Evaluation of different types of self-ligating brackets guided by electromagnetic field simulator on rotational control
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8653852 |
Resumo: | Aim: The objective of this study was to measure and compare the in vitro performance of active and passive self-ligating brackets in orthodontic rotation by means of an electromagnetic field simulation. Methods: The study sample consisted of 32 mandibular right central incisor brackets (n=8), slot 0.022", that were divided into the following groups: 1) BioQuick® (Forestadent, Pforzheim, Germany) active brackets; 2) In-Ovation®R (Dentsply-GAC, Central Islip, New York, USA) active brackets; 3) Damon-Q® (Ormco, Orange, California, USA) passive brackets, and 4) Smartclip® (3M, Monrovia, California, USA) passive brackets. The orthodontic wire used was CuNiTi round section 0.016", thermoactivated at 35o C (ORMCO-Orthodontics Glendora, California, USA). The experiment was performed in a simulator machine, composed of two fixed lateral axes and a movable central axis, which simulated the dental rotation. Qualitative analysis (n = 4) was performed using SEM. After the descriptive and exploratory analysis, the yield and grade data were submitted to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Tukey test, considering the level of significance of 5%. Results: In-Ovation®R brackets showed significantly higher yield than BioQuick® and Damon-Q®. Damon-Q® brackets presented a significantly lower mean value than In-Ovation R and Smartclip®. BioQuick® did not differ significantly from Damon-Q® and Smartclip®. In-Ovation®R did not differ significantly from Smartclip®. Conclusion: In the present study, it was observed that there is a difference in rotational control in the different self-ligating brackets tested being the best rotational control was the In-Ovation R® group (active), followed in descending order by the groups Smartclip® (passive), Bioquick® (active) and Damon Q® (passive). |
id |
UNICAMP-8_fe07018116dcaae93b0bbed5272f3dd1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8653852 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-8 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Evaluation of different types of self-ligating brackets guided by electromagnetic field simulator on rotational controlRotation. Electromagnetic fields. Orthodontic brackets.Aim: The objective of this study was to measure and compare the in vitro performance of active and passive self-ligating brackets in orthodontic rotation by means of an electromagnetic field simulation. Methods: The study sample consisted of 32 mandibular right central incisor brackets (n=8), slot 0.022", that were divided into the following groups: 1) BioQuick® (Forestadent, Pforzheim, Germany) active brackets; 2) In-Ovation®R (Dentsply-GAC, Central Islip, New York, USA) active brackets; 3) Damon-Q® (Ormco, Orange, California, USA) passive brackets, and 4) Smartclip® (3M, Monrovia, California, USA) passive brackets. The orthodontic wire used was CuNiTi round section 0.016", thermoactivated at 35o C (ORMCO-Orthodontics Glendora, California, USA). The experiment was performed in a simulator machine, composed of two fixed lateral axes and a movable central axis, which simulated the dental rotation. Qualitative analysis (n = 4) was performed using SEM. After the descriptive and exploratory analysis, the yield and grade data were submitted to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Tukey test, considering the level of significance of 5%. Results: In-Ovation®R brackets showed significantly higher yield than BioQuick® and Damon-Q®. Damon-Q® brackets presented a significantly lower mean value than In-Ovation R and Smartclip®. BioQuick® did not differ significantly from Damon-Q® and Smartclip®. In-Ovation®R did not differ significantly from Smartclip®. Conclusion: In the present study, it was observed that there is a difference in rotational control in the different self-ligating brackets tested being the best rotational control was the In-Ovation R® group (active), followed in descending order by the groups Smartclip® (passive), Bioquick® (active) and Damon Q® (passive).Universidade Estadual de Campinas2018-10-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionOriginal articleapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/865385210.20396/bjos.v17i0.8653852Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 17 (2018): Continuous Publication; e18885Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 17 (2018): Continuous Publication; e188851677-3225reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8653852/18932Iafigliola, Sérgio GiamasNeves, José GuilhermeValdrighi, Heloísa CristinaGodoi, Ana Paula Terossi deCustódio, Wiliam C.Vedovello Filho, Márioinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-12-22T01:34:08Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8653852Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/PUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/oaibrjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br1677-32251677-3217opendoar:2020-12-22T01:34:08Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of different types of self-ligating brackets guided by electromagnetic field simulator on rotational control |
