Color variation of composite resins in relation to the Vita Classical shade guide: colorimetric analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2024 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8670869 |
Resumo: | Aim: The aim of this study was to verify the color variation between different composite resins and the Vita Classical Shade Guide. Methods: Two-millimeter thickness samples were made (n = 6) from eight commercial brands of composite resin (shade A2): Charisma (Kulzer), Forma (Ultradent), Harmonize (Kerr), Luna (SDI), Opallis (FGM), Oppus Bulk Fill (FGM), Vittra (FGM) and Filtek Z250 XT (3M ESPE). Specimens were stored in distilled water for 7 days and then polished. Color measurements of samples and A2 shade of the Vita Classical Shade Guide were performed using the Vita Easy Shade Advance 4.0 spectrophotometer on a black background. Color variations were calculated using the CIEDE2000 formula, considering values ≥0.81 being noticeable by the human eye and ≥1.77 being clinically unacceptable. Results were statistically analyzed with a 5% significance level. Results: Color variation (ΔE) of composite (E1 ) compared to the Vita Classical Shade Guide (E0 ) was greater than clinically acceptable for all the materials evaluated in this study. Forma (ΔE=2.08 ± sd=0.47) and Filtek Z250 XT (2.50 ± 0.20) had the smallest amount of color variation values found in the results. Harmonize (3.32 ± 0.63) presented values similar to Filtek Z250 XT, but it was worse than Forma. Vittra (3.51 ± 0.28), Charisma (3.80 ± 0.20), Opallis (4.24 ± 0.30) and Luna (5.67 ± 0.20) did not differ among each other and presented higher color variation than Forma, Filtek Z350XT and Harmonize. Oppus Bulk Fill (13.94 ± 1.12) was the composite with the greatest color variation. Conclusions: The findings in this study show that attention should be taken when using the Vita Color Shade Guide for composite shade selection. |
id |
UNICAMP-8_0987a2b9f103fbd02e6a435b2f09dcbc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8670869 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-8 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Color variation of composite resins in relation to the Vita Classical shade guide: colorimetric analysisComposite resinColorSpectrophotometryAim: The aim of this study was to verify the color variation between different composite resins and the Vita Classical Shade Guide. Methods: Two-millimeter thickness samples were made (n = 6) from eight commercial brands of composite resin (shade A2): Charisma (Kulzer), Forma (Ultradent), Harmonize (Kerr), Luna (SDI), Opallis (FGM), Oppus Bulk Fill (FGM), Vittra (FGM) and Filtek Z250 XT (3M ESPE). Specimens were stored in distilled water for 7 days and then polished. Color measurements of samples and A2 shade of the Vita Classical Shade Guide were performed using the Vita Easy Shade Advance 4.0 spectrophotometer on a black background. Color variations were calculated using the CIEDE2000 formula, considering values ≥0.81 being noticeable by the human eye and ≥1.77 being clinically unacceptable. Results were statistically analyzed with a 5% significance level. Results: Color variation (ΔE) of composite (E1 ) compared to the Vita Classical Shade Guide (E0 ) was greater than clinically acceptable for all the materials evaluated in this study. Forma (ΔE=2.08 ± sd=0.47) and Filtek Z250 XT (2.50 ± 0.20) had the smallest amount of color variation values found in the results. Harmonize (3.32 ± 0.63) presented values similar to Filtek Z250 XT, but it was worse than Forma. Vittra (3.51 ± 0.28), Charisma (3.80 ± 0.20), Opallis (4.24 ± 0.30) and Luna (5.67 ± 0.20) did not differ among each other and presented higher color variation than Forma, Filtek Z350XT and Harmonize. Oppus Bulk Fill (13.94 ± 1.12) was the composite with the greatest color variation. Conclusions: The findings in this study show that attention should be taken when using the Vita Color Shade Guide for composite shade selection.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2024-03-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/867086910.20396/bjos.v23i00.8670869Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 23 (2024): Continuous Publication; e240869Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 23 (2024): Continuous Publication; e2408691677-3225reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8670869/33657Brazil; ContemporanyCopyright (c) 2024 João Vitor Andrade Denadai, Roberto Zimmer, Eduardo Galia Reston, Guilherme Anziliero Arossihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDenadai, João Vitor AndradeZimmer, RobertoReston, Eduardo GaliaArossi, Guilherme Anziliero2024-03-11T12:05:31Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8670869Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/PUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/oaibrjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br1677-32251677-3217opendoar:2024-03-11T12:05:31Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Color variation of composite resins in relation to the Vita Classical shade guide: colorimetric analysis |
