Social media and libraries in scientific production in United States

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: França, Maira Nani
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Grossi, Angela Maria, Pacios, Ana R.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8661286
Resumo: Introduction: As organizations responsible for providing accurate and up-to-date information, libraries are continually experimenting with new technological resources and remodeling their services to meet the expectations of their users. At the beginning of the 21st century, social media emerged as yet another opportunity for users to connect to libraries and access their information resources. Objective: This study seeks to identify the characteristics of research on “social media and libraries” in American scientific production in order to follow its evolution and point out trends. Methodology: This is a descriptive study, of a qualitative and quantitative nature, based on domain analysis, proposed by Hjørland. The research corpus consists of 69 articles published in scientific journals of Information Science in the United States. It was found that interdomain has been discussed by the scientific community since 2006, mainly within the scope of university libraries. Results: We identified a possible epistemic community in formation. The Library 2.0 concept is one of the theoretical contributions that influenced librarians and impacted library services. The knowledge produced on the analyzed interdomain circulates between Information Science and various fields of knowledge, such as Social Communication, Education, Computer Science, Sociology, among others. In addition to “Web 2.0”, “social networks” is the term most used by the discursive community, even though “social media” stands out as a trend. There is a predisposition for research on practical applications, followed by theoretical studies. Conclusion: Emerging terms were identified, which represent the analyzed domain, not yet covered in the main thesaurus used by researchers in the area.
id UNICAMP-4_7b6f395faa2b1bbd4f7728254fd44efc
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8661286
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-4
network_name_str Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação
repository_id_str
spelling Social media and libraries in scientific production in United StatesMídias sociais e bibliotecas na produção científica dos Estados UnidosSocial mediaSocial networksWeb 2.0 TechnologiesLibrariesDomain analysisMídias sociaisRedes sociaisTecnologias da Web 2.0.BibliotecasAnálise de domínioIntroduction: As organizations responsible for providing accurate and up-to-date information, libraries are continually experimenting with new technological resources and remodeling their services to meet the expectations of their users. At the beginning of the 21st century, social media emerged as yet another opportunity for users to connect to libraries and access their information resources. Objective: This study seeks to identify the characteristics of research on “social media and libraries” in American scientific production in order to follow its evolution and point out trends. Methodology: This is a descriptive study, of a qualitative and quantitative nature, based on domain analysis, proposed by Hjørland. The research corpus consists of 69 articles published in scientific journals of Information Science in the United States. It was found that interdomain has been discussed by the scientific community since 2006, mainly within the scope of university libraries. Results: We identified a possible epistemic community in formation. The Library 2.0 concept is one of the theoretical contributions that influenced librarians and impacted library services. The knowledge produced on the analyzed interdomain circulates between Information Science and various fields of knowledge, such as Social Communication, Education, Computer Science, Sociology, among others. In addition to “Web 2.0”, “social networks” is the term most used by the discursive community, even though “social media” stands out as a trend. There is a predisposition for research on practical applications, followed by theoretical studies. Conclusion: Emerging terms were identified, which represent the analyzed domain, not yet covered in the main thesaurus used by researchers in the area.Introdução: Como organizações responsáveis por disponibilizarem informações precisas e atualizadas, as bibliotecas estão continuamente experimentando novos recursos tecnológicos e remodelando seus serviços para atender expectativas de seus usuários. No início do século XXI, as mídias sociais surgiram como mais uma oportunidade para eles se conectarem a esses espaços e acessarem seus recursos informacionais. Objetivo: Diante disso, este estudo busca identificar as características de investigações sobre mídias sociais e bibliotecas na produção científica estadunidense, de modo a acompanhar sua evolução e apontar tendências. Metodologia: Para tanto, optou-se pela pesquisa descritiva, de natureza qualiquantitativa, fundamentada na análise de domínio, proposta por Hjørland. O corpus é constituído por 69 artigos, publicados em periódicos científicos da Ciência da Informação dos EUA. Nesse sentido, constatou-se que a temática mídias sociais e bibliotecas tem sido discutida no contexto observado desde 2006, principalmente no âmbito das bibliotecas universitárias. Resultados: Identificou-se, ainda, uma possível comunidade epistêmica em formação. Por sua vez, o conceito Library 2.0 surgiu como uma das contribuições teóricas que influenciou bibliotecários e impactou serviços realizados no segmento. Além da Ciência da Informação, o conhecimento produzido sobre o interdomínio analisado circula por vários campos, como Comunicação Social, Educação, Ciência da Computação, Sociologia, dentre outros. Fora o termo Web 2.0, redes sociais é o mais usado por essa comunidade discursiva, embora mídias sociais se destaque como uma tendência. Há também uma predisposição para pesquisas de aplicações práticas, seguida de estudos teóricos. Conclusão: Foram identificados termos emergentes e representantes do interdomínio analisado ainda não contemplados nos principais tesauros utilizados por pesquisadores da área.