Feasibility of three-dimensional CT reconstruction in assessing mandibular fractures: a survey among oral surgeons and dental maxillofacial radiologists

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Moura, Victor Nogueira
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Nogueira, Emerson, Rodrigues, Ewerton Daniel Rocha, Silva, Caio Gonçalves, de Holanda Vasconcellos, Ricardo José
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8659912
Resumo: Aim: Evaluation of the reliability of 3D computed tomography (3D-CT) in the diagnosis of mandibular fractures. Methods: A cross-sectional, quantitative and qualitative study was carried out, through the application of a questionnaire for 70 professionals in the area of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Radiology. 3D-CT images of mandibular fractures were delivered to the interviewees along with a questionnaire. Participants answered about the number of traces, the region and the type of fracture. The correct diagnosis, that is, the expected answer, was based on the reports of a specialist in oral and maxillofacial radiology after viewing the images in the axial, sagittal and coronal sections. The resulting data from the interviewees was compared with the expected answer and then, the data was analyzed statistically. Results: In the sample 56.9% were between 22 and 30 years old, 52.8% were oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMF), 34.7% were residents in OMF surgery and 12.5% OMF radiologists. Each professional answered 15 questions (related to five patients) and 50.8% of the total of these was answered correctly. Specialists in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Traumatology correctly answered 53.9%. Interviewees with experience between 6 and 10 years correctly answered 58.2%. In identifying fracture traces, 46.1% of the questions were answered correctly. In terms of location, 5.6% of interviewees answered wrongly while 14.2% answered wrongly regarding classification. Conclusion: 3D computed tomography did not prove to be a reliable image for diagnosing mandibular fractures when used alone. This made necessary an association with axial, sagittal and coronal tomographic sections.
id UNICAMP-8_6913f998e1bd6e788bbaa90910758908
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8659912
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-8
network_name_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Feasibility of three-dimensional CT reconstruction in assessing mandibular fractures: a survey among oral surgeons and dental maxillofacial radiologistsTomography, X-ray computedImaging, three-dimensionalDiagnostic imagingMandibular fracturesAim: Evaluation of the reliability of 3D computed tomography (3D-CT) in the diagnosis of mandibular fractures. Methods: A cross-sectional, quantitative and qualitative study was carried out, through the application of a questionnaire for 70 professionals in the area of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Radiology. 3D-CT images of mandibular fractures were delivered to the interviewees along with a questionnaire. Participants answered about the number of traces, the region and the type of fracture. The correct diagnosis, that is, the expected answer, was based on the reports of a specialist in oral and maxillofacial radiology after viewing the images in the axial, sagittal and coronal sections. The resulting data from the interviewees was compared with the expected answer and then, the data was analyzed statistically. Results: In the sample 56.9% were between 22 and 30 years old, 52.8% were oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMF), 34.7% were residents in OMF surgery and 12.5% OMF radiologists. Each professional answered 15 questions (related to five patients) and 50.8% of the total of these was answered correctly. Specialists in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Traumatology correctly answered 53.9%. Interviewees with experience between 6 and 10 years correctly answered 58.2%. In identifying fracture traces, 46.1% of the questions were answered correctly. In terms of location, 5.6% of interviewees answered wrongly while 14.2% answered wrongly regarding classification. Conclusion: 3D computed tomography did not prove to be a reliable image for diagnosing mandibular fractures when used alone. This made necessary an association with axial, sagittal and coronal tomographic sections.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2021-02-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/865991210.20396/bjos.v20i00.8659912Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 20 (2021): Continuous Publication; e219912Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 20 (2021): Continuous Publication; e2199121677-3225reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8659912/25921Brazil; ContemporanyCopyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Oral Scienceshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMoura, Victor Nogueira Nogueira, EmersonRodrigues, Ewerton Daniel Rocha Silva, Caio Gonçalves de Holanda Vasconcellos, Ricardo José 2021-02-09T13:08:46Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8659912Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/PUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/oaibrjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br1677-32251677-3217opendoar:2021-02-09T13:08:46Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Feasibility of three-dimensional CT reconstruction in assessing mandibular fractures: a survey among oral surgeons and dental maxillofacial radiologists
