The form of the law: Lacan and Nancy interpreters of Kant

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Tuppini, Tommaso
Data de Publicação: 2009
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Kant e-prints (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/index.php/kant-e-prints/article/view/485
Resumo: Both Lacan and Nancy saw in the conceptual structure of the Kantian ethical law a kind of anomaly in modern philosophy. For Lacan, the moral Law generates the broken structure of desire. For Nancy, in the categorical character of the imperative comes to light a structure of being-addressed which deconstructs from the inside the self-centred rational and autonomous subject. On the ground of different reason Lacan and Nancy come to the same conclusion: the Kantian form of the law deprives the (Cartesian) subject of its autorefertiality, of its mastery of itself.
id UNICAMP-27_1293aeeed655ed32d322da53900e59eb
oai_identifier_str oai:www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/:article/485
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-27
network_name_str Kant e-prints (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The form of the law: Lacan and Nancy interpreters of KantKantLacanNancyLawBoth Lacan and Nancy saw in the conceptual structure of the Kantian ethical law a kind of anomaly in modern philosophy. For Lacan, the moral Law generates the broken structure of desire. For Nancy, in the categorical character of the imperative comes to light a structure of being-addressed which deconstructs from the inside the self-centred rational and autonomous subject. On the ground of different reason Lacan and Nancy come to the same conclusion: the Kantian form of the law deprives the (Cartesian) subject of its autorefertiality, of its mastery of itself.Centre for Logic, Epistemology, and the History of Science (CLE)2009-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/index.php/kant-e-prints/article/view/485Kant e-prints; v. 3 n. 2 (2008); 279-286Kant e-Prints; Vol. 3 No. 2 (2008); 279-2861677-163Xreponame:Kant e-prints (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:Unicampporhttps://www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/index.php/kant-e-prints/article/view/485/385Copyright (c) 2015 Kant e-Printsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTuppini, Tommaso2021-10-19T15:07:21Zoai:www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/:article/485Revistahttps://www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/index.php/kant-e-prints/PUBhttps://www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/index.php/kant-e-prints/oaiclekant@unicamp.br||danielomarperez@hotmail.com||daniel.omar.perez@pq.cnpq.br1677-163X1677-163Xopendoar:2021-10-19T15:07:21Kant e-prints (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The form of the law: Lacan and Nancy interpreters of Kant
title The form of the law: Lacan and Nancy interpreters of Kant
spellingShingle The form of the law: Lacan and Nancy interpreters of Kant
Tuppini, Tommaso
Kant
Lacan
Nancy
Law
title_short The form of the law: Lacan and Nancy interpreters of Kant
title_full The form of the law: Lacan and Nancy interpreters of Kant
title_fullStr The form of the law: Lacan and Nancy interpreters of Kant
title_full_unstemmed The form of the law: Lacan and Nancy interpreters of Kant
title_sort The form of the law: Lacan and Nancy interpreters of Kant
author Tuppini, Tommaso
author_facet Tuppini, Tommaso
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Tuppini, Tommaso
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Kant
Lacan
Nancy
Law
topic Kant
Lacan
Nancy
Law
description Both Lacan and Nancy saw in the conceptual structure of the Kantian ethical law a kind of anomaly in modern philosophy. For Lacan, the moral Law generates the broken structure of desire. For Nancy, in the categorical character of the imperative comes to light a structure of being-addressed which deconstructs from the inside the self-centred rational and autonomous subject. On the ground of different reason Lacan and Nancy come to the same conclusion: the Kantian form of the law deprives the (Cartesian) subject of its autorefertiality, of its mastery of itself.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/index.php/kant-e-prints/article/view/485
url https://www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/index.php/kant-e-prints/article/view/485
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/index.php/kant-e-prints/article/view/485/385
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Kant e-Prints
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Kant e-Prints
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centre for Logic, Epistemology, and the History of Science (CLE)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centre for Logic, Epistemology, and the History of Science (CLE)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Kant e-prints; v. 3 n. 2 (2008); 279-286
Kant e-Prints; Vol. 3 No. 2 (2008); 279-286
1677-163X
reponame:Kant e-prints (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:Unicamp
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str Unicamp
institution Unicamp
reponame_str Kant e-prints (Online)
collection Kant e-prints (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Kant e-prints (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv clekant@unicamp.br||danielomarperez@hotmail.com||daniel.omar.perez@pq.cnpq.br
_version_ 1754842243314745344

Registros relacionados