Reproducibility and comparison between methods for gingival color evaluation: a validation study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cardoso, Matheus Völz
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Vicenzotti, Giovanna, Sant’Ana, Adriana Campos Passanezi, Ragghianti Zangrando, Mariana Schutzer, Damante, Carla Andreotti
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8665946
Resumo: Aim: This study aims to evaluate and validate the sensibility and the level of agreement between different gingival color measures obtained by a spectrophotometer (SPECTRO) and a photography (PHOTO) method. Methods: Among 40 patients, the color was measured 2 mm apical to the gingival margin by CIE L*, a*, b* system using a reflectance spectrophotometer and the photography’s plus software. The level of agreement between three different measures (m1, m2, m3) in parameters L*, a*, b*, and ΔE (color variation) was evaluated by random and systematic errors, as well as the limits and coefficient of concordance. A comparison between the methods was performed by the Bland-Altman test and the sensibility level was evaluated accordingly to the ΔE: 3.7 thresholds with p<0.05 as the level of significance for these comparisons. Results: The SPECTRO method has not presented the systematic error (p>0.05) and had reproducibly and agreement level in three variable measures L* (r: 0.6), a* (r: 0.3), and b* (r: 0.5) as to the PHOTO method L* (r: 0.6), a* (r: 0.5), and b* (r: 0.5), which presented systematic error in L* values (p<0.05). The means of ΔE between measurements were: 6.5 SPECTRO and 5.9 PHOTO. There was no good level of sensitivity ΔE> 3.7 and agreement between the methods, mainly for the a* values. On the other hand, for the L* and in for the most comparisons of b* values, the level of agreement was higher. Conclusion: Both methods could quantify the gingival color from the coordinates L *, a *, and b *, which has shown greater reliability between the measurements acquired by the SPECTRO method.
id UNICAMP-8_87222516dae807d7eb682ff1e1e599dd
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8665946
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-8
network_name_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Reproducibility and comparison between methods for gingival color evaluation: a validation studyColorGingivaPhotography dentalAim: This study aims to evaluate and validate the sensibility and the level of agreement between different gingival color measures obtained by a spectrophotometer (SPECTRO) and a photography (PHOTO) method. Methods: Among 40 patients, the color was measured 2 mm apical to the gingival margin by CIE L*, a*, b* system using a reflectance spectrophotometer and the photography’s plus software. The level of agreement between three different measures (m1, m2, m3) in parameters L*, a*, b*, and ΔE (color variation) was evaluated by random and systematic errors, as well as the limits and coefficient of concordance. A comparison between the methods was performed by the Bland-Altman test and the sensibility level was evaluated accordingly to the ΔE: 3.7 thresholds with p<0.05 as the level of significance for these comparisons. Results: The SPECTRO method has not presented the systematic error (p>0.05) and had reproducibly and agreement level in three variable measures L* (r: 0.6), a* (r: 0.3), and b* (r: 0.5) as to the PHOTO method L* (r: 0.6), a* (r: 0.5), and b* (r: 0.5), which presented systematic error in L* values (p<0.05). The means of ΔE between measurements were: 6.5 SPECTRO and 5.9 PHOTO. There was no good level of sensitivity ΔE> 3.7 and agreement between the methods, mainly for the a* values. On the other hand, for the L* and in for the most comparisons of b* values, the level of agreement was higher. Conclusion: Both methods could quantify the gingival color from the coordinates L *, a *, and b *, which has shown greater reliability between the measurements acquired by the SPECTRO method.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2022-07-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/866594610.20396/bjos.v21i00.8665946Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 21 (2022): Continuous Publication; e225946Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 21 (2022): Continuous Publication; e2259461677-3225reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8665946/29497Brazil; ContemporanyCopyright (c) 2021 Matheus Völz Cardoso, Giovanna Vicenzotti, Adriana Campos Passanezi Sant’Ana, Mariana Schutzer Ragghianti Zangrando, Carla Andreotti Damantehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCardoso, Matheus VölzVicenzotti, GiovannaSant’Ana, Adriana Campos PassaneziRagghianti Zangrando, Mariana SchutzerDamante, Carla Andreotti2022-07-11T14:47:11Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8665946Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/PUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/oaibrjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br1677-32251677-3217opendoar:2022-07-11T14:47:11Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Reproducibility and comparison between methods for gingival color evaluation: a validation study
title Reproducibility and comparison between methods for gingival color evaluation: a validation study
spellingShingle Reproducibility and comparison between methods for gingival color evaluation: a validation study
Cardoso, Matheus Völz
Color
Gingiva
Photography dental
title_short Reproducibility and comparison between methods for gingival color evaluation: a validation study
title_full Reproducibility and comparison between methods for gingival color evaluation: a validation study
title_fullStr Reproducibility and comparison between methods for gingival color evaluation: a validation study
title_full_unstemmed Reproducibility and comparison between methods for gingival color evaluation: a validation study
title_sort Reproducibility and comparison between methods for gingival color evaluation: a validation study
author Cardoso, Matheus Völz
author_facet Cardoso, Matheus Völz
Vicenzotti, Giovanna
Sant’Ana, Adriana Campos Passanezi
Ragghianti Zangrando, Mariana Schutzer
Damante, Carla Andreotti
author_role author
author2 Vicenzotti, Giovanna
Sant’Ana, Adriana Campos Passanezi
Ragghianti Zangrando, Mariana Schutzer
Damante, Carla Andreotti
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cardoso, Matheus Völz
Vicenzotti, Giovanna
Sant’Ana, Adriana Campos Passanezi
Ragghianti Zangrando, Mariana Schutzer
Damante, Carla Andreotti
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Color
Gingiva
Photography dental
topic Color
Gingiva
Photography dental
description Aim: This study aims to evaluate and validate the sensibility and the level of agreement between different gingival color measures obtained by a spectrophotometer (SPECTRO) and a photography (PHOTO) method. Methods: Among 40 patients, the color was measured 2 mm apical to the gingival margin by CIE L*, a*, b* system using a reflectance spectrophotometer and the photography’s plus software. The level of agreement between three different measures (m1, m2, m3) in parameters L*, a*, b*, and ΔE (color variation) was evaluated by random and systematic errors, as well as the limits and coefficient of concordance. A comparison between the methods was performed by the Bland-Altman test and the sensibility level was evaluated accordingly to the ΔE: 3.7 thresholds with p<0.05 as the level of significance for these comparisons. Results: The SPECTRO method has not presented the systematic error (p>0.05) and had reproducibly and agreement level in three variable measures L* (r: 0.6), a* (r: 0.3), and b* (r: 0.5) as to the PHOTO method L* (r: 0.6), a* (r: 0.5), and b* (r: 0.5), which presented systematic error in L* values (p<0.05). The means of ΔE between measurements were: 6.5 SPECTRO and 5.9 PHOTO. There was no good level of sensitivity ΔE> 3.7 and agreement between the methods, mainly for the a* values. On the other hand, for the L* and in for the most comparisons of b* values, the level of agreement was higher. Conclusion: Both methods could quantify the gingival color from the coordinates L *, a *, and b *, which has shown greater reliability between the measurements acquired by the SPECTRO method.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-07-04
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8665946
10.20396/bjos.v21i00.8665946
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8665946
identifier_str_mv 10.20396/bjos.v21i00.8665946
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8665946/29497
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporany
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 21 (2022): Continuous Publication; e225946
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 21 (2022): Continuous Publication; e225946
1677-3225
reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
collection Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv brjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br
_version_ 1800216403648708608