Effect of electric, ultrasonic and manual toothbrushes on biofilm removal and gingivitis control: in vitro and parallel randomized controlled clinical trial study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cirelli, Thamiris
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Oliveira, Guilherme José Pimentel Lopes de, Nogueira, Andressa Vilas Boas, Ribaldo, Isis Jordão Pinheiro, Furuta, Emelly Yukiko Diz, Cirelli, Joni Augusto
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8659280
Resumo: Aim: To evaluate the effect of manual (M), electric (E) and ultrasonic (US) toothbrushes on the removal of oral biofilm and control of gingivitis. Also, the roughness and tooth wear production were evaluated in vitro. Methods: For the in vitro analyses, thirty bovine dentin specimens were submitted to a 3-month brushing simulation (9 minutes) with the three types of toothbrushes (n = 10). Subsequently, a randomized controlled clinical trial was performed with 36 patients divided into 3 groups according to the toothbrushes used (n = 12). Gingival index, visible plaque index and the volume of crevicular fluid were evaluated at baseline and 3 months after the beginning of the toothbrush use. Furthermore, the performance of the biofilm removal per brushing cycle of 1 and 3 minutes with each toothbrush was made monthly until the end of the experiment. Results: The US group had the highest dentin wear. Clinically, the US group had a lower plaque index at 3 months than the M group. The M group also showed less biofilm removal efficiency from the second month of follow-up and more worn bristles at the end of the 3 month period than the E and US groups. Conclusion: The ultrasonic, electric and manual toothbrushes showed no differences in gingivitis control in the present study. The ultrasonic and electric toothbrushes had a more significant effect on biofilm removal than a manual toothbrush, but the ultrasonic toothbrush promoted greater dentin tissue wear.
id UNICAMP-8_06001a0f096b892819adaf7d05965e13
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8659280
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-8
network_name_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Effect of electric, ultrasonic and manual toothbrushes on biofilm removal and gingivitis control: in vitro and parallel randomized controlled clinical trial studyGingivitisOral hygieneToothbrushingAim: To evaluate the effect of manual (M), electric (E) and ultrasonic (US) toothbrushes on the removal of oral biofilm and control of gingivitis. Also, the roughness and tooth wear production were evaluated in vitro. Methods: For the in vitro analyses, thirty bovine dentin specimens were submitted to a 3-month brushing simulation (9 minutes) with the three types of toothbrushes (n = 10). Subsequently, a randomized controlled clinical trial was performed with 36 patients divided into 3 groups according to the toothbrushes used (n = 12). Gingival index, visible plaque index and the volume of crevicular fluid were evaluated at baseline and 3 months after the beginning of the toothbrush use. Furthermore, the performance of the biofilm removal per brushing cycle of 1 and 3 minutes with each toothbrush was made monthly until the end of the experiment. Results: The US group had the highest dentin wear. Clinically, the US group had a lower plaque index at 3 months than the M group. The M group also showed less biofilm removal efficiency from the second month of follow-up and more worn bristles at the end of the 3 month period than the E and US groups. Conclusion: The ultrasonic, electric and manual toothbrushes showed no differences in gingivitis control in the present study. The ultrasonic and electric toothbrushes had a more significant effect on biofilm removal than a manual toothbrush, but the ultrasonic toothbrush promoted greater dentin tissue wear.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2021-02-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/865928010.20396/bjos.v20i00.8659280Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 20 (2021): Continuous Publication; e219280Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 20 (2021): Continuous Publication; e2192801677-3225reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8659280/26150Brazil; ContemporaryCopyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Oral Scienceshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCirelli, ThamirisOliveira, Guilherme José Pimentel Lopes deNogueira, Andressa Vilas Boas Ribaldo, Isis Jordão PinheiroFuruta, Emelly Yukiko Diz Cirelli, Joni Augusto2021-02-18T11:48:44Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8659280Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/PUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/oaibrjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br1677-32251677-3217opendoar:2021-02-18T11:48:44Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effect of electric, ultrasonic and manual toothbrushes on biofilm removal and gingivitis control: in vitro and parallel randomized controlled clinical trial study
