In vitro tooth whitening effectiveness of whitening mouth rinses

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rodrigues, Ana Paula Morona
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Klein, Mariele Cristina, Dall Agnol, Mauro Antonio, Rodrigues-Junior, Sinval Adalberto
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
DOI: 10.20396/bjos.v19i0.8656779
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8656779
Resumo: Regardless of the extensive availability of mouth rinses that claim to whiten teeth, evidence of achievement of such effect is still missing. Aim: Therefore, this study assessed in vitro the whitening effectiveness of whitening mouth rinses. Methods: Sixty intact bovine incisors were embedded in acrylic resin and had their buccal surface flattened and polished. Then, the specimens were randomly allocated to three conventional (Colgate Plax, Cepacol and Listerine Cool Mint) and three whitening mouth rinse groups (Colgate Luminous White, Cepacol Whitening and Listerine Whitening Extreme) (n=10). Following, the specimens were immersed twice a day in the mouth rinses for one minute for 28 days. In between each immersion period, the specimens remained in artificial saliva at 37oC. Color was measured at baseline, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days using a portable spectrophotometer (Easyshade, Vita Zahnfabrik, Germany) with a 6 mm of diameter probe. Color change was analyzed considering the parameters of ∆L*, ∆a*, ∆b* and, ultimately, ∆E*. The whitening efficacy of the mouth rinses was analyzed using the Whiteness Index for Dentistry (WID). Data of ∆s was analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (α=0.05). Results: The type of mouth rinse affected significantly all the ∆ parameters (p<0.05). A non-whitening (conventional) mouth rinse produced the highest ΔE*, followed by the three whitening mouth rinses. The application time also affected ΔE* (p<0.05), with emphasis on the third week of treatment. Only the hydrogen peroxide-containing mouth rinse (Listerine Whitening Extreme) presented a whitening effect, with an increasing trend over time. Conclusion: Although the overall color change was not different when comparing conventional and whitening mouth rinses, the hydrogen peroxide-containing whitening mouth rinse produces an increasing whitening trend over time. Not every mouth rinse that claims to whiten teeth produces the desired effect.
id UNICAMP-8_0096f7cb61dc47c1b577091f95b5777c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8656779
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-8
network_name_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
spelling In vitro tooth whitening effectiveness of whitening mouth rinsesColorMouthwashesNonprescription drugsTooth bleachingTooth bleaching agentsRegardless of the extensive availability of mouth rinses that claim to whiten teeth, evidence of achievement of such effect is still missing. Aim: Therefore, this study assessed in vitro the whitening effectiveness of whitening mouth rinses. Methods: Sixty intact bovine incisors were embedded in acrylic resin and had their buccal surface flattened and polished. Then, the specimens were randomly allocated to three conventional (Colgate Plax, Cepacol and Listerine Cool Mint) and three whitening mouth rinse groups (Colgate Luminous White, Cepacol Whitening and Listerine Whitening Extreme) (n=10). Following, the specimens were immersed twice a day in the mouth rinses for one minute for 28 days. In between each immersion period, the specimens remained in artificial saliva at 37oC. Color was measured at baseline, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days using a portable spectrophotometer (Easyshade, Vita Zahnfabrik, Germany) with a 6 mm of diameter probe. Color change was analyzed considering the parameters of ∆L*, ∆a*, ∆b* and, ultimately, ∆E*. The whitening efficacy of the mouth rinses was analyzed using the Whiteness Index for Dentistry (WID). Data of ∆s was analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (α=0.05). Results: The type of mouth rinse affected significantly all the ∆ parameters (p<0.05). A non-whitening (conventional) mouth rinse produced the highest ΔE*, followed by the three whitening mouth rinses. The application time also affected ΔE* (p<0.05), with emphasis on the third week of treatment. Only the hydrogen peroxide-containing mouth rinse (Listerine Whitening Extreme) presented a whitening effect, with an increasing trend over time. Conclusion: Although the overall color change was not different when comparing conventional and whitening mouth rinses, the hydrogen peroxide-containing whitening mouth rinse produces an increasing whitening trend over time. Not every mouth rinse that claims to whiten teeth produces the desired effect.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2020-05-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/865677910.20396/bjos.v19i0.8656779Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 19 (2020): Continuous Publication; e206779Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 19 (2020): Continuous Publication; e2067791677-3225reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8656779/22399Brazil; ContemporanyCopyright (c) 2020 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciencesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRodrigues, Ana Paula MoronaKlein, Mariele CristinaDall Agnol, Mauro AntonioRodrigues-Junior, Sinval Adalberto2021-02-08T13:06:05Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8656779Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/PUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/oaibrjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br1677-32251677-3217opendoar:2021-02-08T13:06:05Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv In vitro tooth whitening effectiveness of whitening mouth rinses
