Surface roughness of monolithic zirconia ceramic submitted to different polishing systems

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Somacal, Deise Caren
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Dreyer, Júlia Willers, Danesi, Patrícia, Spohr, Ana Maria
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8657266
Resumo: Aim: The objective was to evaluate, quantitative and qualitative, the abrasive effect of three polishing systems on the monolithic zirconia ceramic. Methods: Thirty disk-shaped samples of Yttria Tetragonal Zirconia Polycrystal (Y-TZP) were randomly distributed in three groups (n = 10) according to polishing system: G1- Komet system (KO); G2 - CeraGloss system (CG); G3 - Eve Diacera system (EV). The surface roughness (Ra) was obtained with Rugosimeter in four different moments: a) initial - glaze sample (Ra0); b) after occlusal adjustment with diamond burs (Ra1); c) after polishing with the abrasive systems (Ra2); d) after polishing with felt disc and diamond paste (Ra3). Four additional samples were observed in scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results: According to the Generalized Estimating Equation followed by the Bonferroni test (α = 0.05), the CG provided the lowest Ra2 (0.63 μm), not differing significantly from the KO (0.78 μm). The highest Ra2 was obtained with the EV (0.97 μm), which did not differ significantly from the KO. There was no statistical difference in Ra between the polishing with the abrasive systems (Ra2) and the final polishing with diamond paste (Ra3). SEM images showed that the polishing systems did not completely remove the grooves caused by the diamond burs during the occlusal adjustment. Conclusion: It was concluded that CG promoted smoother surface of the monolithic zirconia ceramic compared to EV, and intermediate smoothness was obtained with KO.
id UNICAMP-8_32ec233acc943c0076ff888ab3f8dfde
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8657266
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-8
network_name_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Surface roughness of monolithic zirconia ceramic submitted to different polishing systemsDental polishingSurface propertiesCeramics.Aim: The objective was to evaluate, quantitative and qualitative, the abrasive effect of three polishing systems on the monolithic zirconia ceramic. Methods: Thirty disk-shaped samples of Yttria Tetragonal Zirconia Polycrystal (Y-TZP) were randomly distributed in three groups (n = 10) according to polishing system: G1- Komet system (KO); G2 - CeraGloss system (CG); G3 - Eve Diacera system (EV). The surface roughness (Ra) was obtained with Rugosimeter in four different moments: a) initial - glaze sample (Ra0); b) after occlusal adjustment with diamond burs (Ra1); c) after polishing with the abrasive systems (Ra2); d) after polishing with felt disc and diamond paste (Ra3). Four additional samples were observed in scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results: According to the Generalized Estimating Equation followed by the Bonferroni test (α = 0.05), the CG provided the lowest Ra2 (0.63 μm), not differing significantly from the KO (0.78 μm). The highest Ra2 was obtained with the EV (0.97 μm), which did not differ significantly from the KO. There was no statistical difference in Ra between the polishing with the abrasive systems (Ra2) and the final polishing with diamond paste (Ra3). SEM images showed that the polishing systems did not completely remove the grooves caused by the diamond burs during the occlusal adjustment. Conclusion: It was concluded that CG promoted smoother surface of the monolithic zirconia ceramic compared to EV, and intermediate smoothness was obtained with KO.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2019-11-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionOriginal articleapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/865726610.20396/bjos.v18i0.8657266Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 18 (2019): Continuous Publication; e191643Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 18 (2019): Continuous Publication; e1916431677-3225reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8657266/21615Brazil; ContemporarySomacal, Deise Caren Dreyer, Júlia Willers Danesi, Patrícia Spohr, Ana Maria info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-12-22T01:33:53Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8657266Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/PUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/oaibrjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br1677-32251677-3217opendoar:2020-12-22T01:33:53Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Surface roughness of monolithic zirconia ceramic submitted to different polishing systems
title Surface roughness of monolithic zirconia ceramic submitted to different polishing systems
spellingShingle Surface roughness of monolithic zirconia ceramic submitted to different polishing systems
Somacal, Deise Caren
Dental polishing
Surface properties
Ceramics.
title_short Surface roughness of monolithic zirconia ceramic submitted to different polishing systems
title_full Surface roughness of monolithic zirconia ceramic submitted to different polishing systems
title_fullStr Surface roughness of monolithic zirconia ceramic submitted to different polishing systems
title_full_unstemmed Surface roughness of monolithic zirconia ceramic submitted to different polishing systems
title_sort Surface roughness of monolithic zirconia ceramic submitted to different polishing systems
author Somacal, Deise Caren
author_facet Somacal, Deise Caren
Dreyer, Júlia Willers
Danesi, Patrícia
Spohr, Ana Maria
author_role author
author2 Dreyer, Júlia Willers
Danesi, Patrícia
Spohr, Ana Maria
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Somacal, Deise Caren
Dreyer, Júlia Willers
Danesi, Patrícia
Spohr, Ana Maria
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dental polishing
Surface properties
Ceramics.
topic Dental polishing
Surface properties
Ceramics.
description Aim: The objective was to evaluate, quantitative and qualitative, the abrasive effect of three polishing systems on the monolithic zirconia ceramic. Methods: Thirty disk-shaped samples of Yttria Tetragonal Zirconia Polycrystal (Y-TZP) were randomly distributed in three groups (n = 10) according to polishing system: G1- Komet system (KO); G2 - CeraGloss system (CG); G3 - Eve Diacera system (EV). The surface roughness (Ra) was obtained with Rugosimeter in four different moments: a) initial - glaze sample (Ra0); b) after occlusal adjustment with diamond burs (Ra1); c) after polishing with the abrasive systems (Ra2); d) after polishing with felt disc and diamond paste (Ra3). Four additional samples were observed in scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results: According to the Generalized Estimating Equation followed by the Bonferroni test (α = 0.05), the CG provided the lowest Ra2 (0.63 μm), not differing significantly from the KO (0.78 μm). The highest Ra2 was obtained with the EV (0.97 μm), which did not differ significantly from the KO. There was no statistical difference in Ra between the polishing with the abrasive systems (Ra2) and the final polishing with diamond paste (Ra3). SEM images showed that the polishing systems did not completely remove the grooves caused by the diamond burs during the occlusal adjustment. Conclusion: It was concluded that CG promoted smoother surface of the monolithic zirconia ceramic compared to EV, and intermediate smoothness was obtained with KO.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-11-12
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Original article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8657266
10.20396/bjos.v18i0.8657266
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8657266
identifier_str_mv 10.20396/bjos.v18i0.8657266
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8657266/21615
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporary
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 18 (2019): Continuous Publication; e191643
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 18 (2019): Continuous Publication; e191643
1677-3225
reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
collection Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv brjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br
_version_ 1800216402982862848