title Effect of electric, ultrasonic and manual toothbrushes on biofilm removal and gingivitis control: in vitro and parallel randomized controlled clinical trial study
spellingShingle Effect of electric, ultrasonic and manual toothbrushes on biofilm removal and gingivitis control: in vitro and parallel randomized controlled clinical trial study
Cirelli, Thamiris
Gingivitis
Oral hygiene
Toothbrushing
title_short Effect of electric, ultrasonic and manual toothbrushes on biofilm removal and gingivitis control: in vitro and parallel randomized controlled clinical trial study
title_full Effect of electric, ultrasonic and manual toothbrushes on biofilm removal and gingivitis control: in vitro and parallel randomized controlled clinical trial study
title_fullStr Effect of electric, ultrasonic and manual toothbrushes on biofilm removal and gingivitis control: in vitro and parallel randomized controlled clinical trial study
title_full_unstemmed Effect of electric, ultrasonic and manual toothbrushes on biofilm removal and gingivitis control: in vitro and parallel randomized controlled clinical trial study
title_sort Effect of electric, ultrasonic and manual toothbrushes on biofilm removal and gingivitis control: in vitro and parallel randomized controlled clinical trial study
author Cirelli, Thamiris
author_facet Cirelli, Thamiris
Oliveira, Guilherme José Pimentel Lopes de
Nogueira, Andressa Vilas Boas
Ribaldo, Isis Jordão Pinheiro
Furuta, Emelly Yukiko Diz
Cirelli, Joni Augusto
author_role author
author2 Oliveira, Guilherme José Pimentel Lopes de
Nogueira, Andressa Vilas Boas
Ribaldo, Isis Jordão Pinheiro
Furuta, Emelly Yukiko Diz
Cirelli, Joni Augusto
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cirelli, Thamiris
Oliveira, Guilherme José Pimentel Lopes de
Nogueira, Andressa Vilas Boas
Ribaldo, Isis Jordão Pinheiro
Furuta, Emelly Yukiko Diz
Cirelli, Joni Augusto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Gingivitis
Oral hygiene
Toothbrushing
topic Gingivitis
Oral hygiene
Toothbrushing
description Aim: To evaluate the effect of manual (M), electric (E) and ultrasonic (US) toothbrushes on the removal of oral biofilm and control of gingivitis. Also, the roughness and tooth wear production were evaluated in vitro. Methods: For the in vitro analyses, thirty bovine dentin specimens were submitted to a 3-month brushing simulation (9 minutes) with the three types of toothbrushes (n = 10). Subsequently, a randomized controlled clinical trial was performed with 36 patients divided into 3 groups according to the toothbrushes used (n = 12). Gingival index, visible plaque index and the volume of crevicular fluid were evaluated at baseline and 3 months after the beginning of the toothbrush use. Furthermore, the performance of the biofilm removal per brushing cycle of 1 and 3 minutes with each toothbrush was made monthly until the end of the experiment. Results: The US group had the highest dentin wear. Clinically, the US group had a lower plaque index at 3 months than the M group. The M group also showed less biofilm removal efficiency from the second month of follow-up and more worn bristles at the end of the 3 month period than the E and US groups. Conclusion: The ultrasonic, electric and manual toothbrushes showed no differences in gingivitis control in the present study. The ultrasonic and electric toothbrushes had a more significant effect on biofilm removal than a manual toothbrush, but the ultrasonic toothbrush promoted greater dentin tissue wear.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-02-18
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8659280
10.20396/bjos.v20i00.8659280
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8659280
identifier_str_mv 10.20396/bjos.v20i00.8659280
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8659280/26150
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporary
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 20 (2021): Continuous Publication; e219280
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 20 (2021): Continuous Publication; e219280
1677-3225
reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
collection Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv brjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br
_version_ 1800216403075137536