Comparative analysis of the surface roughness of conventional resins and filling after immersion in mouthwashes

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Zica, Juliana de Souza Silva
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Fernandes , Isabela Araújo, Faria, Fernanda Barcellos Ameno, Ferreira, Fernanda Cruz, Albuquerque, Nívea Aparecida Reis, Giovannini, José Flávio Batista Gabrich, Costa, Lidiane Cristina Machado
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8658569
Resumo: Aim: Bulk Fill composite resins were released on the market in order to reduce the time in clinical sessions by using increments of up to 5.0 mm thickness. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the rinsing solutions on the surface roughness of the conventional composite and Bulk fill composite resins. Methods: 40 specimens were prepared from a 4.0mm x 10.0mm teflon matrix and photoactivated for 20 seconds, with 20 specimens made of Filtek Bulk-Fill composite resin (3M ESPE) and 20 specimens made with Filtek™ Z350 XT composite resin (3M ESPE). Each group was subdivided into 2 subgroups: G1 (Filtek™ Z350 XT-3M ESPE-immersed in Colgate PlaxWhitening®); G2 (Filtek™ Z350 XT-3M ESPE-immersed in PlaxFreshMint®); G3 (Filtek™ Bulk-Fill-3M ESPE-immersed in Colgate PlaxWhitening®) and G4 (Filtek™ Bulk-Fill-3M ESPE-immersed in Colgate PlaxFreshMint®). The surface roughness test was performed initially and after immersion in rinses by the Time Group Inc.-TR200® rugosimeter apparatus and the data were submitted to statistical analysis (two-way repeated measures ANOVA). Results: Surface roughness values of the Filtek™ Bulk-Fill composite resin (3M ESPE) were significantly higher than the Filtek™ Z350 XT composite resin (3M ESPE) (P <0.0001). However, no differences were identified before and after immersion in rinses with or without alcohol. Conclusion: The use of mouthwashes does not interfere with the surface roughness of the tested resins, but the composite resin Filtek Z350 XT (3M ESPE) presents a surface with less roughness.
id UNICAMP-8_dddcf250e203a66f5add55d9baf046da
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8658569
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-8
network_name_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparative analysis of the surface roughness of conventional resins and filling after immersion in mouthwashesComposite resinsMaterials testingMouthwashesSurface propertiesAim: Bulk Fill composite resins were released on the market in order to reduce the time in clinical sessions by using increments of up to 5.0 mm thickness. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the rinsing solutions on the surface roughness of the conventional composite and Bulk fill composite resins. Methods: 40 specimens were prepared from a 4.0mm x 10.0mm teflon matrix and photoactivated for 20 seconds, with 20 specimens made of Filtek Bulk-Fill composite resin (3M ESPE) and 20 specimens made with Filtek™ Z350 XT composite resin (3M ESPE). Each group was subdivided into 2 subgroups: G1 (Filtek™ Z350 XT-3M ESPE-immersed in Colgate PlaxWhitening®); G2 (Filtek™ Z350 XT-3M ESPE-immersed in PlaxFreshMint®); G3 (Filtek™ Bulk-Fill-3M ESPE-immersed in Colgate PlaxWhitening®) and G4 (Filtek™ Bulk-Fill-3M ESPE-immersed in Colgate PlaxFreshMint®). The surface roughness test was performed initially and after immersion in rinses by the Time Group Inc.-TR200® rugosimeter apparatus and the data were submitted to statistical analysis (two-way repeated measures ANOVA). Results: Surface roughness values of the Filtek™ Bulk-Fill composite resin (3M ESPE) were significantly higher than the Filtek™ Z350 XT composite resin (3M ESPE) (P <0.0001). However, no differences were identified before and after immersion in rinses with or without alcohol. Conclusion: The use of mouthwashes does not interfere with the surface roughness of the tested resins, but the composite resin Filtek Z350 XT (3M ESPE) presents a surface with less roughness.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2020-08-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/865856910.20396/bjos.v19i0.8658569Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 19 (2020): Continuous Publication; e208569Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 19 (2020): Continuous Publication; e2085691677-3225reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8658569/22829Brazil; ContemporanyCopyright (c) 2020 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciencesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessZica, Juliana de Souza Silva Fernandes , Isabela Araújo Faria, Fernanda Barcellos Ameno Ferreira, Fernanda Cruz Albuquerque, Nívea Aparecida Reis Giovannini, José Flávio Batista Gabrich Costa, Lidiane Cristina Machado 2021-02-08T13:06:05Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8658569Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/PUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/oaibrjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br1677-32251677-3217opendoar:2021-02-08T13:06:05Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative analysis of the surface roughness of conventional resins and filling after immersion in mouthwashes
