Research evaluation in national open science policies

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Trinca, Tatiane Pacanaro
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Albagli, Sarita
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8673139
Resumo: Introduction: Open science is increasingly prominent in international science policy agendas, converging towards the understanding that its consolidation as an academic practice depends on the reformulation of the current research evaluation system. Objective: This study aims to identify and analyze to what extent and in what ways open science policies incorporate and address research evaluation. Methodology: A bibliographic and documentary research was carried out, based on the selection of open science policies from five countries - Finland, Slovenia, the Netherlands, France, and Colombia. Results: It was observed that countries with more comprehensive policies recognize the need to reformulate recognition and reward mechanisms to include open science components. Only the French policy presents more concrete indications of changes. Colombia's National Open Science Policy 2022-2031 sets goals and execution deadlines for the adoption of open science in research evaluation and classification of groups and researchers, based on the proposal to review its accreditation systems for programs and institutions. The plans of the Netherlands, Slovenia, and Finland also anticipate changes after examining the current instruments and criteria they adopt, whether by verifying the feasibility of using altmetric indicators (Netherlands), including new methods (Slovenia), or considering new and variable formats of publication (Finland). Conclusion: There is some limitation in moving from a supportive discursive policy towards open science to a policy with devices that imply concrete changes in the criteria and procedures used in evaluations. 
id UNICAMP-4_ea0fdf87b4d9c4ace1bbfd6c402903be
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8673139
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-4
network_name_str Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação
repository_id_str
spelling Research evaluation in national open science policiesAvaliação da pesquisa científica no âmbito das políticas nacionais de ciência aberta AvaliaçãoPolítica científicaPesquisa científicaCiência abertaAcesso abertoEvaluationScientific researchScientific productionOpen scienceOpen accessIntroduction: Open science is increasingly prominent in international science policy agendas, converging towards the understanding that its consolidation as an academic practice depends on the reformulation of the current research evaluation system. Objective: This study aims to identify and analyze to what extent and in what ways open science policies incorporate and address research evaluation. Methodology: A bibliographic and documentary research was carried out, based on the selection of open science policies from five countries - Finland, Slovenia, the Netherlands, France, and Colombia. Results: It was observed that countries with more comprehensive policies recognize the need to reformulate recognition and reward mechanisms to include open science components. Only the French policy presents more concrete indications of changes. Colombia's National Open Science Policy 2022-2031 sets goals and execution deadlines for the adoption of open science in research evaluation and classification of groups and researchers, based on the proposal to review its accreditation systems for programs and institutions. The plans of the Netherlands, Slovenia, and Finland also anticipate changes after examining the current instruments and criteria they adopt, whether by verifying the feasibility of using altmetric indicators (Netherlands), including new methods (Slovenia), or considering new and variable formats of publication (Finland). Conclusion: There is some limitation in moving from a supportive discursive policy towards open science to a policy with devices that imply concrete changes in the criteria and procedures used in evaluations. Introdução: A ciência aberta recebe crescente destaque nas agendas das políticas científicas internacionais, convergindo-se para o entendimento de que sua consolidação como prática acadêmica depende da reformulação do atual sistema de avaliação da pesquisa. Objetivo: O estudo busca identificar e analisar em que medida e de que modo políticas de ciência aberta incorporam e abordam a avaliação da pesquisa. Metodologia:  Realizou-se pesquisa bibliográfica e documental, a partir da seleção de políticas públicas de ciência aberta de cinco países — Finlândia, Eslovênia, Holanda, França e Colômbia. Resultados: Observou-se que os países com políticas consideradas mais abrangentes reconhecem a necessidade de reformulação dos mecanismos de reconhecimento e recompensa para contemplar componentes da ciência aberta. Apenas a Política francesa apresenta indicativos mais concretos de mudanças. A Política Nacional de Ciência Abierta 2022-2031, da Colômbia, indica metas e prazos de execução para a adoção da ciência aberta em processos de avaliação da pesquisa e de classificação de grupos e pesquisadores, a partir da proposta de revisão de seus sistemas de acreditação de programas e instituições. Os planos da Holanda, Eslovênia e Finlândia também preveem mudanças após realizarem exames dos atuais instrumentos e critérios que adotam, seja averiguando a viabilidade do uso de indicadores altmétricos (Holanda), seja incluindo novos métodos (Eslovênia) ou considerando novos e variáveis formatos de publicação (Finlândia). Conclusão: Observa-se certa limitação em passar de uma política discursiva de apoio à ciência aberta para uma política com dispositivos que impliquem em mudanças concretas nos critérios e procedimentos usados nas avaliações.