Shear Bond Strength of Three Different Bonding Systems for Orthodontic Brackets
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8652883 |
Resumo: | Aim: The objective of this study was to compare the efficiencies of different adhesive systems used to bond orthodontic brackets as well as the fracture pattern during debonding on bovine teeth. Methods: The sample included 45 specimens assigned to 3 groups according to the adhesive system applied: Group I: Transbond XT (3M Unitek®, Monrovia/CA -USA), Group II: Orthocem (FGM® Joinville/SC-BR), and Group III: Orthobond (Morelli®, Sorocaba/SP-BR). For this purpose, metal brackets were bonded to bovine teeth following the instructions from each manufacturer. The specimens were subjected to a shear test to assess bond strength (BS). Finally, after debonding, the adhesive remnant index (ARI) was estimated. Results: The average shear strength for a tooth bonded using the adhesive system Transbond XT was 16.39 MPa, while it was 18.08 Mpa for Orthocem and 7.28 Mpa for Orthobond; The Tukey test revealed no statistically significant differences between groups I and II (p < 0.01) and group III differed statistically from groups I and II. Conclusion: In conclusion, both adhesive systems Transbond XT and Orthocem attained higher bond strength values than Orthobond; the fracture pattern was similar for all adhesive systems applied. |
id |
UNICAMP-8_c76a534eab1a6e0a67fb13c32380af86 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8652883 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-8 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Shear Bond Strength of Three Different Bonding Systems for Orthodontic BracketsDental bonding. Shear strength. Dental enamel.Aim: The objective of this study was to compare the efficiencies of different adhesive systems used to bond orthodontic brackets as well as the fracture pattern during debonding on bovine teeth. Methods: The sample included 45 specimens assigned to 3 groups according to the adhesive system applied: Group I: Transbond XT (3M Unitek®, Monrovia/CA -USA), Group II: Orthocem (FGM® Joinville/SC-BR), and Group III: Orthobond (Morelli®, Sorocaba/SP-BR). For this purpose, metal brackets were bonded to bovine teeth following the instructions from each manufacturer. The specimens were subjected to a shear test to assess bond strength (BS). Finally, after debonding, the adhesive remnant index (ARI) was estimated. Results: The average shear strength for a tooth bonded using the adhesive system Transbond XT was 16.39 MPa, while it was 18.08 Mpa for Orthocem and 7.28 Mpa for Orthobond; The Tukey test revealed no statistically significant differences between groups I and II (p < 0.01) and group III differed statistically from groups I and II. Conclusion: In conclusion, both adhesive systems Transbond XT and Orthocem attained higher bond strength values than Orthobond; the fracture pattern was similar for all adhesive systems applied.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2018-07-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionOriginal articleapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/865288310.20396/bjos.v17i0.8652883Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 17 (2018): Continuous Publication; e18138Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 17 (2018): Continuous Publication; e181381677-3225reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8652883/18436Lon, Luís Filipe SiuKnop, Luegya Amorim HenriquesShintcovsk, Ricardo LimaGuariza Filho, OdilonRaveli, Dirceu Barnabéinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-12-22T01:34:08Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8652883Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/PUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/oaibrjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br1677-32251677-3217opendoar:2020-12-22T01:34:08Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Shear Bond Strength of Three Different Bonding Systems for Orthodontic Brackets |
title |
Shear Bond Strength of Three Different Bonding Systems for Orthodontic Brackets |
spellingShingle |
Shear Bond Strength of Three Different Bonding Systems for Orthodontic Brackets Lon, Luís Filipe Siu Dental bonding. Shear strength. Dental enamel. |
title_short |
Shear Bond Strength of Three Different Bonding Systems for Orthodontic Brackets |
title_full |
Shear Bond Strength of Three Different Bonding Systems for Orthodontic Brackets |
title_fullStr |
Shear Bond Strength of Three Different Bonding Systems for Orthodontic Brackets |
title_full_unstemmed |
Shear Bond Strength of Three Different Bonding Systems for Orthodontic Brackets |
title_sort |
Shear Bond Strength of Three Different Bonding Systems for Orthodontic Brackets |
author |
Lon, Luís Filipe Siu |
author_facet |
Lon, Luís Filipe Siu Knop, Luegya Amorim Henriques Shintcovsk, Ricardo Lima Guariza Filho, Odilon Raveli, Dirceu Barnabé |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Knop, Luegya Amorim Henriques Shintcovsk, Ricardo Lima Guariza Filho, Odilon Raveli, Dirceu Barnabé |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lon, Luís Filipe Siu Knop, Luegya Amorim Henriques Shintcovsk, Ricardo Lima Guariza Filho, Odilon Raveli, Dirceu Barnabé |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dental bonding. Shear strength. Dental enamel. |
topic |
Dental bonding. Shear strength. Dental enamel. |
description |
Aim: The objective of this study was to compare the efficiencies of different adhesive systems used to bond orthodontic brackets as well as the fracture pattern during debonding on bovine teeth. Methods: The sample included 45 specimens assigned to 3 groups according to the adhesive system applied: Group I: Transbond XT (3M Unitek®, Monrovia/CA -USA), Group II: Orthocem (FGM® Joinville/SC-BR), and Group III: Orthobond (Morelli®, Sorocaba/SP-BR). For this purpose, metal brackets were bonded to bovine teeth following the instructions from each manufacturer. The specimens were subjected to a shear test to assess bond strength (BS). Finally, after debonding, the adhesive remnant index (ARI) was estimated. Results: The average shear strength for a tooth bonded using the adhesive system Transbond XT was 16.39 MPa, while it was 18.08 Mpa for Orthocem and 7.28 Mpa for Orthobond; The Tukey test revealed no statistically significant differences between groups I and II (p < 0.01) and group III differed statistically from groups I and II. Conclusion: In conclusion, both adhesive systems Transbond XT and Orthocem attained higher bond strength values than Orthobond; the fracture pattern was similar for all adhesive systems applied. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-07-05 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Original article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8652883 10.20396/bjos.v17i0.8652883 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8652883 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.20396/bjos.v17i0.8652883 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8652883/18436 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 17 (2018): Continuous Publication; e18138 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 17 (2018): Continuous Publication; e18138 1677-3225 reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
collection |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
brjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1800216402272976896 |