Naturalism and realism in Kant’s ethics, de Frederick Raucher
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Kant e-prints (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/index.php/kant-e-prints/article/view/766 |
Resumo: | Professor Rauscher’s book has two main goals: first, to show that Kant’s ethics is compatible with metaphysical naturalism, that is, with the philosophical thesis that no entity outside empirically real nature in space and time is needed; second, to determine the extent to which Kant is a moral realist. As can be seen, Professor Rauscher is not concerned with producing just an exegetical work, and he even recognizes that Kant’s writings are sometimes inconsistent with elements of his interpretation. This is one of the reasons why this is a much welcome book, not only for scholars of Kant, but, more importantly, for philosophers in general. |
id |
UNICAMP-27_622d7e1f470909b22685de6d2b5ce22e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/:article/766 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-27 |
network_name_str |
Kant e-prints (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Naturalism and realism in Kant’s ethics, de Frederick RaucherProfessor Rauscher’s book has two main goals: first, to show that Kant’s ethics is compatible with metaphysical naturalism, that is, with the philosophical thesis that no entity outside empirically real nature in space and time is needed; second, to determine the extent to which Kant is a moral realist. As can be seen, Professor Rauscher is not concerned with producing just an exegetical work, and he even recognizes that Kant’s writings are sometimes inconsistent with elements of his interpretation. This is one of the reasons why this is a much welcome book, not only for scholars of Kant, but, more importantly, for philosophers in general.Centre for Logic, Epistemology, and the History of Science (CLE)2017-06-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/index.php/kant-e-prints/article/view/766Kant e-prints; v. 11 n. 3 (2016); 41-43Kant e-Prints; Vol. 11 No. 3 (2016); 41-431677-163Xreponame:Kant e-prints (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:Unicampenghttps://www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/index.php/kant-e-prints/article/view/766/644Copyright (c) 2017 Kant e-Printsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDall'Agnol, Darlei2021-10-17T22:45:24Zoai:www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/:article/766Revistahttps://www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/index.php/kant-e-prints/PUBhttps://www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/index.php/kant-e-prints/oaiclekant@unicamp.br||danielomarperez@hotmail.com||daniel.omar.perez@pq.cnpq.br1677-163X1677-163Xopendoar:2021-10-17T22:45:24Kant e-prints (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Naturalism and realism in Kant’s ethics, de Frederick Raucher |
title |
Naturalism and realism in Kant’s ethics, de Frederick Raucher |
spellingShingle |
Naturalism and realism in Kant’s ethics, de Frederick Raucher Dall'Agnol, Darlei |
title_short |
Naturalism and realism in Kant’s ethics, de Frederick Raucher |
title_full |
Naturalism and realism in Kant’s ethics, de Frederick Raucher |
title_fullStr |
Naturalism and realism in Kant’s ethics, de Frederick Raucher |
title_full_unstemmed |
Naturalism and realism in Kant’s ethics, de Frederick Raucher |
title_sort |
Naturalism and realism in Kant’s ethics, de Frederick Raucher |
author |
Dall'Agnol, Darlei |
author_facet |
Dall'Agnol, Darlei |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Dall'Agnol, Darlei |
description |
Professor Rauscher’s book has two main goals: first, to show that Kant’s ethics is compatible with metaphysical naturalism, that is, with the philosophical thesis that no entity outside empirically real nature in space and time is needed; second, to determine the extent to which Kant is a moral realist. As can be seen, Professor Rauscher is not concerned with producing just an exegetical work, and he even recognizes that Kant’s writings are sometimes inconsistent with elements of his interpretation. This is one of the reasons why this is a much welcome book, not only for scholars of Kant, but, more importantly, for philosophers in general. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-06-15 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/index.php/kant-e-prints/article/view/766 |
url |
https://www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/index.php/kant-e-prints/article/view/766 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/index.php/kant-e-prints/article/view/766/644 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Kant e-Prints info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Kant e-Prints |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centre for Logic, Epistemology, and the History of Science (CLE) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centre for Logic, Epistemology, and the History of Science (CLE) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Kant e-prints; v. 11 n. 3 (2016); 41-43 Kant e-Prints; Vol. 11 No. 3 (2016); 41-43 1677-163X reponame:Kant e-prints (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:Unicamp |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
Unicamp |
institution |
Unicamp |
reponame_str |
Kant e-prints (Online) |
collection |
Kant e-prints (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Kant e-prints (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
clekant@unicamp.br||danielomarperez@hotmail.com||daniel.omar.perez@pq.cnpq.br |
_version_ |
1754842243573743616 |