Evaluation of different types of self-ligating brackets guided by electromagnetic field simulator on rotational control

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Iafigliola, Sérgio Giamas
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Neves, José Guilherme, Valdrighi, Heloísa Cristina, Godoi, Ana Paula Terossi de, Custódio, Wiliam C., Vedovello Filho, Mário
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8653852
Resumo: Aim: The objective of this study was to measure and compare the in vitro performance of active and passive self-ligating brackets in orthodontic rotation by means of an electromagnetic field simulation. Methods: The study sample consisted of 32 mandibular right central incisor brackets (n=8), slot 0.022", that were divided into the following groups: 1) BioQuick® (Forestadent, Pforzheim, Germany) active brackets; 2) In-Ovation®R (Dentsply-GAC, Central Islip, New York, USA) active brackets; 3) Damon-Q® (Ormco, Orange, California, USA) passive brackets, and 4) Smartclip® (3M, Monrovia, California, USA) passive brackets. The orthodontic wire used was CuNiTi round section 0.016", thermoactivated at 35o C (ORMCO-Orthodontics Glendora, California, USA). The experiment was performed in a simulator machine, composed of two fixed lateral axes and a movable central axis, which simulated the dental rotation. Qualitative analysis (n = 4) was performed using SEM. After the descriptive and exploratory analysis, the yield and grade data were submitted to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Tukey test, considering the level of significance of 5%. Results: In-Ovation®R brackets showed significantly higher yield than BioQuick® and Damon-Q®. Damon-Q® brackets presented a significantly lower mean value than In-Ovation R and Smartclip®. BioQuick® did not differ significantly from Damon-Q® and Smartclip®. In-Ovation®R did not differ significantly from Smartclip®. Conclusion: In the present study, it was observed that there is a difference in rotational control in the different self-ligating brackets tested being the best rotational control was the In-Ovation R® group (active), followed in descending order by the groups Smartclip® (passive), Bioquick® (active) and Damon Q® (passive).
id UNICAMP-8_fe07018116dcaae93b0bbed5272f3dd1
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8653852
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-8
network_name_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of different types of self-ligating brackets guided by electromagnetic field simulator on rotational controlRotation. Electromagnetic fields. Orthodontic brackets.Aim: The objective of this study was to measure and compare the in vitro performance of active and passive self-ligating brackets in orthodontic rotation by means of an electromagnetic field simulation. Methods: The study sample consisted of 32 mandibular right central incisor brackets (n=8), slot 0.022", that were divided into the following groups: 1) BioQuick® (Forestadent, Pforzheim, Germany) active brackets; 2) In-Ovation®R (Dentsply-GAC, Central Islip, New York, USA) active brackets; 3) Damon-Q® (Ormco, Orange, California, USA) passive brackets, and 4) Smartclip® (3M, Monrovia, California, USA) passive brackets. The orthodontic wire used was CuNiTi round section 0.016", thermoactivated at 35o C (ORMCO-Orthodontics Glendora, California, USA). The experiment was performed in a simulator machine, composed of two fixed lateral axes and a movable central axis, which simulated the dental rotation. Qualitative analysis (n = 4) was performed using SEM. After the descriptive and exploratory analysis, the yield and grade data were submitted to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Tukey test, considering the level of significance of 5%. Results: In-Ovation®R brackets showed significantly higher yield than BioQuick® and Damon-Q®. Damon-Q® brackets presented a significantly lower mean value than In-Ovation R and Smartclip®. BioQuick® did not differ significantly from Damon-Q® and Smartclip®. In-Ovation®R did not differ significantly from Smartclip®. Conclusion: In the present study, it was observed that there is a difference in rotational control in the different self-ligating brackets tested being the best rotational control was the In-Ovation R® group (active), followed in descending order by the groups Smartclip® (passive), Bioquick® (active) and Damon Q® (passive).Universidade Estadual de Campinas2018-10-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionOriginal articleapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/865385210.20396/bjos.v17i0.8653852Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 17 (2018): Continuous Publication; e18885Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 17 (2018): Continuous Publication; e188851677-3225reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8653852/18932Iafigliola, Sérgio GiamasNeves, José GuilhermeValdrighi, Heloísa CristinaGodoi, Ana Paula Terossi deCustódio, Wiliam C.Vedovello Filho, Márioinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-12-22T01:34:08Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8653852Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/PUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/oaibrjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br1677-32251677-3217opendoar:2020-12-22T01:34:08Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of different types of self-ligating brackets guided by electromagnetic field simulator on rotational control
title Evaluation of different types of self-ligating brackets guided by electromagnetic field simulator on rotational control
spellingShingle Evaluation of different types of self-ligating brackets guided by electromagnetic field simulator on rotational control
Iafigliola, Sérgio Giamas
Rotation. Electromagnetic fields. Orthodontic brackets.
