Evaluation of pain intensity of the masticatory muscles after occlusal appliance and combined therapy: a 6-months follow-up pilot study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos, Tainá Queiroz dos
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: de la Torre Canales, Giancarlo, Rizzatti-Barbosa, Celia Marisa, Muñoz-Lora, Victor Ricardo Manuel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8660119
Resumo: Masticatory muscle pain (MMP) is a common type of orofacial pain. Occlusal appliance (OA) is contemplated as a first-line conservative approach for chronic MMP, however, integrated biopsychosocial approaches such as counseling and self-care therapies (CSG) are also considered essential. AIM: This pilot study aimed to compare the use of a combined therapy (GSG + OA) and solely OA treatment on pain intensity related to chronic MMP over a 6-month follow-up. METHODS: For this, 20 patients diagnosed with chronic MMP using the Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD) were divided into 2 groups (n=10) and treated with OA or combined therapy (CoT; OA + CSG). Electromyographic muscle activity (EMG), visual analogue scale (VAS) and pressure pain threshold (PPT) were recorded at baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment. Data was collected and statistical analysis were applied at a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: Results showed no significant differences at baseline among groups for any assessment. VAS showed that both treatments decreased subjective pain in volunteers over time, but no significant differences among both groups were observed at any evaluation time. For electromyography, CoT and OA presented no significant differences throughout the experiment neither on relaxed muscle position or maximum volunteer contraction. Finally, a significantly higher PPT for CoT was found for all muscles at the last assessment point (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that both treatments are effective for the reduction of pain perception (VAS) in patients with chronic MMP. However, the addition of CSG to an OA therapy may be more beneficial for the improvement of tenderness on the same patients, at least in a long-term basis (> 3 months). Notwithstanding, a larger study should be performed to substantiate these findings.
id UNICAMP-8_fb3080b8133a49af29eaf9f13629df1b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8660119
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-8
network_name_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of pain intensity of the masticatory muscles after occlusal appliance and combined therapy: a 6-months follow-up pilot studyFacial painMyofascial pain syndromesOcclusal splintsMasticatory muscle pain (MMP) is a common type of orofacial pain. Occlusal appliance (OA) is contemplated as a first-line conservative approach for chronic MMP, however, integrated biopsychosocial approaches such as counseling and self-care therapies (CSG) are also considered essential. AIM: This pilot study aimed to compare the use of a combined therapy (GSG + OA) and solely OA treatment on pain intensity related to chronic MMP over a 6-month follow-up. METHODS: For this, 20 patients diagnosed with chronic MMP using the Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD) were divided into 2 groups (n=10) and treated with OA or combined therapy (CoT; OA + CSG). Electromyographic muscle activity (EMG), visual analogue scale (VAS) and pressure pain threshold (PPT) were recorded at baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment. Data was collected and statistical analysis were applied at a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: Results showed no significant differences at baseline among groups for any assessment. VAS showed that both treatments decreased subjective pain in volunteers over time, but no significant differences among both groups were observed at any evaluation time. For electromyography, CoT and OA presented no significant differences throughout the experiment neither on relaxed muscle position or maximum volunteer contraction. Finally, a significantly higher PPT for CoT was found for all muscles at the last assessment point (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that both treatments are effective for the reduction of pain perception (VAS) in patients with chronic MMP. However, the addition of CSG to an OA therapy may be more beneficial for the improvement of tenderness on the same patients, at least in a long-term basis (> 3 months). Notwithstanding, a larger study should be performed to substantiate these findings.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2020-10-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/866011910.20396/bjos.v19i0.8660119Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 19 (2020): Continuous Publication; e200119Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 19 (2020): Continuous Publication; e2001191677-3225reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8660119/23165Brazil; ContemporaryCopyright (c) 2020 Brazilian Journal of Oral Scienceshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos, Tainá Queiroz dosde la Torre Canales, Giancarlo Rizzatti-Barbosa, Celia Marisa Muñoz-Lora, Victor Ricardo Manuel2021-02-08T13:06:05Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8660119Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/PUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/oaibrjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br1677-32251677-3217opendoar:2021-02-08T13:06:05Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of pain intensity of the masticatory muscles after occlusal appliance and combined therapy: a 6-months follow-up pilot study
