Short-term effect of adhesive system on clinical performance of bulk fill composite: randomized clinical trial

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Vanessa Cristiane Araújo
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Oliveira, Fernanda Piana Santos Lima de, Magalhães, Claudia Silami, Oliveira, Fabíola Belkiss Santos de, Marques, Isabella Pereira, Noronha, Mayara dos Santos, Souza, João Gabriel Silva, Popoff, Daniela Araújo Veloso
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8665042
Resumo: Aim: Although bulk fill composites have been widely used as restorative material, there is no consensus regarding the best clinical protocol in terms of composite technique and adhesive system. Therefore, this clinical trial evaluated the clinical performance of bulk fill composites for class I restorations under different protocols. Methods: A randomized clinical trial including 155 class I restorations was conducted using different adhesive systems: conventional technique (phosphoric acid + conventional three-step adhesive system) (Group 1, 2 and 3); or self-etching adhesive system (Groups 4, 5 and 6). Control groups 1 and 4 were restored with conventional composite; groups 2 and 5 with low viscosity bulk fill and conventional composite as occlusal coverage; groups 3 and 6 with high viscosity bulk fill. The FDI criteria was used for clinical evaluation at baseline and after 6 months. Results: All groups showed good clinical performance. At baseline, the adhesive system did not affect postoperative hypersensitivity. After 6 months, group 5 showed a significant reduction in color and translucency; group 6 a reduction in terms of anatomical form and for postoperative sensitivity and an improvement in patient satisfaction (p<0.05). Considering the same restorative technique, the use of the self-etching adhesive system showed a significant decrease in color and translucency (p<0.05). Conclusion: All groups showed favorable clinical performance, and promising results were found for the conventional adhesive system and high viscosity bulk fill protocol.
id UNICAMP-8_43750f591243fe2e922e3b1a455134c4
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8665042
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-8
network_name_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Short-term effect of adhesive system on clinical performance of bulk fill composite: randomized clinical trialComposite resinsPhosphoric acidsAdhesivesDental restoration, permanentEsthetics, dentalClinical studies as topicAim: Although bulk fill composites have been widely used as restorative material, there is no consensus regarding the best clinical protocol in terms of composite technique and adhesive system. Therefore, this clinical trial evaluated the clinical performance of bulk fill composites for class I restorations under different protocols. Methods: A randomized clinical trial including 155 class I restorations was conducted using different adhesive systems: conventional technique (phosphoric acid + conventional three-step adhesive system) (Group 1, 2 and 3); or self-etching adhesive system (Groups 4, 5 and 6). Control groups 1 and 4 were restored with conventional composite; groups 2 and 5 with low viscosity bulk fill and conventional composite as occlusal coverage; groups 3 and 6 with high viscosity bulk fill. The FDI criteria was used for clinical evaluation at baseline and after 6 months. Results: All groups showed good clinical performance. At baseline, the adhesive system did not affect postoperative hypersensitivity. After 6 months, group 5 showed a significant reduction in color and translucency; group 6 a reduction in terms of anatomical form and for postoperative sensitivity and an improvement in patient satisfaction (p<0.05). Considering the same restorative technique, the use of the self-etching adhesive system showed a significant decrease in color and translucency (p<0.05). Conclusion: All groups showed favorable clinical performance, and promising results were found for the conventional adhesive system and high viscosity bulk fill protocol.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2021-11-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/866504210.20396/bjos.v21i00.8665042Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 21 (2022): Continuous Publication; e225042Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 21 (2022): Continuous Publication; e2250421677-3225reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8665042/27612Brazil; ContemporaryCopyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Oral Scienceshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Vanessa Cristiane AraújoOliveira, Fernanda Piana Santos Lima deMagalhães, Claudia Silami Oliveira, Fabíola Belkiss Santos deMarques, Isabella Pereira Noronha, Mayara dos Santos Souza, João Gabriel SilvaPopoff, Daniela Araújo Veloso2021-11-30T14:01:53Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8665042Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/PUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/oaibrjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br1677-32251677-3217opendoar:2021-11-30T14:01:53Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Short-term effect of adhesive system on clinical performance of bulk fill composite: randomized clinical trial