title |
Evaluation of different types of self-ligating brackets guided by electromagnetic field simulator on rotational control |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of different types of self-ligating brackets guided by electromagnetic field simulator on rotational control Iafigliola, Sérgio Giamas Rotation. Electromagnetic fields. Orthodontic brackets. |
title_short |
Evaluation of different types of self-ligating brackets guided by electromagnetic field simulator on rotational control |
title_full |
Evaluation of different types of self-ligating brackets guided by electromagnetic field simulator on rotational control |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of different types of self-ligating brackets guided by electromagnetic field simulator on rotational control |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of different types of self-ligating brackets guided by electromagnetic field simulator on rotational control |
title_sort |
Evaluation of different types of self-ligating brackets guided by electromagnetic field simulator on rotational control |
author |
Iafigliola, Sérgio Giamas |
author_facet |
Iafigliola, Sérgio Giamas Neves, José Guilherme Valdrighi, Heloísa Cristina Godoi, Ana Paula Terossi de Custódio, Wiliam C. Vedovello Filho, Mário |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Neves, José Guilherme Valdrighi, Heloísa Cristina Godoi, Ana Paula Terossi de Custódio, Wiliam C. Vedovello Filho, Mário |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Iafigliola, Sérgio Giamas Neves, José Guilherme Valdrighi, Heloísa Cristina Godoi, Ana Paula Terossi de Custódio, Wiliam C. Vedovello Filho, Mário |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Rotation. Electromagnetic fields. Orthodontic brackets. |
topic |
Rotation. Electromagnetic fields. Orthodontic brackets. |
description |
Aim: The objective of this study was to measure and compare the in vitro performance of active and passive self-ligating brackets in orthodontic rotation by means of an electromagnetic field simulation. Methods: The study sample consisted of 32 mandibular right central incisor brackets (n=8), slot 0.022", that were divided into the following groups: 1) BioQuick® (Forestadent, Pforzheim, Germany) active brackets; 2) In-Ovation®R (Dentsply-GAC, Central Islip, New York, USA) active brackets; 3) Damon-Q® (Ormco, Orange, California, USA) passive brackets, and 4) Smartclip® (3M, Monrovia, California, USA) passive brackets. The orthodontic wire used was CuNiTi round section 0.016", thermoactivated at 35o C (ORMCO-Orthodontics Glendora, California, USA). The experiment was performed in a simulator machine, composed of two fixed lateral axes and a movable central axis, which simulated the dental rotation. Qualitative analysis (n = 4) was performed using SEM. After the descriptive and exploratory analysis, the yield and grade data were submitted to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Tukey test, considering the level of significance of 5%. Results: In-Ovation®R brackets showed significantly higher yield than BioQuick® and Damon-Q®. Damon-Q® brackets presented a significantly lower mean value than In-Ovation R and Smartclip®. BioQuick® did not differ significantly from Damon-Q® and Smartclip®. In-Ovation®R did not differ significantly from Smartclip®. Conclusion: In the present study, it was observed that there is a difference in rotational control in the different self-ligating brackets tested being the best rotational control was the In-Ovation R® group (active), followed in descending order by the groups Smartclip® (passive), Bioquick® (active) and Damon Q® (passive). |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-10-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Original article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8653852 10.20396/bjos.v17i0.8653852 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8653852 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.20396/bjos.v17i0.8653852 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8653852/18932 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 17 (2018): Continuous Publication; e18885 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 17 (2018): Continuous Publication; e18885 1677-3225 reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
collection |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
brjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1800216402308628480 |