Social media and libraries in scientific production in United States
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8661286 |
Resumo: | Introduction: As organizations responsible for providing accurate and up-to-date information, libraries are continually experimenting with new technological resources and remodeling their services to meet the expectations of their users. At the beginning of the 21st century, social media emerged as yet another opportunity for users to connect to libraries and access their information resources. Objective: This study seeks to identify the characteristics of research on “social media and libraries” in American scientific production in order to follow its evolution and point out trends. Methodology: This is a descriptive study, of a qualitative and quantitative nature, based on domain analysis, proposed by Hjørland. The research corpus consists of 69 articles published in scientific journals of Information Science in the United States. It was found that interdomain has been discussed by the scientific community since 2006, mainly within the scope of university libraries. Results: We identified a possible epistemic community in formation. The Library 2.0 concept is one of the theoretical contributions that influenced librarians and impacted library services. The knowledge produced on the analyzed interdomain circulates between Information Science and various fields of knowledge, such as Social Communication, Education, Computer Science, Sociology, among others. In addition to “Web 2.0”, “social networks” is the term most used by the discursive community, even though “social media” stands out as a trend. There is a predisposition for research on practical applications, followed by theoretical studies. Conclusion: Emerging terms were identified, which represent the analyzed domain, not yet covered in the main thesaurus used by researchers in the area. |
id |
UNICAMP-4_7b6f395faa2b1bbd4f7728254fd44efc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8661286 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-4 |
network_name_str |
Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Social media and libraries in scientific production in United StatesMídias sociais e bibliotecas na produção científica dos Estados UnidosSocial mediaSocial networksWeb 2.0 TechnologiesLibrariesDomain analysisMídias sociaisRedes sociaisTecnologias da Web 2.0.BibliotecasAnálise de domínioIntroduction: As organizations responsible for providing accurate and up-to-date information, libraries are continually experimenting with new technological resources and remodeling their services to meet the expectations of their users. At the beginning of the 21st century, social media emerged as yet another opportunity for users to connect to libraries and access their information resources. Objective: This study seeks to identify the characteristics of research on “social media and libraries” in American scientific production in order to follow its evolution and point out trends. Methodology: This is a descriptive study, of a qualitative and quantitative nature, based on domain analysis, proposed by Hjørland. The research corpus consists of 69 articles published in scientific journals of Information Science in the United States. It was found that interdomain has been discussed by the scientific community since 2006, mainly within the scope of university libraries. Results: We identified a possible epistemic community in formation. The Library 2.0 concept is one of the theoretical contributions that influenced librarians and impacted library services. The knowledge produced on the analyzed interdomain circulates between Information Science and various fields of knowledge, such as Social Communication, Education, Computer Science, Sociology, among others. In addition to “Web 2.0”, “social networks” is the term most used by the discursive community, even though “social media” stands out as a trend. There is a predisposition for research on practical applications, followed by theoretical studies. Conclusion: Emerging terms were identified, which represent the analyzed domain, not yet covered in the main thesaurus used by researchers in the area.Introdução: Como organizações responsáveis por disponibilizarem informações precisas e atualizadas, as bibliotecas estão continuamente experimentando novos recursos tecnológicos e remodelando seus serviços para atender expectativas de seus usuários. No início do século XXI, as mídias sociais surgiram como mais uma oportunidade para eles se conectarem a esses espaços e acessarem seus recursos informacionais. Objetivo: Diante disso, este estudo busca identificar as características de investigações sobre mídias sociais e bibliotecas na produção científica estadunidense, de modo a acompanhar sua evolução e apontar tendências. Metodologia: Para tanto, optou-se pela pesquisa descritiva, de natureza qualiquantitativa, fundamentada na análise de domínio, proposta por Hjørland. O corpus é constituído por 69 artigos, publicados em periódicos científicos da Ciência da Informação dos EUA. Nesse sentido, constatou-se que a temática mídias sociais e bibliotecas tem sido discutida no contexto observado desde 2006, principalmente no âmbito das bibliotecas universitárias. Resultados: Identificou-se, ainda, uma possível comunidade epistêmica em formação. Por sua vez, o conceito Library 2.0 surgiu como uma das contribuições teóricas que influenciou bibliotecários e impactou serviços realizados no segmento. Além da Ciência da Informação, o conhecimento produzido sobre o interdomínio analisado circula por vários campos, como Comunicação Social, Educação, Ciência da Computação, Sociologia, dentre outros. Fora o termo Web 2.0, redes sociais é o mais usado por essa comunidade discursiva, embora mídias sociais se destaque como uma tendência. Há também uma predisposição para pesquisas de aplicações práticas, seguida de estudos teóricos. Conclusão: Foram identificados termos emergentes e representantes do interdomínio analisado ainda não contemplados nos principais tesauros utilizados por pesquisadores da área.