title Short-term effect of adhesive system on clinical performance of bulk fill composite: randomized clinical trial
spellingShingle Short-term effect of adhesive system on clinical performance of bulk fill composite: randomized clinical trial
Oliveira, Vanessa Cristiane Araújo
Composite resins
Phosphoric acids
Adhesives
Dental restoration, permanent
Esthetics, dental
Clinical studies as topic
title_short Short-term effect of adhesive system on clinical performance of bulk fill composite: randomized clinical trial
title_full Short-term effect of adhesive system on clinical performance of bulk fill composite: randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Short-term effect of adhesive system on clinical performance of bulk fill composite: randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Short-term effect of adhesive system on clinical performance of bulk fill composite: randomized clinical trial
title_sort Short-term effect of adhesive system on clinical performance of bulk fill composite: randomized clinical trial
author Oliveira, Vanessa Cristiane Araújo
author_facet Oliveira, Vanessa Cristiane Araújo
Oliveira, Fernanda Piana Santos Lima de
Magalhães, Claudia Silami
Oliveira, Fabíola Belkiss Santos de
Marques, Isabella Pereira
Noronha, Mayara dos Santos
Souza, João Gabriel Silva
Popoff, Daniela Araújo Veloso
author_role author
author2 Oliveira, Fernanda Piana Santos Lima de
Magalhães, Claudia Silami
Oliveira, Fabíola Belkiss Santos de
Marques, Isabella Pereira
Noronha, Mayara dos Santos
Souza, João Gabriel Silva
Popoff, Daniela Araújo Veloso
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Vanessa Cristiane Araújo
Oliveira, Fernanda Piana Santos Lima de
Magalhães, Claudia Silami
Oliveira, Fabíola Belkiss Santos de
Marques, Isabella Pereira
Noronha, Mayara dos Santos
Souza, João Gabriel Silva
Popoff, Daniela Araújo Veloso
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Composite resins
Phosphoric acids
Adhesives
Dental restoration, permanent
Esthetics, dental
Clinical studies as topic
topic Composite resins
Phosphoric acids
Adhesives
Dental restoration, permanent
Esthetics, dental
Clinical studies as topic
description Aim: Although bulk fill composites have been widely used as restorative material, there is no consensus regarding the best clinical protocol in terms of composite technique and adhesive system. Therefore, this clinical trial evaluated the clinical performance of bulk fill composites for class I restorations under different protocols. Methods: A randomized clinical trial including 155 class I restorations was conducted using different adhesive systems: conventional technique (phosphoric acid + conventional three-step adhesive system) (Group 1, 2 and 3); or self-etching adhesive system (Groups 4, 5 and 6). Control groups 1 and 4 were restored with conventional composite; groups 2 and 5 with low viscosity bulk fill and conventional composite as occlusal coverage; groups 3 and 6 with high viscosity bulk fill. The FDI criteria was used for clinical evaluation at baseline and after 6 months. Results: All groups showed good clinical performance. At baseline, the adhesive system did not affect postoperative hypersensitivity. After 6 months, group 5 showed a significant reduction in color and translucency; group 6 a reduction in terms of anatomical form and for postoperative sensitivity and an improvement in patient satisfaction (p<0.05). Considering the same restorative technique, the use of the self-etching adhesive system showed a significant decrease in color and translucency (p<0.05). Conclusion: All groups showed favorable clinical performance, and promising results were found for the conventional adhesive system and high viscosity bulk fill protocol.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-11-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8665042
10.20396/bjos.v21i00.8665042
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8665042
identifier_str_mv 10.20396/bjos.v21i00.8665042
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8665042/27612
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporary
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 21 (2022): Continuous Publication; e225042
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 21 (2022): Continuous Publication; e225042
1677-3225
reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
collection Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv brjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br
_version_ 1800216397649805312