title Comparative analysis of the surface roughness of conventional resins and filling after immersion in mouthwashes
spellingShingle Comparative analysis of the surface roughness of conventional resins and filling after immersion in mouthwashes
Zica, Juliana de Souza Silva
Composite resins
Materials testing
Mouthwashes
Surface properties
title_short Comparative analysis of the surface roughness of conventional resins and filling after immersion in mouthwashes
title_full Comparative analysis of the surface roughness of conventional resins and filling after immersion in mouthwashes
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of the surface roughness of conventional resins and filling after immersion in mouthwashes
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of the surface roughness of conventional resins and filling after immersion in mouthwashes
title_sort Comparative analysis of the surface roughness of conventional resins and filling after immersion in mouthwashes
author Zica, Juliana de Souza Silva
author_facet Zica, Juliana de Souza Silva
Fernandes , Isabela Araújo
Faria, Fernanda Barcellos Ameno
Ferreira, Fernanda Cruz
Albuquerque, Nívea Aparecida Reis
Giovannini, José Flávio Batista Gabrich
Costa, Lidiane Cristina Machado
author_role author
author2 Fernandes , Isabela Araújo
Faria, Fernanda Barcellos Ameno
Ferreira, Fernanda Cruz
Albuquerque, Nívea Aparecida Reis
Giovannini, José Flávio Batista Gabrich
Costa, Lidiane Cristina Machado
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Zica, Juliana de Souza Silva
Fernandes , Isabela Araújo
Faria, Fernanda Barcellos Ameno
Ferreira, Fernanda Cruz
Albuquerque, Nívea Aparecida Reis
Giovannini, José Flávio Batista Gabrich
Costa, Lidiane Cristina Machado
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Composite resins
Materials testing
Mouthwashes
Surface properties
topic Composite resins
Materials testing
Mouthwashes
Surface properties
description Aim: Bulk Fill composite resins were released on the market in order to reduce the time in clinical sessions by using increments of up to 5.0 mm thickness. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the rinsing solutions on the surface roughness of the conventional composite and Bulk fill composite resins. Methods: 40 specimens were prepared from a 4.0mm x 10.0mm teflon matrix and photoactivated for 20 seconds, with 20 specimens made of Filtek Bulk-Fill composite resin (3M ESPE) and 20 specimens made with Filtek™ Z350 XT composite resin (3M ESPE). Each group was subdivided into 2 subgroups: G1 (Filtek™ Z350 XT-3M ESPE-immersed in Colgate PlaxWhitening®); G2 (Filtek™ Z350 XT-3M ESPE-immersed in PlaxFreshMint®); G3 (Filtek™ Bulk-Fill-3M ESPE-immersed in Colgate PlaxWhitening®) and G4 (Filtek™ Bulk-Fill-3M ESPE-immersed in Colgate PlaxFreshMint®). The surface roughness test was performed initially and after immersion in rinses by the Time Group Inc.-TR200® rugosimeter apparatus and the data were submitted to statistical analysis (two-way repeated measures ANOVA). Results: Surface roughness values of the Filtek™ Bulk-Fill composite resin (3M ESPE) were significantly higher than the Filtek™ Z350 XT composite resin (3M ESPE) (P <0.0001). However, no differences were identified before and after immersion in rinses with or without alcohol. Conclusion: The use of mouthwashes does not interfere with the surface roughness of the tested resins, but the composite resin Filtek Z350 XT (3M ESPE) presents a surface with less roughness.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-08-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8658569
10.20396/bjos.v19i0.8658569
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8658569
identifier_str_mv 10.20396/bjos.v19i0.8658569
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8658569/22829
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporany
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 19 (2020): Continuous Publication; e208569
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 19 (2020): Continuous Publication; e208569
1677-3225
reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
collection Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv brjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br
_version_ 1800216403043680256