Evaluation of pain intensity of the masticatory muscles after occlusal appliance and combined therapy: a 6-months follow-up pilot study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8660119 |
Resumo: | Masticatory muscle pain (MMP) is a common type of orofacial pain. Occlusal appliance (OA) is contemplated as a first-line conservative approach for chronic MMP, however, integrated biopsychosocial approaches such as counseling and self-care therapies (CSG) are also considered essential. AIM: This pilot study aimed to compare the use of a combined therapy (GSG + OA) and solely OA treatment on pain intensity related to chronic MMP over a 6-month follow-up. METHODS: For this, 20 patients diagnosed with chronic MMP using the Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD) were divided into 2 groups (n=10) and treated with OA or combined therapy (CoT; OA + CSG). Electromyographic muscle activity (EMG), visual analogue scale (VAS) and pressure pain threshold (PPT) were recorded at baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment. Data was collected and statistical analysis were applied at a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: Results showed no significant differences at baseline among groups for any assessment. VAS showed that both treatments decreased subjective pain in volunteers over time, but no significant differences among both groups were observed at any evaluation time. For electromyography, CoT and OA presented no significant differences throughout the experiment neither on relaxed muscle position or maximum volunteer contraction. Finally, a significantly higher PPT for CoT was found for all muscles at the last assessment point (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that both treatments are effective for the reduction of pain perception (VAS) in patients with chronic MMP. However, the addition of CSG to an OA therapy may be more beneficial for the improvement of tenderness on the same patients, at least in a long-term basis (> 3 months). Notwithstanding, a larger study should be performed to substantiate these findings. |
id |
UNICAMP-8_fb3080b8133a49af29eaf9f13629df1b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8660119 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-8 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Evaluation of pain intensity of the masticatory muscles after occlusal appliance and combined therapy: a 6-months follow-up pilot studyFacial painMyofascial pain syndromesOcclusal splintsMasticatory muscle pain (MMP) is a common type of orofacial pain. Occlusal appliance (OA) is contemplated as a first-line conservative approach for chronic MMP, however, integrated biopsychosocial approaches such as counseling and self-care therapies (CSG) are also considered essential. AIM: This pilot study aimed to compare the use of a combined therapy (GSG + OA) and solely OA treatment on pain intensity related to chronic MMP over a 6-month follow-up. METHODS: For this, 20 patients diagnosed with chronic MMP using the Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD) were divided into 2 groups (n=10) and treated with OA or combined therapy (CoT; OA + CSG). Electromyographic muscle activity (EMG), visual analogue scale (VAS) and pressure pain threshold (PPT) were recorded at baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment. Data was collected and statistical analysis were applied at a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: Results showed no significant differences at baseline among groups for any assessment. VAS showed that both treatments decreased subjective pain in volunteers over time, but no significant differences among both groups were observed at any evaluation time. For electromyography, CoT and OA presented no significant differences throughout the experiment neither on relaxed muscle position or maximum volunteer contraction. Finally, a significantly higher PPT for CoT was found for all muscles at the last assessment point (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that both treatments are effective for the reduction of pain perception (VAS) in patients with chronic MMP. However, the addition of CSG to an OA therapy may be more beneficial for the improvement of tenderness on the same patients, at least in a long-term basis (> 3 months). Notwithstanding, a larger study should be performed to substantiate these findings.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2020-10-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/866011910.20396/bjos.v19i0.8660119Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 19 (2020): Continuous Publication; e200119Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 19 (2020): Continuous Publication; e2001191677-3225reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8660119/23165Brazil; ContemporaryCopyright (c) 2020 Brazilian Journal of Oral Scienceshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos, Tainá Queiroz dosde la Torre Canales, Giancarlo Rizzatti-Barbosa, Celia Marisa Muñoz-Lora, Victor Ricardo Manuel2021-02-08T13:06:05Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8660119Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/PUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/oaibrjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br1677-32251677-3217opendoar:2021-02-08T13:06:05Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of pain intensity of the masticatory muscles after occlusal appliance and combined therapy: a 6-months follow-up pilot study |
title |
Evaluation of pain intensity of the masticatory muscles after occlusal appliance and combined therapy: a 6-months follow-up pilot study |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of pain intensity of the masticatory muscles after occlusal appliance and combined therapy: a 6-months follow-up pilot study Santos, Tainá Queiroz dos Facial pain Myofascial pain syndromes Occlusal splints |
title_short |
Evaluation of pain intensity of the masticatory muscles after occlusal appliance and combined therapy: a 6-months follow-up pilot study |
title_full |
Evaluation of pain intensity of the masticatory muscles after occlusal appliance and combined therapy: a 6-months follow-up pilot study |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of pain intensity of the masticatory muscles after occlusal appliance and combined therapy: a 6-months follow-up pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of pain intensity of the masticatory muscles after occlusal appliance and combined therapy: a 6-months follow-up pilot study |
title_sort |
Evaluation of pain intensity of the masticatory muscles after occlusal appliance and combined therapy: a 6-months follow-up pilot study |
author |
Santos, Tainá Queiroz dos |
author_facet |
Santos, Tainá Queiroz dos de la Torre Canales, Giancarlo Rizzatti-Barbosa, Celia Marisa Muñoz-Lora, Victor Ricardo Manuel |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
de la Torre Canales, Giancarlo Rizzatti-Barbosa, Celia Marisa Muñoz-Lora, Victor Ricardo Manuel |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos, Tainá Queiroz dos de la Torre Canales, Giancarlo Rizzatti-Barbosa, Celia Marisa Muñoz-Lora, Victor Ricardo Manuel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Facial pain Myofascial pain syndromes Occlusal splints |
topic |
Facial pain Myofascial pain syndromes Occlusal splints |
description |
Masticatory muscle pain (MMP) is a common type of orofacial pain. Occlusal appliance (OA) is contemplated as a first-line conservative approach for chronic MMP, however, integrated biopsychosocial approaches such as counseling and self-care therapies (CSG) are also considered essential. AIM: This pilot study aimed to compare the use of a combined therapy (GSG + OA) and solely OA treatment on pain intensity related to chronic MMP over a 6-month follow-up. METHODS: For this, 20 patients diagnosed with chronic MMP using the Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD) were divided into 2 groups (n=10) and treated with OA or combined therapy (CoT; OA + CSG). Electromyographic muscle activity (EMG), visual analogue scale (VAS) and pressure pain threshold (PPT) were recorded at baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment. Data was collected and statistical analysis were applied at a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: Results showed no significant differences at baseline among groups for any assessment. VAS showed that both treatments decreased subjective pain in volunteers over time, but no significant differences among both groups were observed at any evaluation time. For electromyography, CoT and OA presented no significant differences throughout the experiment neither on relaxed muscle position or maximum volunteer contraction. Finally, a significantly higher PPT for CoT was found for all muscles at the last assessment point (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that both treatments are effective for the reduction of pain perception (VAS) in patients with chronic MMP. However, the addition of CSG to an OA therapy may be more beneficial for the improvement of tenderness on the same patients, at least in a long-term basis (> 3 months). Notwithstanding, a larger study should be performed to substantiate these findings. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-10-17 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8660119 10.20396/bjos.v19i0.8660119 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8660119 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.20396/bjos.v19i0.8660119 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8660119/23165 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazil; Contemporary |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 19 (2020): Continuous Publication; e200119 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 19 (2020): Continuous Publication; e200119 1677-3225 reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
collection |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
brjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1800216403512393728 |