Short-term effect of adhesive system on clinical performance of bulk fill composite: randomized clinical trial
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8665042 |
Resumo: | Aim: Although bulk fill composites have been widely used as restorative material, there is no consensus regarding the best clinical protocol in terms of composite technique and adhesive system. Therefore, this clinical trial evaluated the clinical performance of bulk fill composites for class I restorations under different protocols. Methods: A randomized clinical trial including 155 class I restorations was conducted using different adhesive systems: conventional technique (phosphoric acid + conventional three-step adhesive system) (Group 1, 2 and 3); or self-etching adhesive system (Groups 4, 5 and 6). Control groups 1 and 4 were restored with conventional composite; groups 2 and 5 with low viscosity bulk fill and conventional composite as occlusal coverage; groups 3 and 6 with high viscosity bulk fill. The FDI criteria was used for clinical evaluation at baseline and after 6 months. Results: All groups showed good clinical performance. At baseline, the adhesive system did not affect postoperative hypersensitivity. After 6 months, group 5 showed a significant reduction in color and translucency; group 6 a reduction in terms of anatomical form and for postoperative sensitivity and an improvement in patient satisfaction (p<0.05). Considering the same restorative technique, the use of the self-etching adhesive system showed a significant decrease in color and translucency (p<0.05). Conclusion: All groups showed favorable clinical performance, and promising results were found for the conventional adhesive system and high viscosity bulk fill protocol. |
id |
UNICAMP-8_43750f591243fe2e922e3b1a455134c4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8665042 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-8 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Short-term effect of adhesive system on clinical performance of bulk fill composite: randomized clinical trialComposite resinsPhosphoric acidsAdhesivesDental restoration, permanentEsthetics, dentalClinical studies as topicAim: Although bulk fill composites have been widely used as restorative material, there is no consensus regarding the best clinical protocol in terms of composite technique and adhesive system. Therefore, this clinical trial evaluated the clinical performance of bulk fill composites for class I restorations under different protocols. Methods: A randomized clinical trial including 155 class I restorations was conducted using different adhesive systems: conventional technique (phosphoric acid + conventional three-step adhesive system) (Group 1, 2 and 3); or self-etching adhesive system (Groups 4, 5 and 6). Control groups 1 and 4 were restored with conventional composite; groups 2 and 5 with low viscosity bulk fill and conventional composite as occlusal coverage; groups 3 and 6 with high viscosity bulk fill. The FDI criteria was used for clinical evaluation at baseline and after 6 months. Results: All groups showed good clinical performance. At baseline, the adhesive system did not affect postoperative hypersensitivity. After 6 months, group 5 showed a significant reduction in color and translucency; group 6 a reduction in terms of anatomical form and for postoperative sensitivity and an improvement in patient satisfaction (p<0.05). Considering the same restorative technique, the use of the self-etching adhesive system showed a significant decrease in color and translucency (p<0.05). Conclusion: All groups showed favorable clinical performance, and promising results were found for the conventional adhesive system and high viscosity bulk fill protocol.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2021-11-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/866504210.20396/bjos.v21i00.8665042Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 21 (2022): Continuous Publication; e225042Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 21 (2022): Continuous Publication; e2250421677-3225reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8665042/27612Brazil; ContemporaryCopyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Oral Scienceshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Vanessa Cristiane AraújoOliveira, Fernanda Piana Santos Lima deMagalhães, Claudia Silami Oliveira, Fabíola Belkiss Santos deMarques, Isabella Pereira Noronha, Mayara dos Santos Souza, João Gabriel SilvaPopoff, Daniela Araújo Veloso2021-11-30T14:01:53Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8665042Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/PUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/oaibrjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br1677-32251677-3217opendoar:2021-11-30T14:01:53Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Short-term effect of adhesive system on clinical performance of bulk fill composite: randomized clinical trial |
title |
Short-term effect of adhesive system on clinical performance of bulk fill composite: randomized clinical trial |
spellingShingle |
Short-term effect of adhesive system on clinical performance of bulk fill composite: randomized clinical trial Oliveira, Vanessa Cristiane Araújo Composite resins Phosphoric acids Adhesives Dental restoration, permanent Esthetics, dental Clinical studies as topic |
title_short |
Short-term effect of adhesive system on clinical performance of bulk fill composite: randomized clinical trial |
title_full |
Short-term effect of adhesive system on clinical performance of bulk fill composite: randomized clinical trial |
title_fullStr |
Short-term effect of adhesive system on clinical performance of bulk fill composite: randomized clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed |
Short-term effect of adhesive system on clinical performance of bulk fill composite: randomized clinical trial |
title_sort |
Short-term effect of adhesive system on clinical performance of bulk fill composite: randomized clinical trial |
author |
Oliveira, Vanessa Cristiane Araújo |
author_facet |
Oliveira, Vanessa Cristiane Araújo Oliveira, Fernanda Piana Santos Lima de Magalhães, Claudia Silami Oliveira, Fabíola Belkiss Santos de Marques, Isabella Pereira Noronha, Mayara dos Santos Souza, João Gabriel Silva Popoff, Daniela Araújo Veloso |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Oliveira, Fernanda Piana Santos Lima de Magalhães, Claudia Silami Oliveira, Fabíola Belkiss Santos de Marques, Isabella Pereira Noronha, Mayara dos Santos Souza, João Gabriel Silva Popoff, Daniela Araújo Veloso |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, Vanessa Cristiane Araújo Oliveira, Fernanda Piana Santos Lima de Magalhães, Claudia Silami Oliveira, Fabíola Belkiss Santos de Marques, Isabella Pereira Noronha, Mayara dos Santos Souza, João Gabriel Silva Popoff, Daniela Araújo Veloso |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Composite resins Phosphoric acids Adhesives Dental restoration, permanent Esthetics, dental Clinical studies as topic |
topic |
Composite resins Phosphoric acids Adhesives Dental restoration, permanent Esthetics, dental Clinical studies as topic |
description |
Aim: Although bulk fill composites have been widely used as restorative material, there is no consensus regarding the best clinical protocol in terms of composite technique and adhesive system. Therefore, this clinical trial evaluated the clinical performance of bulk fill composites for class I restorations under different protocols. Methods: A randomized clinical trial including 155 class I restorations was conducted using different adhesive systems: conventional technique (phosphoric acid + conventional three-step adhesive system) (Group 1, 2 and 3); or self-etching adhesive system (Groups 4, 5 and 6). Control groups 1 and 4 were restored with conventional composite; groups 2 and 5 with low viscosity bulk fill and conventional composite as occlusal coverage; groups 3 and 6 with high viscosity bulk fill. The FDI criteria was used for clinical evaluation at baseline and after 6 months. Results: All groups showed good clinical performance. At baseline, the adhesive system did not affect postoperative hypersensitivity. After 6 months, group 5 showed a significant reduction in color and translucency; group 6 a reduction in terms of anatomical form and for postoperative sensitivity and an improvement in patient satisfaction (p<0.05). Considering the same restorative technique, the use of the self-etching adhesive system showed a significant decrease in color and translucency (p<0.05). Conclusion: All groups showed favorable clinical performance, and promising results were found for the conventional adhesive system and high viscosity bulk fill protocol. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-11-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8665042 10.20396/bjos.v21i00.8665042 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8665042 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.20396/bjos.v21i00.8665042 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8665042/27612 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazil; Contemporary |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 21 (2022): Continuous Publication; e225042 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 21 (2022): Continuous Publication; e225042 1677-3225 reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
collection |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
brjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1800216397649805312 |