title In vitro tooth whitening effectiveness of whitening mouth rinses
spellingShingle In vitro tooth whitening effectiveness of whitening mouth rinses
In vitro tooth whitening effectiveness of whitening mouth rinses
Rodrigues, Ana Paula Morona
Color
Mouthwashes
Nonprescription drugs
Tooth bleaching
Tooth bleaching agents
Rodrigues, Ana Paula Morona
Color
Mouthwashes
Nonprescription drugs
Tooth bleaching
Tooth bleaching agents
title_short In vitro tooth whitening effectiveness of whitening mouth rinses
title_full In vitro tooth whitening effectiveness of whitening mouth rinses
title_fullStr In vitro tooth whitening effectiveness of whitening mouth rinses
In vitro tooth whitening effectiveness of whitening mouth rinses
title_full_unstemmed In vitro tooth whitening effectiveness of whitening mouth rinses
In vitro tooth whitening effectiveness of whitening mouth rinses
title_sort In vitro tooth whitening effectiveness of whitening mouth rinses
author Rodrigues, Ana Paula Morona
author_facet Rodrigues, Ana Paula Morona
Rodrigues, Ana Paula Morona
Klein, Mariele Cristina
Dall Agnol, Mauro Antonio
Rodrigues-Junior, Sinval Adalberto
Klein, Mariele Cristina
Dall Agnol, Mauro Antonio
Rodrigues-Junior, Sinval Adalberto
author_role author
author2 Klein, Mariele Cristina
Dall Agnol, Mauro Antonio
Rodrigues-Junior, Sinval Adalberto
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rodrigues, Ana Paula Morona
Klein, Mariele Cristina
Dall Agnol, Mauro Antonio
Rodrigues-Junior, Sinval Adalberto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Color
Mouthwashes
Nonprescription drugs
Tooth bleaching
Tooth bleaching agents
topic Color
Mouthwashes
Nonprescription drugs
Tooth bleaching
Tooth bleaching agents
description Regardless of the extensive availability of mouth rinses that claim to whiten teeth, evidence of achievement of such effect is still missing. Aim: Therefore, this study assessed in vitro the whitening effectiveness of whitening mouth rinses. Methods: Sixty intact bovine incisors were embedded in acrylic resin and had their buccal surface flattened and polished. Then, the specimens were randomly allocated to three conventional (Colgate Plax, Cepacol and Listerine Cool Mint) and three whitening mouth rinse groups (Colgate Luminous White, Cepacol Whitening and Listerine Whitening Extreme) (n=10). Following, the specimens were immersed twice a day in the mouth rinses for one minute for 28 days. In between each immersion period, the specimens remained in artificial saliva at 37oC. Color was measured at baseline, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days using a portable spectrophotometer (Easyshade, Vita Zahnfabrik, Germany) with a 6 mm of diameter probe. Color change was analyzed considering the parameters of ∆L*, ∆a*, ∆b* and, ultimately, ∆E*. The whitening efficacy of the mouth rinses was analyzed using the Whiteness Index for Dentistry (WID). Data of ∆s was analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (α=0.05). Results: The type of mouth rinse affected significantly all the ∆ parameters (p<0.05). A non-whitening (conventional) mouth rinse produced the highest ΔE*, followed by the three whitening mouth rinses. The application time also affected ΔE* (p<0.05), with emphasis on the third week of treatment. Only the hydrogen peroxide-containing mouth rinse (Listerine Whitening Extreme) presented a whitening effect, with an increasing trend over time. Conclusion: Although the overall color change was not different when comparing conventional and whitening mouth rinses, the hydrogen peroxide-containing whitening mouth rinse produces an increasing whitening trend over time. Not every mouth rinse that claims to whiten teeth produces the desired effect.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-05
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8656779
10.20396/bjos.v19i0.8656779
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8656779
identifier_str_mv 10.20396/bjos.v19i0.8656779
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8656779/22399
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporany
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 19 (2020): Continuous Publication; e206779
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 19 (2020): Continuous Publication; e206779
1677-3225
reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
collection Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv brjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br
_version_ 1822179083335761920
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.20396/bjos.v19i0.8656779