title_short Evaluation of different types of self-ligating brackets guided by electromagnetic field simulator on rotational control
title_full Evaluation of different types of self-ligating brackets guided by electromagnetic field simulator on rotational control
title_fullStr Evaluation of different types of self-ligating brackets guided by electromagnetic field simulator on rotational control
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of different types of self-ligating brackets guided by electromagnetic field simulator on rotational control
title_sort Evaluation of different types of self-ligating brackets guided by electromagnetic field simulator on rotational control
author Iafigliola, Sérgio Giamas
author_facet Iafigliola, Sérgio Giamas
Neves, José Guilherme
Valdrighi, Heloísa Cristina
Godoi, Ana Paula Terossi de
Custódio, Wiliam C.
Vedovello Filho, Mário
author_role author
author2 Neves, José Guilherme
Valdrighi, Heloísa Cristina
Godoi, Ana Paula Terossi de
Custódio, Wiliam C.
Vedovello Filho, Mário
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Iafigliola, Sérgio Giamas
Neves, José Guilherme
Valdrighi, Heloísa Cristina
Godoi, Ana Paula Terossi de
Custódio, Wiliam C.
Vedovello Filho, Mário
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Rotation. Electromagnetic fields. Orthodontic brackets.
topic Rotation. Electromagnetic fields. Orthodontic brackets.
description Aim: The objective of this study was to measure and compare the in vitro performance of active and passive self-ligating brackets in orthodontic rotation by means of an electromagnetic field simulation. Methods: The study sample consisted of 32 mandibular right central incisor brackets (n=8), slot 0.022", that were divided into the following groups: 1) BioQuick® (Forestadent, Pforzheim, Germany) active brackets; 2) In-Ovation®R (Dentsply-GAC, Central Islip, New York, USA) active brackets; 3) Damon-Q® (Ormco, Orange, California, USA) passive brackets, and 4) Smartclip® (3M, Monrovia, California, USA) passive brackets. The orthodontic wire used was CuNiTi round section 0.016", thermoactivated at 35o C (ORMCO-Orthodontics Glendora, California, USA). The experiment was performed in a simulator machine, composed of two fixed lateral axes and a movable central axis, which simulated the dental rotation. Qualitative analysis (n = 4) was performed using SEM. After the descriptive and exploratory analysis, the yield and grade data were submitted to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Tukey test, considering the level of significance of 5%. Results: In-Ovation®R brackets showed significantly higher yield than BioQuick® and Damon-Q®. Damon-Q® brackets presented a significantly lower mean value than In-Ovation R and Smartclip®. BioQuick® did not differ significantly from Damon-Q® and Smartclip®. In-Ovation®R did not differ significantly from Smartclip®. Conclusion: In the present study, it was observed that there is a difference in rotational control in the different self-ligating brackets tested being the best rotational control was the In-Ovation R® group (active), followed in descending order by the groups Smartclip® (passive), Bioquick® (active) and Damon Q® (passive).
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-10-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Original article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8653852
10.20396/bjos.v17i0.8653852
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8653852
identifier_str_mv 10.20396/bjos.v17i0.8653852
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8653852/18932
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 17 (2018): Continuous Publication; e18885
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 17 (2018): Continuous Publication; e18885
1677-3225
reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
collection Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv brjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br
_version_ 1800216402308628480