social Escenario político - Zimbabue Proteção social Política social Arena política - Zimbábue Social protection Social policy Political arena - Zimbabwe Protection sociale Politique sociale Arène politique - Zimbabwe |
description |
The rise of social protection in Africa is a complex global phenomenon shaped by a wide range of actors interacting at different levels and whose access to policy space and degree of influence are determined by the power and interests that each actor holds. Similarly, in Zimbabwe, the development of the National Social Protection Policy Framework (NSPPF) was a political contestation between the government and different external agencies (international financial institutions, international non-governmental organisations, and United Nations agencies); within the government itself; and within the external agencies themselves. This article looks at the process of developing the NSPPF and concludes that the rise of social protection in Africa needs to be understood as a political contestation, not as a mere technical process. Each player was driven by a different ideological position that it would “push” to prevail over other players’ interests. While external agencies’ push for the policy prevailed, the “success” came at the cost of little national ownership that made its implementation uncertain. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-11-12 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Texto Texte Texto info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/rbest/article/view/16531 10.20396/rbest.v4i00.16531 |
url |
https://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/rbest/article/view/16531 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.20396/rbest.v4i00.16531 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/rbest/article/view/16531/12069 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Samuel Kapingidza https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Samuel Kapingidza https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Zimbabwe; Contemporary Zimbabwe; Contemporáneo Zimbabwe; Contemporain Zimbabwe; Contemporâneo |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
RBEST Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalho; v. 4 (2022): Dossiê: Proteção social em tempos de austeridade; e022011 Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalho; Vol. 4 (2022): Dossier: Protección social en tiempos de austeridad; e022011 RBEST: Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalho; Vol. 4 (2022): Dossier: Social protection in times of austerity; e022011 RBEST: Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalho; Vol. 4 (2022): Dossier: La protection sociale en période d'austérité; e022011 2674-9564 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalho instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalho |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalho |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalho - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rbest@unicamp.br || ppec@unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1797049011967885312 |