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2021-02-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTexto info:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfapplication/pdfvideo/mp4https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/866128610.20396/rdbci.v19i00.8661286RDBCI: Digital Journal of Library and Information Science; Vol. 19 (2021): Countinous Publication; e021004RDBCI: Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação; v. 19 (2021): Publicação Contínua; e0210041678-765Xreponame:Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informaçãoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8661286/26247https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8661286/26264https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8661286/26265https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8661286/26472Estados Unidos; ContemporaryEstados Unidos; ContemporâneoCopyright (c) 2021 Maira Nani França, Angela Maria Grossi, Ana R. Pacioshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFrança, Maira NaniGrossi, Angela Maria Pacios, Ana R. 2023-01-04T18:23:58Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8661286Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbciPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/oaippec@unicamp.br||gilbfe@unicamp.br|| rdbci@unicamp.br|| danif@unicamp.br1678-765X1678-765Xopendoar:2023-05-22T10:16:29.168178Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Social media and libraries in scientific production in United States Mídias sociais e bibliotecas na produção científica dos Estados Unidos |
title |
Social media and libraries in scientific production in United States |
spellingShingle |
Social media and libraries in scientific production in United States França, Maira Nani Social media Social networks Web 2.0 Technologies Libraries Domain analysis Mídias sociais Redes sociais Tecnologias da Web 2.0. Bibliotecas Análise de domínio |
title_short |
Social media and libraries in scientific production in United States |
title_full |
Social media and libraries in scientific production in United States |
title_fullStr |
Social media and libraries in scientific production in United States |
title_full_unstemmed |
Social media and libraries in scientific production in United States |
title_sort |
Social media and libraries in scientific production in United States |
author |
França, Maira Nani |
author_facet |
França, Maira Nani Grossi, Angela Maria Pacios, Ana R. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Grossi, Angela Maria Pacios, Ana R. |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
França, Maira Nani Grossi, Angela Maria Pacios, Ana R. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Social media Social networks Web 2.0 Technologies Libraries Domain analysis Mídias sociais Redes sociais Tecnologias da Web 2.0. Bibliotecas Análise de domínio |
topic |
Social media Social networks Web 2.0 Technologies Libraries Domain analysis Mídias sociais Redes sociais Tecnologias da Web 2.0. Bibliotecas Análise de domínio |
description |
Introduction: As organizations responsible for providing accurate and up-to-date information, libraries are continually experimenting with new technological resources and remodeling their services to meet the expectations of their users. At the beginning of the 21st century, social media emerged as yet another opportunity for users to connect to libraries and access their information resources. Objective: This study seeks to identify the characteristics of research on “social media and libraries” in American scientific production in order to follow its evolution and point out trends. Methodology: This is a descriptive study, of a qualitative and quantitative nature, based on domain analysis, proposed by Hjørland. The research corpus consists of 69 articles published in scientific journals of Information Science in the United States. It was found that interdomain has been discussed by the scientific community since 2006, mainly within the scope of university libraries. Results: We identified a possible epistemic community in formation. The Library 2.0 concept is one of the theoretical contributions that influenced librarians and impacted library services. The knowledge produced on the analyzed interdomain circulates between Information Science and various fields of knowledge, such as Social Communication, Education, Computer Science, Sociology, among others. In addition to “Web 2.0”, “social networks” is the term most used by the discursive community, even though “social media” stands out as a trend. There is a predisposition for research on practical applications, followed by theoretical studies. Conclusion: Emerging terms were identified, which represent the analyzed domain, not yet covered in the main thesaurus used by researchers in the area. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-02-25 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Texto info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8661286 10.20396/rdbci.v19i00.8661286 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8661286 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.20396/rdbci.v19i00.8661286 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8661286/26247 https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8661286/26264 https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8661286/26265 https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8661286/26472 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Maira Nani França, Angela Maria Grossi, Ana R. Pacios https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Maira Nani França, Angela Maria Grossi, Ana R. Pacios https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf video/mp4 |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Estados Unidos; Contemporary Estados Unidos; Contemporâneo |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
RDBCI: Digital Journal of Library and Information Science; Vol. 19 (2021): Countinous Publication; e021004 RDBCI: Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação; v. 19 (2021): Publicação Contínua; e021004 1678-765X reponame:Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação |
collection |
Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
ppec@unicamp.br||gilbfe@unicamp.br|| rdbci@unicamp.br|| danif@unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1788167560197308416 |