Effect of clinical and laboratory techniques of cementation on the assessment of marginal and internal fit of prosthetic elements
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2024 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8670950 |
Resumo: | Aim: The aim of this in vitro study was to compare machine and manual cementation of prosthetic elements by measuring internal and marginal fits. Methods: Eighteen anatomic prefabricated abutments were used to manufacture zirconia copings in the Ceramill (n=9) and Lava systems (n=9). The copings were cemented with a fluid consistency addition silicone using a machine (n=18) and manually (n=18) according to the replica technique. They were then cut in the buccal-palatal and mesial-distal directions. The film thickness was photographed using an optical microscope and measured in the internal and marginal regions. The data collected were analyzed by repeated measures ANOVA and Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test (∂=.05). The Bland-Altman test was performed to evaluate the agreement between the methods. Results: In the evaluation of the internal and marginal misfits, the mean values observed for the cementation performed with the aid of a machine and manually, were as follows: angular regions, 76.7 μm and 76.2 μm; linear regions, 60.6 μm and 60.7 μm; incisal region, 144.8 μm and 145.2 μm; marginal region, 40.1 μm and 40.2 μm; and overall mean, 80.4 μm and 80.6 μm, respectively. No significant differences were found between the 2 methods, for any of regions and systems (P>.05). The Bland-Altman test showed agreement between the methods (P>.05) and that the limits of agreement found were clinically acceptable. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, we can conclude that cementation using manual techniques or mechanical aid produces the same cement films. |
id |
UNICAMP-8_7e75cdc67131544bed8f0dfb44676867 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8670950 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-8 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Effect of clinical and laboratory techniques of cementation on the assessment of marginal and internal fit of prosthetic elementsDental marginal adaptationComputer-aided designDental prosthesis designAim: The aim of this in vitro study was to compare machine and manual cementation of prosthetic elements by measuring internal and marginal fits. Methods: Eighteen anatomic prefabricated abutments were used to manufacture zirconia copings in the Ceramill (n=9) and Lava systems (n=9). The copings were cemented with a fluid consistency addition silicone using a machine (n=18) and manually (n=18) according to the replica technique. They were then cut in the buccal-palatal and mesial-distal directions. The film thickness was photographed using an optical microscope and measured in the internal and marginal regions. The data collected were analyzed by repeated measures ANOVA and Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test (∂=.05). The Bland-Altman test was performed to evaluate the agreement between the methods. Results: In the evaluation of the internal and marginal misfits, the mean values observed for the cementation performed with the aid of a machine and manually, were as follows: angular regions, 76.7 μm and 76.2 μm; linear regions, 60.6 μm and 60.7 μm; incisal region, 144.8 μm and 145.2 μm; marginal region, 40.1 μm and 40.2 μm; and overall mean, 80.4 μm and 80.6 μm, respectively. No significant differences were found between the 2 methods, for any of regions and systems (P>.05). The Bland-Altman test showed agreement between the methods (P>.05) and that the limits of agreement found were clinically acceptable. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, we can conclude that cementation using manual techniques or mechanical aid produces the same cement films.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2024-01-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/867095010.20396/bjos.v23i00.8670950Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 23 (2024): Continuous Publication; e240950Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 23 (2024): Continuous Publication; e2409501677-3225reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8670950/33459Brazil; ContemporanyCopyright (c) 2024 Carolina Chaves Pinto , Leonardo André Lins da Silva, Cristiana Almeida de Assis Licurci, Antonio Canabarrohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPinto , Carolina ChavesSilva, Leonardo André Lins daLicurci, Cristiana Almeida de AssisCanabarro, Antonio2024-01-30T11:50:37Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8670950Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/PUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/oaibrjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br1677-32251677-3217opendoar:2024-01-30T11:50:37Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effect of clinical and laboratory techniques of cementation on the assessment of marginal and internal fit of prosthetic elements |
title |
Effect of clinical and laboratory techniques of cementation on the assessment of marginal and internal fit of prosthetic elements |
spellingShingle |
Effect of clinical and laboratory techniques of cementation on the assessment of marginal and internal fit of prosthetic elements Pinto , Carolina Chaves Dental marginal adaptation Computer-aided design Dental prosthesis design |
title_short |
Effect of clinical and laboratory techniques of cementation on the assessment of marginal and internal fit of prosthetic elements |
title_full |
Effect of clinical and laboratory techniques of cementation on the assessment of marginal and internal fit of prosthetic elements |
title_fullStr |
Effect of clinical and laboratory techniques of cementation on the assessment of marginal and internal fit of prosthetic elements |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effect of clinical and laboratory techniques of cementation on the assessment of marginal and internal fit of prosthetic elements |
title_sort |
Effect of clinical and laboratory techniques of cementation on the assessment of marginal and internal fit of prosthetic elements |
author |
Pinto , Carolina Chaves |
author_facet |
Pinto , Carolina Chaves Silva, Leonardo André Lins da Licurci, Cristiana Almeida de Assis Canabarro, Antonio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva, Leonardo André Lins da Licurci, Cristiana Almeida de Assis Canabarro, Antonio |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pinto , Carolina Chaves Silva, Leonardo André Lins da Licurci, Cristiana Almeida de Assis Canabarro, Antonio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dental marginal adaptation Computer-aided design Dental prosthesis design |
topic |
Dental marginal adaptation Computer-aided design Dental prosthesis design |
description |
Aim: The aim of this in vitro study was to compare machine and manual cementation of prosthetic elements by measuring internal and marginal fits. Methods: Eighteen anatomic prefabricated abutments were used to manufacture zirconia copings in the Ceramill (n=9) and Lava systems (n=9). The copings were cemented with a fluid consistency addition silicone using a machine (n=18) and manually (n=18) according to the replica technique. They were then cut in the buccal-palatal and mesial-distal directions. The film thickness was photographed using an optical microscope and measured in the internal and marginal regions. The data collected were analyzed by repeated measures ANOVA and Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test (∂=.05). The Bland-Altman test was performed to evaluate the agreement between the methods. Results: In the evaluation of the internal and marginal misfits, the mean values observed for the cementation performed with the aid of a machine and manually, were as follows: angular regions, 76.7 μm and 76.2 μm; linear regions, 60.6 μm and 60.7 μm; incisal region, 144.8 μm and 145.2 μm; marginal region, 40.1 μm and 40.2 μm; and overall mean, 80.4 μm and 80.6 μm, respectively. No significant differences were found between the 2 methods, for any of regions and systems (P>.05). The Bland-Altman test showed agreement between the methods (P>.05) and that the limits of agreement found were clinically acceptable. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, we can conclude that cementation using manual techniques or mechanical aid produces the same cement films. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-01-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8670950 10.20396/bjos.v23i00.8670950 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8670950 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.20396/bjos.v23i00.8670950 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8670950/33459 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazil; Contemporany |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 23 (2024): Continuous Publication; e240950 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 23 (2024): Continuous Publication; e240950 1677-3225 reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
collection |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
brjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1800216397580599296 |