In vitro tooth whitening effectiveness of whitening mouth rinses
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
DOI: | 10.20396/bjos.v19i0.8656779 |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8656779 |
Resumo: | Regardless of the extensive availability of mouth rinses that claim to whiten teeth, evidence of achievement of such effect is still missing. Aim: Therefore, this study assessed in vitro the whitening effectiveness of whitening mouth rinses. Methods: Sixty intact bovine incisors were embedded in acrylic resin and had their buccal surface flattened and polished. Then, the specimens were randomly allocated to three conventional (Colgate Plax, Cepacol and Listerine Cool Mint) and three whitening mouth rinse groups (Colgate Luminous White, Cepacol Whitening and Listerine Whitening Extreme) (n=10). Following, the specimens were immersed twice a day in the mouth rinses for one minute for 28 days. In between each immersion period, the specimens remained in artificial saliva at 37oC. Color was measured at baseline, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days using a portable spectrophotometer (Easyshade, Vita Zahnfabrik, Germany) with a 6 mm of diameter probe. Color change was analyzed considering the parameters of ∆L*, ∆a*, ∆b* and, ultimately, ∆E*. The whitening efficacy of the mouth rinses was analyzed using the Whiteness Index for Dentistry (WID). Data of ∆s was analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (α=0.05). Results: The type of mouth rinse affected significantly all the ∆ parameters (p<0.05). A non-whitening (conventional) mouth rinse produced the highest ΔE*, followed by the three whitening mouth rinses. The application time also affected ΔE* (p<0.05), with emphasis on the third week of treatment. Only the hydrogen peroxide-containing mouth rinse (Listerine Whitening Extreme) presented a whitening effect, with an increasing trend over time. Conclusion: Although the overall color change was not different when comparing conventional and whitening mouth rinses, the hydrogen peroxide-containing whitening mouth rinse produces an increasing whitening trend over time. Not every mouth rinse that claims to whiten teeth produces the desired effect. |
id |
UNICAMP-8_0096f7cb61dc47c1b577091f95b5777c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8656779 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-8 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
spelling |
In vitro tooth whitening effectiveness of whitening mouth rinsesColorMouthwashesNonprescription drugsTooth bleachingTooth bleaching agentsRegardless of the extensive availability of mouth rinses that claim to whiten teeth, evidence of achievement of such effect is still missing. Aim: Therefore, this study assessed in vitro the whitening effectiveness of whitening mouth rinses. Methods: Sixty intact bovine incisors were embedded in acrylic resin and had their buccal surface flattened and polished. Then, the specimens were randomly allocated to three conventional (Colgate Plax, Cepacol and Listerine Cool Mint) and three whitening mouth rinse groups (Colgate Luminous White, Cepacol Whitening and Listerine Whitening Extreme) (n=10). Following, the specimens were immersed twice a day in the mouth rinses for one minute for 28 days. In between each immersion period, the specimens remained in artificial saliva at 37oC. Color was measured at baseline, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days using a portable spectrophotometer (Easyshade, Vita Zahnfabrik, Germany) with a 6 mm of diameter probe. Color change was analyzed considering the parameters of ∆L*, ∆a*, ∆b* and, ultimately, ∆E*. The whitening efficacy of the mouth rinses was analyzed using the Whiteness Index for Dentistry (WID). Data of ∆s was analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (α=0.05). Results: The type of mouth rinse affected significantly all the ∆ parameters (p<0.05). A non-whitening (conventional) mouth rinse produced the highest ΔE*, followed by the three whitening mouth rinses. The application time also affected ΔE* (p<0.05), with emphasis on the third week of treatment. Only the hydrogen peroxide-containing mouth rinse (Listerine Whitening Extreme) presented a whitening effect, with an increasing trend over time. Conclusion: Although the overall color change was not different when comparing conventional and whitening mouth rinses, the hydrogen peroxide-containing whitening mouth rinse produces an increasing whitening trend over time. Not every mouth rinse that claims to whiten teeth produces the desired effect.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2020-05-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/865677910.20396/bjos.v19i0.8656779Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 19 (2020): Continuous Publication; e206779Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 19 (2020): Continuous Publication; e2067791677-3225reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8656779/22399Brazil; ContemporanyCopyright (c) 2020 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciencesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRodrigues, Ana Paula MoronaKlein, Mariele CristinaDall Agnol, Mauro AntonioRodrigues-Junior, Sinval Adalberto2021-02-08T13:06:05Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8656779Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/PUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/oaibrjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br1677-32251677-3217opendoar:2021-02-08T13:06:05Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
