Comparison of 2 types of treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusions: a 5-year post-retention analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8640853 |
Resumo: | Aim: To compare 2 types of treatment for Class II malocclusion assessing mandibular behavior in subjects submitted to full orthodontic treatment with standard edgewise appliance and cervical headgear (Kloehn appliance) and those who used cervical headgear in the first period and with full orthodontic appliance in the second period. Methods: The sample consisted of 80 children treated with either cervical headgear combined with full fixed appliances (n=40, group 1), or with cervical headgear at first (n=40, group 2). In both groups, lateral cephalometric radiographs were compared with those made at the beginning of treatment, at its end and at 5-year post-retention phase, in order to quantify the cephalometric measures (8 angular and 3 linear), presenting the mandibular behavior in the antero-posterior and vertical directions. All patients were treated with no extraction and no use of Class II intermaxillary elastics during the full orthodontic treatment. Results: In both groups, the effective treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion did not interfere in the direction and amount of growth of mandibular condyles and remodeling at the lower border, with no influence on the anti-clockwise rotation of the mandible. The mandibular growth also was observed after the orthodontic treatment, suggesting that it is influenced by genetic factors. Conclusions: These observations may lead to the speculation that growing patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion and low mandibular plane are conducive to a good treatment and long-term stability with one or two periods of treatment. |
id |
UNICAMP-8_86f7e8edbd0a0ea92babfd231f0c71ae |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8640853 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-8 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparison of 2 types of treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusions: a 5-year post-retention analysisMalocclusionOrthodonticsControlOdontologiaAim: To compare 2 types of treatment for Class II malocclusion assessing mandibular behavior in subjects submitted to full orthodontic treatment with standard edgewise appliance and cervical headgear (Kloehn appliance) and those who used cervical headgear in the first period and with full orthodontic appliance in the second period. Methods: The sample consisted of 80 children treated with either cervical headgear combined with full fixed appliances (n=40, group 1), or with cervical headgear at first (n=40, group 2). In both groups, lateral cephalometric radiographs were compared with those made at the beginning of treatment, at its end and at 5-year post-retention phase, in order to quantify the cephalometric measures (8 angular and 3 linear), presenting the mandibular behavior in the antero-posterior and vertical directions. All patients were treated with no extraction and no use of Class II intermaxillary elastics during the full orthodontic treatment. Results: In both groups, the effective treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion did not interfere in the direction and amount of growth of mandibular condyles and remodeling at the lower border, with no influence on the anti-clockwise rotation of the mandible. The mandibular growth also was observed after the orthodontic treatment, suggesting that it is influenced by genetic factors. Conclusions: These observations may lead to the speculation that growing patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion and low mandibular plane are conducive to a good treatment and long-term stability with one or two periods of treatment.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2014-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8640853Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 13 n. 4 (2014): Oct./Dec.; 251-256Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 13 No. 4 (2014): Oct./Dec.; 251-2561677-3225reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8640853/8390Copyright (c) 2015 Ana de Lourdes Sá de Lira, Margareth Maria Gomes Souza, Ana Maria Bolognese, Matilde Nojimahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLira, Ana de Lourdes Sá deSouza, Margareth Maria GomesBolognese, Ana MariaNojima, Matilde2023-10-02T11:56:35Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8640853Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/PUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/oaibrjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br1677-32251677-3217opendoar:2023-10-02T11:56:35Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of 2 types of treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusions: a 5-year post-retention analysis |
title |
Comparison of 2 types of treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusions: a 5-year post-retention analysis |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of 2 types of treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusions: a 5-year post-retention analysis Lira, Ana de Lourdes Sá de Malocclusion Orthodontics Control Odontologia |
title_short |
Comparison of 2 types of treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusions: a 5-year post-retention analysis |
title_full |
Comparison of 2 types of treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusions: a 5-year post-retention analysis |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of 2 types of treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusions: a 5-year post-retention analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of 2 types of treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusions: a 5-year post-retention analysis |
title_sort |
Comparison of 2 types of treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusions: a 5-year post-retention analysis |
author |
Lira, Ana de Lourdes Sá de |
author_facet |
Lira, Ana de Lourdes Sá de Souza, Margareth Maria Gomes Bolognese, Ana Maria Nojima, Matilde |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Souza, Margareth Maria Gomes Bolognese, Ana Maria Nojima, Matilde |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lira, Ana de Lourdes Sá de Souza, Margareth Maria Gomes Bolognese, Ana Maria Nojima, Matilde |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Malocclusion Orthodontics Control Odontologia |
topic |
Malocclusion Orthodontics Control Odontologia |
description |
Aim: To compare 2 types of treatment for Class II malocclusion assessing mandibular behavior in subjects submitted to full orthodontic treatment with standard edgewise appliance and cervical headgear (Kloehn appliance) and those who used cervical headgear in the first period and with full orthodontic appliance in the second period. Methods: The sample consisted of 80 children treated with either cervical headgear combined with full fixed appliances (n=40, group 1), or with cervical headgear at first (n=40, group 2). In both groups, lateral cephalometric radiographs were compared with those made at the beginning of treatment, at its end and at 5-year post-retention phase, in order to quantify the cephalometric measures (8 angular and 3 linear), presenting the mandibular behavior in the antero-posterior and vertical directions. All patients were treated with no extraction and no use of Class II intermaxillary elastics during the full orthodontic treatment. Results: In both groups, the effective treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion did not interfere in the direction and amount of growth of mandibular condyles and remodeling at the lower border, with no influence on the anti-clockwise rotation of the mandible. The mandibular growth also was observed after the orthodontic treatment, suggesting that it is influenced by genetic factors. Conclusions: These observations may lead to the speculation that growing patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion and low mandibular plane are conducive to a good treatment and long-term stability with one or two periods of treatment. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-12-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8640853 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8640853 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8640853/8390 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 13 n. 4 (2014): Oct./Dec.; 251-256 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 13 No. 4 (2014): Oct./Dec.; 251-256 1677-3225 reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
collection |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
brjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1800216397727399936 |