Comparative evaluation of push-out bond strength of a MTA-based root canal sealer
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8640903 |
Resumo: | Aim: To evaluate the bond strength to root dentin of three root canal sealers: a mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)-based sealer (MTA Fillapex®), an epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus®), and a zinc oxide eugenol-based sealer (EndoFill®). Methods: Thirty extracted single-root human teeth of similar sizes and circular canals were prepared using #3 and #2 Gates Glidden drills in the cervical portion of the canal and K3® rotary instruments to a size #25/0.06 to working length. Irrigation with 0.5 mL 2% chlorhexidine gel was used before and 1 mL saline after each instrument. The smear layer was removed with 3 mL 17% EDTA for 3 min. The samples were sectioned horizontally into eight 1±0.1 mm-thick serial slices and then the push-out test was carried out. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the post-hoc Tukey test were used for the analysis of the data with a significance level of 5%. Results: AH Plus presented significantly higher bond strengths (p<0.05) than the other sealers, while MTA Fillapex showed the lowest bond strengths (p<0.05). Conclusions: The present study concluded that EndoFill® sealer and MTA FillApex® core combination were not superior to AH Plus® sealer and gutta-percha core combination. |
id |
UNICAMP-8_2dc4cf681149e8e546f4452b0f2756ad |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8640903 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-8 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparative evaluation of push-out bond strength of a MTA-based root canal sealerEndodonticsRoot canal obturationRoot canal filling materialsOdontologiaAim: To evaluate the bond strength to root dentin of three root canal sealers: a mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)-based sealer (MTA Fillapex®), an epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus®), and a zinc oxide eugenol-based sealer (EndoFill®). Methods: Thirty extracted single-root human teeth of similar sizes and circular canals were prepared using #3 and #2 Gates Glidden drills in the cervical portion of the canal and K3® rotary instruments to a size #25/0.06 to working length. Irrigation with 0.5 mL 2% chlorhexidine gel was used before and 1 mL saline after each instrument. The smear layer was removed with 3 mL 17% EDTA for 3 min. The samples were sectioned horizontally into eight 1±0.1 mm-thick serial slices and then the push-out test was carried out. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the post-hoc Tukey test were used for the analysis of the data with a significance level of 5%. Results: AH Plus presented significantly higher bond strengths (p<0.05) than the other sealers, while MTA Fillapex showed the lowest bond strengths (p<0.05). Conclusions: The present study concluded that EndoFill® sealer and MTA FillApex® core combination were not superior to AH Plus® sealer and gutta-percha core combination.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2015-10-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8640903Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 13 n. 2 (2014): Apr./Jun.; 114-117Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 13 No. 2 (2014): Apr./Jun.; 114-1171677-3225reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8640903/8441Copyright (c) 2015 Eduardo Diogo Gurgel-Filho, Felipe Martins Leite, Jaírton Benício de Lima, João Paulo Chaves Montenegro, Flávia Saavedra, Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal Silvahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGurgel-Filho, Eduardo DiogoLeite, Felipe MartinsLima, Jaírton Benício deMontenegro, João Paulo ChavesSaavedra, FláviaSilva, Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal2023-09-29T17:04:51Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8640903Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/PUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/oaibrjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br1677-32251677-3217opendoar:2023-09-29T17:04:51Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparative evaluation of push-out bond strength of a MTA-based root canal sealer |
title |
Comparative evaluation of push-out bond strength of a MTA-based root canal sealer |
spellingShingle |
Comparative evaluation of push-out bond strength of a MTA-based root canal sealer Gurgel-Filho, Eduardo Diogo Endodontics Root canal obturation Root canal filling materials Odontologia |
title_short |
Comparative evaluation of push-out bond strength of a MTA-based root canal sealer |
title_full |
Comparative evaluation of push-out bond strength of a MTA-based root canal sealer |
title_fullStr |
Comparative evaluation of push-out bond strength of a MTA-based root canal sealer |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative evaluation of push-out bond strength of a MTA-based root canal sealer |
title_sort |
Comparative evaluation of push-out bond strength of a MTA-based root canal sealer |
author |
Gurgel-Filho, Eduardo Diogo |
author_facet |
Gurgel-Filho, Eduardo Diogo Leite, Felipe Martins Lima, Jaírton Benício de Montenegro, João Paulo Chaves Saavedra, Flávia Silva, Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Leite, Felipe Martins Lima, Jaírton Benício de Montenegro, João Paulo Chaves Saavedra, Flávia Silva, Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gurgel-Filho, Eduardo Diogo Leite, Felipe Martins Lima, Jaírton Benício de Montenegro, João Paulo Chaves Saavedra, Flávia Silva, Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Endodontics Root canal obturation Root canal filling materials Odontologia |
topic |
Endodontics Root canal obturation Root canal filling materials Odontologia |
description |
Aim: To evaluate the bond strength to root dentin of three root canal sealers: a mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)-based sealer (MTA Fillapex®), an epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus®), and a zinc oxide eugenol-based sealer (EndoFill®). Methods: Thirty extracted single-root human teeth of similar sizes and circular canals were prepared using #3 and #2 Gates Glidden drills in the cervical portion of the canal and K3® rotary instruments to a size #25/0.06 to working length. Irrigation with 0.5 mL 2% chlorhexidine gel was used before and 1 mL saline after each instrument. The smear layer was removed with 3 mL 17% EDTA for 3 min. The samples were sectioned horizontally into eight 1±0.1 mm-thick serial slices and then the push-out test was carried out. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the post-hoc Tukey test were used for the analysis of the data with a significance level of 5%. Results: AH Plus presented significantly higher bond strengths (p<0.05) than the other sealers, while MTA Fillapex showed the lowest bond strengths (p<0.05). Conclusions: The present study concluded that EndoFill® sealer and MTA FillApex® core combination were not superior to AH Plus® sealer and gutta-percha core combination. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-10-07 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8640903 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8640903 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8640903/8441 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 13 n. 2 (2014): Apr./Jun.; 114-117 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 13 No. 2 (2014): Apr./Jun.; 114-117 1677-3225 reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
collection |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
brjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1800216398120615936 |