title |
Color variation of composite resins in relation to the Vita Classical shade guide: colorimetric analysis |
spellingShingle |
Color variation of composite resins in relation to the Vita Classical shade guide: colorimetric analysis Denadai, João Vitor Andrade Composite resin Color Spectrophotometry |
title_short |
Color variation of composite resins in relation to the Vita Classical shade guide: colorimetric analysis |
title_full |
Color variation of composite resins in relation to the Vita Classical shade guide: colorimetric analysis |
title_fullStr |
Color variation of composite resins in relation to the Vita Classical shade guide: colorimetric analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Color variation of composite resins in relation to the Vita Classical shade guide: colorimetric analysis |
title_sort |
Color variation of composite resins in relation to the Vita Classical shade guide: colorimetric analysis |
author |
Denadai, João Vitor Andrade |
author_facet |
Denadai, João Vitor Andrade Zimmer, Roberto Reston, Eduardo Galia Arossi, Guilherme Anziliero |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Zimmer, Roberto Reston, Eduardo Galia Arossi, Guilherme Anziliero |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Denadai, João Vitor Andrade Zimmer, Roberto Reston, Eduardo Galia Arossi, Guilherme Anziliero |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Composite resin Color Spectrophotometry |
topic |
Composite resin Color Spectrophotometry |
description |
Aim: The aim of this study was to verify the color variation between different composite resins and the Vita Classical Shade Guide. Methods: Two-millimeter thickness samples were made (n = 6) from eight commercial brands of composite resin (shade A2): Charisma (Kulzer), Forma (Ultradent), Harmonize (Kerr), Luna (SDI), Opallis (FGM), Oppus Bulk Fill (FGM), Vittra (FGM) and Filtek Z250 XT (3M ESPE). Specimens were stored in distilled water for 7 days and then polished. Color measurements of samples and A2 shade of the Vita Classical Shade Guide were performed using the Vita Easy Shade Advance 4.0 spectrophotometer on a black background. Color variations were calculated using the CIEDE2000 formula, considering values ≥0.81 being noticeable by the human eye and ≥1.77 being clinically unacceptable. Results were statistically analyzed with a 5% significance level. Results: Color variation (ΔE) of composite (E1 ) compared to the Vita Classical Shade Guide (E0 ) was greater than clinically acceptable for all the materials evaluated in this study. Forma (ΔE=2.08 ± sd=0.47) and Filtek Z250 XT (2.50 ± 0.20) had the smallest amount of color variation values found in the results. Harmonize (3.32 ± 0.63) presented values similar to Filtek Z250 XT, but it was worse than Forma. Vittra (3.51 ± 0.28), Charisma (3.80 ± 0.20), Opallis (4.24 ± 0.30) and Luna (5.67 ± 0.20) did not differ among each other and presented higher color variation than Forma, Filtek Z350XT and Harmonize. Oppus Bulk Fill (13.94 ± 1.12) was the composite with the greatest color variation. Conclusions: The findings in this study show that attention should be taken when using the Vita Color Shade Guide for composite shade selection. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-03-10 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8670869 10.20396/bjos.v23i00.8670869 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8670869 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.20396/bjos.v23i00.8670869 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8670869/33657 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazil; Contemporany |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 23 (2024): Continuous Publication; e240869 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 23 (2024): Continuous Publication; e240869 1677-3225 reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
collection |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
brjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1800216397578502144 |