Feasibility of three-dimensional CT reconstruction in assessing mandibular fractures: a survey among oral surgeons and dental maxillofacial radiologists
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8659912 |
Resumo: | Aim: Evaluation of the reliability of 3D computed tomography (3D-CT) in the diagnosis of mandibular fractures. Methods: A cross-sectional, quantitative and qualitative study was carried out, through the application of a questionnaire for 70 professionals in the area of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Radiology. 3D-CT images of mandibular fractures were delivered to the interviewees along with a questionnaire. Participants answered about the number of traces, the region and the type of fracture. The correct diagnosis, that is, the expected answer, was based on the reports of a specialist in oral and maxillofacial radiology after viewing the images in the axial, sagittal and coronal sections. The resulting data from the interviewees was compared with the expected answer and then, the data was analyzed statistically. Results: In the sample 56.9% were between 22 and 30 years old, 52.8% were oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMF), 34.7% were residents in OMF surgery and 12.5% OMF radiologists. Each professional answered 15 questions (related to five patients) and 50.8% of the total of these was answered correctly. Specialists in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Traumatology correctly answered 53.9%. Interviewees with experience between 6 and 10 years correctly answered 58.2%. In identifying fracture traces, 46.1% of the questions were answered correctly. In terms of location, 5.6% of interviewees answered wrongly while 14.2% answered wrongly regarding classification. Conclusion: 3D computed tomography did not prove to be a reliable image for diagnosing mandibular fractures when used alone. This made necessary an association with axial, sagittal and coronal tomographic sections. |
id |
UNICAMP-8_6913f998e1bd6e788bbaa90910758908 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8659912 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-8 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Feasibility of three-dimensional CT reconstruction in assessing mandibular fractures: a survey among oral surgeons and dental maxillofacial radiologistsTomography, X-ray computedImaging, three-dimensionalDiagnostic imagingMandibular fracturesAim: Evaluation of the reliability of 3D computed tomography (3D-CT) in the diagnosis of mandibular fractures. Methods: A cross-sectional, quantitative and qualitative study was carried out, through the application of a questionnaire for 70 professionals in the area of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Radiology. 3D-CT images of mandibular fractures were delivered to the interviewees along with a questionnaire. Participants answered about the number of traces, the region and the type of fracture. The correct diagnosis, that is, the expected answer, was based on the reports of a specialist in oral and maxillofacial radiology after viewing the images in the axial, sagittal and coronal sections. The resulting data from the interviewees was compared with the expected answer and then, the data was analyzed statistically. Results: In the sample 56.9% were between 22 and 30 years old, 52.8% were oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMF), 34.7% were residents in OMF surgery and 12.5% OMF radiologists. Each professional answered 15 questions (related to five patients) and 50.8% of the total of these was answered correctly. Specialists in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Traumatology correctly answered 53.9%. Interviewees with experience between 6 and 10 years correctly answered 58.2%. In identifying fracture traces, 46.1% of the questions were answered correctly. In terms of location, 5.6% of interviewees answered wrongly while 14.2% answered wrongly regarding classification. Conclusion: 3D computed tomography did not prove to be a reliable image for diagnosing mandibular fractures when used alone. This made necessary an association with axial, sagittal and coronal tomographic sections.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2021-02-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/865991210.20396/bjos.v20i00.8659912Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 20 (2021): Continuous Publication; e219912Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 20 (2021): Continuous Publication; e2199121677-3225reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8659912/25921Brazil; ContemporanyCopyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Oral Scienceshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMoura, Victor Nogueira Nogueira, EmersonRodrigues, Ewerton Daniel Rocha Silva, Caio Gonçalves de Holanda Vasconcellos, Ricardo José 2021-02-09T13:08:46Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8659912Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/PUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/oaibrjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br1677-32251677-3217opendoar:2021-02-09T13:08:46Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Feasibility of three-dimensional CT reconstruction in assessing mandibular fractures: a survey among oral surgeons and dental maxillofacial radiologists |
title |
Feasibility of three-dimensional CT reconstruction in assessing mandibular fractures: a survey among oral surgeons and dental maxillofacial radiologists |
spellingShingle |
Feasibility of three-dimensional CT reconstruction in assessing mandibular fractures: a survey among oral surgeons and dental maxillofacial radiologists Moura, Victor Nogueira Tomography, X-ray computed Imaging, three-dimensional Diagnostic imaging Mandibular fractures |
title_short |
Feasibility of three-dimensional CT reconstruction in assessing mandibular fractures: a survey among oral surgeons and dental maxillofacial radiologists |
title_full |
Feasibility of three-dimensional CT reconstruction in assessing mandibular fractures: a survey among oral surgeons and dental maxillofacial radiologists |
title_fullStr |
Feasibility of three-dimensional CT reconstruction in assessing mandibular fractures: a survey among oral surgeons and dental maxillofacial radiologists |
title_full_unstemmed |
Feasibility of three-dimensional CT reconstruction in assessing mandibular fractures: a survey among oral surgeons and dental maxillofacial radiologists |
title_sort |
Feasibility of three-dimensional CT reconstruction in assessing mandibular fractures: a survey among oral surgeons and dental maxillofacial radiologists |
author |
Moura, Victor Nogueira |
author_facet |
Moura, Victor Nogueira Nogueira, Emerson Rodrigues, Ewerton Daniel Rocha Silva, Caio Gonçalves de Holanda Vasconcellos, Ricardo José |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Nogueira, Emerson Rodrigues, Ewerton Daniel Rocha Silva, Caio Gonçalves de Holanda Vasconcellos, Ricardo José |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Moura, Victor Nogueira Nogueira, Emerson Rodrigues, Ewerton Daniel Rocha Silva, Caio Gonçalves de Holanda Vasconcellos, Ricardo José |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Tomography, X-ray computed Imaging, three-dimensional Diagnostic imaging Mandibular fractures |
topic |
Tomography, X-ray computed Imaging, three-dimensional Diagnostic imaging Mandibular fractures |
description |
Aim: Evaluation of the reliability of 3D computed tomography (3D-CT) in the diagnosis of mandibular fractures. Methods: A cross-sectional, quantitative and qualitative study was carried out, through the application of a questionnaire for 70 professionals in the area of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Radiology. 3D-CT images of mandibular fractures were delivered to the interviewees along with a questionnaire. Participants answered about the number of traces, the region and the type of fracture. The correct diagnosis, that is, the expected answer, was based on the reports of a specialist in oral and maxillofacial radiology after viewing the images in the axial, sagittal and coronal sections. The resulting data from the interviewees was compared with the expected answer and then, the data was analyzed statistically. Results: In the sample 56.9% were between 22 and 30 years old, 52.8% were oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMF), 34.7% were residents in OMF surgery and 12.5% OMF radiologists. Each professional answered 15 questions (related to five patients) and 50.8% of the total of these was answered correctly. Specialists in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Traumatology correctly answered 53.9%. Interviewees with experience between 6 and 10 years correctly answered 58.2%. In identifying fracture traces, 46.1% of the questions were answered correctly. In terms of location, 5.6% of interviewees answered wrongly while 14.2% answered wrongly regarding classification. Conclusion: 3D computed tomography did not prove to be a reliable image for diagnosing mandibular fractures when used alone. This made necessary an association with axial, sagittal and coronal tomographic sections. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-02-08 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8659912 10.20396/bjos.v20i00.8659912 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8659912 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.20396/bjos.v20i00.8659912 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8659912/25921 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazil; Contemporany |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 20 (2021): Continuous Publication; e219912 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 20 (2021): Continuous Publication; e219912 1677-3225 reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
collection |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
brjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1800216403089817600 |