title Evaluation of pain intensity of the masticatory muscles after occlusal appliance and combined therapy: a 6-months follow-up pilot study
spellingShingle Evaluation of pain intensity of the masticatory muscles after occlusal appliance and combined therapy: a 6-months follow-up pilot study
Santos, Tainá Queiroz dos
Facial pain
Myofascial pain syndromes
Occlusal splints
title_short Evaluation of pain intensity of the masticatory muscles after occlusal appliance and combined therapy: a 6-months follow-up pilot study
title_full Evaluation of pain intensity of the masticatory muscles after occlusal appliance and combined therapy: a 6-months follow-up pilot study
title_fullStr Evaluation of pain intensity of the masticatory muscles after occlusal appliance and combined therapy: a 6-months follow-up pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of pain intensity of the masticatory muscles after occlusal appliance and combined therapy: a 6-months follow-up pilot study
title_sort Evaluation of pain intensity of the masticatory muscles after occlusal appliance and combined therapy: a 6-months follow-up pilot study
author Santos, Tainá Queiroz dos
author_facet Santos, Tainá Queiroz dos
de la Torre Canales, Giancarlo
Rizzatti-Barbosa, Celia Marisa
Muñoz-Lora, Victor Ricardo Manuel
author_role author
author2 de la Torre Canales, Giancarlo
Rizzatti-Barbosa, Celia Marisa
Muñoz-Lora, Victor Ricardo Manuel
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos, Tainá Queiroz dos
de la Torre Canales, Giancarlo
Rizzatti-Barbosa, Celia Marisa
Muñoz-Lora, Victor Ricardo Manuel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Facial pain
Myofascial pain syndromes
Occlusal splints
topic Facial pain
Myofascial pain syndromes
Occlusal splints
description Masticatory muscle pain (MMP) is a common type of orofacial pain. Occlusal appliance (OA) is contemplated as a first-line conservative approach for chronic MMP, however, integrated biopsychosocial approaches such as counseling and self-care therapies (CSG) are also considered essential. AIM: This pilot study aimed to compare the use of a combined therapy (GSG + OA) and solely OA treatment on pain intensity related to chronic MMP over a 6-month follow-up. METHODS: For this, 20 patients diagnosed with chronic MMP using the Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD) were divided into 2 groups (n=10) and treated with OA or combined therapy (CoT; OA + CSG). Electromyographic muscle activity (EMG), visual analogue scale (VAS) and pressure pain threshold (PPT) were recorded at baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment. Data was collected and statistical analysis were applied at a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: Results showed no significant differences at baseline among groups for any assessment. VAS showed that both treatments decreased subjective pain in volunteers over time, but no significant differences among both groups were observed at any evaluation time. For electromyography, CoT and OA presented no significant differences throughout the experiment neither on relaxed muscle position or maximum volunteer contraction. Finally, a significantly higher PPT for CoT was found for all muscles at the last assessment point (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that both treatments are effective for the reduction of pain perception (VAS) in patients with chronic MMP. However, the addition of CSG to an OA therapy may be more beneficial for the improvement of tenderness on the same patients, at least in a long-term basis (> 3 months). Notwithstanding, a larger study should be performed to substantiate these findings.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-10-17
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8660119
10.20396/bjos.v19i0.8660119
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8660119
identifier_str_mv 10.20396/bjos.v19i0.8660119
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8660119/23165
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporary
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 19 (2020): Continuous Publication; e200119
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 19 (2020): Continuous Publication; e200119
1677-3225
reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
collection Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv brjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br
_version_ 1800216403512393728