In vitro tooth whitening effectiveness of whitening mouth rinses |
title |
In vitro tooth whitening effectiveness of whitening mouth rinses |
spellingShingle |
In vitro tooth whitening effectiveness of whitening mouth rinses In vitro tooth whitening effectiveness of whitening mouth rinses Rodrigues, Ana Paula Morona Color Mouthwashes Nonprescription drugs Tooth bleaching Tooth bleaching agents Rodrigues, Ana Paula Morona Color Mouthwashes Nonprescription drugs Tooth bleaching Tooth bleaching agents |
title_short |
In vitro tooth whitening effectiveness of whitening mouth rinses |
title_full |
In vitro tooth whitening effectiveness of whitening mouth rinses |
title_fullStr |
In vitro tooth whitening effectiveness of whitening mouth rinses In vitro tooth whitening effectiveness of whitening mouth rinses |
title_full_unstemmed |
In vitro tooth whitening effectiveness of whitening mouth rinses In vitro tooth whitening effectiveness of whitening mouth rinses |
title_sort |
In vitro tooth whitening effectiveness of whitening mouth rinses |
author |
Rodrigues, Ana Paula Morona |
author_facet |
Rodrigues, Ana Paula Morona Rodrigues, Ana Paula Morona Klein, Mariele Cristina Dall Agnol, Mauro Antonio Rodrigues-Junior, Sinval Adalberto Klein, Mariele Cristina Dall Agnol, Mauro Antonio Rodrigues-Junior, Sinval Adalberto |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Klein, Mariele Cristina Dall Agnol, Mauro Antonio Rodrigues-Junior, Sinval Adalberto |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rodrigues, Ana Paula Morona Klein, Mariele Cristina Dall Agnol, Mauro Antonio Rodrigues-Junior, Sinval Adalberto |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Color Mouthwashes Nonprescription drugs Tooth bleaching Tooth bleaching agents |
topic |
Color Mouthwashes Nonprescription drugs Tooth bleaching Tooth bleaching agents |
description |
Regardless of the extensive availability of mouth rinses that claim to whiten teeth, evidence of achievement of such effect is still missing. Aim: Therefore, this study assessed in vitro the whitening effectiveness of whitening mouth rinses. Methods: Sixty intact bovine incisors were embedded in acrylic resin and had their buccal surface flattened and polished. Then, the specimens were randomly allocated to three conventional (Colgate Plax, Cepacol and Listerine Cool Mint) and three whitening mouth rinse groups (Colgate Luminous White, Cepacol Whitening and Listerine Whitening Extreme) (n=10). Following, the specimens were immersed twice a day in the mouth rinses for one minute for 28 days. In between each immersion period, the specimens remained in artificial saliva at 37oC. Color was measured at baseline, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days using a portable spectrophotometer (Easyshade, Vita Zahnfabrik, Germany) with a 6 mm of diameter probe. Color change was analyzed considering the parameters of ∆L*, ∆a*, ∆b* and, ultimately, ∆E*. The whitening efficacy of the mouth rinses was analyzed using the Whiteness Index for Dentistry (WID). Data of ∆s was analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (α=0.05). Results: The type of mouth rinse affected significantly all the ∆ parameters (p<0.05). A non-whitening (conventional) mouth rinse produced the highest ΔE*, followed by the three whitening mouth rinses. The application time also affected ΔE* (p<0.05), with emphasis on the third week of treatment. Only the hydrogen peroxide-containing mouth rinse (Listerine Whitening Extreme) presented a whitening effect, with an increasing trend over time. Conclusion: Although the overall color change was not different when comparing conventional and whitening mouth rinses, the hydrogen peroxide-containing whitening mouth rinse produces an increasing whitening trend over time. Not every mouth rinse that claims to whiten teeth produces the desired effect. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-05 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8656779 10.20396/bjos.v19i0.8656779 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8656779 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.20396/bjos.v19i0.8656779 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8656779/22399 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazil; Contemporany |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 19 (2020): Continuous Publication; e206779 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 19 (2020): Continuous Publication; e206779 1677-3225 reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
collection |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
brjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1822179083335761920 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.20396/bjos.v19i0.8656779 |