Microbial evaluation of implant surface : a clinical study comparing submerged, non-submerged and immediately loaded implants

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Furquim, Fabio
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Deliberador, Tatiana Miranda, Giacomel, Maria Cecilia Lopes, Weiss, Suyany Gabriely, Zielak, João César, Scariot, Rafaela
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8664809
Resumo: Aim: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the microbial contamination in internal and external walls of cone morse implant walls. Methods: Eleven patients with edentulous mandibular posterior area were selected to received dental implants, divided into groups: submerged (S), non-submerged (NS), and immediately loaded (IL). Microbiological evaluations (microorganisms’ number, aerobic and anaerobic colony forming units (CFU) number and microorganisms’ qualification) were divided into internal and external collection of the implant walls, at different stages: T0 (surgical procedure), T2 (suture removal), T4 (reopening S group), T6 (suture removal S group), and T8 (abutment placement in S and NS). All data were submitted to statistical analyses, with confidence level of 0.05. Results: There was difference in number of microorganisms observed over time within the same group (p < 0.05). A difference was observed in CFU when evaluated within the same group over time (p < 0.05), except for the IL group. In internal collection, a predominance of non-formation of microorganisms was observed at T0 in all groups, while formation of Gram-positive Diplococci and Gram-positive Bacilli was observed at T8 (p>0.05). In external collection, an increase in number of microorganisms was observed at T0. Conclusion: There was no difference in microbial contamination among the evaluated groups. The microorganism’s colonization changed over time.
id UNICAMP-8_5a1dfe19850b9c535b9f1b4524aa69d7
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8664809
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-8
network_name_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Microbial evaluation of implant surface : a clinical study comparing submerged, non-submerged and immediately loaded implants Dental implantsSurgery, oralActinobacteriaAim: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the microbial contamination in internal and external walls of cone morse implant walls. Methods: Eleven patients with edentulous mandibular posterior area were selected to received dental implants, divided into groups: submerged (S), non-submerged (NS), and immediately loaded (IL). Microbiological evaluations (microorganisms’ number, aerobic and anaerobic colony forming units (CFU) number and microorganisms’ qualification) were divided into internal and external collection of the implant walls, at different stages: T0 (surgical procedure), T2 (suture removal), T4 (reopening S group), T6 (suture removal S group), and T8 (abutment placement in S and NS). All data were submitted to statistical analyses, with confidence level of 0.05. Results: There was difference in number of microorganisms observed over time within the same group (p < 0.05). A difference was observed in CFU when evaluated within the same group over time (p < 0.05), except for the IL group. In internal collection, a predominance of non-formation of microorganisms was observed at T0 in all groups, while formation of Gram-positive Diplococci and Gram-positive Bacilli was observed at T8 (p>0.05). In external collection, an increase in number of microorganisms was observed at T0. Conclusion: There was no difference in microbial contamination among the evaluated groups. The microorganism’s colonization changed over time.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2021-08-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/866480910.20396/bjos.v21i00.8664809Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 21 (2022): Continuous Publication; e224809Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 21 (2022): Continuous Publication; e2248091677-3225reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8664809/27173Brazil; ContemporanyCopyright (c) 2021 Fabio Furquim, Tatiana Miranda Deliberador, Maria Cecilia Lopes Giacomel, Suyany Gabriely Weiss, João César Zielak, Rafaela Scariothttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFurquim, FabioDeliberador, Tatiana MirandaGiacomel, Maria Cecilia LopesWeiss, Suyany GabrielyZielak, João CésarScariot, Rafaela2021-08-25T12:25:27Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8664809Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/PUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/oaibrjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br1677-32251677-3217opendoar:2021-08-25T12:25:27Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Microbial evaluation of implant surface : a clinical study comparing submerged, non-submerged and immediately loaded implants
title Microbial evaluation of implant surface : a clinical study comparing submerged, non-submerged and immediately loaded implants
spellingShingle Microbial evaluation of implant surface : a clinical study comparing submerged, non-submerged and immediately loaded implants
Furquim, Fabio
Dental implants
Surgery, oral
Actinobacteria
title_short Microbial evaluation of implant surface : a clinical study comparing submerged, non-submerged and immediately loaded implants
title_full Microbial evaluation of implant surface : a clinical study comparing submerged, non-submerged and immediately loaded implants
title_fullStr Microbial evaluation of implant surface : a clinical study comparing submerged, non-submerged and immediately loaded implants
title_full_unstemmed Microbial evaluation of implant surface : a clinical study comparing submerged, non-submerged and immediately loaded implants
title_sort Microbial evaluation of implant surface : a clinical study comparing submerged, non-submerged and immediately loaded implants
author Furquim, Fabio
author_facet Furquim, Fabio
Deliberador, Tatiana Miranda
Giacomel, Maria Cecilia Lopes
Weiss, Suyany Gabriely
Zielak, João César
Scariot, Rafaela
author_role author
author2 Deliberador, Tatiana Miranda
Giacomel, Maria Cecilia Lopes
Weiss, Suyany Gabriely
Zielak, João César
Scariot, Rafaela
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Furquim, Fabio
Deliberador, Tatiana Miranda
Giacomel, Maria Cecilia Lopes
Weiss, Suyany Gabriely
Zielak, João César
Scariot, Rafaela
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dental implants
Surgery, oral
Actinobacteria
topic Dental implants
Surgery, oral
Actinobacteria
description Aim: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the microbial contamination in internal and external walls of cone morse implant walls. Methods: Eleven patients with edentulous mandibular posterior area were selected to received dental implants, divided into groups: submerged (S), non-submerged (NS), and immediately loaded (IL). Microbiological evaluations (microorganisms’ number, aerobic and anaerobic colony forming units (CFU) number and microorganisms’ qualification) were divided into internal and external collection of the implant walls, at different stages: T0 (surgical procedure), T2 (suture removal), T4 (reopening S group), T6 (suture removal S group), and T8 (abutment placement in S and NS). All data were submitted to statistical analyses, with confidence level of 0.05. Results: There was difference in number of microorganisms observed over time within the same group (p < 0.05). A difference was observed in CFU when evaluated within the same group over time (p < 0.05), except for the IL group. In internal collection, a predominance of non-formation of microorganisms was observed at T0 in all groups, while formation of Gram-positive Diplococci and Gram-positive Bacilli was observed at T8 (p>0.05). In external collection, an increase in number of microorganisms was observed at T0. Conclusion: There was no difference in microbial contamination among the evaluated groups. The microorganism’s colonization changed over time.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-08-24
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8664809
10.20396/bjos.v21i00.8664809
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8664809
identifier_str_mv 10.20396/bjos.v21i00.8664809
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8664809/27173
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporany
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 21 (2022): Continuous Publication; e224809
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 21 (2022): Continuous Publication; e224809
1677-3225
reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
collection Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv brjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br
_version_ 1800216397642465280