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2023-10-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfapplication/pdftext/htmltext/htmlapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/867313910.20396/rdbci.v21i00.8673139RDBCI: Digital Journal of Library and Information Science; Vol. 21 (2023): Continous Publication; e023021RDBCI: Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação; v. 21 (2023): Publicação Contínua; e0230211678-765Xreponame:Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informaçãoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8673139/32761https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8673139/32762https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8673139/33053https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8673139/33054https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8673139/32767https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8673139/32768Worldly; Contemporary Global; ContemporâneoCopyright (c) 2023 Tatiane Pacanaro Trinca, Sarita Albaglihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTrinca, Tatiane PacanaroAlbagli, Sarita2023-12-23T15:15:27Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8673139Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbciPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/oaippec@unicamp.br||gilbfe@unicamp.br|| rdbci@unicamp.br|| danif@unicamp.br1678-765X1678-765Xopendoar:2023-12-23T15:15:27Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Research evaluation in national open science policies
Avaliação da pesquisa científica no âmbito das políticas nacionais de ciência aberta
title Research evaluation in national open science policies
spellingShingle Research evaluation in national open science policies
Trinca, Tatiane Pacanaro
Avaliação
Política científica
Pesquisa científica
Ciência aberta
Acesso aberto
Evaluation
Scientific research
Scientific production
Open science
Open access
title_short Research evaluation in national open science policies
title_full Research evaluation in national open science policies
title_fullStr Research evaluation in national open science policies
title_full_unstemmed Research evaluation in national open science policies
title_sort Research evaluation in national open science policies
author Trinca, Tatiane Pacanaro
author_facet Trinca, Tatiane Pacanaro
Albagli, Sarita
author_role author
author2 Albagli, Sarita
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Trinca, Tatiane Pacanaro
Albagli, Sarita
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Avaliação
Política científica
Pesquisa científica
Ciência aberta
Acesso aberto
Evaluation
Scientific research
Scientific production
Open science
Open access
topic Avaliação
Política científica
Pesquisa científica
Ciência aberta
Acesso aberto
Evaluation
Scientific research
Scientific production
Open science
Open access
description Introduction: Open science is increasingly prominent in international science policy agendas, converging towards the understanding that its consolidation as an academic practice depends on the reformulation of the current research evaluation system. Objective: This study aims to identify and analyze to what extent and in what ways open science policies incorporate and address research evaluation. Methodology: A bibliographic and documentary research was carried out, based on the selection of open science policies from five countries - Finland, Slovenia, the Netherlands, France, and Colombia. Results: It was observed that countries with more comprehensive policies recognize the need to reformulate recognition and reward mechanisms to include open science components. Only the French policy presents more concrete indications of changes. Colombia's National Open Science Policy 2022-2031 sets goals and execution deadlines for the adoption of open science in research evaluation and classification of groups and researchers, based on the proposal to review its accreditation systems for programs and institutions. The plans of the Netherlands, Slovenia, and Finland also anticipate changes after examining the current instruments and criteria they adopt, whether by verifying the feasibility of using altmetric indicators (Netherlands), including new methods (Slovenia), or considering new and variable formats of publication (Finland). Conclusion: There is some limitation in moving from a supportive discursive policy towards open science to a policy with devices that imply concrete changes in the criteria and procedures used in evaluations. 
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-10-20
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Texto
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8673139
10.20396/rdbci.v21i00.8673139
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8673139
identifier_str_mv 10.20396/rdbci.v21i00.8673139
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8673139/32761
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8673139/32762
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8673139/33053
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8673139/33054
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8673139/32767
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8673139/32768
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Tatiane Pacanaro Trinca, Sarita Albagli
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Tatiane Pacanaro Trinca, Sarita Albagli
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
text/html
text/html
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Worldly; Contemporary
Global; Contemporâneo
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv RDBCI: Digital Journal of Library and Information Science; Vol. 21 (2023): Continous Publication; e023021
RDBCI: Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação; v. 21 (2023): Publicação Contínua; e023021
1678-765X
reponame:Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação
collection Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ppec@unicamp.br||gilbfe@unicamp.br|| rdbci@unicamp.br|| danif@unicamp.br
_version_ 1788167557210963968

Registros relacionados