Shear bond strength of a “solvent-free” adhesive versus contemporary adhesive systems
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8640935 |
Resumo: | Aim: To compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of a solvent free self-etch adhesive with solvent containing adhesives. Methods: Forty-five human teeth were sectioned longitudinally to expose superficial dentin and substrates polished with 600-grit SiC paper. The adhesive area was isolated with a cylindrical Teflon mold 3x4 mm. Fifteen specimens were prepared for each material. Were evaluated a solvent free self-etch adhesive (Bond 1 SF), an ethanol self-etch adhesive (Futurabond M), and a water-acetone-ethanol self-etch adhesive (Optibond All-In-One). All specimens were subjected to an aging procedure by thermo-cycling (5000 cycles). Thirty-six specimens were stressed in shear at a rate of 0.5mm/min. Mean data values were analyzed statistically using the Welch robust analysis of variance and the Games-Howell statistic. Failure patterns were analyzed using stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Additional more dentin specimens were prepared for SEM. Results: The Bond 1 SF showed the statistically significant lowest SBS to dentin (Welch statistic p<0.001). Failures for Bond 1 SF were mainly adhesive failures with partial cohesive failures in the adhesive resin, while for Futurabond M and Optibond All-In-One were mainly mixed. SEM findings confirm the results. Conclusions: Eliminating solvents from self-etch adhesive systems may decrease the bonding strength to dentin. |
id |
UNICAMP-8_2b780c94d1fa13c6c3eb2ac30005aed0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8640935 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-8 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Shear bond strength of a “solvent-free” adhesive versus contemporary adhesive systemsAdhesivesBonding systemsShear bond strengthSolventsOdontologiaAim: To compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of a solvent free self-etch adhesive with solvent containing adhesives. Methods: Forty-five human teeth were sectioned longitudinally to expose superficial dentin and substrates polished with 600-grit SiC paper. The adhesive area was isolated with a cylindrical Teflon mold 3x4 mm. Fifteen specimens were prepared for each material. Were evaluated a solvent free self-etch adhesive (Bond 1 SF), an ethanol self-etch adhesive (Futurabond M), and a water-acetone-ethanol self-etch adhesive (Optibond All-In-One). All specimens were subjected to an aging procedure by thermo-cycling (5000 cycles). Thirty-six specimens were stressed in shear at a rate of 0.5mm/min. Mean data values were analyzed statistically using the Welch robust analysis of variance and the Games-Howell statistic. Failure patterns were analyzed using stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Additional more dentin specimens were prepared for SEM. Results: The Bond 1 SF showed the statistically significant lowest SBS to dentin (Welch statistic p<0.001). Failures for Bond 1 SF were mainly adhesive failures with partial cohesive failures in the adhesive resin, while for Futurabond M and Optibond All-In-One were mainly mixed. SEM findings confirm the results. Conclusions: Eliminating solvents from self-etch adhesive systems may decrease the bonding strength to dentin.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2015-10-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8640935Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 13 n. 1 (2014): Jan./Mar.; 64-69Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2014): Jan./Mar.; 64-691677-3225reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8640935/8468Copyright (c) 2015 Eugenia Koliniotou-Koumpia, Pantelis Kouros, Effimia Koumpia, Maria Helvatzoglou-Antoniadeshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKoliniotou-Koumpia, EugeniaKouros, PantelisKoumpia, EffimiaHelvatzoglou-Antoniades, Maria2023-09-29T16:48:27Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8640935Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/PUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/oaibrjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br1677-32251677-3217opendoar:2023-09-29T16:48:27Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Shear bond strength of a “solvent-free” adhesive versus contemporary adhesive systems |
title |
Shear bond strength of a “solvent-free” adhesive versus contemporary adhesive systems |
spellingShingle |
Shear bond strength of a “solvent-free” adhesive versus contemporary adhesive systems Koliniotou-Koumpia, Eugenia Adhesives Bonding systems Shear bond strength Solvents Odontologia |
title_short |
Shear bond strength of a “solvent-free” adhesive versus contemporary adhesive systems |
title_full |
Shear bond strength of a “solvent-free” adhesive versus contemporary adhesive systems |
title_fullStr |
Shear bond strength of a “solvent-free” adhesive versus contemporary adhesive systems |
title_full_unstemmed |
Shear bond strength of a “solvent-free” adhesive versus contemporary adhesive systems |
title_sort |
Shear bond strength of a “solvent-free” adhesive versus contemporary adhesive systems |
author |
Koliniotou-Koumpia, Eugenia |
author_facet |
Koliniotou-Koumpia, Eugenia Kouros, Pantelis Koumpia, Effimia Helvatzoglou-Antoniades, Maria |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Kouros, Pantelis Koumpia, Effimia Helvatzoglou-Antoniades, Maria |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Koliniotou-Koumpia, Eugenia Kouros, Pantelis Koumpia, Effimia Helvatzoglou-Antoniades, Maria |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Adhesives Bonding systems Shear bond strength Solvents Odontologia |
topic |
Adhesives Bonding systems Shear bond strength Solvents Odontologia |
description |
Aim: To compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of a solvent free self-etch adhesive with solvent containing adhesives. Methods: Forty-five human teeth were sectioned longitudinally to expose superficial dentin and substrates polished with 600-grit SiC paper. The adhesive area was isolated with a cylindrical Teflon mold 3x4 mm. Fifteen specimens were prepared for each material. Were evaluated a solvent free self-etch adhesive (Bond 1 SF), an ethanol self-etch adhesive (Futurabond M), and a water-acetone-ethanol self-etch adhesive (Optibond All-In-One). All specimens were subjected to an aging procedure by thermo-cycling (5000 cycles). Thirty-six specimens were stressed in shear at a rate of 0.5mm/min. Mean data values were analyzed statistically using the Welch robust analysis of variance and the Games-Howell statistic. Failure patterns were analyzed using stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Additional more dentin specimens were prepared for SEM. Results: The Bond 1 SF showed the statistically significant lowest SBS to dentin (Welch statistic p<0.001). Failures for Bond 1 SF were mainly adhesive failures with partial cohesive failures in the adhesive resin, while for Futurabond M and Optibond All-In-One were mainly mixed. SEM findings confirm the results. Conclusions: Eliminating solvents from self-etch adhesive systems may decrease the bonding strength to dentin. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-10-13 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8640935 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8640935 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8640935/8468 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 13 n. 1 (2014): Jan./Mar.; 64-69 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2014): Jan./Mar.; 64-69 1677-3225 reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
collection |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
brjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1800216398161510400 |