The peer review process from the editor’s perspective : a comparative study of Brazilian, Spanish and Mexican journals

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Cláudio Nei Nascimento da
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Moreiro-Gonzalez, José Antonio, Mueller, Suzana Pinheiro Machado
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8640579
Resumo: Presents results of a social statistical analysis of the difficulties identified by scientific journal editors related to the peer review process. A questionnaire in which all questions but one were closed was applied to editors of Brazilian, Spanish and Mexican high ranked journals, so classified by each country’s own criteria. Descriptive statistics was used to describe the editors’ evaluation of the reviewers’ readiness to perform. Results reveal the editors’ main interventions in the peer-review evaluation process, as well as similarities and differences among the three countries and areas of knowledge. Concludes that although editors in the three countries have identified very similar difficulties, areas of knowledge present marked differences.
id UNICAMP-4_23213ad75029d719b67c37c3e3c64a6b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8640579
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-4
network_name_str Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação
repository_id_str
spelling The peer review process from the editor’s perspective : a comparative study of Brazilian, Spanish and Mexican journalsA revisão por pares a partir da percepção dos editores: um estudo comparativo em revistas brasileiras, espanholas e mexicanasEditoresArtigos de periódicosRevisão (editoração)EditorsScientific publicationReview (editing)Presents results of a social statistical analysis of the difficulties identified by scientific journal editors related to the peer review process. A questionnaire in which all questions but one were closed was applied to editors of Brazilian, Spanish and Mexican high ranked journals, so classified by each country’s own criteria. Descriptive statistics was used to describe the editors’ evaluation of the reviewers’ readiness to perform. Results reveal the editors’ main interventions in the peer-review evaluation process, as well as similarities and differences among the three countries and areas of knowledge. Concludes that although editors in the three countries have identified very similar difficulties, areas of knowledge present marked differences.Este trabalho apresenta o resultado de um estudo sobre as dificuldades dos editores de periódicos brasileiros, espanhóis e mexicanos no processo de revisão por pares. Os dados foram colhidos por meio de um questionário composto de questões fechadas e uma aberta, aplicado a editores de periódicos bem qualificados segundo critérios dos três países e tratados com base na estatística descritiva. Os resultados revelaram as principais tarefas realizadas pelo editor no processo de revisão por pares e as diferenças e semelhanças entre países e área do conhecimento. Conclui-se que, além de existirem tarefas onde os editores enfrentam mais dificuldades, os níveis de dificuldades são semelhantes entre países, embora com significativas diferenças entre as áreas do conhecimento.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2016-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/864057910.20396/rdbci.v14i1.8640579RDBCI: Digital Journal of Library and Information Science; Vol. 14 No. 1 (2016): Editorial: Evolution of environments, informational processes and professional librarian performance; 126-143RDBCI: Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação; v. 14 n. 1 (2016): Evolução dos ambientes, processos informacionais e a atuação do profissional bibliotecário; 126-1431678-765Xreponame:Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informaçãoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8640579/pdfBrazil; ContemporaryBrasil; ContemporâneoSilva, Cláudio Nei Nascimento daMoreiro-Gonzalez, José AntonioMueller, Suzana Pinheiro Machadoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-11-12T19:34:11Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8640579Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbciPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/oaippec@unicamp.br||gilbfe@unicamp.br|| rdbci@unicamp.br|| danif@unicamp.br1678-765X1678-765Xopendoar:2023-05-22T10:16:18.014283Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The peer review process from the editor’s perspective : a comparative study of Brazilian, Spanish and Mexican journals
A revisão por pares a partir da percepção dos editores: um estudo comparativo em revistas brasileiras, espanholas e mexicanas
title The peer review process from the editor’s perspective : a comparative study of Brazilian, Spanish and Mexican journals
spellingShingle The peer review process from the editor’s perspective : a comparative study of Brazilian, Spanish and Mexican journals
Silva, Cláudio Nei Nascimento da
Editores
Artigos de periódicos
Revisão (editoração)
Editors
Scientific publication
Review (editing)
title_short The peer review process from the editor’s perspective : a comparative study of Brazilian, Spanish and Mexican journals
title_full The peer review process from the editor’s perspective : a comparative study of Brazilian, Spanish and Mexican journals
title_fullStr The peer review process from the editor’s perspective : a comparative study of Brazilian, Spanish and Mexican journals
title_full_unstemmed The peer review process from the editor’s perspective : a comparative study of Brazilian, Spanish and Mexican journals
title_sort The peer review process from the editor’s perspective : a comparative study of Brazilian, Spanish and Mexican journals
author Silva, Cláudio Nei Nascimento da
author_facet Silva, Cláudio Nei Nascimento da
Moreiro-Gonzalez, José Antonio
Mueller, Suzana Pinheiro Machado
author_role author
author2 Moreiro-Gonzalez, José Antonio
Mueller, Suzana Pinheiro Machado
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Cláudio Nei Nascimento da
Moreiro-Gonzalez, José Antonio
Mueller, Suzana Pinheiro Machado
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Editores
Artigos de periódicos
Revisão (editoração)
Editors
Scientific publication
Review (editing)
topic Editores
Artigos de periódicos
Revisão (editoração)
Editors
Scientific publication
Review (editing)
description Presents results of a social statistical analysis of the difficulties identified by scientific journal editors related to the peer review process. A questionnaire in which all questions but one were closed was applied to editors of Brazilian, Spanish and Mexican high ranked journals, so classified by each country’s own criteria. Descriptive statistics was used to describe the editors’ evaluation of the reviewers’ readiness to perform. Results reveal the editors’ main interventions in the peer-review evaluation process, as well as similarities and differences among the three countries and areas of knowledge. Concludes that although editors in the three countries have identified very similar difficulties, areas of knowledge present marked differences.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Texto
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8640579
10.20396/rdbci.v14i1.8640579
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8640579
identifier_str_mv 10.20396/rdbci.v14i1.8640579
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8640579/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporary
Brasil; Contemporâneo
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv RDBCI: Digital Journal of Library and Information Science; Vol. 14 No. 1 (2016): Editorial: Evolution of environments, informational processes and professional librarian performance; 126-143
RDBCI: Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação; v. 14 n. 1 (2016): Evolução dos ambientes, processos informacionais e a atuação do profissional bibliotecário; 126-143
1678-765X
reponame:Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação
collection Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ppec@unicamp.br||gilbfe@unicamp.br|| rdbci@unicamp.br|| danif@unicamp.br
_version_ 1788167558860374016

Registros relacionados