Fracture strength of ceramic brackets submitted to archwire torsional strain

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Manhães, Fernando Rayes
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Divino, Rosilene, Lucato, Adriana Simone, Vedovello, Sílvia Amélia Scudeler, Correa, Cristian, Valdrigh, Heloísa Cristina
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
DOI: 10.20396/bjos.v10i3.8641626
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641626
Resumo: Aim: To evaluate the fracture strength of ceramic brackets submitted to archwire torsional strain. Methods: Different types of maxillary central incisor ceramic brackets from four different commercial brands, Roth prescription (0.022" x 0.028"), were evaluated, namely: Mystique (GAC), InVu (TP Orthodontics), Clarity (3M Unitek) and Luxi II (RMO Ortohodontics). To evaluate the fracture strength, 0.019"x 0.025" stainless steel orthodontic wires were inserted into the bracket channels and submitted to torsion until they fractured. Results: The InVu brackets showed a significantly higher fracture strength than the other brackets (p<0.05), which did not differ significantly among them (p>0.05). Conclusions: Among the brackets tested, the traditional ceramic bracket InVu showed the highest fracture strength, while the Luxi II bracket, obtained the lowest value.
id UNICAMP-8_569ad870a511510539d76a282d01a1d2
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8641626
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-8
network_name_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
spelling Fracture strength of ceramic brackets submitted to archwire torsional strainBracesCeramicsOrthodonticsBiomechanicsOdontologiaAim: To evaluate the fracture strength of ceramic brackets submitted to archwire torsional strain. Methods: Different types of maxillary central incisor ceramic brackets from four different commercial brands, Roth prescription (0.022" x 0.028"), were evaluated, namely: Mystique (GAC), InVu (TP Orthodontics), Clarity (3M Unitek) and Luxi II (RMO Ortohodontics). To evaluate the fracture strength, 0.019"x 0.025" stainless steel orthodontic wires were inserted into the bracket channels and submitted to torsion until they fractured. Results: The InVu brackets showed a significantly higher fracture strength than the other brackets (p<0.05), which did not differ significantly among them (p>0.05). Conclusions: Among the brackets tested, the traditional ceramic bracket InVu showed the highest fracture strength, while the Luxi II bracket, obtained the lowest value.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2015-11-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/864162610.20396/bjos.v10i3.8641626Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 10 n. 3 (2011): Jul./Sep.; 180-183Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 10 No. 3 (2011): Jul./Sep.; 180-1831677-3225reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641626/9123Manhães, Fernando RayesDivino, RosileneLucato, Adriana SimoneVedovello, Sílvia Amélia ScudelerCorrea, CristianValdrigh, Heloísa Cristinainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2016-02-25T09:11:34Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8641626Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/PUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/oaibrjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br1677-32251677-3217opendoar:2016-02-25T09:11:34Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Fracture strength of ceramic brackets submitted to archwire torsional strain
title Fracture strength of ceramic brackets submitted to archwire torsional strain
spellingShingle Fracture strength of ceramic brackets submitted to archwire torsional strain
Fracture strength of ceramic brackets submitted to archwire torsional strain
Manhães, Fernando Rayes
Braces
Ceramics
Orthodontics
Biomechanics
Odontologia
Manhães, Fernando Rayes
Braces
Ceramics
Orthodontics
Biomechanics
Odontologia
title_short Fracture strength of ceramic brackets submitted to archwire torsional strain
title_full Fracture strength of ceramic brackets submitted to archwire torsional strain
title_fullStr Fracture strength of ceramic brackets submitted to archwire torsional strain
Fracture strength of ceramic brackets submitted to archwire torsional strain
title_full_unstemmed Fracture strength of ceramic brackets submitted to archwire torsional strain
Fracture strength of ceramic brackets submitted to archwire torsional strain
title_sort Fracture strength of ceramic brackets submitted to archwire torsional strain
author Manhães, Fernando Rayes
author_facet Manhães, Fernando Rayes
Manhães, Fernando Rayes
Divino, Rosilene
Lucato, Adriana Simone
Vedovello, Sílvia Amélia Scudeler
Correa, Cristian
Valdrigh, Heloísa Cristina
Divino, Rosilene
Lucato, Adriana Simone
Vedovello, Sílvia Amélia Scudeler
Correa, Cristian
Valdrigh, Heloísa Cristina
author_role author
author2 Divino, Rosilene
Lucato, Adriana Simone
Vedovello, Sílvia Amélia Scudeler
Correa, Cristian
Valdrigh, Heloísa Cristina
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Manhães, Fernando Rayes
Divino, Rosilene
Lucato, Adriana Simone
Vedovello, Sílvia Amélia Scudeler
Correa, Cristian
Valdrigh, Heloísa Cristina
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Braces
Ceramics
Orthodontics
Biomechanics
Odontologia
topic Braces
Ceramics
Orthodontics
Biomechanics
Odontologia
description Aim: To evaluate the fracture strength of ceramic brackets submitted to archwire torsional strain. Methods: Different types of maxillary central incisor ceramic brackets from four different commercial brands, Roth prescription (0.022" x 0.028"), were evaluated, namely: Mystique (GAC), InVu (TP Orthodontics), Clarity (3M Unitek) and Luxi II (RMO Ortohodontics). To evaluate the fracture strength, 0.019"x 0.025" stainless steel orthodontic wires were inserted into the bracket channels and submitted to torsion until they fractured. Results: The InVu brackets showed a significantly higher fracture strength than the other brackets (p<0.05), which did not differ significantly among them (p>0.05). Conclusions: Among the brackets tested, the traditional ceramic bracket InVu showed the highest fracture strength, while the Luxi II bracket, obtained the lowest value.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-11-09
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641626
10.20396/bjos.v10i3.8641626
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641626
identifier_str_mv 10.20396/bjos.v10i3.8641626
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641626/9123
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 10 n. 3 (2011): Jul./Sep.; 180-183
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 10 No. 3 (2011): Jul./Sep.; 180-183
1677-3225
reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
collection Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv brjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br
_version_ 1822181788481486848
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.20396/bjos.v10i3.8641626

Registros relacionados