title Feasibility of three-dimensional CT reconstruction in assessing mandibular fractures: a survey among oral surgeons and dental maxillofacial radiologists
spellingShingle Feasibility of three-dimensional CT reconstruction in assessing mandibular fractures: a survey among oral surgeons and dental maxillofacial radiologists
Moura, Victor Nogueira
Tomography, X-ray computed
Imaging, three-dimensional
Diagnostic imaging
Mandibular fractures
title_short Feasibility of three-dimensional CT reconstruction in assessing mandibular fractures: a survey among oral surgeons and dental maxillofacial radiologists
title_full Feasibility of three-dimensional CT reconstruction in assessing mandibular fractures: a survey among oral surgeons and dental maxillofacial radiologists
title_fullStr Feasibility of three-dimensional CT reconstruction in assessing mandibular fractures: a survey among oral surgeons and dental maxillofacial radiologists
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility of three-dimensional CT reconstruction in assessing mandibular fractures: a survey among oral surgeons and dental maxillofacial radiologists
title_sort Feasibility of three-dimensional CT reconstruction in assessing mandibular fractures: a survey among oral surgeons and dental maxillofacial radiologists
author Moura, Victor Nogueira
author_facet Moura, Victor Nogueira
Nogueira, Emerson
Rodrigues, Ewerton Daniel Rocha
Silva, Caio Gonçalves
de Holanda Vasconcellos, Ricardo José
author_role author
author2 Nogueira, Emerson
Rodrigues, Ewerton Daniel Rocha
Silva, Caio Gonçalves
de Holanda Vasconcellos, Ricardo José
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Moura, Victor Nogueira
Nogueira, Emerson
Rodrigues, Ewerton Daniel Rocha
Silva, Caio Gonçalves
de Holanda Vasconcellos, Ricardo José
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Tomography, X-ray computed
Imaging, three-dimensional
Diagnostic imaging
Mandibular fractures
topic Tomography, X-ray computed
Imaging, three-dimensional
Diagnostic imaging
Mandibular fractures
description Aim: Evaluation of the reliability of 3D computed tomography (3D-CT) in the diagnosis of mandibular fractures. Methods: A cross-sectional, quantitative and qualitative study was carried out, through the application of a questionnaire for 70 professionals in the area of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Radiology. 3D-CT images of mandibular fractures were delivered to the interviewees along with a questionnaire. Participants answered about the number of traces, the region and the type of fracture. The correct diagnosis, that is, the expected answer, was based on the reports of a specialist in oral and maxillofacial radiology after viewing the images in the axial, sagittal and coronal sections. The resulting data from the interviewees was compared with the expected answer and then, the data was analyzed statistically. Results: In the sample 56.9% were between 22 and 30 years old, 52.8% were oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMF), 34.7% were residents in OMF surgery and 12.5% OMF radiologists. Each professional answered 15 questions (related to five patients) and 50.8% of the total of these was answered correctly. Specialists in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Traumatology correctly answered 53.9%. Interviewees with experience between 6 and 10 years correctly answered 58.2%. In identifying fracture traces, 46.1% of the questions were answered correctly. In terms of location, 5.6% of interviewees answered wrongly while 14.2% answered wrongly regarding classification. Conclusion: 3D computed tomography did not prove to be a reliable image for diagnosing mandibular fractures when used alone. This made necessary an association with axial, sagittal and coronal tomographic sections.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-02-08
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8659912
10.20396/bjos.v20i00.8659912
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8659912
identifier_str_mv 10.20396/bjos.v20i00.8659912
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8659912/25921
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporany
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 20 (2021): Continuous Publication; e219912
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 20 (2021): Continuous Publication; e219912
1677-3225
reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
collection Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv brjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br
_version_ 1800216403089817600