Effect of irrigants using ultrasonics on intracanal calcium hydroxide removal – an in vitro comparative evaluation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rao, S. Anitha
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Manasa, N.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641557
Resumo: Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of various irrigating solutions on calcium hydroxide (Apex cal and RC cal) removal with the use of ultrasonics. Methods: The root canals of 120 single-rooted maxillary central incisors were prepared using the stepback technique. The teeth were decoronated and split longitudinally. After filling, the two halves of roots were reassembled with sticky wax and each group was further divided into four subgroups according to the irrigating solution: Smear Clear, 10% citric acid, 5% EDTA and 3% NaOCl. Evaluation for cleanliness was done under a microscope with ×12.5 magnification. Statistical analysis was done with Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney tests at 5% level of significance. Results: There was no statistically significant difference (p>0.05) for calcium hydroxide (Apex Cal and RC Cal) removal by different irrigants. There were more residues in the apical groove than in the coronal groove (p<0.05). Conclusions: When the different irrigants were compared at coronal and apical levels, Smear Clear and citric acid were more effective in calcium hydroxide removal than EDTA and NaOCl.
id UNICAMP-8_b6c126c8b7db8a8c5a6f6e444b7b5ace
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8641557
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-8
network_name_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Effect of irrigants using ultrasonics on intracanal calcium hydroxide removal – an in vitro comparative evaluationSmear clearCalcium hydroxideRoot canal irrigantsOdontologiaAim: To evaluate the efficacy of various irrigating solutions on calcium hydroxide (Apex cal and RC cal) removal with the use of ultrasonics. Methods: The root canals of 120 single-rooted maxillary central incisors were prepared using the stepback technique. The teeth were decoronated and split longitudinally. After filling, the two halves of roots were reassembled with sticky wax and each group was further divided into four subgroups according to the irrigating solution: Smear Clear, 10% citric acid, 5% EDTA and 3% NaOCl. Evaluation for cleanliness was done under a microscope with ×12.5 magnification. Statistical analysis was done with Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney tests at 5% level of significance. Results: There was no statistically significant difference (p>0.05) for calcium hydroxide (Apex Cal and RC Cal) removal by different irrigants. There were more residues in the apical groove than in the coronal groove (p<0.05). Conclusions: When the different irrigants were compared at coronal and apical levels, Smear Clear and citric acid were more effective in calcium hydroxide removal than EDTA and NaOCl.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2015-11-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/864155710.20396/bjos.v11i1.8641557Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 11 n. 1 (2012): Jan./Mar.; 52-55Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 11 No. 1 (2012): Jan./Mar.; 52-551677-3225reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641557/9058Rao, S. AnithaManasa, N.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2016-02-25T09:11:07Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8641557Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/PUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/oaibrjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br1677-32251677-3217opendoar:2016-02-25T09:11:07Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effect of irrigants using ultrasonics on intracanal calcium hydroxide removal – an in vitro comparative evaluation
title Effect of irrigants using ultrasonics on intracanal calcium hydroxide removal – an in vitro comparative evaluation
spellingShingle Effect of irrigants using ultrasonics on intracanal calcium hydroxide removal – an in vitro comparative evaluation
Rao, S. Anitha
Smear clear
Calcium hydroxide
Root canal irrigants
Odontologia
title_short Effect of irrigants using ultrasonics on intracanal calcium hydroxide removal – an in vitro comparative evaluation
title_full Effect of irrigants using ultrasonics on intracanal calcium hydroxide removal – an in vitro comparative evaluation
title_fullStr Effect of irrigants using ultrasonics on intracanal calcium hydroxide removal – an in vitro comparative evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Effect of irrigants using ultrasonics on intracanal calcium hydroxide removal – an in vitro comparative evaluation
title_sort Effect of irrigants using ultrasonics on intracanal calcium hydroxide removal – an in vitro comparative evaluation
author Rao, S. Anitha
author_facet Rao, S. Anitha
Manasa, N.
author_role author
author2 Manasa, N.
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rao, S. Anitha
Manasa, N.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Smear clear
Calcium hydroxide
Root canal irrigants
Odontologia
topic Smear clear
Calcium hydroxide
Root canal irrigants
Odontologia
description Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of various irrigating solutions on calcium hydroxide (Apex cal and RC cal) removal with the use of ultrasonics. Methods: The root canals of 120 single-rooted maxillary central incisors were prepared using the stepback technique. The teeth were decoronated and split longitudinally. After filling, the two halves of roots were reassembled with sticky wax and each group was further divided into four subgroups according to the irrigating solution: Smear Clear, 10% citric acid, 5% EDTA and 3% NaOCl. Evaluation for cleanliness was done under a microscope with ×12.5 magnification. Statistical analysis was done with Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney tests at 5% level of significance. Results: There was no statistically significant difference (p>0.05) for calcium hydroxide (Apex Cal and RC Cal) removal by different irrigants. There were more residues in the apical groove than in the coronal groove (p<0.05). Conclusions: When the different irrigants were compared at coronal and apical levels, Smear Clear and citric acid were more effective in calcium hydroxide removal than EDTA and NaOCl.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-11-03
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641557
10.20396/bjos.v11i1.8641557
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641557
identifier_str_mv 10.20396/bjos.v11i1.8641557
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641557/9058
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 11 n. 1 (2012): Jan./Mar.; 52-55
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 11 No. 1 (2012): Jan./Mar.; 52-55
1677-3225
reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
collection Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv brjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br
_version_ 1800216398916485120