Shear Bond Strength of Three Different Bonding Systems for Orthodontic Brackets

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lon, Luís Filipe Siu
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Knop, Luegya Amorim Henriques, Shintcovsk, Ricardo Lima, Guariza Filho, Odilon, Raveli, Dirceu Barnabé
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8652883
Resumo: Aim: The objective of this study was to compare the efficiencies of different adhesive systems used to bond orthodontic brackets as well as the fracture pattern during debonding on bovine teeth. Methods: The sample included 45 specimens assigned to 3 groups according to the adhesive system applied: Group I: Transbond XT (3M Unitek®, Monrovia/CA -USA), Group II: Orthocem (FGM® Joinville/SC-BR), and Group III: Orthobond (Morelli®, Sorocaba/SP-BR). For this purpose, metal brackets were bonded to bovine teeth following the instructions from each manufacturer. The specimens were subjected to a shear test to assess bond strength (BS). Finally, after debonding, the adhesive remnant index (ARI) was estimated. Results: The average shear strength for a tooth bonded using the adhesive system Transbond XT was 16.39 MPa, while it was 18.08 Mpa for Orthocem and 7.28 Mpa for Orthobond; The Tukey test revealed no statistically significant differences between groups I and II (p < 0.01) and group III differed statistically from groups I and II. Conclusion: In conclusion, both adhesive systems Transbond XT and Orthocem attained higher bond strength values than Orthobond; the fracture pattern was similar for all adhesive systems applied.
id UNICAMP-8_c76a534eab1a6e0a67fb13c32380af86
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8652883
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-8
network_name_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Shear Bond Strength of Three Different Bonding Systems for Orthodontic BracketsDental bonding. Shear strength. Dental enamel.Aim: The objective of this study was to compare the efficiencies of different adhesive systems used to bond orthodontic brackets as well as the fracture pattern during debonding on bovine teeth. Methods: The sample included 45 specimens assigned to 3 groups according to the adhesive system applied: Group I: Transbond XT (3M Unitek®, Monrovia/CA -USA), Group II: Orthocem (FGM® Joinville/SC-BR), and Group III: Orthobond (Morelli®, Sorocaba/SP-BR). For this purpose, metal brackets were bonded to bovine teeth following the instructions from each manufacturer. The specimens were subjected to a shear test to assess bond strength (BS). Finally, after debonding, the adhesive remnant index (ARI) was estimated. Results: The average shear strength for a tooth bonded using the adhesive system Transbond XT was 16.39 MPa, while it was 18.08 Mpa for Orthocem and 7.28 Mpa for Orthobond; The Tukey test revealed no statistically significant differences between groups I and II (p < 0.01) and group III differed statistically from groups I and II. Conclusion: In conclusion, both adhesive systems Transbond XT and Orthocem attained higher bond strength values than Orthobond; the fracture pattern was similar for all adhesive systems applied.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2018-07-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionOriginal articleapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/865288310.20396/bjos.v17i0.8652883Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 17 (2018): Continuous Publication; e18138Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 17 (2018): Continuous Publication; e181381677-3225reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8652883/18436Lon, Luís Filipe SiuKnop, Luegya Amorim HenriquesShintcovsk, Ricardo LimaGuariza Filho, OdilonRaveli, Dirceu Barnabéinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-12-22T01:34:08Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8652883Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/PUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/oaibrjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br1677-32251677-3217opendoar:2020-12-22T01:34:08Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Shear Bond Strength of Three Different Bonding Systems for Orthodontic Brackets
title Shear Bond Strength of Three Different Bonding Systems for Orthodontic Brackets
spellingShingle Shear Bond Strength of Three Different Bonding Systems for Orthodontic Brackets
Lon, Luís Filipe Siu
Dental bonding. Shear strength. Dental enamel.
title_short Shear Bond Strength of Three Different Bonding Systems for Orthodontic Brackets
title_full Shear Bond Strength of Three Different Bonding Systems for Orthodontic Brackets
title_fullStr Shear Bond Strength of Three Different Bonding Systems for Orthodontic Brackets
title_full_unstemmed Shear Bond Strength of Three Different Bonding Systems for Orthodontic Brackets
title_sort Shear Bond Strength of Three Different Bonding Systems for Orthodontic Brackets
author Lon, Luís Filipe Siu
author_facet Lon, Luís Filipe Siu
Knop, Luegya Amorim Henriques
Shintcovsk, Ricardo Lima
Guariza Filho, Odilon
Raveli, Dirceu Barnabé
author_role author
author2 Knop, Luegya Amorim Henriques
Shintcovsk, Ricardo Lima
Guariza Filho, Odilon
Raveli, Dirceu Barnabé
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lon, Luís Filipe Siu
Knop, Luegya Amorim Henriques
Shintcovsk, Ricardo Lima
Guariza Filho, Odilon
Raveli, Dirceu Barnabé
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dental bonding. Shear strength. Dental enamel.
topic Dental bonding. Shear strength. Dental enamel.
description Aim: The objective of this study was to compare the efficiencies of different adhesive systems used to bond orthodontic brackets as well as the fracture pattern during debonding on bovine teeth. Methods: The sample included 45 specimens assigned to 3 groups according to the adhesive system applied: Group I: Transbond XT (3M Unitek®, Monrovia/CA -USA), Group II: Orthocem (FGM® Joinville/SC-BR), and Group III: Orthobond (Morelli®, Sorocaba/SP-BR). For this purpose, metal brackets were bonded to bovine teeth following the instructions from each manufacturer. The specimens were subjected to a shear test to assess bond strength (BS). Finally, after debonding, the adhesive remnant index (ARI) was estimated. Results: The average shear strength for a tooth bonded using the adhesive system Transbond XT was 16.39 MPa, while it was 18.08 Mpa for Orthocem and 7.28 Mpa for Orthobond; The Tukey test revealed no statistically significant differences between groups I and II (p < 0.01) and group III differed statistically from groups I and II. Conclusion: In conclusion, both adhesive systems Transbond XT and Orthocem attained higher bond strength values than Orthobond; the fracture pattern was similar for all adhesive systems applied.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-07-05
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Original article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8652883
10.20396/bjos.v17i0.8652883
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8652883
identifier_str_mv 10.20396/bjos.v17i0.8652883
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8652883/18436
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 17 (2018): Continuous Publication; e18138
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 17 (2018): Continuous Publication; e18138
1677-3225
reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
collection Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv brjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br
_version_ 1800216402272976896