Dentist’s preferences on vital and nonvital tooth bleaching: findings from a Guatemalan survey

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Villagrán Colón, Víctor Ernesto
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Calderón Márquez, Mirna Oldemia, Carrillo-Cotto, Ricardo Alfredo, Demarco, Flavio Fernando, Chisini, Luiz Alexandre
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8661711
Resumo:  Aim: The present study aimed to investigate if the Guatemalan dentist’s options on tooth bleaching could be influenced by their time in clinical practice, the level of specialization or their working place. Methods: A representative sample of dentists working in clinical practice in Guatemala was selected. Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire with information related to gender, professional characteristics (time since graduation in years and working place) and preferences regarding vital (at-home or in-office; type and concentration of bleaching agent) and the nonvital tooth bleaching (bleaching agent used). The analysis was performed and the association between preference for bleaching technique and independent variables were investigated using Fisher’s exact test. Results: 200 dentists were interviewed. More than half of dentists were male (57.0%) with time since graduation between 11 and 20 years (n= 64; 32.3%). Dentists mostly (60.5%) preferred in-office technique for vital bleaching, with 10-20% Carbamide peroxide (CP) as the preferred agent (50%). For nonvital teeth, the preferred agent (46.8%) was 37% Hydrogen Peroxide (HP). About the associations, younger dentists (< 20 years of graduation) selected mostly in-office technique, while those with more than 20 years indicated more the at-home technique. Also, the dentists working in private practice chose more frequently in-office technique. Thus, the in-office technique was more popular among Guatemalan dentists, with 10-20% CP and 37% HP selected as favorite bleaching agents for vital and nonvital techniques, respectively. Conclusion: The time of clinical practice and working place influenced some choices.  
id UNICAMP-8_940e078bb7f32e8b006895f671af54e1
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8661711
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-8
network_name_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Dentist’s preferences on vital and nonvital tooth bleaching: findings from a Guatemalan surveyTooth bleaching agentsCross-sectional studiesPractice Patterns, Dentists'Surveys and questionnaires Aim: The present study aimed to investigate if the Guatemalan dentist’s options on tooth bleaching could be influenced by their time in clinical practice, the level of specialization or their working place. Methods: A representative sample of dentists working in clinical practice in Guatemala was selected. Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire with information related to gender, professional characteristics (time since graduation in years and working place) and preferences regarding vital (at-home or in-office; type and concentration of bleaching agent) and the nonvital tooth bleaching (bleaching agent used). The analysis was performed and the association between preference for bleaching technique and independent variables were investigated using Fisher’s exact test. Results: 200 dentists were interviewed. More than half of dentists were male (57.0%) with time since graduation between 11 and 20 years (n= 64; 32.3%). Dentists mostly (60.5%) preferred in-office technique for vital bleaching, with 10-20% Carbamide peroxide (CP) as the preferred agent (50%). For nonvital teeth, the preferred agent (46.8%) was 37% Hydrogen Peroxide (HP). About the associations, younger dentists (< 20 years of graduation) selected mostly in-office technique, while those with more than 20 years indicated more the at-home technique. Also, the dentists working in private practice chose more frequently in-office technique. Thus, the in-office technique was more popular among Guatemalan dentists, with 10-20% CP and 37% HP selected as favorite bleaching agents for vital and nonvital techniques, respectively. Conclusion: The time of clinical practice and working place influenced some choices.  Universidade Estadual de Campinas2021-02-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/866171110.20396/bjos.v20i00.8661711Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 20 (2021): Continuous Publication; e211711Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 20 (2021): Continuous Publication; e2117111677-3225reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8661711/25922Guatemala; ContemporanyCopyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Oral Scienceshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVillagrán Colón, Víctor Ernesto Calderón Márquez, Mirna Oldemia Carrillo-Cotto, Ricardo Alfredo Demarco, Flavio FernandoChisini, Luiz Alexandre2021-02-09T13:08:46Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8661711Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/PUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/oaibrjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br1677-32251677-3217opendoar:2021-02-09T13:08:46Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Dentist’s preferences on vital and nonvital tooth bleaching: findings from a Guatemalan survey
title Dentist’s preferences on vital and nonvital tooth bleaching: findings from a Guatemalan survey
spellingShingle Dentist’s preferences on vital and nonvital tooth bleaching: findings from a Guatemalan survey
Villagrán Colón, Víctor Ernesto
Tooth bleaching agents
Cross-sectional studies
Practice Patterns, Dentists'
Surveys and questionnaires
title_short Dentist’s preferences on vital and nonvital tooth bleaching: findings from a Guatemalan survey
title_full Dentist’s preferences on vital and nonvital tooth bleaching: findings from a Guatemalan survey
title_fullStr Dentist’s preferences on vital and nonvital tooth bleaching: findings from a Guatemalan survey
title_full_unstemmed Dentist’s preferences on vital and nonvital tooth bleaching: findings from a Guatemalan survey
title_sort Dentist’s preferences on vital and nonvital tooth bleaching: findings from a Guatemalan survey
author Villagrán Colón, Víctor Ernesto
author_facet Villagrán Colón, Víctor Ernesto
Calderón Márquez, Mirna Oldemia
Carrillo-Cotto, Ricardo Alfredo
Demarco, Flavio Fernando
Chisini, Luiz Alexandre
author_role author
author2 Calderón Márquez, Mirna Oldemia
Carrillo-Cotto, Ricardo Alfredo
Demarco, Flavio Fernando
Chisini, Luiz Alexandre
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Villagrán Colón, Víctor Ernesto
Calderón Márquez, Mirna Oldemia
Carrillo-Cotto, Ricardo Alfredo
Demarco, Flavio Fernando
Chisini, Luiz Alexandre
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Tooth bleaching agents
Cross-sectional studies
Practice Patterns, Dentists'
Surveys and questionnaires
topic Tooth bleaching agents
Cross-sectional studies
Practice Patterns, Dentists'
Surveys and questionnaires
description  Aim: The present study aimed to investigate if the Guatemalan dentist’s options on tooth bleaching could be influenced by their time in clinical practice, the level of specialization or their working place. Methods: A representative sample of dentists working in clinical practice in Guatemala was selected. Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire with information related to gender, professional characteristics (time since graduation in years and working place) and preferences regarding vital (at-home or in-office; type and concentration of bleaching agent) and the nonvital tooth bleaching (bleaching agent used). The analysis was performed and the association between preference for bleaching technique and independent variables were investigated using Fisher’s exact test. Results: 200 dentists were interviewed. More than half of dentists were male (57.0%) with time since graduation between 11 and 20 years (n= 64; 32.3%). Dentists mostly (60.5%) preferred in-office technique for vital bleaching, with 10-20% Carbamide peroxide (CP) as the preferred agent (50%). For nonvital teeth, the preferred agent (46.8%) was 37% Hydrogen Peroxide (HP). About the associations, younger dentists (< 20 years of graduation) selected mostly in-office technique, while those with more than 20 years indicated more the at-home technique. Also, the dentists working in private practice chose more frequently in-office technique. Thus, the in-office technique was more popular among Guatemalan dentists, with 10-20% CP and 37% HP selected as favorite bleaching agents for vital and nonvital techniques, respectively. Conclusion: The time of clinical practice and working place influenced some choices.  
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-02-08
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8661711
10.20396/bjos.v20i00.8661711
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8661711
identifier_str_mv 10.20396/bjos.v20i00.8661711
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8661711/25922
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Guatemala; Contemporany
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 20 (2021): Continuous Publication; e211711
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 20 (2021): Continuous Publication; e211711
1677-3225
reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
collection Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv brjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br
_version_ 1800216403604668416