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2021-02-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTexto info:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfapplication/pdfvideo/mp4https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/866128610.20396/rdbci.v19i00.8661286RDBCI: Digital Journal of Library and Information Science; Vol. 19 (2021): Countinous Publication; e021004RDBCI: Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação; v. 19 (2021): Publicação Contínua; e0210041678-765Xreponame:Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informaçãoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8661286/26247https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8661286/26264https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8661286/26265https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8661286/26472Estados Unidos; ContemporaryEstados Unidos; ContemporâneoCopyright (c) 2021 Maira Nani França, Angela Maria Grossi, Ana R. Pacioshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFrança, Maira NaniGrossi, Angela Maria Pacios, Ana R. 2023-01-04T18:23:58Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8661286Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbciPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/oaippec@unicamp.br||gilbfe@unicamp.br|| rdbci@unicamp.br|| danif@unicamp.br1678-765X1678-765Xopendoar:2023-05-22T10:16:29.168178Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Social media and libraries in scientific production in United States
Mídias sociais e bibliotecas na produção científica dos Estados Unidos
title Social media and libraries in scientific production in United States
spellingShingle Social media and libraries in scientific production in United States
França, Maira Nani
Social media
Social networks
Web 2.0 Technologies
Libraries
Domain analysis
Mídias sociais
Redes sociais
Tecnologias da Web 2.0.
Bibliotecas
Análise de domínio
title_short Social media and libraries in scientific production in United States
title_full Social media and libraries in scientific production in United States
title_fullStr Social media and libraries in scientific production in United States
title_full_unstemmed Social media and libraries in scientific production in United States
title_sort Social media and libraries in scientific production in United States
author França, Maira Nani
author_facet França, Maira Nani
Grossi, Angela Maria
Pacios, Ana R.
author_role author
author2 Grossi, Angela Maria
Pacios, Ana R.
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv França, Maira Nani
Grossi, Angela Maria
Pacios, Ana R.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Social media
Social networks
Web 2.0 Technologies
Libraries
Domain analysis
Mídias sociais
Redes sociais
Tecnologias da Web 2.0.
Bibliotecas
Análise de domínio
topic Social media
Social networks
Web 2.0 Technologies
Libraries
Domain analysis
Mídias sociais
Redes sociais
Tecnologias da Web 2.0.
Bibliotecas
Análise de domínio
description Introduction: As organizations responsible for providing accurate and up-to-date information, libraries are continually experimenting with new technological resources and remodeling their services to meet the expectations of their users. At the beginning of the 21st century, social media emerged as yet another opportunity for users to connect to libraries and access their information resources. Objective: This study seeks to identify the characteristics of research on “social media and libraries” in American scientific production in order to follow its evolution and point out trends. Methodology: This is a descriptive study, of a qualitative and quantitative nature, based on domain analysis, proposed by Hjørland. The research corpus consists of 69 articles published in scientific journals of Information Science in the United States. It was found that interdomain has been discussed by the scientific community since 2006, mainly within the scope of university libraries. Results: We identified a possible epistemic community in formation. The Library 2.0 concept is one of the theoretical contributions that influenced librarians and impacted library services. The knowledge produced on the analyzed interdomain circulates between Information Science and various fields of knowledge, such as Social Communication, Education, Computer Science, Sociology, among others. In addition to “Web 2.0”, “social networks” is the term most used by the discursive community, even though “social media” stands out as a trend. There is a predisposition for research on practical applications, followed by theoretical studies. Conclusion: Emerging terms were identified, which represent the analyzed domain, not yet covered in the main thesaurus used by researchers in the area.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-02-25
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Texto
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8661286
10.20396/rdbci.v19i00.8661286
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8661286
identifier_str_mv 10.20396/rdbci.v19i00.8661286
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8661286/26247
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8661286/26264
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8661286/26265
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8661286/26472
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Maira Nani França, Angela Maria Grossi, Ana R. Pacios
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Maira Nani França, Angela Maria Grossi, Ana R. Pacios
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
video/mp4
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Estados Unidos; Contemporary
Estados Unidos; Contemporâneo
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv RDBCI: Digital Journal of Library and Information Science; Vol. 19 (2021): Countinous Publication; e021004
RDBCI: Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação; v. 19 (2021): Publicação Contínua; e021004
1678-765X
reponame:Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação
collection Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ppec@unicamp.br||gilbfe@unicamp.br|| rdbci@unicamp.br|| danif@unicamp.br
_version_ 1788167560197308416